[Bug tree-optimization/96685] Failure to optimize not+sub to add+not

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96685 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 49745 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49745&action=edit gcc11-pr96685.patch Updated patch.

Re: [Bug rtl-optimization/97092] [10/11 Regression] aarch64, SVE: ICE in ira-color.c since r10-4752-g2d56600c

"acoplan at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs" writes: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97092 > > --- Comment #9 from Alex Coplan --- > Thanks for fixing this Andrea! FWIW I can reproduce the ICE with the same > testcase and options on the head of the GCC 10 branch (contrary to my first

[Bug rtl-optimization/97092] [10/11 Regression] aarch64, SVE: ICE in ira-color.c since r10-4752-g2d56600c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97092 --- Comment #10 from Andrea Corallo --- "acoplan at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs" writes: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97092 > > --- Comment #9 from Alex Coplan --- > Thanks for fixing this Andrea! FWIW I can reproduce the IC

[Bug target/97827] bootstrap error building the amdgcn-amdhsa offload compiler with LLVM 11

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97827 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/68778] [F03] Missing default initialization of finalized derived types type(C_PTR) component in subroutines

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68778 --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres --- I see the valgrind errors in comment 4 up to r241883 (2016-11-06). From r241924 (2016-11-07) up to r265319 (2018-10-19) I don't see them anymore but a lot of MacOS related libraries. Finally after r265

[Bug tree-optimization/91257] Compile-time and memory-hog hog

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91257 Rogério de Souza Moraes changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rogerio.souza at gmail dot com

[Bug tree-optimization/91257] Compile-time and memory-hog hog

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91257 --- Comment #13 from Rogério de Souza Moraes --- Created attachment 49746 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49746&action=edit File that reproduces the current structure and has performance issues.

[Bug tree-optimization/91257] Compile-time and memory-hog hog

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91257 --- Comment #14 from Rogério de Souza Moraes --- Created attachment 49747 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49747&action=edit File which all the 'try' macros are taken out to separate routines, for build performance improvemen

[Bug tree-optimization/22326] promotions (from float to double) are not removed when they should be able to

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22326 --- Comment #20 from Segher Boessenkool --- Yes, that is clear... But we have ***double*** x in that example even, as the declared type of the parameter, so converting that to float is almost certainly a bad idea?

[Bug bootstrap/98188] [11 Regression] ICE in decompose, at wide-int.h:984

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98188 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/35718] deallocating non-allocated pointer target does not fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35718 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW

[Bug fortran/97694] ICE with optional assumed rank class(*) argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97694 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/97723] type bound ASSIGNMENT(=) within select rank block wrongly rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97723 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/98053] Add Fortran tests for behavior from environment variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98053 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Priority|P3

[Bug target/98248] New: [11 Regression] SVE: Wrong code with -O3 -msve-vector-bits=256

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98248 Bug ID: 98248 Summary: [11 Regression] SVE: Wrong code with -O3 -msve-vector-bits=256 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/98248] [11 Regression] SVE: Wrong code with -O3 -msve-vector-bits=256

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98248 Alex Coplan changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0 CC|

[Bug c/98183] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in expand_gimple_stmt_1, at cfgexpand.c:3972

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98183 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- With these options one of the #pragma omp return statements is not removed from the IL, which must be done during the ompexp pass.

[Bug c/98183] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in expand_gimple_stmt_1, at cfgexpand.c:3972

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98183 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Reduced testcase: void bar (void); void foo (void) { #pragma acc data { #pragma acc host_data bar (); } }

[Bug c/98183] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in expand_gimple_stmt_1, at cfgexpand.c:3972

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98183 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- And corresponding OpenMP -fopenmp -fexceptions -O0: void bar (); int x, y; void foo (void) { #pragma omp target data map(tofrom: x) { #pragma omp target data map(tofrom: y) bar (); } } ICEs too.

[Bug middle-end/98183] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE in expand_gimple_stmt_1, at cfgexpand.c:3972

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98183 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||openmp Summary|[9/10/11 Regre

[Bug tree-optimization/22326] promotions (from float to double) are not removed when they should be able to

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22326 --- Comment #21 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On December 11, 2020 6:51:05 PM GMT+01:00, "segher at gcc dot gnu.org" wrote: >https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22326 > >--- Comment #20 from Segher Boessenkool --- >Yes, that is cle

[Bug middle-end/98183] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE in expand_gimple_stmt_1, at cfgexpand.c:3972

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98183 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug libstdc++/97600] [ranges] satisfaction value of range affected by prior use of basic_istream_view::begin()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97600 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9324f7a25c7161a813bfae6cc2d180784b165740 commit r11-5954-g9324f7a25c7161a813bfae6cc2d180784b165740 Author: Jason Merrill Date: Fr

[Bug middle-end/98227] [11 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl common' structure, have 'constructor' in get_section, at varasm.c:297 on riscv64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98227 Jim Wilson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wilson at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 fr

[Bug fortran/98017] [8/9/10/11 Regression] Suspected regression (relative to 7.5) using PACK in iolist since r8-4151-g6c6bde30706c29ff

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98017 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:342be4dce16630575e2de21dbeec4baaed7a143a commit r9-9109-g342be4dce16630575e2de21dbeec4baaed7a143a Author: Harald Anlauf Dat

[Bug fortran/98017] [8/9/10/11 Regression] Suspected regression (relative to 7.5) using PACK in iolist since r8-4151-g6c6bde30706c29ff

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98017 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:56f83e64e179f2ff5bb4161db076d7e6ae1c0a3f commit r8-10675-g56f83e64e179f2ff5bb4161db076d7e6ae1c0a3f Author: Harald Anlauf Da

[Bug fortran/98017] [8/9/10/11 Regression] Suspected regression (relative to 7.5) using PACK in iolist since r8-4151-g6c6bde30706c29ff

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98017 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSI

[Bug c++/98249] New: Improper ADL on the `arg` in `new (arg) T`

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98249 Bug ID: 98249 Summary: Improper ADL on the `arg` in `new (arg) T` Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c/98250] New: Wrong code path with -O1 and signed overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98250 Bug ID: 98250 Summary: Wrong code path with -O1 and signed overflow Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug c/98250] Wrong code path with -O1 and signed overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98250 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/98250] Wrong code path with -O1 and signed overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98250 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- After UB anything can happen, just don't invoke UB in your programs. Please read e.g. https://blog.regehr.org/archives/213

[Bug libgcc/98251] New: libgcc on 32-bit soft-float ARM narrows -NaN incorrectly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98251 Bug ID: 98251 Summary: libgcc on 32-bit soft-float ARM narrows -NaN incorrectly Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug middle-end/98183] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE in expand_gimple_stmt_1, at cfgexpand.c:3972

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98183 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cc9b9c0b68233d38a26f7acd68cc5f9a8fc4d994 commit r11-5956-gcc9b9c0b68233d38a26f7acd68cc5f9a8fc4d994 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Sa

<    1   2