[Bug fortran/95829] Bogus error with additional blanks in type(*)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95829 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/95760] ivopts with loop variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95760 --- Comment #2 from Jim Wilson --- I took another look, and it turns out that the should_duplicate_loop_header_p for size/speed is not the only issue. There is also an issue in tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c when computing iv costs. With speed, the +4

[Bug tree-optimization/95803] Failure to optimize strlen in certain situations properly, instead leading to weird code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95803 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Blocks|

[Bug c/95818] wrong "used uninitialized" warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95818 --- Comment #4 from Ferruh YIGIT --- Created attachment 48772 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48772&action=edit preprocessed source

[Bug c/95818] wrong "used uninitialized" warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95818 --- Comment #5 from Ferruh YIGIT --- Got it, 'iavf_ethdev.i' attached. I am able to reproduce with command [1] and got the output [2] using .i file. [1] /usr/local/gcc-latest/bin/gcc -m64 -pthread -march=native -O3 -Wall -Werror -Wno-strict-ali

[Bug middle-end/95818] wrong "used uninitialized" warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95818 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c |middle-end Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/24639] [meta-bug] bug to track all Wuninitialized issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639 Bug 24639 depends on bug 95818, which changed state. Bug 95818 Summary: wrong "used uninitialized" warning https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95818 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug middle-end/95818] wrong "used uninitialized" warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95818 --- Comment #7 from Ferruh YIGIT --- Thanks Martin, explanation and sample clarified the issue for me. Sorry for the inconvenience caused.

[Bug fortran/92702] [F2008] (and hence [F2018]) Implement VALUE support for arrays + deferred-length parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92702 --- Comment #2 from Yao Liu --- (In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #1) > The following restriction of F2003 is also gone: > > C528 (R501) If the VALUE attribute is specified, the length type parameter > values shall be omitted or specifie

[Bug rtl-optimization/89310] Poor code generation returning float field from a struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89310 luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug middle-end/95818] wrong "used uninitialized" warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95818 --- Comment #8 from Martin Sebor --- No problem (and no inconvenience either).

[Bug regression/95830] New: [10 regression][MIPS/MSA] internal compiler error: in do_store_flag, at expr.c:12247 start with gcc-11-1445-g502d63b6d61

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95830 Bug ID: 95830 Summary: [10 regression][MIPS/MSA] internal compiler error: in do_store_flag, at expr.c:12247 start with gcc-11-1445-g502d63b6d61 Product: gcc Versi

[Bug regression/95830] [11 regression][MIPS/MSA] internal compiler error: in do_store_flag, at expr.c:12247 start with gcc-11-1445-g502d63b6d61

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95830 Paul Hua changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10 regression][MIPS/MSA] |[11 regression][MIPS/MSA] |

[Bug c++/95831] New: Wrong line number in " -Wconversion" warning message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95831 Bug ID: 95831 Summary: Wrong line number in " -Wconversion" warning message Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: diagnostic Severity: normal

[Bug target/95676] [armhf] g++ mis-compiles code at -O1 or above

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95676 --- Comment #3 from James McCoy --- (In reply to Richard Earnshaw from comment #1) > So what do you think is wrong with the code? Sorry, I don't have time to > try to second guess what's going on. > > How did you configure the compiler? What o

[Bug libstdc++/95832] New: std::vector specialization leading std::variant ctor treating it as int rather than bool

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95832 Bug ID: 95832 Summary: std::vector specialization leading std::variant ctor treating it as int rather than bool Product: gcc Version: 10.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/95832] std::vector specialization leading std::variant ctor treating it as int rather than bool

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95832 --- Comment #1 from fiesh at zefix dot tv --- https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/utility/variant/variant says that "If T_i is (possibly cv-qualified) bool, F(T_i) is only considered if std::decay_t (until C++20)std::remove_cvref_t (since C++20) is

[Bug fortran/95586] ICE in gfc_validate_kind, at fortran/trans-types.c:773

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95586 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Mark Eggleston : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:384aa890255dc01ba6d6529b127975c2c9a49a3c commit r11-1594-g384aa890255dc01ba6d6529b127975c2c9a49a3c Author: Mark Eggleston Date:

[Bug fortran/95812] [10/11 Regression] ICE in gfc_dep_resolver since r10-2114

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95812 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Thomas Kथà¤nig : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:abcde0a658e17dbbabcb396eaae5a3612e07d401 commit r11-1595-gabcde0a658e17dbbabcb396eaae5a3612e07d401 Author: Thomas Koenig Date:

[Bug fortran/52274] [Meta-bug] Fortran translation related issues: Typos and more

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52274 Bug 52274 depends on bug 42693, which changed state. Bug 42693 Summary: Missing gcc-internal-format on messages from gfc_arith_error https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42693 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug tree-optimization/90594] [9/10/11 regression] Spurious popcount emitted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90594 Hsiao-Hui Chiu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hailey.chiu at sifive dot com --- Comme

[Bug fortran/42693] Missing gcc-internal-format on messages from gfc_arith_error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42693 markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Stat

[Bug translation/40883] [meta-bug] Translation breakage with trivial fixes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40883 Bug 40883 depends on bug 42693, which changed state. Bug 42693 Summary: Missing gcc-internal-format on messages from gfc_arith_error https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42693 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug fortran/95585] ICE in gfc_check_reshape, at fortran/check.c:4751

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95585 markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Stat

[Bug fortran/95708] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in resolve_fl_procedure, at fortran/resolve.c:13002

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95708 markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||markeggleston at gcc do

[Bug libstdc++/95832] std::vector specialization leading std::variant ctor treating it as int rather than bool

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95832 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- cppreference and libstdc++ both need to be updated to implement http://wg21.link/p1957

[Bug c++/95825] [8/9/10/11 Regression] boost::optional -Wuninitialized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95825 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[7/8/9/10/11 Regression]|[8/9/10/11 Regression]

<    1   2