https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93193
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93170
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93124
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93200
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93202
Bug ID: 93202
Summary: [RISCV] ICE when using inline asm 'h' constraint
modifier
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93202
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93201
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Jan 8 16:44:45 2020
New Revision: 280014
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=280014&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
libstdc++: Fix error handling in filesystem::remove_all (PR93201)
When r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91040
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90393
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek ---
*** Bug 91040 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93146
--- Comment #2 from David Edelsohn ---
One option is to force
flag_extern_tls_init=0
as default for AIX, e.g., -fno-extern-tls-init.
That works around the linking issue, but it assumes the limited semantics /
assertion of that option always ar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64697
jon.turney at dronecode dot org.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jon.turney at droneco
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93200
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93202
--- Comment #2 from Jim Wilson ---
%h is used for the gcc internal implementation of emitting auipc. I'm
skeptical that it is useful for asms. Stripping the HIGH rtx is an internal
implementation detail, and does not apply to asms, as you can't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93202
--- Comment #3 from Luís Marques ---
Jim Wilson: I'm not using it, I was only working on the LLVM implementation.
Could you please clarify if following modifiers are also internal only?
'C' Print the integer branch condition for comparison OP
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93202
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 47614
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47614&action=edit
gcc10-pr93202.patch
Untested fix for the ICE (and a typo I found too), fixes it in the
cross-compiler, don't ha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92938
--- Comment #7 from jcmvbkbc at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6)
> (In reply to jcmvbkbc from comment #5)
> > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> > > I DON'T think it is a GCC issue. The code is broken.
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92938
--- Comment #8 from jcmvbkbc at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to jcmvbkbc from comment #7)
> or it doesn't take a reference to a variable in .init*.
That is, it doesn't have a direct reference to a variable in .init* in its
body.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87163
--- Comment #3 from Peter Bergner ---
Martin, can you please check whether you still see this ICE?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93203
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93203
Bug ID: 93203
Summary: [10 Regression] ICE in decide_about_value, at
ipa-cp.c:5448 since r278893
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93204
Bug ID: 93204
Summary: arduino failure to verify
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: analyzer
As
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81806
--- Comment #12 from Xi Ruoyao ---
Created attachment 47615
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47615&action=edit
patch optimizing pb_ds tree split, RFC
I made up a patch but I doubt if this is really useful in competitive
progr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93205
Bug ID: 93205
Summary: std::discrete_distribution's operator>> causes OOM
Product: gcc
Version: 7.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93205
--- Comment #1 from Nicholas Ormrod ---
(This bug was discovered when some empty-istream test code OOMed)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81806
--- Comment #13 from Raihat Zaman Neloy ---
(In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #12)
> Created attachment 47615 [details]
> patch optimizing pb_ds tree split, RFC
>
> I made up a patch but I doubt if this is really useful in competitive
> progra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91369
--- Comment #32 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Jan 8 20:31:20 2020
New Revision: 280018
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=280018&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/91369 - constexpr destructor and member initializer.
Prev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92938
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to jcmvbkbc from comment #7)
> It is not in .init*, but that's ok: the reference from .init to .text is
> present in the original source. It's the reference from .text* to .init*
> which is not pres
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87163
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92938
--- Comment #10 from jcmvbkbc at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #9)
> (In reply to jcmvbkbc from comment #7)
> >It's the reference from .text* to .init*
> > which is not present in the source but is generated by gcc th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93204
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92552
--- Comment #8 from Tony E Lewis ---
I see on Godbolt that my similar-looking ICE is also fixed now.
Thanks very much.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93206
Bug ID: 93206
Summary: non-delegitimized UNSPEC generated for C program on
PowerPc with current mainline GCC tree
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93027
--- Comment #1 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Thank you for the report. I've started working on it. As changes in
constraint processing needs a lot of testing, I think the patch will be read on
Friday or on the next week.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93205
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93207
Bug ID: 93207
Summary: [concepts] Variadic concepts refuse no compile when
function definition is not inline
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93201
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Jan 8 21:48:23 2020
New Revision: 280020
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=280020&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
libstdc++: Fix error handling in filesystem::remove_all (PR93201)
When r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93201
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Jan 8 21:51:38 2020
New Revision: 280021
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=280021&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
libstdc++: Fix error handling in filesystem::remove_all (PR93201)
When r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93201
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||81091
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87163
--- Comment #5 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #4)
> Yep, I can still reproduce it with the current master in a cross compiler.
Ok, thanks. I'll see if I can recreate it with a cross since I cannot get it
to fail w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91377
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 91369, which changed state.
Bug 91369 Summary: Implement P0784R7: constexpr new
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91369
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91369
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88323
Bug 88323 depends on bug 91369, which changed state.
Bug 91369 Summary: Implement P0784R7: constexpr new
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91369
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93017
--- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2020-01-08 9:38 a.m., rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> What ISL version are you using?
dave@mx3210:~$ dpkg -l '*isl*'
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93202
--- Comment #5 from Jim Wilson ---
Jakub's patch looks OK to me.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93202
Andrew Waterman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrew at sifive dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93202
--- Comment #7 from Jim Wilson ---
(In reply to Luís Marques from comment #3)
> Jim Wilson: I'm not using it, I was only working on the LLVM implementation.
> Could you please clarify if following modifiers are also internal only?
>
> 'C' Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90374
--- Comment #27 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Hi Thomas, stating the obvious, I do not find it straight forwaed to interpret
the standards because there are nooks and crannies and corner cases. At least
now I have the basic pieces in place. I will try
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93143
--- Comment #7 from bin cheng ---
(In reply to bin cheng from comment #6)
> (In reply to bin cheng from comment #5)
> > (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #4)
> > > *** Bug 92926 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
> >
> > I sent
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93204
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87695
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tim at westashton dot org.uk
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91703
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87695
--- Comment #17 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 91703 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92124
--- Comment #5 from François Dumont ---
Author: fdumont
Date: Thu Jan 9 05:40:08 2020
New Revision: 280028
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=280028&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/92124 fix incorrect unordered container move assignment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93017
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 8 Jan 2020, dave.anglin at bell dot net wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93017
>
> --- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
> On 2020-01-08 9:38 a.m., rgue
101 - 155 of 155 matches
Mail list logo
