https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95638
--- Comment #14 from bin cheng ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #13)
> GCC 10.2 is released, adjusting target milestone.
Hmm, this should be fixed on GCC10/GCC9. I backported PR95638/PR95804
separately using cherry-pick, so the back
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96260
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kito Cheng :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2ca1b6d009b194286c3ec91f9c51cc6b0a475458
commit r11-2283-g2ca1b6d009b194286c3ec91f9c51cc6b0a475458
Author: Kito Cheng
Date: Wed Jul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95718
--- Comment #4 from PengWang ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #3)
>16.5.2.2 Pointer association status
>
>A pointer may have a pointer association status of associated,
>disassociated, or undefined. Its association status may cha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96294
Bug ID: 96294
Summary: Compile error for pointer function
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96260
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Kito Cheng :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:83f1fbb9e7afaa77d52b200c7937788faa5f24d7
commit r10-8516-g83f1fbb9e7afaa77d52b200c7937788faa5f24d7
Author: Kito Cheng
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96260
Kito Cheng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96295
Bug ID: 96295
Summary: Wmaybe-uninitialized warning for range operator with
empty range struct
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96296
Bug ID: 96296
Summary: libiberty/dyn-string.c:280:3: warning: ‘strncpy’
output truncated before terminating nul copying as
many bytes from a string as its length
[-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53298
Sebastien Bardeau changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bardeau at iram dot fr
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53298
--- Comment #8 from Sebastien Bardeau ---
I am experiencing an ICE looking pretty much the same as this one.
gfortran version and messages:
bardeau ~> gfortran -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gfortran
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/home/bardeau/Soft
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96235
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
Eve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96297
Bug ID: 96297
Summary: Redundant zero extension after inlining the function
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96291
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-07-23
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96245
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96267
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-07-23
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96285
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96291
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
unk-r11-2284-20200723104325-g02cada26e47-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-powerpc64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 11.0.0 20200723 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96035
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:24c35a5ef3f88cf3c25c8bf17f9ff706e4286f53
commit r11-2285-g24c35a5ef3f88cf3c25c8bf17f9ff706e4286f53
Author: Martin Liska
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96035
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96263
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-07-23
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96262
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-07-23
Summary|[11 Regress
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96261
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
(with -std=c++14).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96261
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-07-23
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96294
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONF
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96206
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Last reconfir
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96264
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92285
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.3|10.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96263
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
--- Comment #3 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71579
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.3|---
--- Comment #17 from Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84889
--- Comment #23 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Dave, should we unset the milestone? Any further changes will only happen on
trunk not the gcc-10 branch, right?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89635
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.3|---
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96294
--- Comment #2 from PengWang ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1)
> read
>
> F2008: A pointer function assignment is ambiguous if it is the first
> executable statement after the specification block. Please add any other
> kind
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96298
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu |powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96298
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96298
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
It doesn't fail with 9.3 .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96298
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
I'm gonna bisect that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96294
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
See https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortranStandards.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84889
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.3|---
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96294
--- Comment #4 from PengWang ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #3)
> See https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortranStandards.
thanks a lot!!! ^_^
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96298
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Trying 17, 14 -> 18:
17: r147:DI=r145:DI^r121:DI
REG_DEAD r145:DI
REG_DEAD r121:DI
14: r144:DI=r142:DI^r121:DI
REG_DEAD r142:DI
18: r148:DI=r144:DI^r147:DI
REG_DEAD r147:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96285
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Hey Göran.
I like both your suggestions for the documentation update. Can you please send
a patch to the gcc-patches mailing list?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96267
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:de8bfcc8e45d9c77c48c9f071836698aa6db5ff3
commit r11-2291-gde8bfcc8e45d9c77c48c9f071836698aa6db5ff3
Author: Dong JianQiang
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96267
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95486
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Last reconfi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96262
--- Comment #3 from Hongtao.liu ---
a patch is posted at
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-July/550427.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96058
--- Comment #10 from Martin Liška ---
@Martin: Can you please take a look?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96265
--- Comment #1 from Matthias Klose ---
patch for the target hook posted at
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-July/550534.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96298
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
Started with r11-1715-g346bce6fe0cf1ed5f6a7ad732d2361d77b203c87.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96235
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|marxin at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96299
Bug ID: 96299
Summary: Defaulted operator <=> implicitly deleted when a
member has operator < and operator == and return type
is specified
Product: gcc
Version: 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96235
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
Summary for node e/3:
Returns value
Descriptor for parameter 0:
(locally) unused
param_size_limit: 16, size_reached: 8, by_ref
* Access to unit offset: 0, unit size: 8, type: long int, alias_pt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96235
--- Comment #6 from Martin Jambor ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #4)
> It seems to me something related to IPA SRA.
> @Martin: Can you please take a look?
I will but -fno-dce -fno-tree-dce strongly suggest this is a duplicate of PR
9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96235
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96224
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52094
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94065
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.3|10.0
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96293
--- Comment #2 from lavr at ncbi dot nlm.nih.gov ---
I don't want my structure to be aligned at the int boundary. I want my
structure to reflect the actual data layout "byte","byte","short","int" as they
are laid out without any gaps, and "packed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96293
lavr at ncbi dot nlm.nih.gov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96295
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Summary|Wmaybe-uninitiali
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96278
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95700
--- Comment #19 from vvinayag at arm dot com ---
Created attachment 48921
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48921&action=edit
Add -std=c++11 to the aarch64 native build fix
This patch adds CXX="$CXX -std=c++11" to the patch pro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95700
--- Comment #20 from vvinayag at arm dot com ---
(In reply to vvinayag from comment #18)
> (In reply to Ilya Leoshkevich from comment #17)
> > Created attachment 48917 [details]
> > aarch64 native build fix
> >
> > Could you please try the attach
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96300
Bug ID: 96300
Summary: missing -Wuninitialized reading a struct member by a
conditionally assigned pointer
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96018
--- Comment #17 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Thomas Kथà¤nig
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3373a73172d0e39fe054ab2d4bbff746b36c0fe8
commit r10-8520-g3373a73172d0e39fe054ab2d4bbff746b36c0fe8
Author: Thomas Koeni
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96300
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93963
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-07-23
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96220
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Thomas Kथà¤nig
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5b9f6489081520b7cb10d3ddfae6f010e0986314
commit r10-8521-g5b9f6489081520b7cb10d3ddfae6f010e0986314
Author: Thomas Koenig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94738
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
irmed||2020-07-23
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
This seems to be fixed since
gcc version 9.3.1 20200723 [revision r9-8756-g0a5be099c6f3p2] (GCC).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94048
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96301
Bug ID: 96301
Summary: d: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault during
RTL pass: expand on armhf/armel/s390x
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96301
--- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw ---
The static array path has a different ICE, but the underlying cause is the
same.
test.d:20:18: internal compiler error: in convert_memory_address_addr_space_1,
at explow.c:302
20 | auto result =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93690
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68828
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-07-23
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68828
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
*** Bug 68827 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68827
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Reso
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 68827, which changed state.
Bug 68827 Summary: [concepts] ICE in fold where requires parameter shadows
function argument
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68827
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94065
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by David Edelsohn :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eb0a835d643394d89b13d4f0ac12f2af3e78228d
commit r9-8759-geb0a835d643394d89b13d4f0ac12f2af3e78228d
Author: David Edelsohn
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68826
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Reso
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68828
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
*** Bug 68826 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 68826, which changed state.
Bug 68826 Summary: [concepts] ICE in fold expression with requires
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68826
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96298
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|segher at gcc dot gnu.org |sayle at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96236
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Peter Bergner
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5497677b497b95a261089d19f5295cc80f99a2b6
commit r10-8522-g5497677b497b95a261089d19f5295cc80f99a2b6
Author: Peter Bergner
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35098
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95750
Joseph C. Sible changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||josephcsible at gmail dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56673
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96220
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Thomas Kथà¤nig
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:159c7ca3c3ce34e401b9e57734ecca8b37d8a0ec
commit r9-8760-g159c7ca3c3ce34e401b9e57734ecca8b37d8a0ec
Author: Thomas Koenig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79367
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-checking, |rejects-valid
|ice-on-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96298
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d4b3ea941b1a15cadb79e7ff8a36891131f8804b
commit r11-2296-gd4b3ea941b1a15cadb79e7ff8a36891131f8804b
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Thu Ju
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96302
Bug ID: 96302
Summary: Linux build of gnat/ada fails for lack of gnatdll
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87765
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96220
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87032
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90301
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89871
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90623
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96018
--- Comment #18 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Thomas Kथà¤nig
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7be5add5534f4310b294f1b7ad8855a424edb8c1
commit r9-8761-g7be5add5534f4310b294f1b7ad8855a424edb8c1
Author: Thomas Koenig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96018
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96224
--- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1)
> Could you be more explicit about what you would like?
How about:
mod::init ()
or
mod.init ()
to indicate the relevant namespace.
1 - 100 of 140 matches
Mail list logo
