https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94637
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
Priorit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94106
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
Priorit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94090
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Thomas Kथà¤nig :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2298af0800b292f028298c1eaec42fd3033c4b9b
commit r10-7778-g2298af0800b292f028298c1eaec42fd3033c4b9b
Author: Thomas König
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94090
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94637
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94623
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman ---
Host and target are the same: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94483
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a28edad3da5c59f09565d3d42e20be1a924986c4
commit r10-7780-ga28edad3da5c59f09565d3d42e20be1a924986c4
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88754
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3f5af3f71195b7f1ebe32bd0d695b59904fff778
commit r10-7779-g3f5af3f71195b7f1ebe32bd0d695b59904fff778
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94483
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10 Regression] ICE: tree |[9 Regression] ICE: tree
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88754
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9/10 Regression] |[8/9 Regression]
|Cons
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94439
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #4 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51513
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94635
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94439
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |law at redhat dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94439
--- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
And has likely been broken since the introduction of VTA if I'm reading the
code correctly.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93146
Andrew Paprocki changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrew at ishiboo dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94631
--- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Fri, 17 Apr 2020, bugdal at aerifal dot cx wrote:
> No, GCC's treatment also seems to mess up bitfields smaller than int and fully
> governed by the standard (no implementation-defined us
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94631
--- Comment #7 from Rich Felker ---
Can you provide a citation for that?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94631
--- Comment #8 from Rich Felker ---
OK, I think it's in 6.3.1.1 Boolean, characters, and integers, ¶2, but somewhat
poorly worded:
"The following may be used in an expression wherever an int or unsigned int may
be used:
- An object or expressi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94641
Bug ID: 94641
Summary: -Wpadded -fsanitize=undefined together cause warning
on main()
Product: gcc
Version: 9.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94550
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90275
--- Comment #22 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3737ccc424c56a2cecff202dd79f88d28850eeb2
commit r10-7781-g3737ccc424c56a2cecff202dd79f88d28850eeb2
Author: Jeff Law
Date: Fri Apr 17
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94642
Bug ID: 94642
Summary: missing -Wformat-overflow on %f with excessive
precision
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90983
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |msebor at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94629
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #15
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94417
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4a745938b56da04ed01055d5bcb520dc1c760414
commit r9-8508-g4a745938b56da04ed01055d5bcb520dc1c760414
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Fri Apr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89355
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4a745938b56da04ed01055d5bcb520dc1c760414
commit r9-8508-g4a745938b56da04ed01055d5bcb520dc1c760414
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Fri Apr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94622
--- Comment #1 from acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Compiling with -dap we see:
sync # 7[c=12 l=4] *hwsync
plq 8,.LANCHOR0@pcrel# 8[c=8 l=12] load_quadpti
mr 10,9 # 9[c=4 l=4]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94417
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:99ddb11c0840f68466a14fd583dd4d3a558d4961
commit r8-10186-g99ddb11c0840f68466a14fd583dd4d3a558d4961
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Fri Ap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89355
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:99ddb11c0840f68466a14fd583dd4d3a558d4961
commit r8-10186-g99ddb11c0840f68466a14fd583dd4d3a558d4961
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Fri A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94417
--- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu ---
Fixed for GCC 10, GCC 9.4 and GCC 8.5.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94550
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94231
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88601
Jeff Muizelaar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jmuizelaar at mozilla dot com
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94643
Bug ID: 94643
Summary: [x86_64] gratuitous sign extension of nonnegative
value from 32 to 64 bits
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
--- Comment #206 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
Does adding the linker option "-Wl,-O" help to reduce the size of cc1 and
cc1plus?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94643
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88601
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Jeff Muizelaar from comment #3)
> As heads up, we're also starting to use __builtin_shufflevector in Firefox:
> https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/source/gfx/wr/swgl/src/vector_type.h
>
> We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94592
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #8 from Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94255
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94644
Bug ID: 94644
Summary: Wrong is_nothrow_move_constructible result if used in
a template first
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94645
Bug ID: 94645
Summary: incorrect concecpt evaluation with decltype, plus
internal erropr
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94645
--- Comment #1 from Avi Kivity ---
Created attachment 48304
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48304&action=edit
reduced test case (after preprocessing)
This is what the compiler spat out after it failed to compile the
non-prep
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94646
Bug ID: 94646
Summary: [arm] invalid codegen for conversion from 64-bit int
to double hardfloat
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
101 - 144 of 144 matches
Mail list logo