[Bug objc/94637] [10 Regression] @selector() broken for selectors containing repeated colons

2020-04-17 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94637 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com Priorit

[Bug c/94106] [8/9/10 Regression] error on a function redeclaration with attribute transaction_safe

2020-04-17 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94106 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com Priorit

[Bug fortran/94090] ICE on mismatched interface

2020-04-17 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94090 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Thomas Kथà¤nig : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2298af0800b292f028298c1eaec42fd3033c4b9b commit r10-7778-g2298af0800b292f028298c1eaec42fd3033c4b9b Author: Thomas König Date:

[Bug fortran/94090] ICE on mismatched interface

2020-04-17 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94090 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug objc/94637] [10 Regression] @selector() broken for selectors containing repeated colons

2020-04-17 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94637 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug d/94623] ice for ./gdc.test/compilable/interpret3.d

2020-04-17 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94623 --- Comment #2 from David Binderman --- Host and target are the same: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu

[Bug c++/94483] [9/10 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected type_pack_expansion, have error_mark in add_capture, at cp/lambda.c:607

2020-04-17 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94483 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a28edad3da5c59f09565d3d42e20be1a924986c4 commit r10-7780-ga28edad3da5c59f09565d3d42e20be1a924986c4 Author: Patrick Palka Date: Th

[Bug c++/88754] [8/9/10 Regression] Constructor call wrongly assumed to be a variable declaration

2020-04-17 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88754 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3f5af3f71195b7f1ebe32bd0d695b59904fff778 commit r10-7779-g3f5af3f71195b7f1ebe32bd0d695b59904fff778 Author: Patrick Palka Date: Th

[Bug c++/94483] [9 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected type_pack_expansion, have error_mark in add_capture, at cp/lambda.c:607

2020-04-17 Thread ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94483 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[9/10 Regression] ICE: tree |[9 Regression] ICE: tree

[Bug c++/88754] [8/9 Regression] Constructor call wrongly assumed to be a variable declaration

2020-04-17 Thread ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88754 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9/10 Regression] |[8/9 Regression] |Cons

[Bug debug/94439] [10 Regression] gcc: error: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/builtin-complex-1.c: ‘-fcompare-debug’ failure since r10-3499-g0ce77f463d1d150e

2020-04-17 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94439 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com --- Comment #4 fr

[Bug tree-optimization/51513] Only partially optimizes away __builtin_unreachable switch default case

2020-04-17 Thread bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51513 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug middle-end/94635] [OpenMP][Offloading] mapping with alloc/delete followed by map(from/tofrom:) fails

2020-04-17 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94635 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug debug/94439] [10 Regression] gcc: error: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/builtin-complex-1.c: ‘-fcompare-debug’ failure since r10-3499-g0ce77f463d1d150e

2020-04-17 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94439 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |law at redhat dot com --- Commen

[Bug debug/94439] [10 Regression] gcc: error: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/builtin-complex-1.c: ‘-fcompare-debug’ failure since r10-3499-g0ce77f463d1d150e

2020-04-17 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94439 --- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law --- And has likely been broken since the introduction of VTA if I'm reading the code correctly.

[Bug target/93146] C++ TLS init function not generated on AIX

2020-04-17 Thread andrew at ishiboo dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93146 Andrew Paprocki changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andrew at ishiboo dot com --- Comment

[Bug c/94631] Wrong codegen for arithmetic on bitfields

2020-04-17 Thread joseph at codesourcery dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94631 --- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- On Fri, 17 Apr 2020, bugdal at aerifal dot cx wrote: > No, GCC's treatment also seems to mess up bitfields smaller than int and fully > governed by the standard (no implementation-defined us

[Bug c/94631] Wrong codegen for arithmetic on bitfields

2020-04-17 Thread bugdal at aerifal dot cx
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94631 --- Comment #7 from Rich Felker --- Can you provide a citation for that?

[Bug c/94631] Wrong codegen for arithmetic on bitfields

2020-04-17 Thread bugdal at aerifal dot cx
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94631 --- Comment #8 from Rich Felker --- OK, I think it's in 6.3.1.1 Boolean, characters, and integers, ¶2, but somewhat poorly worded: "The following may be used in an expression wherever an int or unsigned int may be used: - An object or expressi

[Bug c/94641] New: -Wpadded -fsanitize=undefined together cause warning on main()

2020-04-17 Thread edgardragon444 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94641 Bug ID: 94641 Summary: -Wpadded -fsanitize=undefined together cause warning on main() Product: gcc Version: 9.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/94550] False positive with -Wparentheses

2020-04-17 Thread daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94550 Daniel Krügler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.

[Bug rtl-optimization/90275] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE: in insert_regs, at cse.c:1128 with -O2 -fno-dce -fno-tree-dce

2020-04-17 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90275 --- Comment #22 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3737ccc424c56a2cecff202dd79f88d28850eeb2 commit r10-7781-g3737ccc424c56a2cecff202dd79f88d28850eeb2 Author: Jeff Law Date: Fri Apr 17

[Bug middle-end/94642] New: missing -Wformat-overflow on %f with excessive precision

2020-04-17 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94642 Bug ID: 94642 Summary: missing -Wformat-overflow on %f with excessive precision Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priori

[Bug driver/90983] manual documents `-Wno-stack-usage` flag, but it is unrecognized

2020-04-17 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90983 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |msebor at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug other/94629] 10 issues located by the PVS-studio static analyzer

2020-04-17 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94629 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #15

[Bug target/94417] -fcf-protection -mcmodel=large/-mforce-indirect-call is broken

2020-04-17 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94417 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4a745938b56da04ed01055d5bcb520dc1c760414 commit r9-8508-g4a745938b56da04ed01055d5bcb520dc1c760414 Author: H.J. Lu Date: Fri Apr

[Bug target/89355] Unnecessary ENDBR

2020-04-17 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89355 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4a745938b56da04ed01055d5bcb520dc1c760414 commit r9-8508-g4a745938b56da04ed01055d5bcb520dc1c760414 Author: H.J. Lu Date: Fri Apr

[Bug target/94622] testsuite/gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-1.c fails on powerpc64le with -mpcrel

2020-04-17 Thread acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94622 --- Comment #1 from acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org --- Compiling with -dap we see: sync # 7[c=12 l=4] *hwsync plq 8,.LANCHOR0@pcrel# 8[c=8 l=12] load_quadpti mr 10,9 # 9[c=4 l=4]

[Bug target/94417] -fcf-protection -mcmodel=large/-mforce-indirect-call is broken

2020-04-17 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94417 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:99ddb11c0840f68466a14fd583dd4d3a558d4961 commit r8-10186-g99ddb11c0840f68466a14fd583dd4d3a558d4961 Author: H.J. Lu Date: Fri Ap

[Bug target/89355] Unnecessary ENDBR

2020-04-17 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89355 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:99ddb11c0840f68466a14fd583dd4d3a558d4961 commit r8-10186-g99ddb11c0840f68466a14fd583dd4d3a558d4961 Author: H.J. Lu Date: Fri A

[Bug target/94417] -fcf-protection -mcmodel=large/-mforce-indirect-call is broken

2020-04-17 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94417 --- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu --- Fixed for GCC 10, GCC 9.4 and GCC 8.5.

[Bug c++/94550] False positive with -Wparentheses

2020-04-17 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94550 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/94231] Invalid move constructor defaulted outside of class as deleted is accepted

2020-04-17 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94231 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/88601] We may consider adding __builtin_convertvector and __builtin_shufflevector for better compaitbility with Clang

2020-04-17 Thread jmuizelaar at mozilla dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88601 Jeff Muizelaar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jmuizelaar at mozilla dot com --- Comme

[Bug target/94643] New: [x86_64] gratuitous sign extension of nonnegative value from 32 to 64 bits

2020-04-17 Thread bugdal at aerifal dot cx
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94643 Bug ID: 94643 Summary: [x86_64] gratuitous sign extension of nonnegative value from 32 to 64 bits Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: no

[Bug middle-end/61577] [4.9.0 Regression] can't compile on hp-ux v3 ia64

2020-04-17 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577 --- Comment #206 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- Does adding the linker option "-Wl,-O" help to reduce the size of cc1 and cc1plus?

[Bug tree-optimization/94643] [sign extension of nonnegative value from 32 to 64 bits

2020-04-17 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94643 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Keywords|

[Bug c++/88601] We may consider adding __builtin_convertvector and __builtin_shufflevector for better compaitbility with Clang

2020-04-17 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88601 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Jeff Muizelaar from comment #3) > As heads up, we're also starting to use __builtin_shufflevector in Firefox: > https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/source/gfx/wr/swgl/src/vector_type.h > > We

[Bug c++/94592] [10 Regression] ICE in non-type template parameter with constexpr constructor

2020-04-17 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94592 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #8 from Marek Polacek

[Bug c++/94255] template specialization in different namespace causes crash

2020-04-17 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94255 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug c++/94644] New: Wrong is_nothrow_move_constructible result if used in a template first

2020-04-17 Thread rafael at espindo dot la
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94644 Bug ID: 94644 Summary: Wrong is_nothrow_move_constructible result if used in a template first Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/94645] New: incorrect concecpt evaluation with decltype, plus internal erropr

2020-04-17 Thread a...@cloudius-systems.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94645 Bug ID: 94645 Summary: incorrect concecpt evaluation with decltype, plus internal erropr Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/94645] incorrect concecpt evaluation with decltype, plus internal erropr

2020-04-17 Thread a...@cloudius-systems.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94645 --- Comment #1 from Avi Kivity --- Created attachment 48304 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48304&action=edit reduced test case (after preprocessing) This is what the compiler spat out after it failed to compile the non-prep

[Bug target/94646] New: [arm] invalid codegen for conversion from 64-bit int to double hardfloat

2020-04-17 Thread bugdal at aerifal dot cx
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94646 Bug ID: 94646 Summary: [arm] invalid codegen for conversion from 64-bit int to double hardfloat Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norm

<    1   2