https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97787
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|lto |target
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97812
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Wrong output when compiling |[9/10/11 Regression] Wrong
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88566
Trass3r changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96265
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|building nvptx-none on |building nvptx-none on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92294
--- Comment #6 from Marius Hillenbrand ---
Same behavior on s390x: the testcase always calls abort(). As on aarch64,
-fno-section-anchors avoids the issue.
the first cse pass already makes a mistake -- on both aarch64 and s390x, the
compare loos
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97812
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #8)
> Started with r9-4558-g476a31b55b5471262.
>
> Slightly modified test-case:
>
> $ cat pr97812.c
> char c;
>
> int main() {
> volatile short b = 4066;
> unsigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97812
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|marxin at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97799
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.3
Summary|Passing CHARACTE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97812
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|lto |
Component|lto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77404
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3fe07cdec8c79bce53ea5aeb8e607df6eb5c8c2c
commit r11-4969-g3fe07cdec8c79bce53ea5aeb8e607df6eb5c8c2c
Author: Iain Sandoe
Date: Sun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77404
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:64f191b152cb1df0e108a91880cb415e413bad56
commit r11-4971-g64f191b152cb1df0e108a91880cb415e413bad56
Author: Iain Sandoe
Date: Sun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77404
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d35fbf7f7673b5c72ee61720f1a209d4e798152f
commit r11-4970-gd35fbf7f7673b5c72ee61720f1a209d4e798152f
Author: Iain Sandoe
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90707
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5e28fca09c9c72bf5631efd0f0b06d52b0ebdb4d
commit r11-4972-g5e28fca09c9c72bf5631efd0f0b06d52b0ebdb4d
Author: Iain Sandoe
Date: Sun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77404
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77404
--- Comment #9 from Iain Sandoe ---
fixed for GCC-11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87403
Bug 87403 depends on bug 77404, which changed state.
Bug 77404 Summary: Add Wobjc-root-class
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77404
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97799
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #13
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97799
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
So dup of https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94672#c12 ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97812
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dcfd302a79a5e2ea3bb16fc4fc45a5ee31cc0eab
commit r11-4976-gdcfd302a79a5e2ea3bb16fc4fc45a5ee31cc0eab
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97812
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||10.2.0
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97815
Bug ID: 97815
Summary: QNX should use thread_file=posix instead of defining
THREAD_MODEL_SPEC
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97816
Bug ID: 97816
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in good_cloning_opportunity_p, at
ipa-cp.c:3266 since
r11-4949-gb86aedb0cc083efe712e530a723f1237051a6b56
Product: gcc
V
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97816
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-11-13
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97816
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Apparently, without the '-fPIC' option.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97816
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
size_cost: -2147480169
So it's likely about an integer overflow..
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63287
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.llvm.org/show_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97805
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97805
--- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou ---
Created attachment 49555
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49555&action=edit
Tentative fix
Please give it a try when you get a chance.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97816
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jamborm at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96042
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:12042aeb9336f20b9225b2e5139e5f6c9bde7642
commit r10-9021-g12042aeb9336f20b9225b2e5139e5f6c9bde7642
Author: Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97798
--- Comment #18 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The patch will apply cleanly to gcc-10 but not gcc-9. Let me know if you want
me to prepare a patch for the gcc-9 branch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97798
--- Comment #19 from jozefl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #18)
> The patch will apply cleanly to gcc-10 but not gcc-9. Let me know if you
> want me to prepare a patch for the gcc-9 branch.
If it's not too much w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97644
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5d4b824faf1e5846ec684a74f93912cf347928df
commit r11-4979-g5d4b824faf1e5846ec684a74f93912cf347928df
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date: Thu N
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97644
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96734
Natanael Copa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ncopa at alpinelinux dot org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97273
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9df05884b3a30d32744a070d3fc5780b7323231a
commit r9-9043-g9df05884b3a30d32744a070d3fc5780b7323231a
Author: Patrick Palka
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88115
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9df05884b3a30d32744a070d3fc5780b7323231a
commit r9-9043-g9df05884b3a30d32744a070d3fc5780b7323231a
Author: Patrick Palka
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94406
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Jambor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ac91af71c93462cbc701bbd104fa21894bb15e86
commit r11-4983-gac91af71c93462cbc701bbd104fa21894bb15e86
Author: Martin Jambor
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69609
--- Comment #16 from Richard Biener ---
current HEAD with -O2 -fno-checking (a checking enabled build) shows
callgraph ipa passes : 6.80 ( 14%) 0.19 ( 12%) 7.00 ( 14%)
33M ( 5%)
tree FRE : 6.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78655
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amacleod at redhat dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97798
--- Comment #20 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f9d6781ea2ef1cdfd0d6d6b649a5cb5a217a8d5e
commit r10-9022-gf9d6781ea2ef1cdfd0d6d6b649a5cb5a217a8d5e
Author: Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97798
--- Comment #21 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:62c2d527307d8adce31f5c9ca6e19e15b2866b83
commit r9-9045-g62c2d527307d8adce31f5c9ca6e19e15b2866b83
Author: Jonathan Wakely
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97798
--- Comment #22 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I tested the patches on x86_64-linux and confirmed that the branches can
bootstrap msp430-elf, so I went ahead and pushed them.
If you're not going to release anything from the gcc-8 branch, is it OK to
l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97798
--- Comment #23 from jozefl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #22)
> I tested the patches on x86_64-linux and confirmed that the branches can
> bootstrap msp430-elf, so I went ahead and pushed them.
>
> If you're no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97798
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97805
--- Comment #3 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2020-11-13 7:39 a.m., ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Please give it a try when you get a chance.
Will do.
Thanks,
Dave
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93067
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79191
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amacleod at redhat dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79191
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Macleod ---
(In reply to Andrew Macleod from comment #6)
> Ranger knows the range of m_3 on entry to BB3 is:
> [0, 2][4294967296, 18446744069414584322]
> we cant enumerate all the ranges that have [0,2] in the lower wo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97788
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97788
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2935ff7eb7ac2bb089e61078162d3d68b5745281
commit r11-4996-g2935ff7eb7ac2bb089e61078162d3d68b5745281
Author: Martin Liska
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93067
lhyatt at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #47547|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91318
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6f1ae1ecd351348eb33b515c5e23778651bee028
commit r11-4999-g6f1ae1ecd351348eb33b515c5e23778651bee028
Author: Piotr H. Dabrowski
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97816
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Jambor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2e97d6443f0a862ce9b798084499635914e3b8c6
commit r11-5000-g2e97d6443f0a862ce9b798084499635914e3b8c6
Author: Martin Jambor
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89180
Bug 89180 depends on bug 91318, which changed state.
Bug 91318 Summary: [C++][PATCH] warnings about unused internal macros with
-Wunused-macros and #pragma GCC optimize
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91318
What|Remov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91318
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97816
--- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor ---
As noted in the commit message above, the ICE will go away but the underlying
issue stays so please keep this opened until I fix it, hopefully no later than
next week.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97817
Bug ID: 97817
Summary: -Wformat-truncation=2 elicits invalid warning
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97817
--- Comment #1 from jim at meyering dot net ---
I confirmed this happens both with the very latest built from git: gcc version
11.0.0 20201113 (experimental) (GCC), and Fedora 32's gcc version 10.2.1
20201016 (Red Hat 10.2.1-6) (GCC).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97817
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab ---
But when it's 6 it's truncated.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97060
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97388
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91367
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88323
Bug 88323 depends on bug 91367, which changed state.
Bug 91367 Summary: Implement P1099R5: using enum
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91367
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90537
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org|jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88323
Bug 88323 depends on bug 90537, which changed state.
Bug 90537 Summary: Implement P1286R2, Contra CWG DR1778
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90537
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91581
Bug 91581 depends on bug 90537, which changed state.
Bug 90537 Summary: Implement P1286R2, Contra CWG DR1778
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90537
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91370
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolut
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88323
Bug 88323 depends on bug 91370, which changed state.
Bug 91370 Summary: Implement P1041R4 and P1139R2: Stronger Unicode requirements
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91370
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86252
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Sta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97787
--- Comment #7 from Adrian Bunk ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6)
> I see. Still GCC or GAS produces a bogus object file (the original linker
> error). It might be the new problem is an entirely different one? It looks
> more an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97818
Bug ID: 97818
Summary: PDT Parameterized Derived Type fails with SIGABRT at
-O1
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97819
Bug ID: 97819
Summary: Pack expansion in member initializer lists nested with
their parameter list got rejected.
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97820
Bug ID: 97820
Summary: VLAs in function declarations fail to compile
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96322
--- Comment #3 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
Good point.
I tried pt_PT on FreeBSD to check if it's the same as in Linux and it's not:
there grouping=3 is used. +1 for custom locale.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94527
--- Comment #11 from Martin Sebor ---
Patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-November/559053.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94527
--- Comment #12 from Martin Sebor ---
David Malcolm: I went with "overloading" attribute malloc in my patch for the
reasons I explained my comments on your patch and in the patch submission
email. I'm open to changing the name (or the associatio
--enable-multilib --with-system-zlib
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 11.0.0 20201113 (experimental) [master revision
54896b10dbe:c3a97a9df4b:a514934a0565255276adaa4fbd4aa35579ec33c6] (GCC)
[510] %
[510] % gcctk -O1 small.c; ./a.out
5030-170
[511] % gcctk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63287
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1d9a8675d379f02f5e39639f469ae8dfcf33fea9
commit r11-5017-g1d9a8675d379f02f5e39639f469ae8dfcf33fea9
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97817
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Sta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97817
--- Comment #4 from jim at meyering dot net ---
Thanks for explaining. It would be nice if the diagnostic were to say something
along the lines of "... writing into a region whose size may be as low as N".
Given the wording of the current diagnost
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93421
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4d039cb9a1d0ffc6910fe09b726c3561b64527dc
commit r11-5022-g4d039cb9a1d0ffc6910fe09b726c3561b64527dc
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93456
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b8d36dcc917e8a06d8c20b9f5ecc920ed2b9e947
commit r11-5021-gb8d36dcc917e8a06d8c20b9f5ecc920ed2b9e947
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93421
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Rich Felker from comment #7)
> Indeed, the direct clock_gettime syscall stuff is just unnecessary on any
> modern system, certainly any time64 one. I read the patch briefly and I
> don't see an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93456
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Fixed on trunk by the patch above and a few other recent commits today.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97682
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jim Wilson :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:207de83922bda8707aa33d6a2185e691116377e7
commit r11-5026-g207de83922bda8707aa33d6a2185e691116377e7
Author: Monk Chiang
Date: Fri Nov
86 matches
Mail list logo
