https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93631
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93632
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||compile-time-hog
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93626
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93623
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93643
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93644
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93602
--- Comment #13 from Liviu Ionescu ---
I'm not sure what the best solution might be, but it looks like the configure
script can detect the case when a distinct libiconv is encountered.
In this case the only thing that is needed is an explicit re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92518
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #9 from Martin Liška
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92599
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93641
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93648
Bug ID: 93648
Summary: Inline assembly and C++ references cause uninitialized
read
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93618
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:59dbb04df76da41f26192c2c219584fc3d6017cc
commit r10-6543-g59dbb04df76da41f26192c2c219584fc3d6017cc
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93648
--- Comment #1 from Roman Zhikharevich ---
Reproducible in G++ 9.1 and 9.2, but not 8.3 (did not test 9.0 because
godbolt.org doesn't support it).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93648
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
First off the comma is ignored in inline-asm.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93648
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93649
Bug ID: 93649
Summary: ICE in get_representative, at
analyzer/constraint-manager.cc:297
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-invalid-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93641
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93648
--- Comment #4 from Roman Zhikharevich ---
Sorry, I forgot to mention that this is triggered with -O2, on x86-64.
> First off the comma is ignored in inline-asm.
This doesn't seem to be true because it changes the generated assembly.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93648
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
This inline-asm has issue anyways.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93648
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
What exactly are you trying to do with this inline-asm?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93650
Bug ID: 93650
Summary: ICE in cxx_eval_constant_expression, at
cp/constexpr.c:5626
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93375
--- Comment #8 from Christophe Lyon ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #7)
> Does the patch in comment #6 fix the remaining test failures for everyone?
It's OK for me on arm, thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93648
--- Comment #7 from Roman Zhikharevich ---
I am writing benchmarking code for my project and trying to make the compiler
ignore its knowledge of certain values during optimization. I settled for
template
void black_box(T* value) {
asm v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93650
--- Comment #1 from Arseny Solokha ---
W/o :
namespace std {
using type = enum _Ord { less };
class strong_ordering {
type _M_value;
constexpr strong_ordering(_Ord) : _M_value() {}
static const strong_ordering less;
static st
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93650
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93650
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I guess we could do something like punt instead of ICEing if CONSTRUCTOR
appears there with ctx->uid_sensitive, but whether it is the correct thing to
do, no idea.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93636
--- Comment #4 from Sebastian Unger ---
I agree that the API of strncat is confusingly different to many of the other
API such as strncpy etc. However, the use-case I show is a valid one (as far as
one can ever consider any use of a non-terminate
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93648
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92597
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rzhikharevich@yandex-team.r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93650
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93643
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93640
--- Comment #2 from Dominik Czarnota ---
Just to clarify, I reported other cases like this in Bug 93641 - Wrong strncmp
and strncasecmp size arguments
(https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93641).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93637
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The problem is that with -mavx -mno-avx2, we have vcondv4div4df optab, but not
vcondv4div4di. Before fre4 we have:
vect_cst__5 = { 0.0, 0.0, 1.0e+0, 0.0 };
...
_55 = &ev[0] + 32;
MEM [(double *)_55] =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93637
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> _80 = VEC_COND_EXPR <{ -1, -1, 0, -1 }, { 5, 6, 7, 8 }, _28>;
Isn't a constant argument 0 for VEC_COND_EXPR really a VEC_PERM?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93637
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
It is a blend, so yes, it can be represented as VEC_PERM_EXPR, or using
vcond_mask_optab etc.
The trouble is that TARGET_AVX && !TARGET_AVX2 is really weird when 32-byte
integral modes are involved and the qu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93651
Bug ID: 93651
Summary: std::ranges::iota_view::iterator is not a
Cpp17 input iterator
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89863
--- Comment #6 from David Binderman ---
For this C++ code:
// reading 8 bytes from a 5 byte field
# include
# include
struct S
{
char a[ 5];
short b;
};
void f( const S * ps)
{
uint64_t n;
memcpy( &n, ps->a,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93618
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92583
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93375
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93647
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89863
--- Comment #7 from David Binderman ---
For this C++ code:
// Division by zero.
extern void g();
void f()
{
unsigned int vsync_rate_hz = 0;
unsigned int frame_time_microsec = 100 / vsync_rate_hz;
g();
}
gcc and clang have not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93649
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93643
--- Comment #2 from Iñaki Ucar ---
Created attachment 47811
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47811&action=edit
test.ii
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93643
--- Comment #3 from Iñaki Ucar ---
I got no backtrace, just the output shown in my first comment, at least with
the gcc version included in Fedora Rawhide. I've just attached the test.ii file
too. With -v:
$ g++ -v -save-temps test.cpp
Using bu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93651
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93502
--- Comment #6 from Avi Kivity ---
Even if match_results stores a copy of the matching string, it would be stored
on the heap and only pointers would be stored on the stack. So the stack
overflow comes from recursion, not because of the delegatio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93651
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Created attachment 47812
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47812&action=edit
Make cpp17-input-iterator concept allow non-integral types.
This patch fixes the problem.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93652
Bug ID: 93652
Summary: -Wconversion gives false warning with bitwise
operations on reference types returned from function
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93641
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:36a798fd192ced25eefaeee345507fa1a0c0356e
commit r10-6544-g36a798fd192ced25eefaeee345507fa1a0c0356e
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58218
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:36a798fd192ced25eefaeee345507fa1a0c0356e
commit r10-6544-g36a798fd192ced25eefaeee345507fa1a0c0356e
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93641
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:13686ecef23bcfe9443a0755c73a19d677b786bd
commit r10-6545-g13686ecef23bcfe9443a0755c73a19d677b786bd
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93632
--- Comment #2 from Jean-Michaël Celerier ---
Without these options it goes down from 2 minutes to 16 seconds which is
already much better, but still a couple times slower than before
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93582
--- Comment #17 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #16)
> I'll play with it next week.
What can be handled specially is certainly size2i == maxsizei for the
known_subrange_p case. Then we can pun the RHS directly wi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93615
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Christophe Lyon :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5602b48b2ed84feb1a5792e3d73b00b42138ca6e
commit r10-6546-g5602b48b2ed84feb1a5792e3d73b00b42138ca6e
Author: Christophe Lyon
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93582
--- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #17)
> As for the more complex case of handling non-constants mixed with constants
> I do have some patches in the queue for stage1 for the partial overlap case
> but
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93641
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a59aa3026821ac4883198f1858984b6f78612ae6
commit r10-6547-ga59aa3026821ac4883198f1858984b6f78612ae6
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93639
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91913
--- Comment #4 from Richard Earnshaw ---
Main bug fixed with https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2020-02/msg02312.html
Awaiting commit of testcase.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93599
--- Comment #8 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
While trying to figure out what was going on I tried the original test on
several different machines including multiple power 8s and power 9s and it
eventually would fail on any of them. Sometimes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85334
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bf6465d0461234ccd45ae34d5e2375a0bee0081d
commit r10-6550-gbf6465d0461234ccd45ae34d5e2375a0bee0081d
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Mon Feb 10 07
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91913
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:86edfcfeccf16a30e541883532d9bdbece5d9f60
commit r10-6551-g86edfcfeccf16a30e541883532d9bdbece5d9f60
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85334
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3fde3398341ba900ed2e1eaecf00799fda66686a
commit r9-8208-g3fde3398341ba900ed2e1eaecf00799fda66686a
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Mon Fe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91489
--- Comment #4 from Paul Gofman ---
I suppose I figured a better way to fix this and sent the patch to the mailing
list: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2020-02/msg00554.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93372
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Hans-Peter Nilsson :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7573521f46427d36a203f72794af7188ce04de88
commit r10-6557-g7573521f46427d36a203f72794af7188ce04de88
Author: Hans-Peter Nilsson
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93653
Bug ID: 93653
Summary: diagnose calls to strncmp with bound less than
constant string length
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93654
Bug ID: 93654
Summary: Inappropriate "- -fcf-protection and
-mindirect-branch=thunk are incompatible on x86_64"
restriction
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93203
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93549
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93640
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0cc575e4d8b68b743e07da02a74733f9b5cb585a
commit r10-6559-g0cc575e4d8b68b743e07da02a74733f9b5cb585a
Author: Martin Sebor
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93640
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93653
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93655
Bug ID: 93655
Summary: diagnose calls to strncmp with bound greater than
constant string length
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhance
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93653
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81652
Bug 81652 depends on bug 85334, which changed state.
Bug 85334 Summary: Shadow stack isn't unwound properly through signal handler
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85334
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85334
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93656
Bug ID: 93656
Summary: FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr67770.c execution test with
-fcf-protection
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83113
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andrew Benson :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7848054c68bad6e2aa40cb59f77cc99bd8448d52
commit r10-6560-g7848054c68bad6e2aa40cb59f77cc99bd8448d52
Author: Andrew Benson
Date: M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89943
Bug 89943 depends on bug 83113, which changed state.
Bug 83113 Summary: Bogus "duplicate allocatable attribute" error for submodule
character function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83113
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83113
Andrew Benson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93641
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c88ffcc6f4f46223c219014729f33f6cb9649928
commit r10-6561-gc88ffcc6f4f46223c219014729f33f6cb9649928
Author: Iain Sandoe
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93635
--- Comment #2 from Steve Kargl ---
On Sun, Feb 09, 2020 at 06:39:31PM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> Fortuantely, I
> use neither namelist nor equivalence, so have no skin in the
> game. Someone else can complete the fix.
>
Here
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93549
--- Comment #9 from David Binderman ---
False alarm. Sorry. Bad raspberry pi config.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93203
--- Comment #4 from David Binderman ---
Another false result produced by my bad gcc config.
Please ignore my previous comment.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93657
Bug ID: 93657
Summary: Ambiguous wording "is doing to"
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: analyzer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93657
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||documentation
--- Comment #1 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93658
Bug ID: 93658
Summary: [9/10 Regression] infinite loop building ghostscript
and icu with -O3 on powerpc64le-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93658
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ra
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93659
Bug ID: 93659
Summary: typo in analyzer.opt: call tha would
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: analyzer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93660
Bug ID: 93660
Summary: ICE in ipa_simd_modify_function_body, at
omp-simd-clone.c:993
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93659
--- Comment #1 from Roland Illig ---
And another typo, from the same file:
- Warn about code paths in which an initialized value is used.
+ Warn about code paths in which an uninitialized value is used.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93661
Bug ID: 93661
Summary: [10 Regression] ICE in tree_to_poly_int64, at
tree.c:2976
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93662
Bug ID: 93662
Summary: [10 Regression] ICE in tree_to_poly_int64, at
tree.c:2976
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93663
Bug ID: 93663
Summary: [10 Regression] ICE in is_halfway_below, at
real.c:5192
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93661
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |tree-optimization
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93582
--- Comment #19 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #18)
> > For bitfields there's also the ever present bitfield-lowering idea...
>
> I understood Andrew P. is working on something, but no idea how far it is.
I am wo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93643
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Iñaki Ucar from comment #3)
> I got no backtrace, just the output shown in my first comment, at least with
> the gcc version included in Fedora Rawhide. I've just attached the test.ii
> file too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93657
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm ---
common.opt's has:
fdump-
Common Joined RejectNegative Var(common_deferred_options) Defer
-fdump- Dump various compiler internals to a file.
so how about:
fdump-analyzer
Common RejectNegative Var(flag_du
Hello,
CLI Investment Group here in New York, an affiliate of CLI Ventures. We are a
Financial Investment Company looking for Company(s) with profitable projects or
entrepreneurial teams that require partnership. We are focusing on supporting
early to late stage Companies. If interested, please
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93659
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
1 - 100 of 161 matches
Mail list logo
