https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97521
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ams at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #19
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97524
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Tom Stellard from comment #6)
> If I have make installed on my system, but am using something else (e.g.
> ninja) to build my project, will I still get parallel execution?
No, we construct an art
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97521
--- Comment #20 from Richard Biener ---
So at least the tree.c use of get_mask_mode only passes it MODE_VECTOR so
we don't have to second-guess the component size when passed a MODE_INT used
as representation for an integer vector type.
So I'm t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97534
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97538
Bug ID: 97538
Summary: ICE in during GIMPLE pass: wrestrict
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97538
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97539
Bug ID: 97539
Summary: error: definition in block 5 does not dominate use in
block 24
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97532
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
memory_operand calls general_operand which for MEM does:
/* Use the mem's mode, since it will be reloaded thus. LRA can
generate move insn with invalid addresses which is made valid
a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97535
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97524
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6fade5a6044b7102758f4ca66c8715ebc12a6306
commit r11-4279-g6fade5a6044b7102758f4ca66c8715ebc12a6306
Author: Martin Liska
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97524
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97540
Bug ID: 97540
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in lra_set_insn_recog_data, at
lra.c:1004 since r11-4202-g4de7b010038933dd
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97540
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97535
--- Comment #3 from Icenowy Zheng ---
A minimal reproduction: (Compile with gcc -c -O1)
```
#include
#define SIZE 2181038080
extern char raw_buffer[SIZE];
void setRaw(const void *raw)
{
memcpy(raw_buffer, raw, SIZE);
}
```
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97164
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:50bc94898fac1bd9cc1dabf227208fb5d369c4c4
commit r11-4282-g50bc94898fac1bd9cc1dabf227208fb5d369c4c4
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97532
--- Comment #8 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7)
> memory_operand calls general_operand which for MEM does:
> /* Use the mem's mode, since it will be reloaded thus. LRA can
> generate move insn with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97521
--- Comment #21 from Andrew Stubbs ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #19)
> GCN also uses MODE_INT for the mask mode and thus may be similarly affected.
> Andrew - are the bits in the mask dense? Thus for a V4SImode compare
> would th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97521
--- Comment #22 from Andrew Stubbs ---
(In reply to Andrew Stubbs from comment #21)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #19)
> > GCN also uses MODE_INT for the mask mode and thus may be similarly affected.
> > Andrew - are the bits in the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97539
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97537
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
But the compiler never sees that #include, because it's guarded by the #ifndef
The -H option is not a general purpose dependency scanner, it just shows the
result of preprocessing. The documentation is cle
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97537
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Oh sorry, I misread your example. The second #include "header3.h" is indeed
reached. The header is skipped due to the optimization described at
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/cpp/Once-Only-Headers.html so t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97538
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 49428
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49428&action=edit
test-case
I see it also on x86_64-linux-gnu with ASAN:
$ /home/marxin/Programming/gcc2/objdir/gcc/xg++ -B
/home
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97538
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||11.0
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Alexandre Oliva :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9e3b9ddb996f18d541a3e03611d46c3a6c0c0b5f
commit r11-4314-g9e3b9ddb996f18d541a3e03611d46c3a6c0c0b5f
Author: Alexandre Oliva
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97535
--- Comment #4 from Tamar Christina ---
Yeah, the overflow in the signed type is causing the number of instructions
guard to fail.
I'll submit a patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
--- Comment #8 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
---
(In reply to Alexandre Oliva from comment #5)
> Created attachment 49427 [details]
> patch that should fix the remaining s390 problem
>
> So, the issue is already fixed on aarch64-*, powerpc*-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97534
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-10-23
Stat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97528
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97541
Bug ID: 97541
Summary: Ada failed to bootstrap: Error: file table slot 1 is
already occupied by a different file
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97541
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97540
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
target?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97539
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97542
Bug ID: 97542
Summary: Enable OpenMP efficient performance profiling via ITT
tracing
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97542
--- Comment #1 from Vitaly Slobodskoy ---
Created attachment 49430
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49430&action=edit
ITT API
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97542
--- Comment #2 from Vitaly Slobodskoy ---
Created attachment 49431
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49431&action=edit
Autogenerated files changes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97542
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||openmp
--- Comment #3 from Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97541
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97541
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> So isn't that yet another thing that needs to be changed/fixed in gas?
> Plus on the gcc side add a test for that once it is fixed in binutils?
I think this is a GCC b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97541
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|jakub at redhat dot com|mark at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97541
--- Comment #5 from Mark Wielaard ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4)
> # 82 "s-atocou.adb" 1
> isn't a .file assignment though.
> As I said earlier, if we don't want to revert the r11-3693 change and be
> able to specify -gdwarf-5 et
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97543
Bug ID: 97543
Summary: powerpc64le: libgcc has unexpected long double in
.gnu_attribute
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97541
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 49432
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49432&action=edit
a-stzunb.s.xz
The assembly (though, I don't have binutils 2.35.1+ around, so can't verify
easily myself now).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97541
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Host||https://sourceware.org/bugz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97540
--- Comment #2 from Hongtao.liu ---
2588 /* For special_memory_operand, there could be a memory operand
inside,
2589 and it would cause a mismatch for constraint_satisfied_p. */
2590 if (UNARY_P (op) && op == ext
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97544
Bug ID: 97544
Summary: -Wtype-limits triggered for comparison to template
argument
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97544
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97545
Bug ID: 97545
Summary: ICE since commit 90e88fd376b and using
selective-scheduling2
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97538
--- Comment #3 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Created attachment 49434
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49434&action=edit
proposed patch in testing
Ranger was returning undefined, which caused get_size_range() to use an
uninitialize
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97546
Bug ID: 97546
Summary: [SVE] ICE with -fenable-tree-bswap
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97544
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
It's right, but it's not helpful. There are other instantiations of the
template where the condition isn't always true, and users shouldn't have to
write the condition as (N != 0 && i < N) just to silence t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97544
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97546
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96742
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to William Throwe from comment #2)
> This warns if passed an array of length 0 because the for-loop condition is
> always false. Any change I can make to fix it seems to make the code worse.
> I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97546
--- Comment #2 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Likely find_bswap_or_nop just needs to bail out if !cst_and_fits_in_hwi
(TYPE_SIZE_UNIT (gimple_expr_type (stmt)))
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96742
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Oh and since C++17 you can do:
if constexpr (N != 0)
for (size_t i = 0; i < N; ++i) {
ret += i * x[i];
}
but it still shouldn't be necessary :-)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97546
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97547
Bug ID: 97547
Summary: How to fix problem causing warning?
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97544
--- Comment #4 from Benedek Thaler ---
FTR, Using (N != 0 && i < N) does not silence the warning.
https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/WqaT3G
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97544
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96742
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||erenon2 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97548
Bug ID: 97548
Summary: bogus -Wvla-parameter on a bound expression involving
a parameter
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97549
Bug ID: 97549
Summary: include/pstl rebase breaking
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97532
--- Comment #9 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #6)
>
>
> Shouldn't memory_operand (XEXP (op, 0), GET_MODE (XEXP (op, 0))) imply
> legitimate_address_p?
memory_operand does not imply legitimate_address_p. When L
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97550
Bug ID: 97550
Summary: libgcc ICE on x86_64-linux-gnu compiler hosted on
msys2
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 11.0.0 20201023 (experimental) (GCC)
git version: 43868df37b0e1fa19c32175b41dd7dc1e7c515fd
***
Command Lines:
$ gcc -Wall -Wextra -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97552
Bug ID: 97552
Summary: missing waning passing null to a VLA argument declared
[static]
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97553
Bug ID: 97553
Summary: [missed optimization] constexprness not noticed when
UBsan enabled
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
se from autogenerated verifier of observations, that
is now failing to compile after including newest meteorological data.
gcc version 11.0.0 20201023 (experimental) linux x86_64
$ gcc -Wall -Wextra -O2 -c nwp_test.c
during RTL pass: cprop
nwp_test.c: In function 'obs_verif_body_entry':
nw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97553
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97550
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ian at airs dot com
--- Comment #1 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97459
--- Comment #10 from Thomas Koenig ---
There are a couple of more constants for this could be tried.
Base 7:
static unsigned
rem_7_v2 (mytype n)
{
unsigned long a, b, c, d;
a = n & MASK_48;
b = (n >> 48) & MASK_48;
c = n >> 96;
retur
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97543
Gustavo Walbon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gustavowalbon at gmail dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97543
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97463
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7991e963239160624b22a12caaacce95d3667e49
commit r11-4326-g7991e963239160624b22a12caaacce95d3667e49
Author: Martin Sebor
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97552
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:757ba6653c2699761c2243e0194749a6695112d8
commit r11-4327-g757ba6653c2699761c2243e0194749a6695112d8
Author: Martin Sebor
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97463
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97552
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97543
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
This part of the attribute (all but the low 2 bits) is not documented
in the as manual, btw.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87403
Bug 87403 depends on bug 91741, which changed state.
Bug 91741 Summary: Implement new warning -Wsizeof-array-div
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91741
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91741
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
version 11.0.0 20201023 (experimental) [master revision
7991e963239:9cbfe237f74:757ba6653c2699761c2243e0194749a6695112d8] (GCC)
[537] %
[537] % gcctk -O1 small.c; ./a.out
[538] %
[538] % gcctk -Os small.c
[539] % ./a.out
Floating point exception
[540] %
[540] % cat small.c
struct {
int a:1;
} b
-system-zlib
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 11.0.0 20201023 (experimental) [master revision
7991e963239:9cbfe237f74:757ba6653c2699761c2243e0194749a6695112d8] (GCC)
[521] %
[521] % gcctk -m32 -Os -c small.c
[522] %
[522] % gcctk -m32 -O2 -c small.c
during
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97557
Bug ID: 97557
Summary: [11 regression] several ada test case failures
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95979
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96742
Hana Dusíková changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hanicka at hanicka dot net
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97543
--- Comment #4 from Peter Bergner ---
Created attachment 49436
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49436&action=edit
patch file
So libgcc compiles are explicitly using -mlong-double-128, which doesn't seem
right when GCC is conf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97543
--- Comment #5 from Michael Meissner ---
One of my patches for adding IEEE 128-bit long double may help with this
situation. The ibm-ldouble.c module was not being compiled with
-mno-gnu-attributes would affect things if a different long double
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97543
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97558
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97558
Bug ID: 97558
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in
vect_slp_analyze_node_operations, at
tree-vect-slp.c:3342 since r11-4227-g655f7f0fb7c9aa2f
Product: gcc
Version: 11.
91 matches
Mail list logo
