https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96890
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|fortran |libfortran
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96902
michalak at ucar dot edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96903
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||88443
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96908
Bug ID: 96908
Summary: [c++20] substitution failure if lambda in default
template param
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96909
Bug ID: 96909
Summary: ICE with nested polymorphic allocatable component
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96910
Bug ID: 96910
Summary: intrinsic assignment does not duplicate allocatable
component of nested derived type
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96856
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8bd5530bfa136663f1fa79e9a1d3932b5adf15bd
commit r11-2990-g8bd5530bfa136663f1fa79e9a1d3932b5adf15bd
Author: liuhongt
Date: Mon Aug 3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96857
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8bd5530bfa136663f1fa79e9a1d3932b5adf15bd
commit r11-2990-g8bd5530bfa136663f1fa79e9a1d3932b5adf15bd
Author: liuhongt
Date: Mon Aug 3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96246
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8bd5530bfa136663f1fa79e9a1d3932b5adf15bd
commit r11-2990-g8bd5530bfa136663f1fa79e9a1d3932b5adf15bd
Author: liuhongt
Date: Mon Aug 3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96855
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8bd5530bfa136663f1fa79e9a1d3932b5adf15bd
commit r11-2990-g8bd5530bfa136663f1fa79e9a1d3932b5adf15bd
Author: liuhongt
Date: Mon Aug 3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96856
Hongtao.liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96857
Hongtao.liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96855
Hongtao.liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96246
--- Comment #8 from Hongtao.liu ---
Should be fixed in GCC11.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96861
Hongtao.liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96906
Hongtao.liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||crazylht at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96906
--- Comment #2 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #1)
> For vector compare to integer mask, gcc use UNSPEC, that's why it's not
> handled by general part, maybe peephole2 should be added for this.
Or in ix86_expand_int_vc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96861
--- Comment #3 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #2)
> .
Difference comes from
/* Cost the integer to sse and sse to integer moves. */
cost += n_sse_to_integer * ix86_cost->sse_to_integer;
/* ??? integer_to_sse
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96906
--- Comment #3 from Hongtao.liu ---
(gdb) f 6
#6 0x00f04a33 in expand_vect_cond_optab_fn (stmt=0x7fffea1193f0,
optab=vcond_optab) at ../../../gcc/gnu-toolchain/master/gcc/internal-fn.c:2612
2612 expand_insn (icode, 6, ops);
(gdb) p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96246
Hongtao.liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|REOPENED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96890
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96810
--- Comment #5 from Wei Wentao ---
Sorry for the last comment.I don't know how this happened.
Let's get to the point.
>>And while the bug described in the comment is really hard to diagnose at
>>compile time and in most cases impossible, what cl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96900
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96903
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96907
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
They are not really "builtins", they are merely present to have default
attributes attached to them.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96909
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96759
--- Comment #3 from Kito Cheng ---
ICE after g:70cdb21e579191fe9f0f1d45e328908e59c0179e
101 - 127 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
