https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97834
--- Comment #7 from Roland Illig ---
(In reply to Nathan Sidwell from comment #5)
> you're looking in the wrong place. see gcov_var and GCOV_BLOCK_SIZE.
Hmmm, this looks like there is some buffering. But still, in gcov_open, when I
comment out
> Note i686-linux bootstrap is still broken in r11-5062 - the PR97853 error.
Yes, as discussed earlier (but perhaps lost in other coments) we need
fix for the targetm.calls.empty_record_p (type) divergence. It is not
clear to me if simply calling the default implementation instead of the
rather com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97840
--- Comment #11 from Jan Hubicka ---
> Note i686-linux bootstrap is still broken in r11-5062 - the PR97853 error.
Yes, as discussed earlier (but perhaps lost in other coments) we need
fix for the targetm.calls.empty_record_p (type) divergence. It
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97834
Roland Illig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97828
--- Comment #7 from Patrick Palka ---
Patch posted at
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/libstdc++/2020-November/051458.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97589
--- Comment #13 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #12)
> Reduced test case:
>
> program main
> type global_model_state
> real, allocatable :: ps(:) [:]
> end type global_model_state
> type (global_model_s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97840
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I agree we should just rename default_is_empty_type to is_empty_type, export
it, declare in tree.h and use it instead that complicated test. TYPE_EMPTY_P
isn't something tree-ssa-uninit.c should care about,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97864
Bug ID: 97864
Summary: Homebrew Operator Overload ICE
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97589
--- Comment #14 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #13)
> (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #12)
> > Reduced test case:
> >
> > program main
> > type global_model_state
> > real, allocatable :: ps(:) [:]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97840
--- Comment #13 from Jan Hubicka ---
> I agree we should just rename default_is_empty_type to is_empty_type, export
> it, declare in tree.h and use it instead that complicated test. TYPE_EMPTY_P
> isn't something tree-ssa-uninit.c should care ab
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97834
--- Comment #9 from Roland Illig ---
(In reply to Roland Illig from comment #7)
> I wonder why on NetBSD there is no buffering but on Linux there is.
> Both stdio implementations are so old that I don't expect any bugs
> in this area anymore.
It
> I agree we should just rename default_is_empty_type to is_empty_type, export
> it, declare in tree.h and use it instead that complicated test. TYPE_EMPTY_P
> isn't something tree-ssa-uninit.c should care about, that is just whether the
> backend decided it will not be passed at all.
OK, perhaps
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97865
Bug ID: 97865
Summary: MACOSX_DEPLOY_TARGET needs to be updated
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97843
--- Comment #6 from Alex ---
>From cppreference.com :
The behavior of every builtin compound-assignment expression E1 op= E2 (where
E1 is a modifiable lvalue expression and E2 is an rvalue expression or a
braced-init-list (since C++11)) is exact
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48958
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0c81ccc3d87098b93b0e6a2dd76815e4d6e78ff0
commit r11-5064-g0c81ccc3d87098b93b0e6a2dd76815e4d6e78ff0
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86465
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #10)
> Created attachment 49449 [details]
> preprocessed source, unreduced, gzipped
>
> Here's another example that produces this kind of warning, this time from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97865
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9
--- Comment #5 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org ---
the following patch in reg-stack.c fixed the failure:
qinzhao@gcc10:~/Work/write_gcc/gcc$ git diff reg-stack.c
diff --git a/gcc/reg-stack.c b/gcc/reg-stack.c
index 8f98bd85750..3dab843f803 100644
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97589
--- Comment #16 from Thomas Koenig ---
program random_weather
implicit none
type global_model_state
real, allocatable :: ps(:,:) [:,:]
end type global_model_state
integer :: nxslab, nyslab
type(global_model_state) :: ms_full
in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97589
--- Comment #15 from Thomas Koenig ---
Next reduced test-case:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93456
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:730e1357dfb9aff481d6c47a21ef748f0d810d4f
commit r10-9031-g730e1357dfb9aff481d6c47a21ef748f0d810d4f
Author: Jonathan Wakel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97857
--- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka ---
In my setup I get ICE segfault with
#0 0x011fcf44 in vec::release (this=0x0) at ../../gcc/vec.h:1811
#1 0x011fcf2f in auto_vec::~auto_vec
(this=, this=) at ../../gcc/vec.h:1542
#2 speculative
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97854
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:814e016318646d06b1662219cc716d502b76d8ce
commit r11-5065-g814e016318646d06b1662219cc716d502b76d8ce
Author: Iain Sandoe
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97866
Bug ID: 97866
Summary: [11 Regression] bootstrap error in libasan building a
s390x-linux-gnu cross compiler
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97857
--- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka ---
The checking enabled build ICEs for me at same spot as for you
0x01475505 <+165>: punpcklqdq %xmm2,%xmm3
0x01475509 <+169>: movaps %xmm3,0x30(%rsp)
0x0147550e <+174>: cal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93071
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
The checking enabled build ICEs for me at same spot as for you
0x01475505 <+165>: punpcklqdq %xmm2,%xmm3
0x01475509 <+169>: movaps %xmm3,0x30(%rsp)
0x0147550e <+174>: callq 0x10949d0
::iterator::slide()>
0x01475513 <+179>: mov%r12,0x20(%rsp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93071
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
These might benefit from the same improvements (compile with -std=c++20):
#include
int i(int x) {
return 31 - std::countl_zero((unsigned)x);
}
int j(int x) {
return std::bit_width((unsigned)x) -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97840
--- Comment #14 from Martin Sebor ---
Created attachment 49572
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49572&action=edit
Patch under test.
The attached patch avoids the warning on aarch64. Let me finish testing it and
submit it lat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97865
--- Comment #2 from Jürgen Reuter ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #1)
> This should probably handled by upstream libtool
Indeed I reported this to libtool as well, and I was not the first apparently.
How do you include this? In our c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92978
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7dbed9dead9002ee0cd4aa9c22b20942c6f13757
commit r8-10624-g7dbed9dead9002ee0cd4aa9c22b20942c6f13757
Author: Jonathan Wakely
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92978
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97840
>
> --- Comment #14 from Martin Sebor ---
> Created attachment 49572
> --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49572&action=edit
> Patch under test.
>
> The attached patch avoids the warning on aarch64. Let me finish testing it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97840
--- Comment #15 from Jan Hubicka ---
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97840
>
> --- Comment #14 from Martin Sebor ---
> Created attachment 49572
> --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49572&action=edit
> Patch unde
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91488
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to ensadc from comment #1)
> It seems that the inliner does not like the `static` specifier in
> `__constant_string_p`. This also triggers "inlining failed in call to
> always_inline" error:
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97858
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|middle-end |bootstrap
--- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94568
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ABI
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94345
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Fixed for GCC 11 by b1850c617b14eedaf60b358f3b7d4707cff73b8a
I might still backport it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97842
--- Comment #4 from Alex ---
Created attachment 49573
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49573&action=edit
dustmite reduced problem.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48958
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
Status|SUSPEND
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97857
--- Comment #10 from Jan Hubicka ---
So I think I know what happens. It is actually the pre-existing
problem I mentioned in
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-November/559017.html
the iterator is small type consiting of two pointers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97847
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #1 from Segher
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97864
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80635
--- Comment #55 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
So to summarize some thoughts from Richi from last year.
Converting the V_C_E into a NOP_EXPR is undesirable as the truncation becomes
sub-optimal because we end up with an additional masking operation. S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97867
Bug ID: 97867
Summary: FAIL: test-combination.c.exe test-functions.c.exe
test-pr66779.c.exe test-threads.c.exe killed
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97867
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96089
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
gcc_jit_global_set_initializer was added in GCC 11, which can initialize some
global variables.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97858
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97857
--- Comment #11 from Jan Hubicka ---
This patch fixes the issue by making the conflict with C type sticky via
clearing the CXX bit. I checked that it recovers profiledbootstrap,
hwoever I want to look into the code tomorrow bit more to be sure t
This patch fixes the issue by making the conflict with C type sticky via
clearing the CXX bit. I checked that it recovers profiledbootstrap,
hwoever I want to look into the code tomorrow bit more to be sure that
it does not disable more than it should.
Honza
diff --git a/gcc/ipa-utils.h b/gcc/ip
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92180
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:be39636d9f68c437c8a2c2e7a225c4aed4663e78
commit r11-5066-gbe39636d9f68c437c8a2c2e7a225c4aed4663e78
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Mon Nov 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97736
--- Comment #12 from ncm at cantrip dot org ---
As it is, your probability of failure in 9 and 10 is exactly 1.0.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90569
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||77691
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97868
Bug ID: 97868
Summary: warn about using fences with TSAN
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97846
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-11-17
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97805
--- Comment #4 from John David Anglin ---
We need:
#include
The define for LLONG_MIN is guarded by __STDC_VERSION__ in glimits.h:
#if defined (__STDC_VERSION__) && __STDC_VERSION__ >= 199901L
/* Minimum and maximum values a `signed long long
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88115
--- Comment #7 from James Y Knight ---
I've created an ABI proposal against itanium abi, here:
https://github.com/itanium-cxx-abi/cxx-abi/issues/112
I realized since writing my last comment here that
::= u [] # vendor extended type
has been
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95673
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b1ecb86569f63f897f6a95049c4ccf400bddeaad
commit r11-5072-gb1ecb86569f63f897f6a95049c4ccf400bddeaad
Author: Martin Sebor
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83819
Bug 83819 depends on bug 95673, which changed state.
Bug 95673 Summary: missing -Wstring-compare for an impossible strncmp test
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95673
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95673
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97840
--- Comment #16 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3072125a40ccfc139a92d44fb3911a8a7186b025
commit r11-5073-g3072125a40ccfc139a92d44fb3911a8a7186b025
Author: Martin Sebor
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97194
--- Comment #22 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:287cc750b0887e86cb309d976b17c7ee95f7ad48
commit r11-5074-g287cc750b0887e86cb309d976b17c7ee95f7ad48
Author: liuhongt
Date: Mon Oct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97194
--- Comment #23 from Hongtao.liu ---
Fixed in GCC11, may need a bit adjustment for the modeless operand(the variable
index) as dicussed in
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-November/559213.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97682
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Kito Cheng :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4ba2f918583089172ac899c8eecaddef0d47cd85
commit r10-9033-g4ba2f918583089172ac899c8eecaddef0d47cd85
Author: Monk Chiang
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97869
Bug ID: 97869
Summary: defines __cpp_lib_span even when
doesn't provide an implementation
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97849
--- Comment #1 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Hi,
Sorry for the breakage, will take a look.
Regards,
Prathamesh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97864
--- Comment #2 from Brad Richardson ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1)
> Works for me on Big Sur with all the revision I have tried.
I just update to Big Sur (initial report was still on Catalina), and am still
seeing the sam
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97849
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-11-17
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97849
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97854
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97870
Bug ID: 97870
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error:
too many outgoing branch edges from bb 2)
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97855
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||lto
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22326
luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97857
--- Comment #12 from Martin Liška ---
I can confirm that, using dbgcnt-bisect.py script I was able to reduce that to:
-fdbg-cnt=merged_ipa_icf:4876-4877 where the problematic function is really
slide:
../../gcc/hash-table.h:1110:1: optimized: Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22326
--- Comment #5 from luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org ---
With above hack, changing argument x from float to double could still generate
correct code with conversion of fabsf result:
float foo(float f, double x, float y) {
return (fabs(f)*x+y);
}
006t.g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97856
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Version|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97871
Bug ID: 97871
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in cp_parser_declaration, at
cp/parser.c:13539
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-invali
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97858
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |11.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97860
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97859
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97861
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97862
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97866
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97871
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97870
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97869
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.3
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97872
Bug ID: 97872
Summary: Missed optimization for less-than comparison on
vectors
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97859
--- Comment #2 from Matthias Klose ---
targeting powerpc-linux-gnu also works
101 - 188 of 188 matches
Mail list logo
