https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58237
--- Comment #5 from David Binderman ---
Has this new code been tried out on gcc trunk or the linux kernel
or a distribution like fedora or debian ?
That might be the next phase of testing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93002
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 20 08:22:46 2019
New Revision: 279632
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279632&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/93002
* config/i386/i386.md (dec reg; cmp $-1, r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92841
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 20 08:23:42 2019
New Revision: 279633
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279633&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/92841
* config/i386/i386.md (*stack_protect_set
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58237
--- Comment #6 from David Binderman ---
I tried out recent cppcheck on recent gcc trunk and found these resource leaks:
trunk/libvtv/scripts/sum-vtv-counts.c:94:4: error: Resource leak: fp_in
[resourceLeak]
trunk/libvtv/scripts/sum-vtv-counts.c:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92495
--- Comment #6 from Wilhelm M ---
That meens, all NNTP of class type have to have all-public data members?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93015
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93018
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93023
Bug ID: 93023
Summary: give preference to address iv without offset in ivopts
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92495
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Yes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93020
--- Comment #2 from Svante Signell ---
Created attachment 47531
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47531&action=edit
Fixes libgo syscall test
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93020
--- Comment #1 from Svante Signell ---
Created attachment 47530
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47530&action=edit
Fixes libgo os test.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93024
Bug ID: 93024
Summary: Python Pretty Printers get disabled on executable
reload by GDB
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93024
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
This seems like a GDB bug not a libstdc++ one.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92996
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus ---
Author: burnus
Date: Fri Dec 20 11:35:20 2019
New Revision: 279638
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279638&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fortran] PR 92996 – fix rank resolution EXPR_ARRAY
PR fortran/92
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92996
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92738
--- Comment #14 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Fri Dec 20 11:51:05 2019
New Revision: 279639
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279639&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Introduce -finline-arg-packing.
2019-12-20 Thomas Koenig
PR mi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91512
--- Comment #22 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Fri Dec 20 11:51:05 2019
New Revision: 279639
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279639&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Introduce -finline-arg-packing.
2019-12-20 Thomas Koenig
PR mi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93025
Bug ID: 93025
Summary: [OpenACC] ICE with copy(y(1)%cc(:)%i) type of
strided access – permitted since commit of OpenACC 2.6
deep copy patch series
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93025
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus ---
See also: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-12/msg01439.html
with some longer comments and another remark.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92586
--- Comment #7 from epagone ---
Many thanks for looking into this, G. Steinmetz.
Looking at your reduced cases, I understand that this is not related to
character type. Should I remove the dependency to the meta bug "Fortran
character"?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92781
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93026
Bug ID: 93026
Summary: gfortran.dg/goacc/finalize-1.f – FAILs since r279531
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92975
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91512
--- Comment #23 from Thomas Koenig ---
Could you check if this still occurs if you use -finline-arg-packing?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 92738, which changed state.
Bug 92738 Summary: [10 regression] Large code size growth for -O2 binaries
between 2019-05-19...2019-05-29
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92738
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92738
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93027
Bug ID: 93027
Summary: ICE: in match_reload, at lra-constraints.c:1060
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92791
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58237
--- Comment #7 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #4)
> Patch committed to dmalcolm/analyzer branch:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-12/msg01425.html
> Ought to be live on godbolt.org within the next 24 hou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92591
--- Comment #10 from Roman Zhuykov ---
Author: zhroma
Date: Fri Dec 20 15:05:12 2019
New Revision: 279642
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279642&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
modulo-sched: backport PR92591 fix from mainline
2019-12-20 Roman Zhuy
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92591
--- Comment #11 from Roman Zhuykov ---
Author: zhroma
Date: Fri Dec 20 15:07:58 2019
New Revision: 279643
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279643&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
modulo-sched: backport PR92591 fix from mainline
2019-12-20 Roman Zhuy
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93028
Bug ID: 93028
Summary: internal compiler error: in write_type, at
cp/mangle.c:2073
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93029
Bug ID: 93029
Summary: [OpenACC] no_create fails with component use of
aggregated types
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: openacc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92927
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
When the functions are not inline they are not instantiated by std::string at
-O0:
$ nm bad-stage1-src/c++11/string-inst.o | grep on_swap
W _ZN9__gnu_cxx14__alloc_traitsISaIcEcE10_S_on_swa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92927
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
As these functions were already inline the right fix is just to restore that
for C++11. If that wasn't the case, an alternative fix would be to explicitly
instantiate them in the library by adding this to s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2019
--- Comment #10 from Roman Zhuykov ---
Author: zhroma
Date: Fri Dec 20 15:40:46 2019
New Revision: 279645
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279645&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Rename tests to reference the correct PR
2019-12-20 Roman Zhuykov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93015
--- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor ---
I proposed a patch on the mailing list:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-12/msg01451.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2019
--- Comment #11 from Roman Zhuykov ---
Author: zhroma
Date: Fri Dec 20 15:50:44 2019
New Revision: 279646
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279646&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport: rename tests to reference the correct PR
2019-12-20 Roman Zhu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2019
--- Comment #12 from Roman Zhuykov ---
Author: zhroma
Date: Fri Dec 20 15:52:02 2019
New Revision: 279647
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279647&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport: rename tests to reference the correct PR
2019-12-20 Roman Zhu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92591
Roman Zhuykov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93030
Bug ID: 93030
Summary: [OpenACC] libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/deep-copy-10.c
FAILS on AMDGCN – invalid 'async' usage?
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93018
--- Comment #3 from John Drouhard ---
I don't think this is a matter of object lifetime. Passing -fnolifetime-dse or
-flifetime-dse=1 does not change the generated assembly here at all.
As a user of the functions baz1 and baz2, I would expect th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90040
--- Comment #2 from Roman Zhuykov ---
Same ICE also appears when compiling gcc.c-torture/execute/pr71550.c with -O3
-fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions
-fmodulo-sched -freorder-blocks-and-partition on seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93031
Bug ID: 93031
Summary: Wish: When the underlying ISA does not force pointer
alignment, option to make GCC not assume it
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93028
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93009
--- Comment #4 from Matthias Hochsteger ---
Created attachment 47534
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47534&action=edit
new code, cout results
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93009
Matthias Hochsteger changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INV
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90842
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 20 16:55:06 2019
New Revision: 279649
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279649&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2019-11-21 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90677
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 20 16:56:30 2019
New Revision: 279650
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279650&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2019-11-22 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92615
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 20 16:57:21 2019
New Revision: 279651
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279651&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2019-11-23 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92154
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 20 16:58:35 2019
New Revision: 279653
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279653&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2019-11-26 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92644
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 20 16:58:07 2019
New Revision: 279652
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279652&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2019-11-26 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61414
--- Comment #24 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 20 17:00:02 2019
New Revision: 279654
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279654&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2019-11-26 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92648
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 20 17:01:08 2019
New Revision: 279655
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279655&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2019-11-26 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92927
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Dec 20 17:10:18 2019
New Revision: 279656
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279656&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
libstdc++: Add inline to maybe-constexpr functions (PR 92927)
Originally
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69497
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Dec 20 17:10:22 2019
New Revision: 279657
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279657&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
fortran: Fix PR number in comment of testcase for PR 69497
The testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92927
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92664
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 20 17:23:34 2019
New Revision: 279658
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279658&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2019-11-27 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92524
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 20 17:24:30 2019
New Revision: 279659
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279659&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2019-11-27 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91944
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 20 17:25:39 2019
New Revision: 279660
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279660&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2019-11-27 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92695
--- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 20 17:26:28 2019
New Revision: 279661
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279661&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2019-11-28 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60228
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 20 17:30:38 2019
New Revision: 279662
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279662&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2019-11-29 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92695
--- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 20 17:32:23 2019
New Revision: 279663
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279663&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2019-12-02 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92695
--- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 20 17:33:13 2019
New Revision: 279664
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279664&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2019-12-03 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92732
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 20 17:34:14 2019
New Revision: 279665
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279665&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2019-12-03 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93032
Bug ID: 93032
Summary: analyzer fails to detect FILE * leak in
zlib/contrib/minizip/mztools.c
Product: gcc
Version: analyzer branch
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92756
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 20 17:35:18 2019
New Revision: 279666
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279666&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR fortran/92756
* omp-low.c (check_omp_nesting_restrictio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92781
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 20 17:36:08 2019
New Revision: 279667
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279667&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2019-12-05 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58237
--- Comment #8 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #6)
> I tried out recent cppcheck on recent gcc trunk and found these resource
> leaks:
>
> trunk/libvtv/scripts/sum-vtv-counts.c:94:4: error: Resource leak: fp_in
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92775
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 20 17:36:48 2019
New Revision: 279668
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279668&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2019-12-06 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92831
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 20 17:37:45 2019
New Revision: 279669
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279669&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2019-12-06 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92723
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 20 17:41:17 2019
New Revision: 279671
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279671&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2019-12-11 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92899
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 20 17:42:22 2019
New Revision: 279672
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279672&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2019-12-11 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92904
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 20 17:43:23 2019
New Revision: 279673
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279673&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2019-12-12 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92930
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 20 17:44:16 2019
New Revision: 279674
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279674&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2019-12-14 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92357
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 20 17:44:50 2019
New Revision: 279675
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279675&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2019-12-14 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92977
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 20 17:45:56 2019
New Revision: 279676
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279676&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2019-12-19 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90492
g.peterh...@t-online.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||10.0
--- Comment #6 from g.pete
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90842
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9 Regression] ICE in |[8 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91944
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9 Regression] ICE in |[8 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92524
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90677
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 92524, which changed state.
Bug 92524 Summary: [9 Regression] ICE in short program with constexpr and
std::array
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92524
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92644
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed for 9.3+ too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92723
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9 Regression] ICE in |[8 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92615
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9 Regression] ICE in |[8 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92756
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92899
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9 Regression] [OpenMP] |[8 Regression] [OpenMP] ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92930
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9 Regression] GCC|[8 Regression] GCC
|in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92775
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9 Regression] Incorrect |[8 Regression] Incorrect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92438
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93033
Bug ID: 93033
Summary: error: incorrect sharing of tree nodes
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93033
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman ---
Reduced C++ code seems to be
template class b {
public:
b(a *);
~b();
};
class c {
struct C {
b d;
float e;
};
c();
};
b f(b);
c::c() { C a[]{f("")}; }
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93034
Bug ID: 93034
Summary: variant not constexpr in c++17 mode
Product: gcc
Version: 7.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93033
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93009
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89832
--- Comment #11 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Hi, (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #10)
> Fixed on trunk.
I am trying to back port the fix for 89832 into our company's gcc8.2.1 release.
by looking at the patch, it's huge, and it's inc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93033
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93009
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 47537
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47537&action=edit
gcc10-pr93009.patch
Untested fix.
The bug is obvious, these *_bcst_1 patterns used =v,v 0,v v,0 m,m constraints
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93033
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
template struct S {
S(T *);
~S();
};
struct X {
struct C {
S d;
float e;
};
X();
};
S f(S);
X::X() { C a[]{f("")}; }
$ ./cc1plus -quiet 93033.C
93033.C: In constructor ‘X::X()’:
93033.C:13
1 - 100 of 139 matches
Mail list logo
