Le Jeu 23 Jui 2020 06:54:32, tamar.christ...@arm.com a écrit :
> Hi All,
>
> Was wondering if anyone knows what's going on here,
>
> The write access link on gcc.org (https://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/)
> on the sidebar the "..write access" link
> Seems to point to https://www.gnu.org/software/gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83342
Haonan Chen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||phychn at stu dot xmu.edu.cn
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96312
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenther at suse dot de
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96317
Bug ID: 96317
Summary: [8/9/10/11] Int compare optimizations make some errors
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96317
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Use -fwrapv or unsigned integers as signed signed integer overflow is
undefined. Use -fsanitizer=undefined will detect this at runtime.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96312
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #4)
> so it is likely that this patch just started issuing a warning
> for a pre-existing bug in the front end.
That is indeed the case. Grepping for tmp in the modc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96317
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88080
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96318
Bug ID: 96318
Summary: FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/strncpy-overflow-1.c * output
pattern test with C on Darwin
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28397
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
*** Bug 56675 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56675
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93567
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Thomas Kथà¤nig
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d0dbe7695cf1e7a7163952797c4590cfda137541
commit r10-8532-gd0dbe7695cf1e7a7163952797c4590cfda137541
Author: Dominique d'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93592
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Thomas Kथà¤nig
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b45f51d467c6c192c70f57e517bec3a3c0c9d1f4
commit r10-8531-gb45f51d467c6c192c70f57e517bec3a3c0c9d1f4
Author: Dominique d'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93592
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Thomas Kथà¤nig
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eca316afa46907e6b0e1513ecbc3010aaf2590f3
commit r9-8765-geca316afa46907e6b0e1513ecbc3010aaf2590f3
Author: Dominique d'Hu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93592
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Thomas Kथà¤nig
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1757a63809d6c6073c87978c22dcfffe85753c0f
commit r8-10375-g1757a63809d6c6073c87978c22dcfffe85753c0f
Author: Dominique d'H
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96291
--- Comment #5 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
I shrunk example to "single-file" (almost) example to ease local tweaking:
$ cat 1file.c
void e(void);
void f(void);
void a(int, int);
void c(int);
#ifdef COMPILE_F1
int b;
void c(int d) {
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #223 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #222)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #221)
> > For the chromium with GCC 10, inliner starts after ~5 minutes, so it's very
> > likely inliner that takes so lo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95859
Tobias Schlüter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #48779|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96291
--- Comment #6 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
-fdump-ipa-all-all generates sdb.wpa.076i.cp that says f() has no jump
functions:
"""
Jump functions:
Jump functions of caller main/9:
Jump functions of caller a/8:
callsite a/8 -> e/2 :
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94958
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||damian at sourceryinstitute
dot o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93567
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93592
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95397
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-07-25
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92122
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-07-25
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96291
--- Comment #7 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
(In reply to Sergei Trofimovich from comment #6)
> -fdump-ipa-all-all generates sdb.wpa.076i.cp that says f() has no jump
> functions:
> ...
> Is it expected?
print_all_lattices() suggests it is expecte
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96319
Bug ID: 96319
Summary: Don't warn for LOGICAL kind conversion with
-Wconversion
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81658
Sergei Trofimovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96310
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96190
Sergei Trofimovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96310
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e0633768a1a2efe689e5505b3a95aa949d704b06
commit r11-2322-ge0633768a1a2efe689e5505b3a95aa949d704b06
Author: Martin Sebor
Date: Sat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96310
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95507
Bug 95507 depends on bug 96310, which changed state.
Bug 96310 Summary: Ignoring Wnonnull via pragma gcc diagnostics still produces
a unwanted note
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96310
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82018
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96320
Bug ID: 96320
Summary: gfortran 8-10 shape mismatch in assumed-length dummy
argument character array
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96306
--- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus ---
Initial TI support for AMDGCN has been committed, see:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-July/550663.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8d0b2b33748014ee57973c1d7bc9fd7706bb3da9
commit 8d0b2b33748014ee57
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96306
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2e764ae1d666002b136726e6548481013527197d
commit r11-2328-g2e764ae1d666002b136726e6548481013527197d
Author: Tobias Burnus
Date: S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96321
Bug ID: 96321
Summary: GCC accepts conversion-function-id after the keyword
template
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: accepts-invalid
37 matches
Mail list logo
