[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #12 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug c++/81692] Bogus noreturn warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81692 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org Known to f

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #13 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #14 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug target/94135] PPC: subfic instead of neg used for rotate right

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94135 --- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool --- Please try it out on hardware (or on a cycle-accurate simulator) if you don't believe me ;-)

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #15 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug target/93654] Inappropriate "-fcf-protection and -mindirect-branch=thunk are incompatible on x86_64" restriction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93654 David Woodhouse changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dwmw2 at infradead dot org --- Comment

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #16 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #17 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #18 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #19 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #20 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #21 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #22 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug c/94172] [arm-none-eabi] ICE in expand_debug_locations, at cfgexpand.c:5403

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94172 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug driver/94198] Placement of source file in GCC command line has impact on whether the link succeeds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94198 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #23 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #25 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #24 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #25 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #29 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #27 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #30 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug target/94185] [10 Regression] crashes with "error: unable to generate reloads for {*zero_extendsidi2} internal compiler error: in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:4006

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94185 --- Comment #4 from Vladimir Makarov --- Thank you the reduced test. I've started to work on this.

[Bug middle-end/90404] No warning on attempts to modify a const object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90404 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug inline-asm/87733] local register variable not honored with earlyclobber

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87733 --- Comment #37 from Peter Bergner --- (In reply to Rich Felker from comment #30) > The code has been working for the past 8 years with the "0"(r2) input > constraint added, and would clearly be valid if r2 were pre-initialized with > something.

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #31 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug middle-end/94169] warn for modifying getenv() result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94169 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|88781 | --- Comment #1 from Martin Sebor --- On

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #32 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug driver/94198] Placement of source file in GCC command line has impact on whether the link succeeds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94198 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- See also http://c-faq.com/lib/libsearch.html Order of source files (or generated object files) relative to libraries matters, and preserving it matters,

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #33 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug target/94185] [10 Regression] crashes with "error: unable to generate reloads for {*zero_extendsidi2} internal compiler error: in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:4006

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94185 --- Comment #5 from Vladimir Makarov --- I found the problem. LRA reused the same insn alternative when mem subreg was changed. The patch will be ready today or tomorrow at worst.

[Bug target/94194] x86: Provide feraiseexcept builtins

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94194 --- Comment #2 from Adhemerval Zanella --- Afaik the libc implementation is free to set any macro value for FE_*, although glibc and other implementations I am awre of try to make is related to architecture values when it does make sense (and it

[Bug middle-end/94169] warn for modifying getenv() result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94169 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- Other C standard functions that return a pointer to an unmodifiable object: localeconv(), setlocale(), strerror() In addition, stdin, stdout, and stderr could be marked as pointing to read-only (although u

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #34 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #35 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #36 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #37 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #39 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #38 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug target/91886] [10 regression] powerpc64 impossible constraint in asm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91886 --- Comment #36 from Segher Boessenkool --- (In reply to Rich Felker from comment #34) > Per the IBM docs, LE/elfv2 (which they confusingly equate) Where do you see this, btw? The introduction of the ABI doc says > The OpenPOWER ELF V2 ABI is

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #40 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug target/91886] [10 regression] powerpc64 impossible constraint in asm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91886 --- Comment #37 from Segher Boessenkool --- Oh, hrm, I am looking at an older version. Ugh.

[Bug libstdc++/94199] New: std::experimental::net::v1::make_service function template not instantiatable

://godbolt.org/z/7guiic The function template tries to throw service_already_exists, which isn't default constructible: /opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-trunk-20200316/include/c++/10.0.1/experimental/executor:581:8: error: use of deleted function 'std::experimental::net::v1::service_alre

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #42 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #43 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #44 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #45 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #46 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #47 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug target/94185] [10 Regression] crashes with "error: unable to generate reloads for {*zero_extendsidi2} internal compiler error: in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:4006

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94185 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Vladimir Makarov : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bae7b38cf8a21e068ad5c0bab089dedb78af3346 commit r10-7197-gbae7b38cf8a21e068ad5c0bab089dedb78af3346 Author: Vladimir N. Makarov D

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #48 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #49 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #50 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #51 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #52 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug c/94200] New: -mabi=ibmlongdouble and -mlong-double-128 produces error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94200 Bug ID: 94200 Summary: -mabi=ibmlongdouble and -mlong-double-128 produces error Product: gcc Version: 7.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #53 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug tree-optimization/94187] [10 Regression] valgrind error in count_nonzero_bytes since r10-2101

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94187 --- Comment #8 from David Binderman --- >From the testsuite, files ./gcc.dg/Warray-bounds-29.c and ./gcc.dg/Warray-bounds-32.c seem to cause similar problems with function count_nonzero_bytes, so it might be worthwhile checking that these two tes

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #54 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug target/94200] -mabi=ibmlongdouble and -mlong-double-128 produces error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94200 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/94199] std::experimental::net::v1::make_service function template not instantiatable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94199 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Status|UNCON

[Bug c++/94197] __is_constructible gives an access error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94197 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wak

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #55 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #56 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #58 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #57 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug c/94179] [10 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:14399 since r10-7127-gcb99630f254aaec6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94179 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c015ff8ccaf3ee8e4f6393679ed790ed0df92873 commit r10-7198-gc015ff8ccaf3ee8e4f6393679ed790ed0df92873 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Mo

[Bug c/94179] [10 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:14399 since r10-7127-gcb99630f254aaec6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94179 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug d/92216] GDC generate duplicate symbols when mixins and interfaces are used to gather

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92216 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:447d196e75d97a9ac7c6a548dc9d0fe367adf6be commit r10-7199-g447d196e75d97a9ac7c6a548dc9d0fe367adf6be Author: Iain Buclaw Date: Mon Ma

[Bug target/94173] [RISCV] Superfluous stackpointer manipulation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94173 Jim Wilson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wilson at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 fr

[Bug target/94173] [RISCV] Superfluous stackpointer manipulation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94173 Jim Wilson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/94173] [RISCV] Superfluous stackpointer manipulation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94173 Andrew Waterman changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andrew at sifive dot com --- Comment #

[Bug d/92216] GDC generate duplicate symbols when mixins and interfaces are used to gather

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92216 ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASS

[Bug d/92792] [10 Regression] symbols dropped from libphobos

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92792 ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/94173] [RISCV] Superfluous stackpointer manipulation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94173 --- Comment #3 from Jim Wilson --- I was looking at the rv32 output. For the rv64 compiler, you need to use aligned(16).

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #59 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #59 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #61 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug libstdc++/94199] std::experimental::net::v1::make_service function template not instantiatable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94199 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c62f5e6e1f457462b1cea74792833821bbea64bb commit r10-7200-gc62f5e6e1f457462b1cea74792833821bbea64bb Author: Jonathan Wakely Date:

[Bug libstdc++/94199] std::experimental::net::v1::make_service function template not instantiatable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94199 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:31b204ace293b81fc51f76bf9faf459ab1cd7c50 commit r9-8381-g31b204ace293b81fc51f76bf9faf459ab1cd7c50 Author: Jonathan Wakely

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #62 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug libstdc++/94199] std::experimental::net::v1::make_service function template not instantiatable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94199 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #63 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug d/92309] Assignment to anonymous union member corrupts sibling members in struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92309 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2691ffe6dbaffb704593dd6220178c28848b3855 commit r10-7201-g2691ffe6dbaffb704593dd6220178c28848b3855 Author: Iain Buclaw Date: Mon Ma

[Bug d/92309] Assignment to anonymous union member corrupts sibling members in struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92309 ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED CC|

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #64 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #65 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #66 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #67 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug target/94194] x86: Provide feraiseexcept builtins

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94194 --- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- GCC already has implicit knowledge of how FE_* for exceptions relate to the hardware, because it generates calls to __atomic_feraiseexcept, which is defined in libatomic using FE_* from .

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #68 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #69 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #70 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #71 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #72 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #73 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #74 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #75 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #76 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

<    1   2   3   >