https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94084
--- Comment #2 from vfdff ---
thanks very much, you are right.
I try the case2 with global pointer and it get similar result with case1.
extern int base;
extern int *dest, *src;
void foo (int n)
{
int i;
// #pragma no_swp
for (i=0; i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94084
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to vfdff from comment #2)
> thanks very much, you are right.
The same problem is here.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94059
--- Comment #3 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #2)
> Also note I bootstrap m68k regularly, last build was:
>
> 8e6d0dba166324f4b257329bd4b4ddc2b4522359
>
> Without more relevant data, there's nothing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94042
--- Comment #36 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
The m68k bootstrap also recently got broken (PR/94059). Currently testing
whether this is also a result of this change
(r10-6919-gf3ce088645e5305d932380c7520809181b2d2eb9).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93781
--- Comment #2 from vfdff ---
For more test, I find the following case2 can get the expect result, while the
case1 can't.
== [case1] ==
unsigned int foo (unsigned int arg)
{
unsigned int C03FE = 4;
if
101 - 105 of 105 matches
Mail list logo