https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98323
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
-checking=yes,extra,rtl
--with-build-config=bootstrap-lto-lean
/packages/gcc/11/gcc-11-11-20201216/build/./gcc/xg++
-B/packages/gcc/11/gcc-11-11-20201216/build/./gcc/ -nostdinc++ -nostdinc++
-I/packages/gcc/11/gcc-11-11-20201216/build/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include/x86_64-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98323
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98325
Bug ID: 98325
Summary: [11 regression] gcc.dg/pr25376.c fails after r11-5027
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98315
--- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell ---
On 12/16/20 12:26 PM, ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98315
>
> --- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE Uni-Bielefeld.DE> ---
>> ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98322
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98108
--- Comment #8 from i.hamsa at gmail dot com ---
After re-reading the relevant parts of the standard, I have convinced myself
that the program is indeed not required to work unless is included,
even in a single-threaded version. Even though the s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98315
--- Comment #4 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Another fix: 269e82d49e2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98323
--- Comment #3 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Nathan Sidwell from comment #2)
> stupid underspecified offsetof
I did try commenting out the offending block of code and a re-build
and got further errors ;-<
I don't know if you have access
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98322
Ivan Sučić changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |FIXED
--- Comment #3 from Ivan Sučić ---
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98323
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98322
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |INVALID
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jeline
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98315
--- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell ---
[...]
>> Unfortunately not: there are still two instances of the problem:
>
> There is another path to get to a poisoned bcopy. Fixed thusly.
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98324
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95757
--- Comment #5 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Still seeing this on powerpc64, too.
g:8379916b167de9bebc32401526b6f53d06dca349, r11-6152
make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="dg.exp=gcc.dg/Wstringop-overflow-25.c"
FAIL: gcc.dg/Wstringop-overflow-25
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98326
Bug ID: 98326
Summary: ICE: in create_tmp_var, at gimple-expr.c:482,
converting stateless generic-lambda to function
pointer
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98327
Bug ID: 98327
Summary: C++ Module ICE on Linux
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: un
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98327
fdlbxtqi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98305
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98328
Bug ID: 98328
Summary: [11 Regression] "make install-strip" failed
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98328
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-12-16
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98305
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |msebor at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98329
Bug ID: 98329
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in cp_build_bit_cast, at
cp/semantics.c:10730
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98330
Bug ID: 98330
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in compute_parm_map, at
ipa-modref.c:2900
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98331
Bug ID: 98331
Summary: [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in haifa_luid_for_non_insn,
at haifa-sched.c:7845
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98332
Bug ID: 98332
Summary: [10/11 Regression] ICE in unshare_constructor, at
cp/constexpr.c:1527
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98333
Bug ID: 98333
Summary: [10/11 Regression] ICE in check_qualified_type, at
tree.c:6593
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98210
--- Comment #6 from Jozef Lawrynowicz ---
I've posted a patch where the HAVE_GAS_SHF_GNU_RETAIN configure test has been
extended to check for SHF_GNU_RETAIN gold support:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-December/562100.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98334
Bug ID: 98334
Summary: Failure to optimally optimize add loop to mul
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98302
--- Comment #11 from Martin Liška ---
> which is miscompiled at -O2 -ftree-vectorize or -O3.
What a great reduction, can you please share knowledge how did you achieve
that?!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98315
--- Comment #6 from Nathan Sidwell ---
gah! there was me thinking the only networking thing in cp is
mapper-client.cc. (It's the only thing that cares about networking. That
mapper-resolver.cc needed a tweak should have clued me in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98315
--- Comment #7 from Nathan Sidwell ---
sorry for not getting this right sooner:
b7b6879f0b5: c++: Another solaris header use [PR 98315]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98328
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98297
--- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Fixed trunk, 8d8bb85b486 2020-12-16 | c++: Fix template parm ICE [PR 98297]
backports to 10, 9, & 8 in progress
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98324
--- Comment #1 from Nathan Sidwell ---
need to copy some more libcpp configurey bits ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98280
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Edelsohn :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cdb1c276560b26a9c3bc837340669962ef1b430a
commit r11-6159-gcdb1c276560b26a9c3bc837340669962ef1b430a
Author: David Edelsohn
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98323
--- Comment #5 from Nathan Sidwell ---
On 12/16/20 12:45 PM, dcb314 at hotmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98323
>
> --- Comment #3 from David Binderman ---
> (In reply to Nathan Sidwell from comment #2)
>> stu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98307
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98307
--- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I'm regtesting the following patch candidate:
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/trans-stmt.c b/gcc/fortran/trans-stmt.c
index adc6b8fefb5..e35b2f9ed34 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/trans-stmt.c
+++ b/gcc/fortra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92729
--- Comment #47 from abebeos at lazaridis dot com ---
Relevant news:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-December/562114.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98307
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
gnu.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98297
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98300
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98335
Bug ID: 98335
Summary: [9/10/11 Regression] Poor code generation for partial
struct initialization
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98336
Bug ID: 98336
Summary: [OOP] CLASS assignment to derived-type component does
not use __copy/allocate
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98337
Bug ID: 98337
Summary: Failure to optimize out on-stack array construction
when unneeded
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98260
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Uecker :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ec13758ed41936bf803640f0dd8c259c034fe4b9
commit r11-6164-gec13758ed41936bf803640f0dd8c259c034fe4b9
Author: Martin Uecker
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98047
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Uecker :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:58a45ce44a9acf3d15fada265d2a391a8e1bc960
commit r11-6165-g58a45ce44a9acf3d15fada265d2a391a8e1bc960
Author: Martin Uecker
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89581
Gabriel Ravier changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gabravier at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98108
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Right, this actually has nothing to do with threads.
The behaviour is exactly the same as if file1.cc contained this instead:
void threadfunc();
struct StaticThread {
StaticThread() { threadf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98323
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97750
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Macleod ---
The op1-range expression solving for the RHS of a cast of the form
low_precision_var = (low_precision) high_precision_var
doesnt support pointers properly.
It fills in possible bit/ranges in high_precisio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98323
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98323
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
See also http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2396.htm#dr_496
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98338
Bug ID: 98338
Summary: [11 Regression] profiledbootstrap failure on
x86_64-linux
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98338
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 49781
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49781&action=edit
range-op.ii.xz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98338
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 49782
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49782&action=edit
range-op.gcda
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93644
--- Comment #11 from eggert at cs dot ucla.edu ---
Created attachment 49783
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49783&action=edit
another instance of a -Wreturn-local-addr false alarm
I ran into a different instance of the bug to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93644
--- Comment #12 from eggert at cs dot ucla.edu ---
There are really two bugs here:
(A) GCC emits the false alarm.
(B) there's no way to shut off the false alarm, not even with '# pragma GCC
diagnostic ignored "-Wreturn-local-addr"'.
Although th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98305
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Incomprehensible|spurious
|-Wmismatched-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88767
--- Comment #13 from Jiu Fu Guo ---
Hi Richard，
As checking the changed code as in comment 9, it seems there is another
opportunity to improve the performance: By improving locality of array A
usage.
Unroll and jam loop1 into loop4 (or unroll
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93195
--- Comment #10 from Fangrui Song ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #9)
> I believe this broke building the kernel, see
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-December/561974.html
> for details.
For
> ld: .init.data has both
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94722
Fangrui Song changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||i at maskray dot me
--- Comment #7 from F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93644
--- Comment #13 from Jeffrey Walton ---
On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 9:05 PM eggert at cs dot ucla.edu
wrote:
> ...
> (B) there's no way to shut off the false alarm, not even with '# pragma GCC
> diagnostic ignored "-Wreturn-local-addr"'.
https://gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98339
Bug ID: 98339
Summary: GCC could not vectorize loop with conditional reduced
add and store
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optim
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98318
--- Comment #2 from Rimvydas (RJ) ---
With configure fixed in g:6d972f5183d8d476cfb008b85e224aa9b90e628d
only missing header issue remains in netclient.cc and
netserver.cc:
g++ -std=c++11 -g -fno-enforce-eh-specs -fno-stack-protector
-fno-thread
101 - 166 of 166 matches
Mail list logo
