[Bug gcov-profile/96919] [GCOV] uncovered line of stack allocation while using virutal destructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96919 --- Comment #6 from Libin Dang --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #2) > Using latest GCC release you can see what happens: > > $ g++ pr96919.cc --coverage && ./a.out && gcov a-pr96919.cc -t > hello > libgcov profiling > error:/home/marxi

[Bug tree-optimization/97558] [11 Regression] ICE in vect_slp_analyze_node_operations, at tree-vect-slp.c:3342 since r11-4227-g655f7f0fb7c9aa2f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97558 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug ada/97557] [11 regression] several ada test case failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97557 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0

[Bug tree-optimization/97559] ICE at -O1 and above on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu: verify_ssa failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97559 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug rtl-optimization/97554] ICE: during RTL pass: cprop /segfault in sbitmap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97554 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ipa/97575] [11 Regression] ICE in try_make_edge_direct_simple_call, at ipa-prop.c:3671 or in propagate_controlled_uses, at ipa-prop.c:4073

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97575 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0

[Bug ipa/97565] -flto -ipa-pta ICE: at cgraph_node::get_untransformed_body()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97565 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-10-26 Assignee|unassigne

[Bug ipa/97576] [11 Regression] ICE: verify_cgraph_node failed (error: reference to dead statement)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97576 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||openmp Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/97559] ICE at -O1 and above on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu: verify_ssa failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97559 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- OK, so as expected this is static bool statement_sink_location (gimple *stmt, basic_block frombb, gimple_stmt_iterator *togsi, bool *zero_uses_p) { ... /* If this is a load th

[Bug preprocessor/97577] New: [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in get_location_from_adhoc_loc)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97577 Bug ID: 97577 Summary: [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in get_location_from_adhoc_loc) Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: error-r

[Bug tree-optimization/97539] [10/11 Regression] ICE verify_ssa failed since r10-4200-gb7ff7cef5005721e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97539 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- So the fundamental issue is that we have a debug-only live use and we do not have LC SSA for those. When vectorizer epilogue peeling then creates the loop copy the debug use is still refering to the first l

[Bug tree-optimization/97558] [11 Regression] ICE in vect_slp_analyze_node_operations, at tree-vect-slp.c:3342 since r11-4227-g655f7f0fb7c9aa2f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97558 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Huh. OK, so we're having a !relevant and !live stmt in the SLP tree, and the removed check for !vectype caught this.

[Bug driver/97574] Allow for nul output with Windows

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97574 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- I think "nul" should work, but it looks like the error is in the linker, ld.exe, not GCC.

[Bug driver/97574] Allow for nul output with Windows

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97574 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug ipa/97551] ICE: verify_cgraph_node failed with "-O2 -fno-toplevel-reorder -fno-tree-dce -fno-tree-forwprop -fno-tree-fre -fipa-cp-clone"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97551 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0 Known to fail|

[Bug ipa/97575] [11 Regression] ICE in try_make_edge_direct_simple_call, at ipa-prop.c:3671 or in propagate_controlled_uses, at ipa-prop.c:4073

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97575 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ipa/97576] [11 Regression] ICE: verify_cgraph_node failed (error: reference to dead statement)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97576 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Known to work|

[Bug ipa/97576] [11 Regression] ICE: verify_cgraph_node failed (error: reference to dead statement)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97576 --- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka --- The problem here is that clone materialization invalidates statement pointers in refs. We clean these at the begining of late optimization, I guess it should be done on demand during materialization (they are

[Bug tree-optimization/97558] [11 Regression] ICE in vect_slp_analyze_node_operations, at tree-vect-slp.c:3342 since r11-4227-g655f7f0fb7c9aa2f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97558 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- But then in vect_fixup_scalar_cycles_with_patterns we leave us with a reduction chain with eventually half irrelevant stmts because we mix in-pattern and non-in-pattern stmts for gcc.dg/vect/pr83965-2.c. Wi

[Bug c++/97569] Declaring a struct in a field declaration of another struct. gcc and clang difference.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97569 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- Ah right, so int main() { struct A { struct B *b; struct C {} *c; }; using U = B; using V = C; } For the `struct C {}` case that explicitly defines

[Bug tree-optimization/97559] ICE at -O1 and above on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu: verify_ssa failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97559 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||10.2.0 Known to fail|

[Bug driver/97574] Allow for nul output with Windows

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97574 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/53929] Bug in the use of Intel asm syntax when a global is named "and"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53929 --- Comment #6 from jbeulich at suse dot com --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3) > The problem is that the intel asm syntax is just badly defined (broken by > design). I'm not aware of any compiler that would emit for such testcases >

[Bug target/53929] Bug in the use of Intel asm syntax when a global is named "and"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53929 --- Comment #7 from jbeulich at suse dot com --- For the problem originally reported here (operator name space collision) a workaround could be introduced (e.g. a new operand to .intel_syntax to allow suppressing the recognition of MASM-like opera

[Bug tree-optimization/97556] [11 Regression] ICE at -O2 and -O3 in 32-bit mode on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu in size_remaining, at builtins.c:235 since r11-3827

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97556 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- I think the problem is that compute_objsize doesn't bother to check for any kind of overflow on any arithmetics it does. E.g. in: 4815 offset_int sz = wi::to_offset (tpsize); 4816 or

[Bug tree-optimization/97559] [11 Regression] ICE at -O1 and above on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu: verify_ssa failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97559 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|ICE at -O1 and above on |[11 Regression] ICE at -O1

[Bug tree-optimization/97539] [10/11 Regression] ICE verify_ssa failed since r10-4200-gb7ff7cef5005721e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97539 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:27c14056f4805c9d8cfc655ef2c846be128b02c9 commit r11-4376-g27c14056f4805c9d8cfc655ef2c846be128b02c9 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug rtl-optimization/97554] ICE: during RTL pass: cprop /segfault in sbitmap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97554 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/97539] [10 Regression] ICE verify_ssa failed since r10-4200-gb7ff7cef5005721e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97539 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail|11.0| Summary|[10/11 Regression]

[Bug c++/97572] [c++ 20] Constraining is broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97572 --- Comment #2 from Dimitri Gorokhovik --- Fair enough, passing a boolean by value into 'any()' is evaluation of local parameter 't', and that is prohibited (7.5.7.4/2). Doesn't this merit a better diagnostics though? A slightly modified code:

[Bug libstdc++/97570] avr-gcc: error: 'void* memalign' redeclared as different kind of entity

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97570 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Assignee|unassigned at gcc

[Bug target/95458] Inline strncmp is *much* slower than glibc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95458 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4052c05e5b30fee0fb95a51e74e12a56dce29491 commit r11-4380-g4052c05e5b30fee0fb95a51e74e12a56dce29491 Author: H.J. Lu Date: Wed Jul 15 10:

[Bug target/95458] Inline strncmp is *much* slower than glibc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95458 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug target/95151] [9/10/11 Regression] Add cmpmemM pattern for -minline-all-stringops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95151 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/97521] [11 Regression] wrong code with -mno-sse2 since r11-3394

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97521 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|REOPENED

[Bug target/97521] [11 Regression] wrong code with -mno-sse2 since r11-3394

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97521 --- Comment #23 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:605c2a393d3a2db86454a70fd7c9467db434060c commit r11-4381-g605c2a393d3a2db86454a70fd7c9467db434060c Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug c/97578] New: ice during IPA pass: inline

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97578 Bug ID: 97578 Summary: ice during IPA pass: inline Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee:

[Bug c++/97572] [c++ 20] Constraining is broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97572 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic --- Comment #3 from Jonatha

[Bug tree-optimization/97546] [11 Regression][SVE] ICE with -fenable-tree-bswap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97546 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Kyrylo Tkachov : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7f0ce82a4c033b78ec5131a27bac87271bb95185 commit r11-4382-g7f0ce82a4c033b78ec5131a27bac87271bb95185 Author: Kyrylo Tkachov Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/97579] [11 Regression] ICE in gimple_expand_vec_cond_expr, at gimple-isel.cc:201 since r11-4123-g128f43cf679e5156

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97579 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/97546] [11 Regression][SVE] ICE with -fenable-tree-bswap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97546 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug tree-optimization/97579] New: [11 Regression] ICE in gimple_expand_vec_cond_expr, at gimple-isel.cc:201 since r11-4123-g128f43cf679e5156

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97579 Bug ID: 97579 Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in gimple_expand_vec_cond_expr, at gimple-isel.cc:201 since r11-4123-g128f43cf679e5156 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCON

[Bug c/97578] ice during IPA pass: inline

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97578 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Keywords|

[Bug c/97578] ice during IPA pass: inline

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97578 --- Comment #2 from David Binderman --- Here is a second simpler test case: int a; static void b(int c) { if (a) while (c) b(0); d(); } void e(c) { b(c); } void f() { e(0); }

[Bug c++/97572] [c++ 20] Constraining is broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97572 --- Comment #4 from Dimitri Gorokhovik --- I probably cannot objectively tell anymore which one is better, since I just read the specification. However, subjectively, Clang's diagnostics: a) seems to have phrasing much closer to the spec, and

[Bug libstdc++/97561] coroutine_handle doesn't have inheritance

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97561 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/97579] [11 Regression] ICE in gimple_expand_vec_cond_expr, at gimple-isel.cc:201 since r11-4123-g128f43cf679e5156

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97579 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Target|

[Bug libstdc++/97561] coroutine_handle doesn't have inheritance

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97561 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- Do you have a real world use case where the inheritance is actually required?

[Bug preprocessor/97577] [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in get_location_from_adhoc_loc)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97577 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0

[Bug libstdc++/97570] avr-gcc: error: 'void* memalign' redeclared as different kind of entity

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97570 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- Thanks for the report. It's fixed on the development trunk now, but I will also backport it to the release branches.

[Bug libstdc++/97570] avr-gcc: error: 'void* memalign' redeclared as different kind of entity

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97570 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:93e9a7bcd5434a24c945de33cd7fa01a25f68418 commit r11-4383-g93e9a7bcd5434a24c945de33cd7fa01a25f68418 Author: Jonathan Wakely Date:

[Bug c++/97562] NRVO is very fragile (adding an extra scope breaks the optimization)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97562 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- Dup of PR 51571 ?

[Bug c/97578] ice during IPA pass: inline

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97578 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at redhat dot com,

[Bug libstdc++/97570] avr-gcc: error: 'void* memalign' redeclared as different kind of entity

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97570 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Matwey V. Kornilov from comment #0) > Then gcc and libstdc++ are compiled and installed successfully without any > further errors. P.S. this is great news. I've been meaning to check this myse

[Bug c++/97562] NRVO is very fragile (adding an extra scope breaks the optimization)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97562 --- Comment #2 from Barry Revzin --- Yep, looks like the same issue to me.

[Bug ipa/97576] [11 Regression] ICE: verify_cgraph_node failed (error: reference to dead statement)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97576 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug c++/97580] New: reinterpret_cast<> and constant expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97580 Bug ID: 97580 Summary: reinterpret_cast<> and constant expression Product: gcc Version: 7.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug ipa/97576] [11 Regression] ICE: verify_cgraph_node failed (error: reference to dead statement)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97576 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jan Hubicka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:783dc02d89712f5219093d33ad7f08e1509a2134 commit r11-4385-g783dc02d89712f5219093d33ad7f08e1509a2134 Author: Jan Hubicka Date: Mon Oc

[Bug libfortran/97581] New: libgfortran/intrinsics/random.c:754: bad array size ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97581 Bug ID: 97581 Summary: libgfortran/intrinsics/random.c:754: bad array size ? Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug c++/97580] reinterpret_cast<> and constant expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97580 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug ipa/97576] [11 Regression] ICE: verify_cgraph_node failed (error: reference to dead statement)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97576 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug c++/97580] reinterpret_cast<> and constant expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97580 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid Status|UNCO

[Bug rtl-optimization/97497] gcse wrong code generation with partial register clobbers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97497 --- Comment #7 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Andreas Krebbel from comment #6) > Alternatively I could also mark r12 as preserved across function calls for > -fpic in the backend. In fact all the bits we care about are preserv

[Bug c++/97582] New: Regression Internal compiler error in lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97582 Bug ID: 97582 Summary: Regression Internal compiler error in lambda Product: gcc Version: 9.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug fortran/97571] long parsing phase for simple array constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97571 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug gcov-profile/96919] [GCOV] uncovered line of stack allocation while using virutal destructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96919 --- Comment #7 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Libin Dang from comment #6) > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #2) > > Using latest GCC release you can see what happens: > > > > $ g++ pr96919.cc --coverage && ./a.out && gcov a-pr96919.cc

[Bug c++/97582] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE tree check: expected function_type or method_type, have error_mark in add_function_candidate, at cp/call.c:2146 since r9-6405-gbddee796d0b4800b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97582 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/40876] OpenMP private variable referenced in a statement function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40876 Bill Long changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|DUPLICATE |--- Status|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/42478] [meta-bug] gfortran OpenMP bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42478 Bug 42478 depends on bug 40876, which changed state. Bug 40876 Summary: OpenMP private variable referenced in a statement function https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40876 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug tree-optimization/97555] [11 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu since r11-3685

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97555 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Macleod --- : f.0_1 = f; _2 = 1 % f.0_1; h_24 = (char) _2; _3 = _2; c = _3; _4 = b.a; _5 = (int) _4; _6 = ~_5; f = _6; if (_4 != -1) goto ; [INV] else goto ; [INV] when calculating the

[Bug tree-optimization/97555] [11 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu since r11-3685

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97555 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org --- Com

[Bug target/96879] [11 Regresssion] ICE in native_encode_rtx, at simplify-rtx.c:6482

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96879 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assigne

[Bug c++/51571] No named return value optimization while adding a dummy scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51571 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||barry.revzin at gmail dot com --- Commen

[Bug c++/97562] NRVO is very fragile (adding an extra scope breaks the optimization)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97562 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE CC|

[Bug c++/51571] No named return value optimization while adding a dummy scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51571 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/96342] [SVE] Add support for "omp declare simd"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96342 --- Comment #6 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment on attachment 49413 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49413 part1-patch Thanks for the summary and patches, and sorry for the delayed reply. Taking part1-patch firs

[Bug c++/97533] ICE encountering operator() within lambda expression within templated struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97533 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org Target Mil

[Bug target/96342] [SVE] Add support for "omp declare simd"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96342 --- Comment #7 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment on attachment 49414 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49414 part2-patch Nice :-) For the constant_multiple_p calls that calculate a vector multiple, it might be goo

[Bug c++/97479] Auto as template argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97479 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-10-26 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug tree-optimization/97456] [10/11 Regression] An incorrect optimization causes a function to always return the same value when using -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97456 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Martin Jambor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d99b9dea37adfb88de2af121d31eed1c06b174b4 commit r10-8945-gd99b9dea37adfb88de2af121d31eed1c06b174b4 Author: Martin Jambor D

[Bug c++/97479] Auto as template argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97479 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/97456] [10/11 Regression] An incorrect optimization causes a function to always return the same value when using -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97456 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug c++/97536] [concepts] parser segfault for concept defined in function template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97536 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/97553] [missed optimization] constexprness not noticed when UBsan enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97553 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug bootstrap/97124] ICE when bootstrapping GCC on x86_64-w64-mingw32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97124 Liu Hao changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/96342] [SVE] Add support for "omp declare simd"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96342 --- Comment #8 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to yangyang from comment #3) > The work is mainly composed of three parts: the generating of SVE > functions for "omp declare simd" in pass_omp_simd_clone, the supporting of > SVE

[Bug c++/97446] gcc accepts an unnamed struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97446 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org Reso

[Bug c++/97418] error diagnostics do not point the use of undeclared identifier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97418 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/97555] [11 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu since r11-3685

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97555 --- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez --- The problem here is we're trying to add 1 to a -1 in a signed 1-bit field. Signed 1-bits are annoying because you can't really add or subtract one, because the one is unrepresentable. For invert() we have

[Bug c++/97376] Function type to function pointer type adjustment for non-type template parameter does not work when using decltype(auto)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97376 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC|

[Bug c++/97376] Function type to function pointer type adjustment for non-type template parameter does not work when using decltype(auto)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97376 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- s/pro/for/

[Bug rtl-optimization/97554] ICE: during RTL pass: cprop /segfault in sbitmap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97554 --- Comment #3 from Rimvydas (RJ) --- The g:50f9e1f4d458e36d306b2449c689e45492847f68 applied on top of gcc-10.2 release tarball also allows to compile without segfault in reasonable amount of time. Could this fix be added to gcc-10 branch for gcc

[Bug libstdc++/97561] coroutine_handle doesn't have inheritance

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97561 --- Comment #3 from stinkingmadgod at gmail dot com --- Thanks for the link. I was attempting to create a type-erased task type where the handles in one case was be passed in as a std::coroutine_handle<>& to avoid using std::function and the like

[Bug c++/97214] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE in lookup_template_class_1, at cp/pt.c:9896

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97214 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Summary|ICE in

[Bug c++/97214] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE in lookup_template_class_1, at cp/pt.c:9896

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97214 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.5

[Bug c++/97121] ICE (segfault) on incorrect default three-way comparison declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97121 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/92831] CWG1299 extend_ref_init_temps_1 punts on COND_EXPRs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92831 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/92831] CWG1299 extend_ref_init_temps_1 punts on COND_EXPRs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92831 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/97555] [11 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu since r11-3685

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97555 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Aldy Hernandez : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2118438f49f0c193abe3fa3def350a8129045746 commit r11-4390-g2118438f49f0c193abe3fa3def350a8129045746 Author: Aldy Hernandez Date:

[Bug rtl-optimization/97583] New: Unknown mode_attribute (or iterator) ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97583 Bug ID: 97583 Summary: Unknown mode_attribute (or iterator) ignored Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: rt

  1   2   >