https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96214
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96189
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96189
--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On July 16, 2020 9:05:52 AM GMT+02:00, ubizjak at gmail dot com
wrote:
>https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96189
>
>Uroš Bizjak changed:
>
> What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96003
--- Comment #7 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
Similar example from xmms2 project, dynamic_cast<> version:
#include
// main loop interface
struct I {
virtual void run();
};
struct M : public I {
virtual void run();
void setu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96203
--- Comment #7 from Matthias Klose ---
Please could you elaborate how this should be revisited?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95491
--- Comment #1 from Max Kellermann ---
Bug still occurs with "gcc version 10.1.0 (Debian 10.1.0-6)"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96217
Bug ID: 96217
Summary: undefined reference to `_Unwind_Resume'
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96218
Bug ID: 96218
Summary: DR 2032: Default template-arguments of variable
templates
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96218
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96001
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Szabolcs Nagy :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:315a7e8cca13530d4d3c5b5f39775c7a62877f3d
commit r9-8742-g315a7e8cca13530d4d3c5b5f39775c7a62877f3d
Author: Szabolcs Nagy
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94891
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Szabolcs Nagy :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a0ae6c76529ccee9ee53c32dc115aec263ee633b
commit r9-8745-ga0ae6c76529ccee9ee53c32dc115aec263ee633b
Author: Szabolcs Nagy
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94891
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Szabolcs Nagy :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f5cab5862172176c49814214cc7df2fa6d6b5e56
commit r9-8746-gf5cab5862172176c49814214cc7df2fa6d6b5e56
Author: Szabolcs Nagy
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94891
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Szabolcs Nagy :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a6a2935076b192109171310db5159183e5ab059b
commit r9-8747-ga6a2935076b192109171310db5159183e5ab059b
Author: Szabolcs Nagy
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94791
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Szabolcs Nagy :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a70d5d81c41048556fd86eaa1036018a6bfba115
commit r9-8744-ga70d5d81c41048556fd86eaa1036018a6bfba115
Author: Szabolcs Nagy
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94891
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Szabolcs Nagy :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a70d5d81c41048556fd86eaa1036018a6bfba115
commit r9-8744-ga70d5d81c41048556fd86eaa1036018a6bfba115
Author: Szabolcs Nagy
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96001
nsz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94791
nsz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94891
nsz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96106
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Assi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96219
Bug ID: 96219
Summary: New Feature (c++ core 727): explicit specialization in
class definition should be allowed
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85282
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||haoxintu at gmail dot com
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96219
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96203
--- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 48881
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48881&action=edit
Something like this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96203
--- Comment #9 from Matthias Klose ---
Comment on attachment 48881
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48881
Something like this
please could you update gcc/doc/invoke.texi?
is error only supposed to be passed in LDFLAGS, not i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96203
--- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Matthias Klose from comment #9)
> Comment on attachment 48881 [details]
> Something like this
>
> please could you update gcc/doc/invoke.texi?
It needs more than documentation.
> is error only supp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96220
Bug ID: 96220
Summary: -fc-prototypes forgets types for doubles
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96214
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96220
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-07-16
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96221
Bug ID: 96221
Summary: Constructor attribute priority is ignored if
additional prototypes omit attribute
Product: gcc
Version: 8.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95417
Olivier Kannengieser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95417
Olivier Kannengieser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |INVALID
--- Comment #4 from Olivi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93121
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70611
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mark at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96222
Bug ID: 96222
Summary: std::filesystem::directory_iterator shares state
Product: gcc
Version: 9.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50370
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ec13n at my dot fsu.edu
--- Comment #3 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82850
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50370
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||david.bolvansky at gmail dot
com
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87234
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96189
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cc1ef413a859433a8313fa9c15aaff41bdc837dc
commit r11-2181-gcc1ef413a859433a8313fa9c15aaff41bdc837dc
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Thu Ju
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54734
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mark at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58528
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mark at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96223
Bug ID: 96223
Summary: DR 1787 and indeterminate values in constexpr context
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96223
--- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek ---
Note that is_byte_access_type won't do, because it includes char8_t too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96224
Bug ID: 96224
Summary: -fdump-tree-original could use more sophisticated or
mangled procedure names
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96224
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96213
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96222
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96214
--- Comment #2 from Jonny Grant ---
Thank you. Saw there is -Wdangling-else already as well
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96014
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:75edc31f9ebe7f8b933860981a124f7f0993214b
commit r11-2182-g75edc31f9ebe7f8b933860981a124f7f0993214b
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86742
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-07-16
Assignee|unassign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95458
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96225
Bug ID: 96225
Summary: ice in extract_insn, at recog.c:2294
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95895
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0f66b8486cea8668020e4bd48f261b760cb579be
commit r11-2183-g0f66b8486cea8668020e4bd48f261b760cb579be
Author: Iain Sandoe
Date: Sat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95599
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0f66b8486cea8668020e4bd48f261b760cb579be
commit r11-2183-g0f66b8486cea8668020e4bd48f261b760cb579be
Author: Iain Sandoe
Date: Sat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95591
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0f66b8486cea8668020e4bd48f261b760cb579be
commit r11-2183-g0f66b8486cea8668020e4bd48f261b760cb579be
Author: Iain Sandoe
Date: Sat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95823
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0f66b8486cea8668020e4bd48f261b760cb579be
commit r11-2183-g0f66b8486cea8668020e4bd48f261b760cb579be
Author: Iain Sandoe
Date: Sat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95824
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0f66b8486cea8668020e4bd48f261b760cb579be
commit r11-2183-g0f66b8486cea8668020e4bd48f261b760cb579be
Author: Iain Sandoe
Date: Sat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96226
Bug ID: 96226
Summary: Failure to optimize shift+not to rotate
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optim
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96203
--- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 48885
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48885&action=edit
A patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96203
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-07-16
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96215
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87726
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96227
Bug ID: 96227
Summary: Comma operation sequencing issue
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86412
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mark at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96215
--- Comment #2 from Arthur O'Dwyer ---
WG21's commentary on CWG 1273 (which is now
http://cwg-issue-browser.herokuapp.com/cwg1172
) seems completely bizarre to me. Sure, `decltype(g.x)` could theoretically
refer to a private member of `g`; but so
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96228
Bug ID: 96228
Summary: -Wstack-usage does not understand constant
__builtin_alloca calls
Product: gcc
Version: 9.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96228
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Assignee|d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47785
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mark at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #18
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96228
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96139
Will Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||willschm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96214
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95720
--- Comment #10 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Created attachment 48886
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48886&action=edit
patch that hopefully fixes the problem
Does this fix the problem in your testglue-requiring test runs?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96214
--- Comment #4 from Jonny Grant ---
I realised there could be many else {} that can't be executed, added one more
to the example.
int main(void)
{
const int i = 1;
if(1 == i)
{
return 1;
}
else if(1 != i)
{
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93372
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Segher Boessenkool :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:84c5396d4bdbf9f1d628c77db4421808f9a9dcb6
commit r11-2185-g84c5396d4bdbf9f1d628c77db4421808f9a9dcb6
Author: Segher Boessenkool
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96229
Bug ID: 96229
Summary: Invalid specialization accepted when also constrained
in base template template parameter
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
URL: https://godbolt.org/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39970
--- Comment #10 from Brandon Nickell ---
Well I did open this bug 11 years ago (time flies!) and C++0x was still in mid
flight before it turned into C++11, so quite a bit has changed since this was
originally reported (for instance there was no c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96230
Bug ID: 96230
Summary: driver: ICE in process_command, at gcc.c:5095
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: driv
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54734
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96208
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
V
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96003
--- Comment #8 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
(In reply to Sergei Trofimovich from comment #6)
> (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #4)
> > The warning in the test case in comment #3 looks correct to me.
>
> Thank you! I'll try to re-reduce and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96217
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
I think you should report this to glibc, not GCC.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96225
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman ---
Reduced C++ code is:
extern "C" double sqrt(double);
template class a {
public:
a();
void b();
double c, m;
};
template void a::b() {
d e = 1 / sqrt(m);
c = e;
}
class f {
public:
void g() co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96225
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86_64 |x86_64-*-*
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96230
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
84 matches
Mail list logo
