[Bug fortran/96624] New: A segment error occurred when using the reshape function result to assign a variable

2020-08-15 Thread shenpo.d...@compiler-dev.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96624 Bug ID: 96624 Summary: A segment error occurred when using the reshape function result to assign a variable Product: gcc Version: 10.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sev

[Bug c/96625] New: Unnecessarily large assembly generated when a bit-offsetted higher-end end of a uint64_t-backed bitfield is shifted toward the high end (left) by its bit-offset

2020-08-15 Thread pskocik at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96625 Bug ID: 96625 Summary: Unnecessarily large assembly generated when a bit-offsetted higher-end end of a uint64_t-backed bitfield is shifted toward the high end (left) by its

[Bug libstdc++/96626] New: utf-8 string literal not convertible to std::string with -std=c++20

2020-08-15 Thread rcopley at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96626 Bug ID: 96626 Summary: utf-8 string literal not convertible to std::string with -std=c++20 Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/96627] New: gcc raises compile-time segmentation fault on <=> = default

2020-08-15 Thread poul250 at yandex dot ru
(const Float& other) const noexcept = default; |^~~~ Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. See <https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/> for instructions. gcc -v output: Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=/opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-snapshot/bin/g++ COLLECT_LT

[Bug c++/96627] gcc raises compile-time segmentation fault on <=> = default

2020-08-15 Thread poul250 at yandex dot ru
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96627 --- Comment #1 from Pavel Kulis --- compile options: --std=c++2a

[Bug fortran/96624] A segment fault occurred when using the reshape function result to assign a variable

2020-08-15 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96624 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org E

[Bug other/96628] New: Feature request: __attribute__((no_builtin(Foo)))

2020-08-15 Thread rafael_andreas at hotmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96628 Bug ID: 96628 Summary: Feature request: __attribute__((no_builtin(Foo))) Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug other/96628] Feature request: __attribute__((no_builtin("Foo")))

2020-08-15 Thread rafael_andreas at hotmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96628 Rafaƫl Kooi changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rafael_andreas at hotmail dot com

[Bug c/96629] New: spurious uninitialized variable warning with branches at -O1 and higher

2020-08-15 Thread yyc1992 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96629 Bug ID: 96629 Summary: spurious uninitialized variable warning with branches at -O1 and higher Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal