https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93796
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93780
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:be7c145ad52e76a1a0fd201dd96bc92e8d3a275d
commit r10-6689-gbe7c145ad52e76a1a0fd201dd96bc92e8d3a275d
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93780
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93631
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93631
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Just to add as a data point, gimple_builtin_call_types_compatible_p was
originally added to catch indirect calls turned into direct calls of
builtins but with wrongly typed args like from
void (*fn)(int) =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93794
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93792
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93791
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93788
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Status|UN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93786
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93785
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93745
--- Comment #9 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 18 Feb 2020, msebor at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93745
>
> --- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor ---
> That's why I asked "What language relies on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93799
Bug ID: 93799
Summary: [10 Regression] ice in
propagate_vals_across_arith_jfunc, at ipa-cp.c:2039
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92420
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2d8ea3a0a6095a56b7c59c50b1068d602cde934a
commit r9-8248-g2d8ea3a0a6095a56b7c59c50b1068d602cde934a
Author: Richard Sandif
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92710
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:84a465171761faeceb87037a606f7834dab18942
commit r9-8249-g84a465171761faeceb87037a606f7834dab18942
Author: Richard Sandif
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90724
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:65709f4b93c74101440ab16bf4bddf6e44672177
commit r9-8247-g65709f4b93c74101440ab16bf4bddf6e44672177
Author: Prathamesh Kul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93434
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e129cd5283c2e57fc2a86e6981b8e1556b13069c
commit r9-8250-ge129cd5283c2e57fc2a86e6981b8e1556b13069c
Author: Richard Sandif
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93797
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:da67227bfc407dd1412b3396ed962f30084f9401
commit r10-6690-gda67227bfc407dd1412b3396ed962f30084f9401
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93797
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92587
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93791
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-checking
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90724
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolutio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92710
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolutio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93434
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9 Regression]|[8 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93799
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93786
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93789
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93794
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93786
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> Hmm, but this destructive modification of something we don't unshare doesn't
> work. Either we have to always wrap statement lists but then we're back to
> the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27452
Thomas Henlich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thenlich at gcc dot gnu.org
Res
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93786
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 18 Feb 2020, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93786
>
> --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93786
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #4)
> Could we make those sepcifc DEBUG_STMTS appear only later (during
> gimplification maybe?) and represent them as expression flags in the
> FEs? That would av
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93580
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Mark Eggleston
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d4c10c9f4bff616e7ed07e92504fe31a700e2af1
commit r10-6691-gd4c10c9f4bff616e7ed07e92504fe31a700e2af1
Author: Mark Eggleston
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93582
--- Comment #27 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 17 Feb 2020, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93582
>
> --- Comment #26 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> Created attachment 47863
> --> https://g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93800
Bug ID: 93800
Summary: GCC adds unwanted nops to align loops on powerpc 8xx
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93800
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93801
Bug ID: 93801
Summary: False -Wmismatched-tags upon redundant typename
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93580
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Mark Eggleston
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:560139481239e37a1cc878fb90805fa5e94f623c
commit r9-8251-g560139481239e37a1cc878fb90805fa5e94f623c
Author: Mark Eggleston
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93579
Bug 93579 depends on bug 93580, which changed state.
Bug 93580 Summary: [9/10 Regression] ICE in gfc_validate_kind(): Got bad kind
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93580
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93580
markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resol
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93802
Bug ID: 93802
Summary: gcc generates a rlwinm/or pair instead of a single
rlwimi (powerpc)
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93603
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Mark Eggleston
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8f55a0eec910dd02992f4caca083048d91c0b2e1
commit r10-6692-g8f55a0eec910dd02992f4caca083048d91c0b2e1
Author: Mark Eggleston
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90313
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:52db14c1f700e14e5b1b6c7fc702c0a08cc3781c
commit r9-8252-g52db14c1f700e14e5b1b6c7fc702c0a08cc3781c
Author: Richard Sandif
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92768
--- Comment #20 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2408b93a10c9c6cb210bc2a93d39ce6d56144ca3
commit r9-8253-g2408b93a10c9c6cb210bc2a93d39ce6d56144ca3
Author: Richard Sandi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93603
markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93776
--- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor ---
x86_64 testcase (reproduces at -O1):
struct empty {};
struct s { int i; };
struct z
{
int j;
struct empty e;
struct s s;
};
void bar (struct z);
void foo (void)
{
struct z z, z2;
z2.s.i = 1;
z
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93779
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:68f9c41d54a7839e90d10e1400c8726c8ccde88d
commit r10-6693-g68f9c41d54a7839e90d10e1400c8726c8ccde88d
Author: David Malcolm
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
--- Comment #189 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2020-02-16 4:21 p.m., John David Anglin wrote:
> On 2020-02-15 3:32 p.m., peter.bisroev at groundlabs dot com wrote:
>> I have not had a chance to look through these in great detail, will do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93774
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a674c7b8b8028c5d7e52dd38783e8e2b02034b63
commit r10-6694-ga674c7b8b8028c5d7e52dd38783e8e2b02034b63
Author: David Malcolm
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93388
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2e6233935c77b56a68e939c629702f960b8e6fb2
commit r10-6695-g2e6233935c77b56a68e939c629702f960b8e6fb2
Author: David Malcolm
Date: M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93778
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2e6233935c77b56a68e939c629702f960b8e6fb2
commit r10-6695-g2e6233935c77b56a68e939c629702f960b8e6fb2
Author: David Malcolm
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93777
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4f40164a9322105012e9070eebd57ba80c69b873
commit r10-6696-g4f40164a9322105012e9070eebd57ba80c69b873
Author: David Malcolm
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93692
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0b2b45a68f48817e2310b12db3e03e648d4d2005
commit r10-6697-g0b2b45a68f48817e2310b12db3e03e648d4d2005
Author: David Malcolm
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92924
--- Comment #29 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ea0b12523d0d9a9059b5173ce9653b92ddfb284f
commit r10-6698-gea0b12523d0d9a9059b5173ce9653b92ddfb284f
Author: Martin Liska
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92924
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93692
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93777
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93598
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93778
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93774
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93779
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93583
--- Comment #18 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:33351ff9faa21c4c1af377d661a52ac0ce366db3
commit r10-6699-g33351ff9faa21c4c1af377d661a52ac0ce366db3
Author: Martin Liska
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93773
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
I'm still working on reproducing this.
Looking at the stderr from attachment 47857, this seems reminiscent of
g:b4f3232d6979022a36b4055d7d3aaba693a39938 (PR c++/70105 and PR c/68473)
and also g:876217ae71c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93583
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93203
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92587
--- Comment #9 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 47867
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47867&action=edit
Reduced test-case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92587
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to wo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92518
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92518
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:08afe87b7976e93197a66e01f93191ead496ad42
commit r10-6700-g08afe87b7976e93197a66e01f93191ead496ad42
Author: Martin Liska
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93401
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc- |
|patches/2020-02/msg00
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92587
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93601
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Mark Eggleston
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:23d3f25c87d307536f7e0f15e211968a87657602
commit r10-6701-g23d3f25c87d307536f7e0f15e211968a87657602
Author: Mark Eggleston
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93601
markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93799
--- Comment #2 from fxue at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Duplicate of pr93763
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93801
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91724
--- Comment #4 from Christophe Lyon ---
It worked for me with gcc-8-branch at
g:9eba9635f653291804ecb832eebe1ed96e3346ba
Using:
../gcc/configure --with-arch=armv7-a --with-fpu=vfpv3-d16 --with-float=hard
--with-mode=thumb --with-build-config=boo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93787
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus ---
Note: Once this bug is fixed, libgomp/openacc_lib.h shall be updated as the
'async_' name is user visible and wrong.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88751
--- Comment #10 from Babneet Singh ---
Confirming that this fix resolves the reported regression in all OpenJ9 builds.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91724
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||doko at ubuntu dot com
--- Comment #5 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93803
Bug ID: 93803
Summary: ICE: segmentation fault with constant initialization
of class having a [[no_unique_address]] field
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
* cp/decl.c (reshape_init_array_1): Enforce constructor creation
for VLAs when initialized with zero value.
* testsuite/g++.dg/pr93730.C: New test
* testsuite/g++.dg/abi/mangle72.C: Change mangling to new version
I'm not sure about fix of c++/58646 but this allows t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93582
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #47863|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90378
--- Comment #4 from Vladimir Makarov ---
> Miscompilation occurs in same configuration: arm-linux-gnueabihf at -O2
> -flto.
>
I don't see how these two patches *directly* resulted in miscompilation.
Although it might trigger some latent bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90378
--- Comment #5 from Richard Earnshaw ---
(In reply to Vladimir Makarov from comment #4)
> > Miscompilation occurs in same configuration: arm-linux-gnueabihf at -O2
> > -flto.
> >
>
> I don't see how these two patches *directly* resulted in misc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90378
--- Comment #6 from Richard Earnshaw ---
(In reply to Richard Earnshaw from comment #5)
> (In reply to Vladimir Makarov from comment #4)
> > > Miscompilation occurs in same configuration: arm-linux-gnueabihf at -O2
> > > -flto.
> > >
> >
> > I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93714
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Mark Eggleston
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:06119d691e27e25fd4f4486467ad95f7b545fde3
commit r10-6703-g06119d691e27e25fd4f4486467ad95f7b545fde3
Author: Mark Eggleston
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93804
Bug ID: 93804
Summary: exempt extern "C" headers from -Wredundant-tags
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93805
Bug ID: 93805
Summary: [8/9/10 Regression] A suspicious -Werror=noexcept
warning since r8-2461-g9fb82e652cee118b
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93805
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93667
--- Comment #6 from Martin Jambor ---
I proposed a fix on the mailing list:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2020-02/msg01053.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93776
--- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor ---
I proposed a fix on the mailing list:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2020-02/msg01054.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93801
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91724
--- Comment #6 from Christophe Lyon ---
I added --enable-default-pie to my configure options, and it's still
successful.
("a is 1\n");
}
}
--
$ gcc -std=c11 -pedantic -Wall -Wextra -funsafe-math-optimizations -O3 test.c
&& ./a.out
a = 0
a is 1
--
gcc x86-64 version: gcc (GCC) 10.0.1 20200218 (experimental)
--
mizations -O3 test.c
&& ./a.out
one = 1
one = 0
--
gcc x86-64 version: gcc (GCC) 10.0.1 20200218 (experimental)
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93807
Bug ID: 93807
Summary: -std=c++2a allows to omit out-of-class declaration in
template class
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93808
Bug ID: 93808
Summary: [9 Regression] [SH] Ruby crashes with 'Illegal
Instruction' when compiled with gcc-9
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93809
Bug ID: 93809
Summary: bogus error class tag used in naming union on typedef
typename ::U U2
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93808
--- Comment #1 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
Log for a successful build with gcc-8:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=ruby2.5&arch=sh4&ver=2.5.5-4&stamp=1564498024&raw=0
Log for a failed build with gcc-9:
https://buildd.debian.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93809
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Known to fail|
1 - 100 of 150 matches
Mail list logo
