https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94864
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94844
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
> This is intentional. You get a diagnostic with -pedantic or -pedantic-errors
>
> 94844.cc: In function ‘int main()’:
> 94844.cc:9:8: warning: ‘long’ specified
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94865
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Last recon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80516
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3)
> The warning has changed slightly since GCC 9:
>
> 80516.cc:6:3: warning: ‘signed’ specified with ‘u’ {aka ‘unsigned int’}
> [-Wpedantic]
> 6 | S s;
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94866
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-04-30
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80516
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
This extension has been in G++ since G++ was checked into a repo.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94867
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-04-30
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94442
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94529
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Version|unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94848
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus ---
Similar:
* PR71536 – *ICE* with *unused* static variable in declare-target function
Richard wrote in
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-April/544905.html
> IIRC there was a bugreport similar to t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94538
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10 Regression] ICE: in |[9/10 Regression] ICE: in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94848
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus ---
Also possibly related (static local device variable) are the fixed PRs,
which might give a hint how to solve it (although, those look more like a band
aid):
* PR85063 – local variable for switch statement; s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94868
Bug ID: 94868
Summary: GCC compile error(GCC-4.6.3)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
Assi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94863
--- Comment #3 from Gabriel Ravier ---
For binary size, the `movsd` takes 4 bytes and the `blendps` takes 6 bytes
The port allocations for the instructions are as such (same formatting as for
the throughputs) :
Wolfdale: p5, p015
Nehalem: p5,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93581
--- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #7)
> Patch was submitted at
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2020-March/054050.html
>
> And committed as r10-7081-g9de42a8e995451cb13dceb3970ae23ff88240bff
> [
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94856
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Reduced test-case:
class a {
public:
virtual ~a() {}
};
class b {
public:
virtual void c();
};
class C : a, public b {};
class d : C {
~d();
void c();
};
d::~d() { ((b *)this)->c(); }
void d::c() {}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94836
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
OK, so it's not that easy to do. Consider
int f(int x)
{
static int s;
if (!s)
s = x;
return s;
}
which we cannot optimize in this way. VN would need to work in a way
assigning the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94836
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94869
Bug ID: 94869
Summary: Template argument deduction/substitution failure with
Howard Hinnant's calendar library
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94868
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94870
Bug ID: 94870
Summary: Failure to use movhlps instead of seperated
mov+unpckhpd
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57002
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Christophe Lyon :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:03afbf335776916724b0608c256495c04a369d2b
commit r10-8063-g03afbf335776916724b0608c256495c04a369d2b
Author: Christophe Lyon
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57002
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94856
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
So the GNU TM is involved only very slightly as it prevents one inlining
candidate:
Without -fgnu-tm:
Enqueueing calls in d::~d()/9.
Estimating body: c.constprop/34
Known to be false: not inlined
si
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94856
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
With the patch, minimal options are:
g++ pr47218.ii -fno-tree-dse --param uninlined-function-insns=0 --param
early-inlining-insns=3 -O2 -c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94763
--- Comment #3 from Christophe Lyon ---
(In reply to vvinayag from comment #2)
> Sorry for the late reply.
> The tests appear to pass when I invoke them locally. They only failed as
> part of our buildbot run tests. It could be a glitch in our
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94869
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94725
--- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:31e6f8293362979aea53b5cae3fa6ab0b6981694
commit r10-8064-g31e6f8293362979aea53b5cae3fa6ab0b6981694
Author: Paul Thomas
Date: Thu Apr 30 09:56:01 2020 +0100
PR94725 - deleting gfor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94871
Bug ID: 94871
Summary: Failure to convert cmpeqpd+pxor with -1 into cmpneqpd
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39612
--- Comment #37 from Richard Biener ---
Eww. Fixing the missed optimization causes tons of maybe-uninit warnings.
That was probably to be expected since we're introducing undefs on the loop
entry edge and conditional uses. We eventually should
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639
Bug 24639 depends on bug 94769, which changed state.
Bug 94769 Summary: Possible use of uninitialized variable num
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94769
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94769
Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94538
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||9.2.0
--- Comment #18 from Christophe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90719
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:05b6520ed29a9e2b5480ecab4e71d999c7d04f29
commit r10-8066-g05b6520ed29a9e2b5480ecab4e71d999c7d04f29
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date: Thu A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94825
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:05b6520ed29a9e2b5480ecab4e71d999c7d04f29
commit r10-8066-g05b6520ed29a9e2b5480ecab4e71d999c7d04f29
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date: Thu Ap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94856
--- Comment #7 from Martin Jambor ---
The "edge points to wrong decl" case is a verifier error. We have a
method which (in the course of IPA-CP) loses its this pointer because
it is unused and the pass then does not clone all the this adjusting
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94842
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Indeed:
_Atomic float x = 5;
void
bar (float y[(int) (x += 2)])
{
}
is accepted while
_Atomic float x = 5;
void
foo (void)
{
void bar (float y[(int) (x += 2)]) {}
}
ICEs. The problem is that create_artif
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94868
--- Comment #2 from Zhao Jing ---
Dear Richard Biener:
I have already installed gmp/mpfr/mpc before install gcc.
zhaojing2@ubuntu:/opt/gcc-4.6.3$ ls gmp-4.3.2/gmp_install/
include lib share
zhaojing2@ubuntu:/opt/gcc-4.6.3$ ls mpfr-2.4.2/mpfr_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94842
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94871
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94872
Bug ID: 94872
Summary: Failure to optimize shuffle from u32 array into u64
array properly
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
rch64-unknown-linux-gnu-ld
--with-as=/usr/bin/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu-as --disable-libstdcxx-pch
--prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-r10-8064-20200430095601-g31e6f829336-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-aarch64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 10.0.1 20200430 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94874
Bug ID: 94874
Summary: [OpenMP] Unhelpful 'defaultmap(none)' diagnostic for
'DECL_ARTIFICIAL': 'error: ‘array_li.0’ not specified
in enclosing ‘target’'
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94874
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94874
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
This is something that is handled by
lang_hooks.decls.omp_predetermined_sharing
some FEs need to treat all DECL_ARTIFICIAL decls that way, others perhaps a
subset of them.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94875
Bug ID: 94875
Summary: -fdebug-types-section drops DW_AT_object_pointer
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94876
Bug ID: 94876
Summary: [OpenACC] Unhelpful mapping for 'DECL_ARTIFICIAL'
inside OpenACC 'kernels' regions
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keyword
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94876
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94876
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Created attachment 48419
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48419&action=edit
'0001-WIP-Refuse-OMP-OpenACC-DECL_ARTIFICIAL-in-oacc_defau.patch'
Indeed, using the attached
'0001-WIP-Refuse
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94358
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Schwinge ---
(In reply to Thomas Schwinge from comment #0)
> The original test case, 'gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/goacc/default_none.f95',
> had already gotten committed (unmodified) to trunk in r229832 (commit
> ef014f95
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94875
--- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries ---
Minimal example:
...
$ cat derivation.cc
class A {
public:
A() {}
int afoo() { return 1; }
};
A a_instance;
int
main (void)
{
return 0;
}
...
compiled as:
...
$ g++ derivation.cc -g -fdebug-types-se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94847
--- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries ---
Minimal test-case:
...
$ cat constvars.c
int
main (void)
{
const char laconic = 'A';
volatile char vox = 'X';
const volatile char victor = 'Y';
return 0;
}
...
Compiled like this:
...
$ gcc -g constv
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94877
Bug ID: 94877
Summary: Failure to simplify ~(x + 1) to -2 - x
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94748
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Szabolcs Nagy :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6ac83d350604c3e934d5e8a455ba7ec1c1c0240b
commit r10-8069-g6ac83d350604c3e934d5e8a455ba7ec1c1c0240b
Author: Szabolcs Nagy
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94878
Bug ID: 94878
Summary: Failure to optimize div with bls/or pattern
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94878
--- Comment #1 from Gabriel Ravier ---
Also, the assembly outputs are for when compiling with with `-mbmi` but that
should not affect the bug itself
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39612
--- Comment #38 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 48420
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48420&action=edit
patch
Tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, queued for GCC 11. Note it does not
(and cannot) fix the case for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94879
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94879
Bug ID: 94879
Summary: coroutines: ICE building folly in captures_temporary,
at cp/coroutines.cc:2707
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57359
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #48381|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94538
--- Comment #19 from Wilco ---
Yes I have a GCC9.3 build now, this fails too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94880
Bug ID: 94880
Summary: Failure to recognize andn pattern
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimizatio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94882
Bug ID: 94882
Summary: Failure to optimize and+or+sub into xor+not
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94881
Bug ID: 94881
Summary: incorrect Wstringop-overflow warning with thread
sanitizer
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94775
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6318fe77395fc0dd59419bc4d69cd06ac0158e54
commit r10-8071-g6318fe77395fc0dd59419bc4d69cd06ac0158e54
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94873
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94881
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milest
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94873
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94873
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94872
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Ever confirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94883
Bug ID: 94883
Summary: coroutines: ICE building folly in verify_gimple_stmt,
at tree-cfg.c:4959
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94883
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Assignee|unassigned at gcc d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94775
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9/10 Regression] ICE in |[8/9 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94877
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-04-30
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94878
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94880
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94882
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-04-30
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94884
Bug ID: 94884
Summary: Failure to recognize that result of or is always
superior to operands
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94884
--- Comment #1 from Gabriel Ravier ---
`f` can also be translated to `return true;` when it's this :
bool f(unsigned x, unsigned y)
{
return (x & y) <= getXOrY(x, y);
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94884
--- Comment #2 from Gabriel Ravier ---
Also when it is this :
bool f(unsigned x, unsigned y)
{
return x <= (x | ~y);
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94884
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94885
Bug ID: 94885
Summary: Functional cast from int to empty class incorrectly
accepted with -std=c++2a
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94885
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88780
Pei JIA changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jiapei at longervision dot com
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94675
--- Comment #18 from Xavier ---
The lib has been recently opensourced so I can share it :
https://github.com/Intersec/lib-common/blob/master/src/core/str-stream.h
We have 100-200 usages of p_end/s_end/b_end so even if it's possible to patch
them
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94885
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94886
Bug ID: 94886
Summary: coroutines: ICE building folly, in
transform_local_var_uses, at cp/coroutines.cc:1908
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94886
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Assignee|unass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94887
Bug ID: 94887
Summary: -fdebug-types-section drops DW_TAG_formal_parameter
and DW_TAG_template_type_param
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89510
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-04-30
Summary|new_allo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94888
Bug ID: 94888
Summary: segment fault
Product: gcc
Version: 5.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94888
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94888
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
AddressSanitizer:DEADLYSIGNAL
=
==198476==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: stack-overflow on address 0x7ffc0eba4ff8 (pc
0x7f4eab1169b4 bp 0x7f4eab20ef
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94869
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
It includes tons of std::lib headers:
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#if !(__cplusplus >= 201402)
# include
#endif
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94827
--- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Created attachment 48425
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48425&action=edit
try instantiating the fn
This one ices with the initial patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94885
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94885
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
Summary|Functional cast
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94889
Bug ID: 94889
Summary: Negate function not getting optimised to negate call
Product: gcc
Version: 9.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94890
Bug ID: 94890
Summary: std::tuple({0}) fails to compile with
-std=c++2a
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94856
--- Comment #8 from Martin Jambor ---
I proposed the patch on the mailing list:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-April/544943.html
1 - 100 of 188 matches
Mail list logo
