[Bug c++/97820] VLAs in function declarations fail to compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97820 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-11-19 CC|

[Bug c++/97819] Pack expansion in member initializer lists nested with their parameter list got rejected.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97819 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/97772] Wording of GCC's error message when calling lvalue-ref qualified member function on temporary object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97772 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org Last recon

[Bug c++/97745] [10 Regression] ICE in tsubst_decl, at cp/pt.c:14666

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97745 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/97700] Bogus error when a class containing a function pointer is used as a non-type template parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97700 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-11-19 Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug c++/97895] [11 Regression] ICE in do_auto_deduction, at cp/pt.c:29255

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97895 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:25056bdf94d5f3e66bef039702f7fae799ef16b9 commit r11-5178-g25056bdf94d5f3e66bef039702f7fae799ef16b9 Author: Marek Polacek Date: We

[Bug c++/97895] [11 Regression] ICE in do_auto_deduction, at cp/pt.c:29255

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97895 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/97523] [11 Regression] bogus "would use explicit constructor" error for new[]()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97523 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ae48b74ca0c0ba33d396a6ebad7a1c0a6dadb1f7 commit r11-5179-gae48b74ca0c0ba33d396a6ebad7a1c0a6dadb1f7 Author: Marek Polacek Date: We

[Bug c++/97523] [11 Regression] bogus "would use explicit constructor" error for new[]()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97523 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c/97860] [11 Regression] ICE in handle_argspec_attribute, at c-family/c-attribs.c:3244 since r11-3303-g6450f07388f9fe57

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97860 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8156cfaa4c45f1249bbdda29d04b4fef84b7eafe commit r11-5180-g8156cfaa4c45f1249bbdda29d04b4fef84b7eafe Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Th

[Bug other/97911] [11 regression] make install issue undefined reference to std::__throw_bad_array_new_length after r11-5142

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97911 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/78928] void(*); accepted in block scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78928 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org Reso

[Bug tree-optimization/97915] New: ICE in get_odr_type, at ipa-devirt.c:1930 in pre

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97915 Bug ID: 97915 Summary: ICE in get_odr_type, at ipa-devirt.c:1930 in pre Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug fortran/97864] Homebrew Operator Overload ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97864 Damian Rouson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||damian at sourceryinstitute dot or

[Bug other/97911] [11 regression] make install issue undefined reference to std::__throw_bad_array_new_length after r11-5142

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97911 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Please see https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-November/559605.html

[Bug target/97865] libtool needs to be updated for Darwin20.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97865 --- Comment #23 from Jürgen Reuter --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #18) > (In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #17) > - > > * I found that there was one incorrect case in libgfortran (where there is a > direct reference to **env

[Bug tree-optimization/97915] ICE in get_odr_type, at ipa-devirt.c:1930 in pre

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97915 --- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka --- Hi, this ought to be fixed by g:0862d007b564eca8c9a48fca0e689dd3f90db828 sorry for the breakage. OBJ_TYPE_REF in obj-C frontend is odd.

Re: [Bug tree-optimization/97915] New: ICE in get_odr_type, at ipa-devirt.c:1930 in pre

Hi, this ought to be fixed by g:0862d007b564eca8c9a48fca0e689dd3f90db828 sorry for the breakage. OBJ_TYPE_REF in obj-C frontend is odd.

[Bug tree-optimization/97832] AoSoA complex caxpy-like loops: AVX2+FMA -Ofast 7 times slower than -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97832 --- Comment #10 from Michael_S --- I lost track of what you're talking about long time ago. But that's o.k.

[Bug tree-optimization/91029] missed optimization regarding value of modulo operation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91029 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #49595|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/97513] [11 regression] aarch64 SVE regressions since r11-3822

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97513 --- Comment #4 from Christophe Lyon --- Not quite: as of r11-5140, I see: FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/sve/slp_perm_1.c -march=armv8.2-a+sve scan-assembler-times \\trevb\\tz[0-9]+\\.d, p[0-7]/m, z[0-9]+\\.d\\n 1 FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/sve/slp_perm

[Bug c++/97908] Should _ZTI and _ZTS symbols be marked GNU_UNIQUE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97908 --- Comment #4 from Jan Engelhardt --- >don't dlclose a library when you are using anything from it. That's easier said then done when using C++, as (inline) functions and static objects can potentially be instantiated in any object file. A shar

[Bug c++/97601] ICE when using type determined by std::tuple_element_t<...>, on tuple generated from type id stored in std::array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97601 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug fortran/97864] Homebrew Operator Overload ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97864 --- Comment #4 from Damian Rouson --- The above reduced version produces an ICE with gfortran 11.0.0 2020815 built from source so this is not specific to Homebrew but is specific to macOS.

[Bug fortran/97896] [11 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_assignment_1, at fortran/trans-expr.c:11156

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97896 --- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #2) > Reverting the following snippet from my fix attempt for pr91651: That snippet is necessary for the scalarizer during simplification. The original ICE is comi

[Bug fortran/97864] Homebrew Operator Overload ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97864 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 fr

[Bug c++/85016] internal compiler error: side-effects element in no-side-effects CONSTRUCTOR

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85016 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org Reso

[Bug fortran/97864] Homebrew Operator Overload ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97864 --- Comment #6 from Brad Richardson --- I recently updated to Big Sur, and have xcode version 12.2, but this initially occurred on Catalina. I don't know exactly which version of xcode was installed then.

[Bug c/97860] [11 Regression] ICE in handle_argspec_attribute, at c-family/c-attribs.c:3244 since r11-3303-g6450f07388f9fe57

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97860 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/95989] Segmentation fault compiling with static libraries and using jthread::request_stop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95989 --- Comment #16 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:08b4d325711d5c6f68ac29443aba3fd7aa173ac8 commit r11-5183-g08b4d325711d5c6f68ac29443aba3fd7aa173ac8 Author: Jonathan Wakely Date:

[Bug libstdc++/97876] stop_token header doesn't compile on clang-8 with -std=c++20

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97876 --- Comment #5 from Eric Niebler --- > Github's poor life choices should not be our problem ;-) I thought you'd say that. :-) > If clang-8 doesn't ship and doesn't work with GCC's > , I would interpret that as you can't test with > clang-8.

[Bug libstdc++/97876] stop_token header doesn't compile on clang-8 with -std=c++20

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97876 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug libstdc++/97876] stop_token header doesn't compile on clang-8 with -std=c++20

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97876 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- g:f5d9bc8ae81abe46640477bc9e655aa093947f5f removed the dependency from on for most targets.

[Bug c/97916] New: Can't compile gcc-10.2.0 with --enable-fixed-point

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97916 Bug ID: 97916 Summary: Can't compile gcc-10.2.0 with --enable-fixed-point Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: build Severity: normal Prio

[Bug c/97916] Can't compile gcc-10.2.0 with --enable-fixed-point

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97916 --- Comment #1 from Steven Benzel --- /home/jonny/work/gcc_build/./gcc/xgcc -B/home/jonny/work/gcc_build/./gcc/ -B/home/jonny/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/ -B/home/jonny/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/ -isystem /home/jonny/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/

[Bug bootstrap/97916] Can't compile gcc-10.2.0 with --enable-fixed-point

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97916 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c |bootstrap Target|

[Bug bootstrap/97916] Can't compile gcc-10.2.0 with --enable-fixed-point

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97916 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|documentation | Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/93781] Optimizer produces suboptimal code related to -ftree-vrp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93781 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d0d8b5d83614d8f0d0e40c0520d4f40ffa01f8d9 commit r11-5185-gd0d8b5d83614d8f0d0e40c0520d4f40ffa01f8d9 Author: Andrew MacLeod Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/93781] Optimizer produces suboptimal code related to -ftree-vrp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93781 Andrew Macleod changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #48008|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug libstdc++/97876] stop_token header doesn't compile on clang-8 with -std=c++20

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97876 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/91029] missed optimization regarding value of modulo operation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91029 --- Comment #12 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d3f293348768667c07770e433ff00af51fee73a2 commit r11-5186-gd3f293348768667c07770e433ff00af51fee73a2 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: F

[Bug c/96788] "integer constant is so large that it is unsigned" warning is incorrect

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96788 Pascal Cuoq changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pascal_cuoq at hotmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/93917] VRP forgets range of value read from memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93917 Andrew Macleod changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amacleod at redhat dot com --- Comment

[Bug other/97911] [11 regression] make install issue undefined reference to std::__throw_bad_array_new_length after r11-5142

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97911 --- Comment #3 from Tamar Christina --- Thanks Jakub, that patch does seem to fix the AArch64 build.

[Bug other/97911] [11 regression] make install issue undefined reference to std::__throw_bad_array_new_length after r11-5142

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97911 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC|

[Bug other/97911] [11 regression] make install issue undefined reference to std::__throw_bad_array_new_length after r11-5142

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97911 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Even that should be fixed by the patch I've posted.

[Bug target/97865] libtool needs to be updated for Darwin20.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97865 --- Comment #24 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #22) > (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #19) > > (In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #16) > > > (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #15) > > > > (In reply to Jü

[Bug gcov-profile/97917] New: [GCOV]incorrect code coverage for intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97917 Bug ID: 97917 Summary: [GCOV]incorrect code coverage for intrinsics Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: gcov-

[Bug gcov-profile/97917] [GCOV]incorrect code coverage for intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97917 --- Comment #1 from Yibiao Yang --- $ gcc --version; gcov --version gcc (GCC) 10.0.1 20200419 (experimental) Copyright (C) 2020 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; no

[Bug c++/97918] New: ICE near htab_hash_string when LTO, -O & -g

++ --disable-multilib Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd gcc version 11.0.0 20201119 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug c++/97918] ICE near htab_hash_string when LTO, -O & -g

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97918 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org Se

[Bug gcov-profile/97919] New: [GCOV]volatile member in struct lead to incorrect code coverage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97919 Bug ID: 97919 Summary: [GCOV]volatile member in struct lead to incorrect code coverage Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/97920] New: [FINAL] -O2 segment fault due to extend derive type's member being partially allocated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97920 Bug ID: 97920 Summary: [FINAL] -O2 segment fault due to extend derive type's member being partially allocated Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug gcov-profile/97921] New: [GCOV]inline function with an incremental argument lead to incorrect coverage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97921 Bug ID: 97921 Summary: [GCOV]inline function with an incremental argument lead to incorrect coverage Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: no

[Bug c++/97922] New: inline namespace caused confusing error message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97922 Bug ID: 97922 Summary: inline namespace caused confusing error message Product: gcc Version: 10.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug gcov-profile/97923] New: [GCOV]Wrong code coverage for multiple expressions with Logical OR Operator at multiple lines

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97923 Bug ID: 97923 Summary: [GCOV]Wrong code coverage for multiple expressions with Logical OR Operator at multiple lines Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/97417] RISC-V Unnecessary andi instruction when loading volatile bool

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97417 --- Comment #41 from Levy --- When putting the same debug_rtx(addr) at the first line of riscv_address_cost() Unpatched one outputs: (plus:DI (reg/f:DI 15 a5 [88]) (const_int 32 [0x20])) (plus:DI (reg:DI 10 a0 [92]) (const_int 800 [0x320

[Bug gcov-profile/97924] New: [GCOV]incorrect coverage for "?:" statement falls in different lines

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97924 Bug ID: 97924 Summary: [GCOV]incorrect coverage for "?:" statement falls in different lines Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug gcov-profile/97925] New: [GCOV]incorrect code coverage for function call for when multiple Logical OR expressions of a "if" statement in different lines

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97925 Bug ID: 97925 Summary: [GCOV]incorrect code coverage for function call for when multiple Logical OR expressions of a "if" statement in different lines Product: gcc

[Bug target/97417] RISC-V Unnecessary andi instruction when loading volatile bool

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97417 --- Comment #42 from Jim Wilson --- riscv_address_cost is a hook, so it is targetm.address_cost which is only called from address_cost which is only called in a few places one of which is in postreload.c so that is the one I would look at first.

[Bug tree-optimization/97901] ICE at -Os: verify_gimple failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97901 --- Comment #4 from Jiu Fu Guo --- Hi Richard, thank you to handle this!

[Bug tree-optimization/97909] expr_not_equal_to (mainly in match.pd) vs. ranger

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97909 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Note that all folding may only ever access SSA use-def chains and cannot rely on immediate uses. Also it may not use context (aka gimple_bb of def stmts) so I have a hard time seeing on-demand range compute

[Bug tree-optimization/97832] AoSoA complex caxpy-like loops: AVX2+FMA -Ofast 7 times slower than -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97832 --- Comment #11 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Michael_S from comment #10) > I lost track of what you're talking about long time ago. > But that's o.k. No problem - difficult PRs tend to be used as media to brain-dump and record work progr

[Bug c++/97913] -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks not working properly with constexpr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97913 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- -fno-delete-null-pointer-check means that objects can live at address zero so (((const int*)(& arr)) == 0u) is indeed not a constant expression. I suppose with -fno-delete-null-pointer-check C++ lacks a way

[Bug tree-optimization/97915] ICE in get_odr_type, at ipa-devirt.c:1930 in pre

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97915 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/97926] New: ICE in patch_jump_insn, at cfgrtl.c:1298

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97926 Bug ID: 97926 Summary: ICE in patch_jump_insn, at cfgrtl.c:1298 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal Prio

[Bug target/97926] ICE in patch_jump_insn, at cfgrtl.c:1298

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97926 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/97918] ICE near htab_hash_string when LTO, -O & -g

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97918 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Keywords|

[Bug target/96849] [11 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2294 (error: unrecognizable insn) since r11-2623

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96849 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/97918] ICE near htab_hash_string when LTO, -O & -g

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97918 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug c++/97918] ICE near htab_hash_string when LTO, -O & -g

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97918 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug fortran/97920] [FINAL] -O2 segment fault due to extend derive type's member being partially allocated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97920 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/97918] ICE near htab_hash_string when LTO, -O & -g

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97918 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- cvise.

[Bug other/97911] [11 regression] make install issue undefined reference to std::__throw_bad_array_new_length after r11-5142

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97911 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a774a6a2fbeaf7cbcb7a7afe433418f2d740b45b commit r11-5190-ga774a6a2fbeaf7cbcb7a7afe433418f2d740b45b Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Fr

[Bug other/97911] [11 regression] make install issue undefined reference to std::__throw_bad_array_new_length after r11-5142

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97911 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Should be fixed now.

[Bug other/97911] [11 regression] make install issue undefined reference to std::__throw_bad_array_new_length after r11-5142

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97911 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

<    1   2