https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96665
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-08-18
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96058
--- Comment #18 from Martin Liška ---
*thanks for reminder
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
Bug 45375 depends on bug 96058, which changed state.
Bug 96058 Summary: ICE in c_getstr at gcc/fold-const.c:15475
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96058
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96058
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96669
Bug ID: 96669
Summary: Failure to optimize left shift+and to test for 0
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96669
--- Comment #1 from Gabriel Ravier ---
PS: This can also be done when the shift is a right shift instead of a left
shift (i.e. `1 >> x` is used instead of `1 << x`)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96670
Bug ID: 96670
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in tree_to_uhwi, at tree.c:7361
since r11-2709-g866626efd749ed3e
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96671
Bug ID: 96671
Summary: Failure to optimize a 3 xor+and pattern to xor +
andnot
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96671
Gabriel Ravier changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Summary|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96168
--- Comment #11 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #10)
> Since there is no other viable Fortran compiler on iOS,
AFAIK, iOS has not been supported by GCC since Apple gcc-4.2.1 and
the Apple releases didn't have gfortra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96645
--- Comment #5 from Sergey ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #4)
> And libc++'s std::variant is still affected by the same issue, but instead
> of the default constructor being deleted it just has the wrong exception
> specification:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96301
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6bebbc033d8bf2246745ffef7186b0424e08ba6b
commit r11-2734-g6bebbc033d8bf2246745ffef7186b0424e08ba6b
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date: Fri Ju
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96301
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:412068819b463751ef476183077638b3429213de
commit r10-8637-g412068819b463751ef476183077638b3429213de
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96301
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96536
--- Comment #7 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #5)
> (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #4)
> > Created attachment 49060 [details]
> > Proposed patch
> >
> > Attached patch completely rewrites restore_stack_nonloc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96668
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cltang at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96672
Bug ID: 96672
Summary: Missing -Wclobbered diagnostic, or:
__attribute__((returns_twice)) does not inhibit
constant folding across call site
Product: gcc
Version:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83445
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Invoking Target(Source const&) is a user-defined conversion too. The conversion
sequence requires binding a reference to the Source object and then converting
it to a Target.
In C++17 there is no call to T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96673
Bug ID: 96673
Summary: Friend class with templates and default constructor
not recognized in C++14 or later
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96668
--- Comment #2 from Chung-Lin Tang ---
Note that what I'm working on at the moment does not include the Fortran parts,
and this particular feature appears to be more suitable to be implemented
within the Fortran FE, I think.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96674
Bug ID: 96674
Summary: Failure to optimize combination of comparisons to
dec+compare
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96675
Bug ID: 96675
Summary: tautological-compare warning emitted for NTTP bitwise
comparison
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96676
Bug ID: 96676
Summary: Segmentation fault on parsing simple variadic template
function call
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96676
--- Comment #1 from Ivan Leonov ---
Output of gcc -v:
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/opt/wandbox/gcc-head/bin/g++
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/opt/wandbox/gcc-head/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/11.0.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Config
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96677
Bug ID: 96677
Summary: Compile error on valid code with variadic template
function call
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96672
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83445
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96678
Bug ID: 96678
Summary: [OpenMP] Rejects map(var[:]) of known size with "for
pointer type length expression must be specified"
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96671
--- Comment #2 from Gabriel Ravier ---
There is also a very similar pattern with this function :
int f(int a, int b, int c)
{
return (a ^ b) | ((b ^ c) ^ a);
}
Which can be optimized to `return (a ^ b) | c;`.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69724
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bb1b7f087bdd028000fd8f84e74b20adccc9d5bb
commit r11-2736-gbb1b7f087bdd028000fd8f84e74b20adccc9d5bb
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96656
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Last reconfi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69724
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96652
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-08-18
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94162
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||poul250 at yandex dot ru
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96627
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96060
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96679
Bug ID: 96679
Summary: Failure to optimize or+and+or pattern to and+or
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94162
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nunoplopes at sapo dot pt
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94162
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94162
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96636
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96637
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96638
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10/11 Regression] ICE in |[8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96298
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d850dec9b7bd02ef925def138894402038cca78d
commit r11-2737-gd850dec9b7bd02ef925def138894402038cca78d
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Tue Au
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96298
Roger Sayle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96558
Roger Sayle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61372
--- Comment #3 from David Crocker ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
> extern "C" functions can throw, so it would be wrong to unconditionally
> assume they can't.
True, you can write an extern "C" function that throws. But does i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60473
Roger Sayle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96623
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10/11 Regression] ICE in |[11 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96623
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
We should have rejected "noexcept()".
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61372
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to David Crocker from comment #3)
> (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
> > extern "C" functions can throw, so it would be wrong to unconditionally
> > assume they can't.
>
> True, you
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96536
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f8104bb9dc2365d268ca93e43a24f42e8314fcc1
commit r11-2739-gf8104bb9dc2365d268ca93e43a24f42e8314fcc1
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Tue Au
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96536
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6342cee8801f191466b71116d004e8ccb812caaa
commit r10-8638-g6342cee8801f191466b71116d004e8ccb812caaa
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9
--- Comment #1 from Arseny Solokha ---
Created attachment 49073
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49073&action=edit
Testcase 2
I've managed to come up w/ a smaller testcase, partially reduced from
test/std/utilities/any/any.no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88780
Marietto changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marietto2008 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61494
Roger Sayle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||roger at nextmovesoftware dot
com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96673
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96668
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96673
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
The ICE with -std=c++14 started with r216750. It was fixed by r234442, but the
error appeared.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96675
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot
gnu.org
La
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96680
Bug ID: 96680
Summary: [11 Regression][OpenMP][LTO] Declare variant + ICE in
lto_fixup_prevailing_decls, at lto/lto-common.c:2595
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96665
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization, patch
St
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96681
Bug ID: 96681
Summary: Failure to optimize xor of comparisons with specific
constants to comparison of xor-ed of compared
variables
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96680
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus ---
In the debugger, the first call to lto_fixup_prevailing_decls is for
main._omp_fn.0 and the second - and failing - one is for
(gdb) p debug_tree(t)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96682
SRINATH PARVATHANENI changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96682
Bug ID: 96682
Summary: Arm: Wrong code generated for MVE with -O1 and above
optimization options.
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96676
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84796
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ivan.leonov.d at yandex dot ru
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96680
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus ---
Created attachment 49075
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49075&action=edit
C testcase - de-macro-fied version sollve_vv's
5.0/declare_variant/test_declare_variant.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96536
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:65f460db575eb004172e75b88f5a76724f04e255
commit r9-8813-g65f460db575eb004172e75b88f5a76724f04e255
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84796
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Test from bug 96676.
template < typename T, typename... TYPES >
struct A {
template < TYPES... types >
void Get() { }
};
void f() {}
int main() {
A a;
a.Get<&f>();
}
But even r150013 ICEs,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96676
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96683
Bug ID: 96683
Summary: Arm: MVE ACLE intrinsics vst1q_{s8|u8|s16|u16} is not
supported by GCC.
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84796
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
*** Bug 96677 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96677
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96668
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #3)
> > integer, pointer :: p1 => null()
> > integer, pointer :: p1 => null()
> Module m looks wrong. Should the 2nd p1 be p2?
It should be "p2(:)"
(Thanks. I wrote it i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96684
Bug ID: 96684
Summary: arm: MVE intrinsics / __ARM_undef presence in f16
vector max routine
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96684
SRINATH PARVATHANENI changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96683
SRINATH PARVATHANENI changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-08-18
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96602
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94958
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 from v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96593
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96685
Bug ID: 96685
Summary: Failure to optimize not+sub to add+not
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88780
--- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor ---
(In reply to Marietto from comment #6)
...
> In function ‘strncpy’,
> inlined from ‘xc_set_cpufreq_gov’ at xc_pm.c:308:5:
> /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/string_fortified.h:106:10: error:
> ‘__builtin_str
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96536
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bf7b9330982165e051de0962c5bc231e2d1242d9
commit r8-10410-gbf7b9330982165e051de0962c5bc231e2d1242d9
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96536
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.5
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96686
Bug ID: 96686
Summary: MIN/MAX should reject character arguments of different
kind rather than ICE
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96686
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96687
Bug ID: 96687
Summary: new char[4]{"foo"} doesn't work
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96687
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot
gnu.org
La
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96670
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bb04901d14f7749eb949092fd3dfcb6ca1958701
commit r11-2742-gbb04901d14f7749eb949092fd3dfcb6ca1958701
Author: Martin Sebor
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78257
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bb04901d14f7749eb949092fd3dfcb6ca1958701
commit r11-2742-gbb04901d14f7749eb949092fd3dfcb6ca1958701
Author: Martin Sebor
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96670
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Assignee|unassigned at gcc do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96670
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78257
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d367f5fcb579d21c3093cf5c464f5787fe584a1d
commit r11-2743-gd367f5fcb579d21c3093cf5c464f5787fe584a1d
Author: Martin Sebor
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96665
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d367f5fcb579d21c3093cf5c464f5787fe584a1d
commit r11-2743-gd367f5fcb579d21c3093cf5c464f5787fe584a1d
Author: Martin Sebor
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96665
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96688
Bug ID: 96688
Summary: Failure to optimize shift-right+not of constant to
avoid not
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96686
--- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #1)
> Yep, I agree that this should simply be rejected. I looked at your other
> patch for min/max, and think it can be committed. If you want to update
> that pat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96613
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3c04bd60e56da399a441f73ebb687b5039b9cf3f
commit r11-2746-g3c04bd60e56da399a441f73ebb687b5039b9cf3f
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: Tu
1 - 100 of 142 matches
Mail list logo
