https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96378
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Summary|ICE: Solaris/SPAR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98389
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab ---
The list just needs to be updated.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98383
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98390
Bug ID: 98390
Summary: AIX: exceptions in threads: IOT/Abort trap(coredump)
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98348
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
In the light of the recent discussions I've been wondering about doing it as
combine splitters only, like roughly:
--- sse.md.jj 2020-12-03 10:04:35.862093285 +0100
+++ sse.md 2020-12-19 11:00:14.27214
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98348
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Seems the adjustment for last UNSPEC_PCMP operand between all_ones, const0 and
const0, all_ones is GEN_INT (INTVAL (operands[3]) ^ 4).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98348
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 49806
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49806&action=edit
gcc11-pr98348.patch
So, if we go for GCC11 the way of pre-reload define_insn_and_split, this is
some incrementa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98378
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9032d2b2414ed22e53a9980a51b835d3caf83c48
commit r11-6269-g9032d2b2414ed22e53a9980a51b835d3caf83c48
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Sa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95150
Chinoune changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|WONTFIX
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98391
Bug ID: 98391
Summary: Wrong results with small matrix size
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libgomp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98378
--- Comment #8 from David Binderman ---
I can provide, if requested, a list of other testsuite files
that fail in the same way.
This might be a good sanity check for Jakub's fix.
Otherwise, I suggest that this bug could be marked as fixed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98378
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98392
Bug ID: 98392
Summary: Parallel algorithms fail to enforce Mandates:
requirements
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: accepts-invalid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98389
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98381
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenther at suse dot de
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98387
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98387
--- Comment #3 from Daniel Han-Chen ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #2)
> _mm_cmp_ps is an AVX intrinsic.
Yep noticed _mm_cmp_ps is only in AVX. The weird part is it actually causes no
errors when used on SSE only targets [ie Nehalem], and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88413
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67343
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||brennan at umanwizard dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89818
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67343
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tromey at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85648
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-12-19
Resolution|DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98393
Bug ID: 98393
Summary: new valgrind error for ./gcc.target/m68k/pr52573.c
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98382
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpelinux at gmail dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98393
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman ---
Trying hash f6e8e2797ebae21e.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98387
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Daniel Han-Chen from comment #3)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #2)
> > _mm_cmp_ps is an AVX intrinsic.
>
> Yep noticed _mm_cmp_ps is only in AVX. The weird part is it actually causes
> no errors
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98394
Bug ID: 98394
Summary: Concept with auto... template parameter pack in
if-statement causes compilation error
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98382
--- Comment #3 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to Mikael Pettersson from comment #2)
> Are you sure about the "recently"? I get ICEs with crosses based on
> gcc-11-20201213, gcc-10.2.0, gcc-10.1.0, and gcc-9-20201218 (so pre-CC0
> co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98395
Bug ID: 98395
Summary: libgcc_s.so.1 almost 10x bigger in gcc-10.2 than
gcc-9.2
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98307
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4e9563cda3f841f26f2ad1d9961dd6ffc9f39146
commit r10-9160-g4e9563cda3f841f26f2ad1d9961dd6ffc9f39146
Author: Harald Anlauf
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98395
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab ---
What does size tell?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98395
--- Comment #2 from john.frankish at outlook dot com ---
Something significant must have changed, or be wrong, for such a big increase
in size
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98067
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e9e4ddfc5abbf9ee5e657d626264cef89f10b4c3
commit r11-6270-ge9e4ddfc5abbf9ee5e657d626264cef89f10b4c3
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date: Wed D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98395
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98058
Bug 98058 depends on bug 98067, which changed state.
Bug 98067 Summary: [11 Regression] d: ICE in in force_decl_die, at
dwarf2out.c:26197 with -gdwarf-2 -gstrict-dwarf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98067
What|Remove
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98067
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98396
Bug ID: 98396
Summary: gcc wrongly assumes that free preserves errno
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98396
Bruno Haible changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.0.4, 4.1.2, 4.2.4, 4.3.6,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98366
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:69165332a914f1167c3077fa1f57afc64fd8a667
commit r11-6271-g69165332a914f1167c3077fa1f57afc64fd8a667
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Sa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98366
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98395
--- Comment #4 from john.frankish at outlook dot com ---
Both are stripped and all the other gcc libs are of comparable size between
gcc-9.2 and gcc-10.2.
I'll compile with -O2 instead of -Os in the next couple of days to see if that
makes a diff
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98393
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman ---
Seems good, so range reduces to f6e8e2797ebae21e..97b56dece7413839
Trying 4cf70c20cb10acd6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93685
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93480
--- Comment #2 from Will Wray ---
For reference, here's a macro-free workaround to provide portable
operator<=> for templated classes with array members, defaulting
where possible (current Clang and MSVC) otherwise dispatching to
a user-defined i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92065
Gabor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gtoth at umich dot edu
--- Comment #6 from Gabor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98393
--- Comment #3 from David Binderman ---
Seems ok, so range reduces to 4cf70c20cb10acd6..97b56dece7413839
Trying 7f359556a772e26e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98393
--- Comment #4 from David Binderman ---
Seems good, so range reduces to 7f359556a772e26e..97b56dece7413839
Trying 1423318fa7786493
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98393
--- Comment #5 from David Binderman ---
Range so far seems to be 7f359556a772e26e..1423318fa7786493
Trying fa4a8b6463e0dbc2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98393
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenther at suse dot de
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98397
Bug ID: 98397
Summary: C2X: pointers to arrays with qualifiers are now
pointers to qualified types
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92065
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92065
--- Comment #8 from Gabor ---
Dear HTH,
Apparently this bug was reported years ago, and it was not fixed. There was no
suggestion on how to avoid it either.
I am not sure why gfortran is not supported by GNU, as it is used heavily in
the compu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92065
--- Comment #9 from Steve Kargl ---
On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 11:35:24PM +, gtoth at umich dot edu wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92065
>
>
> Apparently this bug was reported years ago, and it was not fixed. There was n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98398
Bug ID: 98398
Summary: demangler fails on function parameter from enclosing
parameter-type-list
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98387
--- Comment #5 from Daniel Han-Chen ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #4)
> (In reply to Daniel Han-Chen from comment #3)
> > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #2)
> > > _mm_cmp_ps is an AVX intrinsic.
> >
> > Yep noticed _mm_cmp_ps is only
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92065
--- Comment #10 from Gabor ---
Good to know that gfortran has come to an end. It means, for example, that
i will not rely on the openacc implementation either. Or openmp5.
I develop software as part of my work, and when someone reports a bug, my
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92065
--- Comment #11 from Steve Kargl ---
On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 05:24:53AM +, gtoth at umich dot edu wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92065
>
> --- Comment #10 from Gabor ---
> Good to know that gfortran has come to an end
57 matches
Mail list logo
