https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95847
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95826
--- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Patch posted for review:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2020-June/054582.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95827
--- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Patch posted for review:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2020-June/054583.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95837
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Keywords|wrong-co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95849
Bug ID: 95849
Summary: Universal forwarding constructor inheritance
resolution issue
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95850
Bug ID: 95850
Summary: [11 regression]
gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/forall_5.f90 fails
starting with r11-r11-1595
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Statu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95846
--- Comment #2 from cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Reported to binutils bugzilla:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95850
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95851
Bug ID: 95851
Summary: [10/11 Regression] std::to_chars(p, p, c, 2) segfault
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95851
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93976
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6b161257f9f8c7a26b7d119ebc32cbbc54d2e508
commit r11-1615-g6b161257f9f8c7a26b7d119ebc32cbbc54d2e508
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95852
Bug ID: 95852
Summary: Failure to optimize __builtin_mul_overflow pattern
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95853
Bug ID: 95853
Summary: Failure to optimize add overflow pattern to
__builtin_add_overflow
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95842
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95637
--- Comment #4 from Maciej W. Rozycki ---
Sigh, I keep forgetting we don't have PC-relative memory access machine
instructions. We could have had base=x0 encodings allocated for that,
which are otherwise of rather limited use.
Regardless, I thi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87208
Language Lawyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||language.lawyer at gmail dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95775
--- Comment #4 from Yichao Yu ---
> Hey. My opinion is similar to Richi's. If you really want a highly optimized
> library, you should rather use a dlopen mechanism with pre-built set of
> options.
Well, a few things,
1. That sounds like an a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93976
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88323
Bug 88323 depends on bug 93976, which changed state.
Bug 93976 Summary: Implement P2082R1, Fixing CTAD for aggregates
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93976
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95719
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95854
Bug ID: 95854
Summary: ICE in find_bswap_or_nop_1 of pass store-merging
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64242
Paul Hua changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paul.hua.gm at gmail dot com
--- Comment #40
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95855
Bug ID: 95855
Summary: A missing ifcvt optimization to generate fcsel
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95843
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-06-24
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95720
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #3 from Alexandre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95845
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Last recon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95761
--- Comment #8 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #7)
> I see the test-cases fixed.
> Can you still reproduce that?
r11-1553 PASS x_1.i for me and FAIL unreduced one.
r11-1582 PASS x_1.i, x_2.i for me and PASS un
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95847
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.4
Summary|Internal error w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95854
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target|
101 - 129 of 129 matches
Mail list logo