[Bug fortran/96012] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2558

2020-12-20 Thread drikosev at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96012 Ev Drikos changed: What|Removed |Added CC||drikosev at gmail dot com --- Comment #3 fro

[Bug fortran/92065] [8/9/10/11 Regression] internal compiler error: in expand_expr_real_1

2020-12-20 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92065 --- Comment #12 from Dominique d'Humieres --- The following test compiles (swapping fun1 and fun2): module buggy implicit none type :: bar integer :: x end type bar type :: foo integer :: n contains procedure :: fun1

[Bug fortran/92065] [8/9/10/11 Regression] internal compiler error: in expand_expr_real_1

2020-12-20 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92065 --- Comment #13 from Thomas Koenig --- (In reply to Gabor from comment #10) > Good to know that gfortran has come to an end. It means, for example, that > i will not rely on the openacc implementation either. Or openmp5. Those two fields are act

[Bug target/98399] New: x86: Awful code generation for shifting vectors

2020-12-20 Thread gabravier at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98399 Bug ID: 98399 Summary: x86: Awful code generation for shifting vectors Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ta

[Bug c++/93480] Defaulted <=> doesn't expand array elements

2020-12-20 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93480 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug other/98400] New: GCC online docs "S/390 and zSeries Options" has a typo

2020-12-20 Thread firasuke at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98400 Bug ID: 98400 Summary: GCC online docs "S/390 and zSeries Options" has a typo Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Com

[Bug c++/98401] New: Temporaries passed to co_await sometimes cause an extraneous call to destructor at incorrect address

2020-12-20 Thread brandt.milo2 at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98401 Bug ID: 98401 Summary: Temporaries passed to co_await sometimes cause an extraneous call to destructor at incorrect address Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRM

[Bug c++/98401] Temporaries passed to co_await sometimes cause an extraneous call to destructor at incorrect address

2020-12-20 Thread brandt.milo2 at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98401 --- Comment #1 from Milo Brandt --- Created attachment 49812 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49812&action=edit A zipped copy of the preprocessed source (main.ii) - which is slightly larger than the 1000 KB file size limit alo

[Bug go/98402] New: [11 Regression] libgo build broken on arm-linux-gnueabi

2020-12-20 Thread doko at debian dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98402 Bug ID: 98402 Summary: [11 Regression] libgo build broken on arm-linux-gnueabi Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priorit

[Bug fortran/92065] [8/9/10/11 Regression] internal compiler error: in expand_expr_real_1

2020-12-20 Thread gtoth at umich dot edu via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92065 --- Comment #14 from Gabor --- Hi All, I am sorry if I hurt anyone’s feelings. My goal was to get things improved for the future. If my dry humor offended you, my apologies. Even if you fixed the bug today, I would still have to find a work-arou

[Bug other/98400] GCC online docs "S/390 and zSeries Options" has a typo

2020-12-20 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98400 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8b01af02b50761bbe4e078c60d030912ab359c9a commit r11-6275-g8b01af02b50761bbe4e078c60d030912ab359c9a Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Su

[Bug other/98400] GCC online docs "S/390 and zSeries Options" has a typo

2020-12-20 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98400 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Sta

[Bug target/98403] New: [11 Regression] ICE: in add_def, at rtl-ssa/accesses.cc:837 with -Og -march=goldmont -fPIC -fcse-follow-jumps -fipa-ra -mforce-indirect-call

2020-12-20 Thread zsojka at seznam dot cz via Gcc-bugs
mpression algorithms: zlib zstd gcc version 11.0.0 20201220 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug other/98400] GCC online docs "S/390 and zSeries Options" has a typo

2020-12-20 Thread firasuke at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98400 --- Comment #3 from Firas Khalil Khana --- Awesome, thanks for your time.

[Bug libstdc++/98374] No #include on windows. Bootstrapping failure

2020-12-20 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98374 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC|jwakely at redhat dot com | --- Comment #4 from Jonathan W

[Bug go/98402] [11 Regression] libgo build broken on arm-linux-gnueabi

2020-12-20 Thread ian at airs dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98402 --- Comment #1 from Ian Lance Taylor --- Odd. What version of mpfr do you have installed?

[Bug fortran/92065] [8/9/10/11 Regression] internal compiler error: in expand_expr_real_1

2020-12-20 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92065 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug c++/98383] internal compiler error: in make_decl_rtl, at varasm.c:1342

2020-12-20 Thread cebtenzzre at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98383 --- Comment #2 from Cebtenzzre --- I tried GCC 9.3.0 in Godbolt and there was no ICE, so I ran a git bisect. It turns out this issue is a regression caused by commit d81ab49d0586fca0f3ee2f49c4581dd02508fcca ("tree.h (OMP_CLAUSE_LASTPRIVATE_TASKLO

[Bug c/98404] New: Compiler emits unexpected function call that may cause security problems

2020-12-20 Thread msharov at users dot sourceforge.net via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98404 Bug ID: 98404 Summary: Compiler emits unexpected function call that may cause security problems Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norma

[Bug c/98404] Compiler emits unexpected function call that may cause security problems

2020-12-20 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98404 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/93685] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in gfc_constructor_append_expr, at fortran/constructor.c:135

2020-12-20 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93685 --- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- A first attempt to fix the character / non-character issue seem to require a replacement of the following hunk from commit eb401400f59e4d1f28bbdc788c3234e0968081d7 Author: Andre Vehreschild Date:

[Bug c/98404] Compiler emits unexpected function call that may cause security problems

2020-12-20 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98404 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug fortran/93685] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in gfc_constructor_append_expr, at fortran/constructor.c:135

2020-12-20 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93685 --- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- The following seems to do the latter job: diff --git a/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c b/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c index bfe08be2a94..f66afab85d1 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c +++ b/gcc/fortran/tr

[Bug fortran/93685] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in gfc_constructor_append_expr, at fortran/constructor.c:135

2020-12-20 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93685 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot gnu.

[Bug middle-end/98405] New: missing -Wmaybe-uninitialized passing a member by reference in a ctor initializer list

2020-12-20 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98405 Bug ID: 98405 Summary: missing -Wmaybe-uninitialized passing a member by reference in a ctor initializer list Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/98405] missing -Wmaybe-uninitialized passing a member by reference in a ctor initializer list

2020-12-20 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98405 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||24639 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/98406] New: missing -Wmaybe-uninitialized passing a member by reference

2020-12-20 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98406 Bug ID: 98406 Summary: missing -Wmaybe-uninitialized passing a member by reference Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug libstdc++/98374] No #include on windows. Bootstrapping failure

2020-12-20 Thread unlvsur at live dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98374 --- Comment #5 from cqwrteur --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #4) > Please stop adding random unrelated people to the CC list of your bugs. bugs for libstdc++. CC you. What's wrong with it?

[Bug libfortran/98301] random_init() is broken

2020-12-20 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98301 --- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 49816 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49816&action=edit Newest patch. This new patch implements Thomas idea of generating appropriate library calls for the d

[Bug target/98399] x86: Awful code generation for shifting vectors

2020-12-20 Thread crazylht at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98399 --- Comment #1 from Hongtao.liu --- I'll take a look.

[Bug target/96892] [ARM]Wrong __stack_chk_guard for comparison

2020-12-20 Thread dongjianqiang2 at huawei dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96892 --- Comment #4 from John Dong --- diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/arm.md b/gcc/config/arm/arm.md index 1a8e498ba4c..97c2f6a1174 100644 --- a/gcc/config/arm/arm.md +++ b/gcc/config/arm/arm.md @@ -9301,6 +9301,7 @@ (define_insn_and_split "*stack_protec

[Bug c/98407] New: [11 Regression] ICE: Aborted (in constant_byte_string; free(): invalid pointer)

2020-12-20 Thread asolokha at gmx dot com via Gcc-bugs
pointer jenyen4s.c: In function 'ia': jenyen4s.c:11:3: internal compiler error: Aborted 11 | return __builtin_memcmp (&un, &og, sizeof og); | ^~ 0xdf83df crash_signal /var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-11.0.0_alpha20201220/work/gcc-11-20201220/gcc/toplev.c:327 0xa

[Bug go/98402] [11 Regression] libgo build broken on arm-linux-gnueabi

2020-12-20 Thread doko at debian dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98402 --- Comment #2 from Matthias Klose --- 4.1.0, no change since July.