https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97065
Bug ID: 97065
Summary: Support -fprofile-update=set (boolean counters)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95654
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #3)
> Created attachment 49222 [details]
> Slightly reduced example, compile with gfortran -fopenmp -O1 -ftracer
On the host side, a single BB gets inserted – but more
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97066
Bug ID: 97066
Summary: GCC11 regression caused by r11-3207
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimizat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97066
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|GCC11 regression caused by |[11 Regression] regression
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96987
--- Comment #4 from Iain Buclaw ---
And what about void pointers? How is it assumed that the pointed to object is
read when it has no value?
Expanded example loosely rewritten from the original library code.
---
void GC_addRange(const void * co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97065
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Severity|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97053
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bd909071ac04e94f4b6f0baab64d0687ec55681d
commit r11-3219-gbd909071ac04e94f4b6f0baab64d0687ec55681d
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97053
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7e97e7470e74b0d9a68000938a359a7049774d77
commit r10-8769-g7e97e7470e74b0d9a68000938a359a7049774d77
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97053
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95677
--- Comment #9 from liusujian ---
After lto and as:
/home/lsj/dts/SDK_CPU_RISCV/output/hcc_riscv32/hcc_riscv32/bin/../lib/gcc/riscv32-unknown-elf/7.3.0/../../../../riscv32-unknown-elf/bin/as
-v --traditional-format -march=rv32imc -march=rv32imc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97066
--- Comment #1 from Feng Xue ---
Both cases will be simplified with new pattern, and this is correct. Will
change test code to make that not happen.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97060
--- Comment #2 from Jiri Olsa ---
Created attachment 49223
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49223&action=edit
fs/init.i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97066
fxue at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |testsuite
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97060
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Sta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97060
--- Comment #4 from Jiri Olsa ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> So this is really just something like: -O2 -g -dA:
> extern int foo (unsigned int, unsigned int);
>
> int
> bar (void)
> {
> foo (1, 2);
> return 0;
> }
>
> whe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97060
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
So perhaps completely untested:
--- gcc/dwarf2out.c.jj 2020-09-07 13:17:58.383594248 +0200
+++ gcc/dwarf2out.c 2020-09-16 10:53:44.353632197 +0200
@@ -26547,7 +26547,8 @@ dwarf2out_early_global_decl (tre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97060
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|10.2.1 |11.0
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97060
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97067
Bug ID: 97067
Summary: UBSAN: False positive maybe-uninitialized
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: sanitize
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96789
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-09-16
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96789
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #7)
> Two questions in mind, need to dig into it further:
> 1) from the assembly of scalar/vector code, I don't see any stores needed
> into temp array d (array diff in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97060
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Unfortunately the patch doesn't really bootstrap.
Small testcase that ICEs:
struct S { virtual ~S (); } s;
This is on the external S::~S() declaration, which has non-NULL
decl_ultimate_origin (the abstract de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97068
Bug ID: 97068
Summary: Can't demangle a certain symbl
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: demangler
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97066
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Feng Xue :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f419a0158950034ed9996ae860b0c8df03731119
commit r11-3228-gf419a0158950034ed9996ae860b0c8df03731119
Author: Feng Xue
Date: Wed Sep 16 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96789
--- Comment #9 from Kewen Lin ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #8)
> (In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #7)
> > Two questions in mind, need to dig into it further:
> > 1) from the assembly of scalar/vector code, I don't see any sto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97032
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:453a20c65722719b9e2d84339f215e7ec87692dc
commit r11-3229-g453a20c65722719b9e2d84339f215e7ec87692dc
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Mon Sep 14 08:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97069
Bug ID: 97069
Summary: Zero valued #line directive results in excessively
large blocks of memory being allocated
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96789
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #9)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #8)
> > (In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #7)
> > > Two questions in mind, need to dig into it further:
> > > 1) from t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95654
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vries at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97070
Bug ID: 97070
Summary: Discrepancy in results between OpenMP/OpenACC
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95654
--- Comment #6 from Tom de Vries ---
Created attachment 49227
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49227&action=edit
Dumps for failing test-case
(In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #5)
> Minimal example:
> ...
> ! { dg-do run
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97033
Kaiyan Chang changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||changkaiyan at live dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97069
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97071
Bug ID: 97071
Summary: Fails to CSE / inherit constant pool load
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-opti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97071
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc64le
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97071
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96987
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor ---
A void pointer is usually cast to one to a complete type that's then used to
access the object (e.g., bsearch). But not every instance of every warning
should be expected to indicate a bug. Most only suggest
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97071
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
So on targets where the FP constant loads are separate insns the load of the
negated constant could be replaced by a (neg:DF ..) which might even be
profitable when not combined with the following add. As s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97071
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> REG_EQUAL notes aren't really needed for that, we have functions to query
> the values from the constant pool for loads from it.
> So guess it is a matter of loo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97071
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Related and more difficult case where the add is first and we'd want to
change the load of -3 to a load of 3 so we can CSE the 3 for the
multiplication.
double foo (double x)
{
return (x + -3.) * 3.;
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97061
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:91347c3bbf788ede4af89f46206991c47fa8aceb
commit r11-3232-g91347c3bbf788ede4af89f46206991c47fa8aceb
Author: Tobias Burnus
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97069
--- Comment #2 from Martin Ogden ---
I appreciate `#line 0 "main.c"` doesn't make much sense, but according to
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/cpp/Line-Control.html, 0 is a valid input.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97061
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95654
--- Comment #7 from Tom de Vries ---
Minimal example after commit 91347c3bbf7 "Fortran: OpenMP - fix simd with
(last)private (PR97061)":
...
! { dg-do run }
program main
implicit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95654
--- Comment #8 from Tom de Vries ---
Created attachment 49228
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49228&action=edit
Dumps for failing test-case (no collapse case)
(In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #7)
> Minimal example afte
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97034
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
// PR c++/97034
namespace N {
template struct S {
template S(T, U);
};
} // namespace N
template struct E {
template struct G { T t; };
void fn() { G{N::S{'a', 1}}; }
};
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96139
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Will Schmidt
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:74c624523bdbe4329c7cb77bff222ac695e36c95
commit r8-10453-g74c624523bdbe4329c7cb77bff222ac695e36c95
Author: Will Schmidt
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96497
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97072
Bug ID: 97072
Summary: -Wanalyzer-malloc-leak false positive when writing
through some pointers
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97073
Bug ID: 97073
Summary: Miscompilation with -m32 -O1 -march=i686
Product: gcc
Version: 8.4.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96958
Ryan Houdek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||houdek.r...@fex-emu.org
--- Comment #4 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97074
Bug ID: 97074
Summary: -Wanalyzer-malloc-leak false positive when merging
states
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97071
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97034
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
The same ICE can be triggered with
template
struct E {
template
struct G {
T t;
G(T) { }
};
void fn() { G{1}; }
};
which started with r269093.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97075
Bug ID: 97075
Summary: [11 regression] powerpc64 vector tests fails after
r11-3230
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97076
Bug ID: 97076
Summary: clang-format file does not work for some C++11 code
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97034
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
Another, valid, where C++20 aggregate CTAD should work:
template
struct E {
template
struct G {
T t;
};
void fn() { G{1}; }
};
void
g () {
E e;
e.fn ();
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94325
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:175f052446556d32e887e1658a5a92c3c2f3a6f5
commit r9-8875-g175f052446556d32e887e1658a5a92c3c2f3a6f5
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94438
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cb09410d3c61d325c64b17eabe9dfd1609cec1a6
commit r9-8876-gcb09410d3c61d325c64b17eabe9dfd1609cec1a6
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89494
--- Comment #26 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:489c62beef150f870d1755d3772bd2d0ce7344b4
commit r9-8878-g489c62beef150f870d1755d3772bd2d0ce7344b4
Author: Gustavo Romero
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94524
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:780b2ab071391495690141c61604370d6cf7af49
commit r9-8877-g780b2ab071391495690141c61604370d6cf7af49
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94618
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dea597314f4503228e23e887ddbb773cbf197093
commit r9-8881-gdea597314f4503228e23e887ddbb773cbf197093
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94641
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1e4a928134e8f17bbcae99f2bac2bbce73ef6f73
commit r9-8882-g1e4a928134e8f17bbcae99f2bac2bbce73ef6f73
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94571
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a43981bb51fd0b8e68452faea6ec160cbea058e5
commit r9-8879-ga43981bb51fd0b8e68452faea6ec160cbea058e5
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94755
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d6a341eb9170fdb21aee235142d1f09e6dc5c5cd
commit r9-8886-gd6a341eb9170fdb21aee235142d1f09e6dc5c5cd
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94705
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:934ede34973909eb15b678f88395d83be01433e7
commit r9-8883-g934ede34973909eb15b678f88395d83be01433e7
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94780
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1777beb6b12983b946dae4177470a319693fc0dc
commit r9-8887-g1777beb6b12983b946dae4177470a319693fc0dc
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94809
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:522022361984407ebc84cde22bdbd199261d0443
commit r9--g522022361984407ebc84cde22bdbd199261d0443
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94710
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:15e2cca37186c848d12f4a0bb9ebcb8be32ed9de
commit r9-8884-g15e2cca37186c848d12f4a0bb9ebcb8be32ed9de
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94621
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5b23b0c44692cc5e4d5e726f96497bff73094e7b
commit r9-8880-g5b23b0c44692cc5e4d5e726f96497bff73094e7b
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94742
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e9dbd80b5e62a126ccb40970f0fb233f7e0ac3a6
commit r9-8885-ge9dbd80b5e62a126ccb40970f0fb233f7e0ac3a6
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94826
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:540e1de23a70360fe9b626df8420be704d02e3a7
commit r9-8890-g540e1de23a70360fe9b626df8420be704d02e3a7
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95108
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b78ea59edbd354fed914d0f8eb78109db7316ce8
commit r9-8899-gb78ea59edbd354fed914d0f8eb78109db7316ce8
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94950
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:79002374e81588fa1052c21f3d397cf9ad61f97d
commit r9-8896-g79002374e81588fa1052c21f3d397cf9ad61f97d
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94873
--- Comment #24 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0f717ba5975ab42e1176db4cd2384f1862872519
commit r9-8895-g0f717ba5975ab42e1176db4cd2384f1862872519
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95080
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9d01f91514f627590adc408ac9a35a7153123119
commit r9-8898-g9d01f91514f627590adc408ac9a35a7153123119
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94832
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ccee0511abf6e0bb679fa6b4941e5a71a6521b12
commit r9-8892-gccee0511abf6e0bb679fa6b4941e5a71a6521b12
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94832
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f97bf9657cecaaf8afd14b43e5ca9be294ab870c
commit r9-8891-gf97bf9657cecaaf8afd14b43e5ca9be294ab870c
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94820
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:029d813ddf3595bfc93bfb4afad645dd033d21bf
commit r9-8889-g029d813ddf3595bfc93bfb4afad645dd033d21bf
Author: Haijian Zhang
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94951
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eca1dbea010ba4c18ccec90bacbad5d8ec72c09f
commit r9-8897-geca1dbea010ba4c18ccec90bacbad5d8ec72c09f
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95328
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8efa945b308307fd9b0313705f5826a8499de405
commit r9-8900-g8efa945b308307fd9b0313705f5826a8499de405
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94842
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b66139a3ba159473432edabb983c62219a28590d
commit r9-8894-gb66139a3ba159473432edabb983c62219a28590d
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95903
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a1eb6e41832816b671d3b945014f7e8255167470
commit r9-8902-ga1eb6e41832816b671d3b945014f7e8255167470
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95810
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6ff6c02695c9b6ae6e840422080f6d10449577b8
commit r9-8901-g6ff6c02695c9b6ae6e840422080f6d10449577b8
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96426
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3f804f63cde54ff94f35abd00953b050a4c861c7
commit r9-8905-g3f804f63cde54ff94f35abd00953b050a4c861c7
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96545
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:67627293b4fe2b230c6c32484752adb49f713315
commit r9-8908-g67627293b4fe2b230c6c32484752adb49f713315
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96571
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d2472e513c6490b6e2832b07d08731df26e6dc06
commit r9-8909-gd2472e513c6490b6e2832b07d08731df26e6dc06
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93553
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cdc1ed0ceaf7e520164c262358ea6bfe89ff027c
commit r9-8907-gcdc1ed0ceaf7e520164c262358ea6bfe89ff027c
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96729
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ace10c37de7c2f9f2d419337dc1f173c01f7ec7d
commit r9-8911-gace10c37de7c2f9f2d419337dc1f173c01f7ec7d
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96174
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fdcb6dae610aba75e23c1fd2d31b491691e54091
commit r9-8904-gfdcb6dae610aba75e23c1fd2d31b491691e54091
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96459
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:464ed899038051f80af1df7197e561f327502107
commit r9-8906-g464ed899038051f80af1df7197e561f327502107
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96722
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:acd97038dba34830520ed58915d509d21348b554
commit r9-8910-gacd97038dba34830520ed58915d509d21348b554
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96862
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:25542b27aa6a75ad0f7316c3767c957cce912fb7
commit r9-8912-g25542b27aa6a75ad0f7316c3767c957cce912fb7
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95857
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:62714a106493d0f1f22ff98c2dff2204f09cfcc0
commit r9-8903-g62714a106493d0f1f22ff98c2dff2204f09cfcc0
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96295
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8b75204b27cb2a296ac329d48918992b4053c61e
commit r11-3237-g8b75204b27cb2a296ac329d48918992b4053c61e
Author: Martin Sebor
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96295
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639
Bug 24639 depends on bug 96295, which changed state.
Bug 96295 Summary: [11 Regression] -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning for range
operator with reference to an empty struct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96295
What|Rem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96935
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:31dd5cd6344bfbbe122fb512993b128e11236d35
commit r11-3238-g31dd5cd6344bfbbe122fb512993b128e11236d35
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96935
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10/11 Regression] ICE in |[9/10 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94102
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
1 - 100 of 144 matches
Mail list logo
