https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93477
Bug ID: 93477
Summary: [10 Regression] __atribute__((weak)) variables sharing
the same name in two named namespaces cause a multiple
definition error
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93411
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> There's also already a bug about this (can't find it quickly enough). IIRC
> my concerns were
>
> 1) it should be done during propagation to catch 2nd level o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93477
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93477
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Oops, sorry, started with r10-6110-g8158a4640819dbb3210326e37786fb874f450272
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93478
Bug ID: 93478
Summary: Spelling error in std/atomic trivally -> trivially
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93477
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
get_guard used to do:
- if (TREE_PUBLIC (decl))
- DECL_WEAK (guard) = DECL_WEAK (decl);
and doesn't anymore, so either it should be readded this way, or perhaps
instead look for weak attribute on d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93457
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93469
--- Comment #3 from Karen ---
Created attachment 47723
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47723&action=edit
Testcase preprocessed file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93458
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93458
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |10.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93459
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93469
--- Comment #4 from Karen ---
Here the additional info:
GCC version: Apple clang version 11.0.0 (clang-1100.0.33.16)
Target: x86_64-apple-darwin19.2.0
Configured with: --prefix=/Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/usr
--with-gxx-include-dir=/Libr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93460
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93461
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93466
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93462
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93463
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93464
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91498
--- Comment #19 from Richard Biener ---
Doesn't seem fixed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93465
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93467
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93468
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93465
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93471
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93455
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||aarch64
--- Comment #2 from Richard Bie
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93473
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93460
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93461
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ABI
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93478
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93471
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
No idea what to look for, don't have any Windows around, and grep doesn't find
any winsup strings in libgomp. Nor am aware of any mingw32/cygwin etc. related
changes in libgomp recently.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93464
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93466
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92024
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93466
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
guess if the input filename is already 256 characters even the .gcov will blow
the limit. For the path there's the option of hashing it... (ick).
Most importantly gracefully dealing with the failure to ope
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93214
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93475
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ABI
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93477
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93478
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:06d481d044ca7126f9d298ad9a4074fafde47ee8
commit r10-6274-g06d481d044ca7126f9d298ad9a4074fafde47ee8
Author: Martin Liska
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92440
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1d8593070a62b5e5e7583687648c6d34e825cee2
commit r10-6276-g1d8593070a62b5e5e7583687648c6d34e825cee2
Author: Martin Liska
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93478
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92440
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d3c00969fe619ae116dfbc07e6b364558acb6e3f
commit r10-6275-gd3c00969fe619ae116dfbc07e6b364558acb6e3f
Author: Martin Liska
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92440
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93458
--- Comment #3 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Tom Tromey from comment #1)
> I think it's invalid.
Yes, it's invalid, unfortunately, one cannot write a C++20 coroutine in such a
simple form; they need supporting methods that are found through
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92326
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Any update on this Martin?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92326
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
And for the record, qemu package build is also affected with this:
/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/qemu-4.2.0/scsi/qemu-pr-helper.c: In function
‘multipath_pr_out’:
/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/qemu-4.2.0/scsi/qem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93460
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93393
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93462
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93469
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Karen from comment #4)
> Here the additional info:
>
> GCC version: Apple clang version 11.0.0 (clang-1100.0.33.16)
> Target: x86_64-apple-darwin19.2.0
> Configured with: --prefix=/Library/Dev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93411
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80603
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93460
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3aa64a0f08664a4b0094352aa11f877fa2bd4c37
commit r10-6278-g3aa64a0f08664a4b0094352aa11f877fa2bd4c37
Author: Richard Sandiford
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93460
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolutio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93434
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6cedf5d8e23c862db147e71d5767ca57e6b4f433
commit r10-6279-g6cedf5d8e23c862db147e71d5767ca57e6b4f433
Author: Richard Sandiford
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93434
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9/10 Regression] |[8/9 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91841
Bernard B changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||b-gccbugzilla@largestprime.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93463
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92822
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1ee3b380dfb479b335f3b50039ce26abcbffe59a
commit r10-6280-g1ee3b380dfb479b335f3b50039ce26abcbffe59a
Author: Richard Sandiford
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93469
--- Comment #6 from Karen ---
Sorry, you right.
gcc version 9.2.0 (Homebrew GCC 9.2.0_2)
Target: x86_64-apple-darwin19
Configured with: ../configure --build=x86_64-apple-darwin19
--prefix=/usr/local/Cellar/gcc/9.2.0_2
--libdir=/usr/local/Cella
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93464
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:627d59b6b3062de921fbdd80b2b48de18f599d03
commit r10-6281-g627d59b6b3062de921fbdd80b2b48de18f599d03
Author: Tobias Burnus
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93464
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93439
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
OK, so the reason is that when we actually create the parallel decl last_clique
is not yet up to its maximum since we later loop_version another loop in the
source function. The solution is to move the last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87763
--- Comment #63 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:465c7c89e92a6d6d582173e505cb16dcb9873034
commit r10-6283-g465c7c89e92a6d6d582173e505cb16dcb9873034
Author: Richard Sandiford
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93439
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
> OK, so the reason is that when we actually create the parallel decl
> last_clique
> is not yet up to its maximum since we later loop_version another loop in the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93465
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93439
--- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 28 Jan 2020, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93439
>
> --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93458
--- Comment #4 from Tom Tromey ---
> BTW, did you include ?
>
> (FAOD: it would still be broken if you did, but ISTM we might at some point
> add a hint that if the traits can't be found, you probably forgot that).
The code was exactly as writ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93471
--- Comment #3 from Keith Marshall ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> No idea what to look for, don't have any Windows around,
Nor do I ... I encountered this, initially when building a --target=mingw32
cross-compiler, on an up-to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90766
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90764
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90785
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90787
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90789
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90812
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90814
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90821
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93469
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92822
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolutio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90843
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92002
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #12 from Eric Botcazou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90846
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90861
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90858
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90869
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90872
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90894
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90787
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93434
--- Comment #7 from Ryan Livingston ---
Many thanks. The responsiveness here has been nothing short of impressive!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90861
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Schwing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93465
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
>From reading oacc_verify_routine_clauses, it seems that from OpenACC pragmas on
a FUNCTION_DECL "omp declare target" attribute will have always non-NULL
TREE_VALUE and (at least right now - for host/nohost w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93452
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93428
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
OK, I know what happens.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91399
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1e964774aec65472d7a0741d7faa6a884295fc81
commit r10-6285-g1e964774aec65472d7a0741d7faa6a884295fc81
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Tue Jan 28 04:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93439
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.0
Summary|[9/10 Regressio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93439
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.0
Summary|[9/10 Regressio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93325
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:759812fddc81c0c131d4633b2a7f56412ce8dbed
commit r10-6287-g759812fddc81c0c131d4633b2a7f56412ce8dbed
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93470
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:72a9fd209b6db3b5f81fbb008e22ea93c00465e5
commit r10-6288-g72a9fd209b6db3b5f81fbb008e22ea93c00465e5
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93325
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Only fxed on master so far, but I plan to backport it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90895
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90901
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
1 - 100 of 277 matches
Mail list logo