https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97205
--- Comment #5 from Bernd Edlinger ---
(In reply to SRINATH PARVATHANENI from comment #4)
> With the above patch I'm getting ICE as below while building arm-none-eabi
> target:
>
> checking for scalbnl... during RTL pass: expand
>
> generice_bu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97579
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 27 Oct 2020, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97579
>
> --- Comment #2 from Martin Li?ka ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97599
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
I think the main confusion is as to how we represent IPA clones in debug,
namely making them have an abstract origin to the cloned function even though
their signatures do not match. In reality we're creati
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97205
--- Comment #6 from Bernd Edlinger ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #3)
> On Tue, 27 Oct 2020, bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de wrote:
> > --- a/gcc/emit-rtl.c
> > +++ b/gcc/emit-rtl.c
> > @@ -2089,7 +2089,8 @@ set_mem_attributes_m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97599
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Implementation-wise we'd have to put a wrapping inline BLOCK in function clones
plus the appropriate inlined PARM_DECLs / debug stmts to initialize the
call parameters. And then simply forgo with setting DE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97603
--- Comment #3 from Gabriel Ravier ---
Well, I don't actually know enough to be able to determine which would be
optimal. Transformation to the example from the third comment would be
suboptimal on some targets (say, I don't think AVR would like
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97611
Bug ID: 97611
Summary: FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/pr83232.f90 with AVX, suitable
target selector missing
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97205
--- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 28 Oct 2020, bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97205
>
> --- Comment #6 from Bernd Edlinger ---
> (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97205
--- Comment #8 from SRINATH PARVATHANENI ---
(In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #5)
> (In reply to SRINATH PARVATHANENI from comment #4)
> > With the above patch I'm getting ICE as below while building arm-none-eabi
> > target:
> >
> > che
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97569
Anders Granlund changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97612
Bug ID: 97612
Summary: Structure constructor of type with nested allocatable
array components fails to compile
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97613
Bug ID: 97613
Summary: chrono::year_month_weekday cast to sys_days : return
bad value if index() == 0
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97613
--- Comment #1 from Akira Takahashi ---
- #include
+ #include
#include
#include
namespace chrono = std::chrono;
using namespace std::chrono_literals;
int main()
{
chrono::sys_days date1 = 2020y/3/chrono::Sunday[1];
assert(chrono::year_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97595
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97599
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97599
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97603
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |rtl-optimization
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96680
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f165ef89c08ddabb19583e45e8a6819f810d95ab
commit r11-4468-gf165ef89c08ddabb19583e45e8a6819f810d95ab
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81690
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3f39b64e57ab8e8f69a017e4bd20aa6dd2aec492
commit r11-4469-g3f39b64e57ab8e8f69a017e4bd20aa6dd2aec492
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97081
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ca84557f3024c75ede850007099ec9b2c19e9f8a
commit r10-8948-gca84557f3024c75ede850007099ec9b2c19e9f8a
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97081
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a78cd759754c92cecbf235ac9b447dcdff6c6e2f
commit r10-8949-ga78cd759754c92cecbf235ac9b447dcdff6c6e2f
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97605
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-10-28
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97532
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97606
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97607
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97609
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97614
Bug ID: 97614
Summary: MinGW-w64 pointer to long conversion loses precision
error
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97599
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Another version of the patch:
--- gcc/dwarf2out.c.jj 2020-10-27 18:38:00.001979404 +0100
+++ gcc/dwarf2out.c 2020-10-28 10:52:29.618796758 +0100
@@ -22756,6 +22756,7 @@ gen_subprogram_die (tree decl, dw_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97599
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97615
Bug ID: 97615
Summary: [11 Regression] -O3 on -Wsequence-point-unclean code
ICEs: during GIMPLE pass: slp: internal compiler
error: in vectorizable_live_operation, at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97615
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97616
Bug ID: 97616
Summary: [11 regression] bb-slp-58.c and bb-slp-59.c fail on
arm after r11-4428
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97616
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97615
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
And slightly simplified; still ICEs with -O3:
short *a;
int e, f;
void
foo (int c, int d)
{
short *a1, *a2, *a3;
a1 = a++;
*a1 = c;
a2 = a++;
*a2 = *a1;
a3 = a++;
*a3 = d;
}
void
bar (void)
{
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97616
--- Comment #1 from Christophe Lyon ---
Actually these are not regressions, but new failures since the tests were just
added.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
--- Comment #18 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Alexandre Oliva :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:31643fa3e994749bd2da7b35846f1958f8823b8d
commit r11-4472-g31643fa3e994749bd2da7b35846f1958f8823b8d
Author: Alexandre Oliva
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97609
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97617
Bug ID: 97617
Summary: missing aggressive loop optimization warning in C++
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97497
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97617
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97323
Maxim Kuvyrkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97615
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97616
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95609
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0f7cd5e5735e5536bf7bc8ca2b998f7ce8b4ddee
commit r11-4475-g0f7cd5e5735e5536bf7bc8ca2b998f7ce8b4ddee
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95609
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95592
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:72a87d82e0d0741d75c72c8f3d2fc070e3a02b5f
commit r11-4476-g72a87d82e0d0741d75c72c8f3d2fc070e3a02b5f
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95592
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95567
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95557
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97617
--- Comment #2 from Jan Smets ---
Is it maybe a possibility to report the (possible) false positives with
something like -Waggressive-loop-optimizations=2 ?
Would that only require a skip of single_exit() in
do_warn_aggressive_loop_optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97617
--- Comment #3 from Jan Smets ---
Sorry, I was too quickly in my wording to "skip single_exit()", of course that
edge is still required.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89610
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92124
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arthur.j.odwyer at gmail dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94268
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0bc199fc5d4eef5a20ced20df892e5e3b8821b60
commit r11-4479-g0bc199fc5d4eef5a20ced20df892e5e3b8821b60
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94268
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97362
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9/10/11 Regression] |[8/9/10 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97596
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Macleod ---
This should be fixed with:
commit 279a9ce9d545f65a0bb1bc4564abafabfc25f82d
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Wed Oct 28 10:24:20 2020 +0100
wide-int: Fix up set_bit_large
> >> wide_int new_lb = wi::s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97613
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97618
Bug ID: 97618
Summary: undefined reference to LC11 building for target
MinGW-w64 32-bit
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96331
Pilar Latiesa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pilarlatiesa at gmail dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65114
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |SUSPENDED
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60630
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-10-28
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97615
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b626b00823af9ca9ab619fe13d1e8703a3101dab
commit r11-4482-gb626b00823af9ca9ab619fe13d1e8703a3101dab
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97615
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97616
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95609
--- Comment #6 from Niall Douglas ---
Cool, thanks. I believe that all three major STLs now implement struct iovec
compatibility with span. That's a nice win.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97618
--- Comment #1 from Brecht Sanders
---
I see a similar issue when building mpfr with the resulting compiler, but here
the error is:
build_mingw\i686-w64-mingw32\libgcc/../../../libgcc/config/libbid/bid128_div.c:616:
undefined reference to `LC4'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60630
--- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
My hpux11.00 machine died some years ago.
On hpux11.11, the only non prettyprinter fail is:
FAIL: 26_numerics/complex/proj.cc execution test
The prettyprinter tests all fail due to a perl issu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45821
Philip R Brenan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||philiprbrenan at gmail dot com
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65113
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68003
Arthur O'Dwyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arthur.j.odwyer at gmail dot
com
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68003
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86769
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot
eelis
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87404
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95132
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9ccc3495766116ea4ae8e4cd8129beca60e30445
commit r11-4488-g9ccc3495766116ea4ae8e4cd8129beca60e30445
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97618
--- Comment #2 from Brecht Sanders
---
To build mpfr wich fails with:
build_mingw\i686-w64-mingw32\libgcc/../../../libgcc/config/libbid/bid128_div.c:1523:
undefined reference to `LC4'
I figured out that the symbol LC4 is defined in libgcc.a, so
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86769
Arthur O'Dwyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arthur.j.odwyer at gmail dot
com
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96713
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8572edc828f6d1e7c8243f901fe7c96f62a11a8e
commit r11-4490-g8572edc828f6d1e7c8243f901fe7c96f62a11a8e
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96713
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97609
--- Comment #2 from Aldy Hernandez ---
tl;dr: substitute_and_fold_engine::replace_uses_in() creates invalid gimple, so
when its loop goes on to request a range (value_of_expr), the ranger may see
invalid IL and die an ungraceful death.
The long
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97613
--- Comment #3 from Patrick Palka ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8572edc828f6d1e7c8243f901fe7c96f62a11a8e
commit r11-4490-g8572edc828f6d1e7c8243f901fe7c96f62a11a8e
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97613
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97609
--- Comment #3 from Aldy Hernandez ---
And the reason this was working before is two-fold.
First, value_of_expr() in legacy evrp won't look at broken gimple, so the
request for __keep_12(D) in the following statement actually succeeds:
__to_d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96217
--- Comment #8 from LE GARREC Vincent ---
Thanks, you're right. I was able to build with
CFLAGS="-march=native -ggdb2 -g2 -pipe -fno-omit-frame-pointer -O0"
CXXFLAGS="-march=native -ggdb2 -g2 -pipe -fno-omit-frame-pointer -O0"
but with adding :
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97600
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot
gnu.org
Last
unk and compiler
flag -O3, does this:
/home/dcb/gcc/results.20201027/bin/gcc
/home/dcb/gcc/results.20201028/bin/gcc
resample.c: In function ‘merge_linear_argb_ref’:
resample.c:163:1: error: true/false edge after a non-GIMPLE_COND in bb 4
resample.c:163:1: error: true/false edge after a non-GIMPLE_CON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97619
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman ---
Reduced code is:
char a;
char *b;
int c;
void f(void)
{
char *d = f;
int e;
for(;e;e++)
{
d[4*e] = a*(256-c) + b[4*e]*c >> 8;
d[4*e+1] = a*(
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97205
--- Comment #9 from Bernd Edlinger ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #7)
> On Wed, 28 Oct 2020, bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97205
> >
> > --- Comment #6 from Bernd Edl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97620
Bug ID: 97620
Summary: -fexec-charset=IBM16804 triggers ICE
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: analyzer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97621
Bug ID: 97621
Summary: [11 regression] bogus message in
gcc.dg/analyzer/malloc-vs-local-1b.c after r11-4434
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97620
--- Comment #1 from fdlbxtqi ---
Program:
#include
int main()
{
printf("Hello World %d\n",6);
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97457
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:54ef7701a9dec8c923a12d1983f8a051ba88a7b9
commit r11-4495-g54ef7701a9dec8c923a12d1983f8a051ba88a7b9
Author: Richard Sandiford
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82700
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||euloanty at live dot com
--- Comment #4 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97620
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Assignee|dmalcolm at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97609
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Macleod ---
This worked OK because the code does:
/* Replace real uses in the statement. */
did_replace |= substitute_and_fold_engine->replace_uses_in (stmt);
gimple_stmt_iterator prev_gsi = i;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97535
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tamar Christina :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3dcd47389b16f48dcf5512b9ebba15af5c0be948
commit r11-4496-g3dcd47389b16f48dcf5512b9ebba15af5c0be948
Author: Tamar Christina
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97620
--- Comment #3 from fdlbxtqi ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #2)
> This is almost certainly caused by an incomplete charset, same as in pr82700.
>
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 82700 ***
Then provide a better e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86773
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:43cb72263fb3b7b97a74fb38d71364a1d5cf0448
commit r11-4498-g43cb72263fb3b7b97a74fb38d71364a1d5cf0448
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86773
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94799
--- Comment #16 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:323dd4255203479d8c456b85513db4f8e0041d04
commit r11-4499-g323dd4255203479d8c456b85513db4f8e0041d04
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: M
1 - 100 of 137 matches
Mail list logo
