[Bug libstdc++/93923] [10 Regression] std::is_copy_constructible raises compilation error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93923 --- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law --- ISTM that if the standard disallows, then we should as well. We could always raise a DR if we think the standard ought to be updated to be more user friendly in what it accepts. I think I ran into maybe a

[Bug libstdc++/92906] [10 regression] FAIL: libstdc++-abi/abi_check

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92906 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com --- Comment #8 fr

[Bug target/91804] [10 regression] r265398 breaks gcc.target/powerpc/vec-rlmi-rlnm.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91804 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P1 |P2 CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/93674] [8/9/10 Regression] GCC eliminates conditions it should not, when strict-enums is on

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93674 --- Comment #12 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Definitely an IVOPTS problem of some kind. It shouldn't be using some_enum types for the induction variables. It's probably a one-line fix for whomever knows the code. Bin?

[Bug tree-optimization/93674] [8/9/10 Regression] GCC eliminates conditions it should not, when strict-enums is on

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93674 bin cheng changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug rtl-optimization/90280] [9/10 Regression] ICE: in lra_assign, at lra-assigns.c:1650 with -O -fno-dce -fno-forward-propagate -fno-omit-frame-pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90280 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug debug/92417] [10 Regression] gcc generates wrong debug information at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92417 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com --- Comment #3 fr

<    1   2