https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91038
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91046
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91049
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91051
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91066
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91075
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93369
--- Comment #12 from Bill Seurer ---
On 2020-01-27 02:19, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93369
>
> --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> Even the git gcc-descr --full output can be shortened, us
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91079
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91093
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91080
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91081
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93369
--- Comment #13 from Martin Liška ---
>
> Should we be putting the short version like "r10-1234" in the summary line?
I'm planning to start doing that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90952
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90957
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92692
--- Comment #19 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Wilco Dijkstra
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b2200f40e3ecf87238eb15c909e74a2fe16de948
commit r8-9957-gb2200f40e3ecf87238eb15c909e74a2fe16de948
Author: Wilco Dijkstra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90959
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90961
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92692
Wilco changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91196
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85781
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91171
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91198
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90878
Bug 90878 depends on bug 90952, which changed state.
Bug 90952 Summary: Costs of moves are used for costs of RTL expressions
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90952
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91406
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90952
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91432
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88918
Bug 88918 depends on bug 91066, which changed state.
Bug 91066 Summary: GCC does not provide XOP functions through
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91066
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91066
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91461
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91399
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91498
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93369
--- Comment #14 from Segher Boessenkool ---
We can use the r10-1234 names in exactly the places we use r123456 before.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91488
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||trans-mem
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91625
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91628
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91634
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91692
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91399
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91461
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91171
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91696
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91695
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91745
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91498
--- Comment #18 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #17)
> Can the issue be closed as resolved?
I've fixed a -fno-common issue on the tester and will report back after the
next run.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91811
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91928
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91987
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93454
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93454
Bug ID: 93454
Summary: [10 Regression] buffer overflow in
fold_array_ctor_reference since r10-1882
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91085
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91826
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathan Sidwell :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:feaa1640b3543c7c3a1f3a788bc449a3638cb780
commit r10-6253-gfeaa1640b3543c7c3a1f3a788bc449a3638cb780
Author: Nathan Sidwell
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92012
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91928
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91826
--- Comment #4 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Fixed master feaa1640b3543c7c3a1f3a788bc449a3638cb780, will backport
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91171
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Started to XPASS with r10-1892-gb9ef6a2e04bfd01329902781818ef80c52cd8b97.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93276
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:26d949c8c7a757df891ce79162b9bf15087418c6
commit r10-6254-g26d949c8c7a757df891ce79162b9bf15087418c6
Author: David Malcolm
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93276
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91989
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92082
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93455
Bug ID: 93455
Summary: aarch64: Q constraint address is recomputed
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92021
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93456
Bug ID: 93456
Summary: No overflow check in
__atomic_futex_unsigned_base::_M_futex_wait_until
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91171
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Guenther :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:317346b271638d405970fbcc3d043a1f8dc098cb
commit r10-6255-g317346b271638d405970fbcc3d043a1f8dc098cb
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92024
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91171
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92013
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92137
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92136
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92211
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93454
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 47715
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47715&action=edit
gcc10-pr93454.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92192
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92195
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92239
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92357
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92822
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c15893df6eafc32efd6184379dd7f02c36da7d12
commit r10-6258-gc15893df6eafc32efd6184379dd7f02c36da7d12
Author: Richard Sandiford
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90841
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90807
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90797
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93403
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3ae37f9297fc97aefc6c6968315bd1ac6a1bc7ef
commit r10-6260-g3ae37f9297fc97aefc6c6968315bd1ac6a1bc7ef
Author: Martin Liska
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93403
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93421
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Rich Felker from comment #0)
> Created attachment 47704 [details]
> simple fix, not necessarily right for upstream
I like this solution for upstream too. It's simple and it works.
> This assu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92948
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Because of the alias template build_converted_constant_expr produces a
TARGET_EXPR containing a TEMPLATE_PARM_INDEX which makes it value-dependent.
So we don't call get_template_parm_object here
7449
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93456
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91838
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tnfchris at gcc dot
gnu.org
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93456
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Testcase that terminates in reasonable time:
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
int main()
{
using namespace std;
using namespace std::chrono;
auto now = system_clock::now();
second
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91826
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Nathan Sidwell
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2ceb5aba64e587f8ce66bec3c9af1f2cf60effa0
commit r9-8181-g2ceb5aba64e587f8ce66bec3c9af1f2cf60effa0
Author: Nathan Sidwell
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71727
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a044dfb0934c3caea0886dbb497181e3aca660df
commit r10-6261-ga044dfb0934c3caea0886dbb497181e3aca660df
Author: Richard Sandiford
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92024
--- Comment #7 from Bernd Edlinger ---
Yes, I guess so.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91826
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Nathan Sidwell
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:573b265dc7bbafbdef82dd7904ca429f703e1f6c
commit r8-9958-g573b265dc7bbafbdef82dd7904ca429f703e1f6c
Author: Nathan Sidwell
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91826
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92895
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93291
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f89e844f9c589d1717248597641d25d81a4acb41
commit r10-6262-gf89e844f9c589d1717248597641d25d81a4acb41
Author: David Malcolm
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93291
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93349
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2fbea4190e76a59c4880727cf84706fe083c00ae
commit r10-6263-g2fbea4190e76a59c4880727cf84706fe083c00ae
Author: David Malcolm
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93349
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93457
Bug ID: 93457
Summary: ICE in make_region_for_type, at
analyzer/region-model.cc:5983
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93416
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #1 from David Malcol
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93459
Bug ID: 93459
Summary: ix86_fold_builtin should handle
__builtin_ia32_pcmpeqd128_mask and similar builtins
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93458
Bug ID: 93458
Summary: ICE using coroutines
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: un
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93458
Tom Tromey changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
--- Comment #1 from Tom
101 - 200 of 291 matches
Mail list logo