[Bug fortran/94737] New: BIND(C) names are not always treated as case sensitive. Versions < 8 are ok.

2020-04-23 Thread busby1 at llnl dot gov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94737 Bug ID: 94737 Summary: BIND(C) names are not always treated as case sensitive. Versions < 8 are ok. Product: gcc Version: 8.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: n

[Bug tree-optimization/94734] [10 Regression] Program crashes when compiled with -O2 since r10-1892-gb9ef6a2e04bfd013

2020-04-23 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94734 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com --- Comment #3 fr

[Bug fortran/94738] New: C descriptor passed to Fortran from C apepars to have wrong type information.

2020-04-23 Thread longb at cray dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94738 Bug ID: 94738 Summary: C descriptor passed to Fortran from C apepars to have wrong type information. Product: gcc Version: 9.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: n

[Bug c++/94645] [10 Regression][concepts] incorrect concept evaluation with decltype, plus internal error since r10-7554-gf1ad7bac76b66257

2020-04-23 Thread ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94645 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/94645] [10 Regression][concepts] incorrect concept evaluation with decltype, plus internal error since r10-7554-gf1ad7bac76b66257

2020-04-23 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94645 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f9f166251f181ddcee64092d89aecbc1166ca706 commit r10-7932-gf9f166251f181ddcee64092d89aecbc1166ca706 Author: Patrick Palka Date: T

[Bug libstdc++/90415] [9/10 Regression] std::is_copy_constructible> is incomplete

2020-04-23 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90415 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||alabuzhev at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug libstdc++/91630] std::any SFINAE breaks valid code since 9.1

2020-04-23 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91630 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug fortran/94737] BIND(C) names are not always treated as case sensitive. Versions < 8 are ok.

2020-04-23 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94737 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/94734] [10 Regression] Program crashes when compiled with -O2 since r10-1892-gb9ef6a2e04bfd013

2020-04-23 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94734 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug tree-optimization/94734] [10 Regression] Program crashes when compiled with -O2 since r10-1892-gb9ef6a2e04bfd013

2020-04-23 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94734 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- All the PR89430 testcases have such a load.

[Bug c++/94645] [10 Regression][concepts] incorrect concept evaluation with decltype, plus internal error since r10-7554-gf1ad7bac76b66257

2020-04-23 Thread rafael at espindo dot la
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94645 --- Comment #13 from Rafael Avila de Espindola --- Thank you so much. I can confirm that scylla now builds with gcc master with just a few fixes on the scylla side (we build with -Werror). There is a couple of test failures. I will try to reduce

[Bug driver/90983] [9/10 Regression] manual documents `-Wno-stack-usage` flag, but it is unrecognized

2020-04-23 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90983 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ae962e573ea5063fda7e86f93d9622e64cea9a7e commit r10-7934-gae962e573ea5063fda7e86f93d9622e64cea9a7e Author: Martin Sebor Date: Thu

[Bug driver/90983] [9 Regression] manual documents `-Wno-stack-usage` flag, but it is unrecognized

2020-04-23 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90983 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail|10.0| Target Milestone|---

[Bug libstdc++/90415] [9/10 Regression] std::is_copy_constructible> is incomplete

2020-04-23 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90415 --- Comment #13 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d1462b0782555354b4480e1f46498586d5882972 commit r10-7935-gd1462b0782555354b4480e1f46498586d5882972 Author: Jonathan Wakely Date:

[Bug libstdc++/92156] Cannot in-place construct std::any with std::any

2020-04-23 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92156 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d1462b0782555354b4480e1f46498586d5882972 commit r10-7935-gd1462b0782555354b4480e1f46498586d5882972 Author: Jonathan Wakely Date:

[Bug libstdc++/90415] [9 Regression] std::is_copy_constructible> is incomplete

2020-04-23 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90415 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[9/10 Regression] |[9 Regression] |std:

[Bug libstdc++/92156] Cannot in-place construct std::any with std::any

2020-04-23 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92156 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|---

[Bug libstdc++/91807] [9/10 Regression] std::variant with multiple identical types assignment fail to compile

2020-04-23 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91807 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/94734] [10 Regression] Program crashes when compiled with -O2 since r10-1892-gb9ef6a2e04bfd013

2020-04-23 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94734 --- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law --- THe whole point of that change is to not require a dominating load if the object comes from the stack. We conditionally load from the same location, then have a PHI which selects that loaded value or "1" an

[Bug bootstrap/94739] New: GCC won't build on CET enabled Linux OS

2020-04-23 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94739 Bug ID: 94739 Summary: GCC won't build on CET enabled Linux OS Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap

[Bug target/94740] New: ICE on testsuite/gcc.dg/sso/t5.c with -mcpu=future -mpcrel -O1

2020-04-23 Thread acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94740 Bug ID: 94740 Summary: ICE on testsuite/gcc.dg/sso/t5.c with -mcpu=future -mpcrel -O1 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/94740] ICE on testsuite/gcc.dg/sso/t5.c with -mcpu=future -mpcrel -O1

2020-04-23 Thread acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94740 --- Comment #1 from acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org --- Reduced test case: struct __attribute__((scalar_storage_order("big-endian"))) { int a; int b[]; } c; int d; int e() { d = c.b[0]; }

[Bug tree-optimization/94734] [10 Regression] Program crashes when compiled with -O2 since r10-1892-gb9ef6a2e04bfd013

2020-04-23 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94734 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #6) > THe whole point of that change is to not require a dominating load if the > object comes from the stack. Yeah, but I find that flawed. One can do it after perf

[Bug fortran/90350] ubound ICE on assumed size array even though explicit bound is specified

2020-04-23 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90350 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/93956] Wrong array creation with p => array_dt(1:n)%component

2020-04-23 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93956 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Thomas Kथà¤nig : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2a732dbdfcc0a3bc2b4bdb5387fffa193fea6df6 commit r9-8541-g2a732dbdfcc0a3bc2b4bdb5387fffa193fea6df6 Author: Thomas König D

<    1   2