https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96913
--- Comment #4 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
(In reply to Sergei Trofimovich from comment #3)
> Specifically I think this is already a wrong format on disk:
>
> > _json.gcda:01a7: 0:COUNTERS topn 0 counts
> > _json.gcda:01a9: 48
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40771
--- Comment #3 from Zdenek Sojka ---
The vectorized code seems to have improved in gcc-9 over gcc-8.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96854
--- Comment #11 from Michael_S ---
Just to understand
Will 10.1 and 10.2 be fixed?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96913
Sergei Trofimovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96947
Bug ID: 96947
Summary: _gfortran_caf_fail_image called with wrong number of
arguments
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96913
Sergei Trofimovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|gcc-11: __gcov_merge_topn |[10/11 regression] gcov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96394
--- Comment #8 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
Might end up being caused by the same bug in PR96913: TOPN streaming from/for
shared libraries is incorrect.
Proposed patch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-September/553320.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96854
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Michael_S from comment #11)
> Just to understand
> Will 10.1 and 10.2 be fixed?
No, they were already released, so can't be fixed. You can apply the changes
to them if you want. The fix is on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96854
--- Comment #13 from Michael_S ---
I don't follow gcc versioning policy all that closely.
What is the function "micro" versions now? For internal use and experimentation
only, but not for public release?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96854
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The versioning is well documented https://gcc.gnu.org/develop.html#num_scheme
and the only way how things are fixed is fixing on the mainline and when needed
on still open release branches. Those will becom
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87256
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96854
--- Comment #15 from Michael_S ---
Thank you.
That does not sound too different from what I assumed in post above.
10.1.0 is release. Expected to be used by "normal" people.
10.1.1 was for purpose of development of 10.2.0. Since release of 10.2.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96854
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek ---
If you want bugfixes as in this case. The cadence on the release branches is
gradually slowing down, the last release is usually about a year about the one
before that. It is already quite a lot of work to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96947
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Franथà¤ois-Xavier Coudert
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3489d80fee42764460cb06f7a2e9f126c18602b4
commit r11-3018-g3489d80fee42764460cb06f7a2e9f126c18602b4
Author: Francois-Xa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96947
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53929
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96394
--- Comment #9 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
(In reply to Sergei Trofimovich from comment #8)
> Might end up being caused by the same bug in PR96913: TOPN streaming
> from/for shared libraries is incorrect.
>
> Proposed patch:
> https://gcc.gnu.or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95189
--- Comment #16 from Martin Sebor ---
I think it should be. Let me do it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96923
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96923
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||25290
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96933
--- Comment #5 from Kewen Lin ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #4)
> Yes, timing suggests there is some SHL/LHS flush.
>
> On p9 and later we can use mtvsrdd instead of mtvsrd (moving two
> bytes into place at one), which reduces
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96948
Bug ID: 96948
Summary: _Unwind_GetIP() and _Unwind_GetIPInfo() empty in
_Unwind_Backtrace() with SEH on mingw64
Product: gcc
Version: 8.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96948
--- Comment #1 from Kirill Müller ---
Created attachment 49188
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49188&action=edit
Proposed patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96948
--- Comment #2 from Kirill Müller ---
$ gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=C:\rtools40_\mingw64\bin\gcc.exe
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=C:/rtools40_/mingw64/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-w64-mingw32/8.3.0/lto-wrapper.exe
Target: x86_64-w64-mingw32
Configur
/tmp/portage/cross-powerpc-e300c3-linux-gnu/gcc-11.0.0_alpha20200906/work/gcc-11-20200906/gcc/analyzer/analyzer.h:164
0x70304f ana::region_offset::get_bit_offset() const
/var/tmp/portage/cross-powerpc-e300c3-linux-gnu/gcc-11.0.0_alpha20200906/work/gcc-11-20200906/gcc/analyzer/analyzer.h:162
/portage/cross-powerpc-e300c3-linux-gnu/gcc-11.0.0_alpha20200906/work/gcc-11-20200906/gcc/analyzer/store.cc:475
0x11fbe35 ana::binding_map::apply_ctor_to_region(ana::region const*,
tree_node*, ana::region_model_manager*)
/var/tmp/portage/cross-powerpc-e300c3-linux-gnu/gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96937
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Last recon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96948
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Patches should be sent to gcc-patc...@gcc.gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96948
--- Comment #4 from Kirill Müller ---
Done.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96854
--- Comment #17 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Sun, 6 Sep 2020, already5chosen at yahoo dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96854
>
> --- Comment #15 from Michael_S ---
> Thank you.
> That does not sound too dif
30 matches
Mail list logo
