[Bug c++/97268] Segfault on 11.0.0 20200930

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97268 --- Comment #2 from Burak Arslan --- Sorry about that. Here is the cmdline: g++ prog.cc -Wall -Wextra -std=gnu++2a

[Bug c++/97268] Segfault on 11.0.0 20200930

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97268 --- Comment #3 from Burak Arslan --- Sorry about that. Here is the cmdline: g++ prog.cc -Wall -Wextra -std=gnu++2a

[Bug c++/97268] 11 Regression] Segfault on 11.0.0 20200930

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97268 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0 Status|WAITING

[Bug c++/97268] [11 Regression] ICE in maybe_warn_pass_by_reference at gcc/tree-ssa-uninit.c:514 since r11-1763-g27aebb7d6cf14175

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97268 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||10.2.0 Summary|[11 Regression]

[Bug target/89233] [9 Regression] ICE in change_address_1, at emit-rtl.c:2286

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89233 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- *** Bug 88082 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug target/88082] ICE in change_address_1, at emit-rtl.c:2286

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88082 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW

[Bug target/96879] [11 Regresssion] ICE in native_encode_rtx, at simplify-rtx.c:6482

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96879 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- Any progress on this. Are you planning Jakub to suggest the patch?

[Bug target/96879] [11 Regresssion] ICE in native_encode_rtx, at simplify-rtx.c:6482

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96879 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-10-02 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/97269] New: [11 Regression] ICE in change_address_1, at emit-rtl.c:2275 since r11-3427-ge94797250b403d66cb3624a594e41faf0dd76617

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97269 Bug ID: 97269 Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in change_address_1, at emit-rtl.c:2275 since r11-3427-ge94797250b403d66cb3624a594e41faf0dd76617 Product: gcc Version:

[Bug target/97269] [11 Regression] ICE in change_address_1, at emit-rtl.c:2275 since r11-3427-ge94797250b403d66cb3624a594e41faf0dd76617

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97269 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-10-02 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/97270] New: [11 Regression] ICE in do_store_flag, at expr.c:12247 since r11-1445-g502d63b6d61415

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97270 Bug ID: 97270 Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in do_store_flag, at expr.c:12247 since r11-1445-g502d63b6d61415 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywo

[Bug tree-optimization/97270] [11 Regression] ICE in do_store_flag, at expr.c:12247 since r11-1445-g502d63b6d61415

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97270 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug sanitizer/97229] pointer-compare sanitizer is very slow due to __asan::IsAddressNearGlobal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97229 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 49298 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49298&action=edit Reduced test-case There's reduced test-case: $ gcc pointer-cmp.c -fsanitize=address,pointer-compare && ASAN_OPT

[Bug sanitizer/97229] pointer-compare sanitizer is very slow due to __asan::IsAddressNearGlobal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97229 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- I've got a hackish patch that tries to resolve that. Basically, linear iteration of globals is very slow and a better data structure should be used (I used sorted list), so each lookup is at least O(log N). I'

[Bug sanitizer/97229] pointer-compare sanitizer is very slow due to __asan::IsAddressNearGlobal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97229 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 49299 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49299&action=edit Hackish patch candidate

[Bug sanitizer/97229] pointer-compare sanitizer is very slow due to __asan::IsAddressNearGlobal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97229 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING URL|

[Bug gcov-profile/96913] [10 regression] gcov TOPN streaming is incorrect for shared libraries

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96913 --- Comment #9 from Sergei Trofimovich --- (In reply to Sergei Trofimovich from comment #8) > Should be fixed for gcc-11. Will send a backport to gcc-10 this evening (the > code changed slightly since gcc-10). gcc-10 backport sent for review as

[Bug tree-optimization/96979] [9/10/11 Regression] Switch with case values derived from constexpr function takes unreasonable time to compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96979 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gcov-profile/64636] LTO PGO bootstrap fails on linux-sparc64 in stream_out_histogram_value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64636 --- Comment #18 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Martin Liska : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7c55364eaaf5f882e80e8943e702081f9648f582 commit r9-8968-g7c55364eaaf5f882e80e8943e702081f9648f582 Author: Martin Liska Date

[Bug gcov-profile/97069] Zero valued #line directive results in excessively large blocks of memory being allocated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97069 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Martin Liska : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:20f699a44492f2f43351d19849873d1112ffc7e0 commit r9-8967-g20f699a44492f2f43351d19849873d1112ffc7e0 Author: Martin Liska Date:

[Bug gcov-profile/64636] LTO PGO bootstrap fails on linux-sparc64 in stream_out_histogram_value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64636 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug gcov-profile/97069] Zero valued #line directive results in excessively large blocks of memory being allocated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97069 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gcov-profile/97193] [9/10/11 Regression] .gcno files are not written to same directory as the object file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97193 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f8dcbea5d2fb17dca3a7de97f15fc49997222365 commit r11-3614-gf8dcbea5d2fb17dca3a7de97f15fc49997222365 Author: Martin Liska Date: Fri

[Bug gcov-profile/97193] [9/10 Regression] .gcno files are not written to same directory as the object file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97193 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[9/10/11 Regression] .gcno |[9/10 Regression] .gcno

[Bug target/83562] broken destructors of thread_local objects on i686 mingw targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83562 ralphengels at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ralphengels at gmail dot c

[Bug gcov-profile/97193] [9/10 Regression] .gcno files are not written to same directory as the object file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97193 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Martin Liska : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f97ef0b2dfdad07db3d564b932c7b7373654b7d4 commit r10-8843-gf97ef0b2dfdad07db3d564b932c7b7373654b7d4 Author: Martin Liska Dat

[Bug gcov-profile/97193] [9/10 Regression] .gcno files are not written to same directory as the object file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97193 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Martin Liska : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:991a376015309ac9b413eeb97d94511908498e9a commit r9-8969-g991a376015309ac9b413eeb97d94511908498e9a Author: Martin Liska Date:

[Bug gcov-profile/97193] [9/10 Regression] .gcno files are not written to same directory as the object file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97193 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gcov-profile/96919] [GCOV] uncovered line of stack allocation while using virutal destructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96919 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|marxin at gcc dot

[Bug c++/81271] gcc/cp/lex.c:116: wrong condition ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81271 --- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell --- fwiw, I was kind of hoping the compiler could spot the test of three adjacent bits and do a 3-bit extraction and comparison to zero.

[Bug c++/97268] [11 Regression] ICE in maybe_warn_pass_by_reference at gcc/tree-ssa-uninit.c:514 since r11-1763-g27aebb7d6cf14175

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97268 --- Comment #6 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #5) > Started with Nathan's commit. r11-1763-g27aebb7d6cf14175

[Bug target/96528] [11 Regression] vector comparisons on ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96528 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|A

[Bug tree-optimization/97228] [11 regression] New ICEs on arm since r11-3426 g:10843f8303509fcba880c6c05c08e4b4ccd24f36

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97228 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolutio

[Bug target/97012] [SVE] Extend PR96357 to other aarch64-sve.md patterns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97012 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rsandifo at gcc dot

[Bug gcov-profile/96913] [10 regression] gcov TOPN streaming is incorrect for shared libraries

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96913 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Sergei Trofimovich : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b843d57c57ac92c9cd38eec7289da2f1ea696f18 commit r10-8844-gb843d57c57ac92c9cd38eec7289da2f1ea696f18 Author: Sergei Tro

[Bug gcov-profile/96913] [10 regression] gcov TOPN streaming is incorrect for shared libraries

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96913 Sergei Trofimovich changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/97271] New: [ARM MVE]: Wrong code generated for scatter store with writeback intrinsics with -O2.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97271 Bug ID: 97271 Summary: [ARM MVE]: Wrong code generated for scatter store with writeback intrinsics with -O2. Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Seve

[Bug target/97271] [ARM MVE]: Wrong code generated for scatter store with writeback intrinsics with -O2.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97271 SRINATH PARVATHANENI changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever confirmed|0

[Bug bootstrap/95582] [11 Regression] LTO lean + PGO bootstrap is broken in Ada

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95582 --- Comment #14 from Martin Liška --- > Yes, it works. I've been using it for some time in out gcc11 package. PING

[Bug c++/97266] "enum constant in boolean context" warning seems incorrect

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97266 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/97256] auto function return different result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97256 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|NEW

[Bug target/97269] [11 Regression] ICE in change_address_1, at emit-rtl.c:2275 since r11-3427-ge94797250b403d66cb3624a594e41faf0dd76617

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97269 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0

[Bug fortran/97245] ASSOCIATE intrinsic does not recognize a ponter variable the second time it is used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97245 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/97266] "enum constant in boolean context" warning seems incorrect

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97266 --- Comment #6 from m farazma --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #5) > Neither of those cases are constants, and the warning documentation (and the > actual diagnostic itself) talk about constants. > > But there's still no warning for

[Bug fortran/97272] New: Wrong answer from MAXLOC with character arg

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97272 Bug ID: 97272 Summary: Wrong answer from MAXLOC with character arg Product: gcc Version: 10.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fort

[Bug fortran/97224] [8/9/10/11 Regression] SPECCPU 2006 Gamess fails to build after g:e5a76af3a2f3324efc60b4b2778ffb29d5c377bc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97224 --- Comment #8 from Ev Drikos --- Created attachment 49301 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49301&action=edit test-case with a module Hello again, Here is another test-case with a module. It's a question if this should fail

[Bug libstdc++/97273] New: Strange behaviour of unordered_set when vector is included (i686)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97273 Bug ID: 97273 Summary: Strange behaviour of unordered_set when vector is included (i686) Product: gcc Version: 10.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libgomp/81778] libgomp.c/for-5.c failure on nvptx -- illegal memory access

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81778 --- Comment #11 from Tobias Burnus --- Cross ref: the submitted patch is at https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-October/555352.html

[Bug libstdc++/97273] [8/9/10/11 Regression] Strange behaviour of unordered_set when vector is included (i686)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97273 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Known to work|

[Bug c++/97268] [11 Regression] ICE in maybe_warn_pass_by_reference at gcc/tree-ssa-uninit.c:514 since r11-1763-g27aebb7d6cf14175

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97268 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/97274] New: Need ability to ensure no warning about tmpnam

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97274 Bug ID: 97274 Summary: Need ability to ensure no warning about tmpnam Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c/97274] Need ability to ensure no warning about tmpnam

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97274 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- The linker issues the warning, because the symbol in glibc is annotated to cause a warning. It has nothing to do with GCC.

[Bug c/97274] Need ability to ensure no warning about tmpnam

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97274 --- Comment #2 from Eyal Rozenberg --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1) > The linker issues the warning, because the symbol in glibc is annotated to > cause a warning. It has nothing to do with GCC. Hmm. There's still a question of

[Bug c/97274] Need ability to ensure no warning about tmpnam

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97274 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/97272] Wrong answer from MAXLOC with character arg

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97272 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/97272] Wrong answer from MAXLOC with character arg

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97272 --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Untested fix: diff --git a/gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.c b/gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.c index 3b3bd8629cd..9e9898c2bbf 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.c +++ b/gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic

[Bug bootstrap/92719] MacOS 10.15 Catalina build fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92719 Nikhil Benesch changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nikhil.benesch at gmail dot com --- Com

[Bug bootstrap/92719] MacOS 10.15 Catalina build fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92719 --- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Nikhil Benesch from comment #3) > For posterity, I could reproduce this issue even with the suggested > `./configure` arguments, i.e., excluding the `--enable-multilib` option. > I worked around t

[Bug fortran/97272] Wrong answer from MAXLOC with character arg

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97272 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot gnu.

[Bug bootstrap/92719] MacOS 10.15 Catalina build fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92719 --- Comment #5 from Nikhil Benesch --- Ah, sorry, I was imprecise before. By “system gmp” I meant a gmp installed by Homebrew, as in `brew install gmp`. I believe this is a third option from the two you listed. (At least, it is on non-macOS plat

[Bug fortran/95644] IEEE_FMA is missing from the IEEE_ARITHMETIC module

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95644 --- Comment #2 from Bill Long --- Any update on a fix for this? (The original customer is asking.)

[Bug fortran/95640] gfortran ieee_selected_real_kind returns 10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95640 --- Comment #19 from Bill Long --- On an ia64 Intel target that does not support x87 floating point, it seems that having IEEE_SUPPORT_DATATYPE (1._10) return .true. is as error. If that is fixed, will the rest of the issue fall into place?

[Bug rtl-optimization/97275] New: Linux kernel cgroup.c internal compiler error (ICE).

Component: rtl-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: dr.duncan.p.simpson at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Host: amd64-linux-gnu Target: aarch64-linux-gnu Build: 11.0.0 20201002 Created attachment 49303

[Bug c++/95806] Result of call with reference argument to newed object is cached during constant evaluation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95806 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/95808] Can mismatch non-array new/delete with array new/delete during constant evaluation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95808 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|wrong-code |accepts-invalid Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/97014] Class NTTPs not demangled in the compilation error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97014 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/96394] [10/11 Regression] ICE in add_new_edges_to_heap, at ipa-inline.c:1746 (-O3 PGO)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96394 --- Comment #20 from Sergei Trofimovich --- (In reply to Martin Jambor from comment #18) > I proposed the patch on the mailing list (I guess I should put Martin's name > at least to the testsuite ChangeLog and probably to both): > > https://gcc.

[Bug c++/96331] Class template argument deduction (CTAD) with Concepts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96331 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |--- Status|RESOLVED

[Bug c/97276] New: A whole if-block is ignored by avr-gcc 9.3.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97276 Bug ID: 97276 Summary: A whole if-block is ignored by avr-gcc 9.3.0 Product: gcc Version: 9.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug c/97276] A whole if-block is ignored by avr-gcc 9.3.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97276 --- Comment #1 from David Weese --- The README.txt also contains the steps to reproduce the pwm.s assemblies.

[Bug c++/97277] New: Lambda in fold expressions capture arguments are default initialized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97277 Bug ID: 97277 Summary: Lambda in fold expressions capture arguments are default initialized Product: gcc Version: 7.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/97273] [8/9/10/11 Regression] Strange behaviour of unordered_set when vector is included (i686)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97273 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/97278] New: increment or decrement operator on the same object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97278 Bug ID: 97278 Summary: increment or decrement operator on the same object Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: