[Bug tree-optimization/92537] [10 Regression] ICE in vect_slp_analyze_node_operations, at tree-vect-slp.c:2775

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92537 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- One issue that I think can pop up with the way we now make nodes built from scalars (aka turn them into externs) is that it can possibly invalidate earlier validation of other SLP instances. It's probably n

[Bug tree-optimization/92584] A 454.calculix optimization opportunity

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92584 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #1) > On Tue, 19 Nov 2019, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > > I noticed that the speed drop back on the trunk happened since r278281. > > Would you be intereste

[Bug target/92545] avr: support ATmega devices from the 0-series

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92545 --- Comment #5 from Georg-Johann Lay --- Author: gjl Date: Wed Nov 20 08:19:44 2019 New Revision: 278478 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278478&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Make 0-series device specs work with older versions of avr-gcc.

[Bug sanitizer/92589] heuristic to avoid flexible array members too liberal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92589 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Kees Cook from comment #2) > Is there anything to enforce a strict "only consider empty array size as > flexible array member" mode? This is an unfortunate weakening of the array > bounds checker

[Bug target/92592] Redundant comparison after subtraction on x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92592 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- I think this is really a dup of bug 3507.

[Bug middle-end/91195] [10 regression] incorrect may be used uninitialized smw (272711, 273474]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91195 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Nov 20 08:26:52 2019 New Revision: 278479 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278479&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/91195 * tree-ssa-phiopt.c (cond_store_replac

[Bug c/90898] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in insert_clobber_before_stack_restore, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:2112

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90898 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Nov 20 08:29:35 2019 New Revision: 278481 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278481&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c/90898 * tree-ssa-ccp.c (insert_clobber_before_stack_r

[Bug target/90867] [8/9/10 Regression] Multiplication or typecast of integer and double always zero when...

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90867 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Nov 20 08:31:43 2019 New Revision: 278482 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278482&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/90867 * config/i386/i386-options.c (ix86_valid_t

[Bug middle-end/90840] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c:6441

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90840 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Nov 20 08:32:56 2019 New Revision: 278483 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278483&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/90840 * expmed.c (store_bit_field_1): Handle

[Bug c++/92590] [10 Regression] Cannot expose protected default constructor with "using" keyword in gcc 10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92590 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/90767] [9/10 Regression] jumbled error message with this and const

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90767 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Nov 20 08:33:56 2019 New Revision: 278484 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278484&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/90767 * call.c (complain_about_no_candidates_for_me

[Bug d/91628] libdruntime uses glibc internal symbol on s390

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91628 --- Comment #15 from rdapp at linux dot ibm.com --- Any feedback on the two options I proposed? Is the .S file variant (I posted last) ok?

[Bug tree-optimization/92584] A 454.calculix optimization opportunity

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92584 --- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 20 Nov 2019, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92584 > > --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- > (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment

[Bug tree-optimization/92584] A 454.calculix optimization opportunity

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92584 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/90767] [9 Regression] jumbled error message with this and const

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90767 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/90840] [8/9 Regression] ICE in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c:6441

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90840 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9/10 Regression] ICE in |[8/9 Regression] ICE in

[Bug c/90898] [8/9 Regression] ICE in insert_clobber_before_stack_restore, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:2112

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90898 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug middle-end/91195] [10 regression] incorrect may be used uninitialized smw (272711, 273474]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91195 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/24639] [meta-bug] bug to track all Wuninitialized issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639 Bug 24639 depends on bug 91195, which changed state. Bug 91195 Summary: [10 regression] incorrect may be used uninitialized smw (272711, 273474] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91195 What|Removed |

[Bug c++/55004] [meta-bug] constexpr issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004 Bug 55004 depends on bug 92414, which changed state. Bug 92414 Summary: [10 Regression] internal compiler error: tree check: expected constructor, have error_mark in cxx_eval_store_expression, at cp/constexpr.c:4009 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/

[Bug target/90867] [8/9 Regression] Multiplication or typecast of integer and double always zero when...

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90867 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9/10 Regression] |[8/9 Regression] |Mult

[Bug c++/92414] [10 Regression] internal compiler error: tree check: expected constructor, have error_mark in cxx_eval_store_expression, at cp/constexpr.c:4009

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92414 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/92504] [9 Regression] ICE on gcc-9 -fopenmp: internal compiler error: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl common' structure, have 'baselink' in get_inner_reference, at expr.c:7238

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92504 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[9/10 Regression] ICE on|[9 Regression] ICE on gcc-9

[Bug middle-end/26163] [meta-bug] missed optimization in SPEC (2k17, 2k and 2k6 and 95)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163 Bug 26163 depends on bug 92584, which changed state. Bug 92584 Summary: A 454.calculix optimization opportunity https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92584 What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/92584] A 454.calculix optimization opportunity

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92584 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug d/91628] libdruntime uses glibc internal symbol on s390

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91628 --- Comment #16 from Florian Weimer --- (In reply to rdapp from comment #15) > Any feedback on the two options I proposed? Is the .S file variant (I posted > last) ok? I'd prefer the patch from comment 13, but I'm not a GCC developer. You shoul

[Bug c++/92504] [9 Regression] ICE on gcc-9 -fopenmp: internal compiler error: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl common' structure, have 'baselink' in get_inner_reference, at expr.c:7238

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92504 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Nov 20 09:52:27 2019 New Revision: 278488 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278488&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-11-19 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c/90898] [8/9 Regression] ICE in insert_clobber_before_stack_restore, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:2112

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90898 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Nov 20 09:53:15 2019 New Revision: 278489 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278489&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c/90898 * tree-ssa-ccp.c (insert_clobber_before_stack_r

[Bug target/90867] [8/9 Regression] Multiplication or typecast of integer and double always zero when...

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90867 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Nov 20 09:54:02 2019 New Revision: 278490 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278490&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/90867 * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_valid_target_at

[Bug middle-end/90840] [8/9 Regression] ICE in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c:6441

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90840 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Nov 20 09:55:01 2019 New Revision: 278491 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278491&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/90840 * expmed.c (store_bit_field_1): Handle

[Bug c++/90767] [9 Regression] jumbled error message with this and const

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90767 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Nov 20 09:55:56 2019 New Revision: 278492 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278492&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/90767 * call.c (complain_about_no_candidates_for_me

[Bug target/92534] [10 regression] gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-42.c fails after r278262

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92534 Kewen Lin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #4 from Kewen Lin ---

[Bug c++/92593] New: ICE with CTAD using undeclared constraint

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92593 Bug ID: 92593 Summary: ICE with CTAD using undeclared constraint Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code Severity: normal P

[Bug tree-optimization/92537] [10 Regression] ICE in vect_slp_analyze_node_operations, at tree-vect-slp.c:2775

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92537 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Nov 20 10:40:09 2019 New Revision: 278494 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278494&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-11-20 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/92537

[Bug c++/92593] [10 Regression] ICE with CTAD using undeclared constraint

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92593 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-bisection Known to work|

[Bug c++/92594] New: [10 Regression] internal compiler error: in build_value_init_noctor, at cp/init.c:400 using std::tuple

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92594 Bug ID: 92594 Summary: [10 Regression] internal compiler error: in build_value_init_noctor, at cp/init.c:400 using std::tuple Product: gcc Version: 10.0

[Bug c++/92594] [10 Regression] internal compiler error: in build_value_init_noctor, at cp/init.c:400 using std::tuple

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92594 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Status|U

[Bug c/90898] [8 Regression] ICE in insert_clobber_before_stack_restore, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:2112

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90898 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9 Regression] ICE in |[8 Regression] ICE in

[Bug c++/90767] [9 Regression] jumbled error message with this and const

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90767 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/92504] [9 Regression] ICE on gcc-9 -fopenmp: internal compiler error: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl common' structure, have 'baselink' in get_inner_reference, at expr.c:7238

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92504 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/90840] [8 Regression] ICE in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c:6441

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90840 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9 Regression] ICE in |[8 Regression] ICE in

[Bug target/90867] [8 Regression] Multiplication or typecast of integer and double always zero when...

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90867 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9 Regression]|[8 Regression] |Multip

[Bug middle-end/90796] [8/9 Regression] GCC: O2 vs O3 output differs on simple test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90796 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #14

[Bug tree-optimization/92537] [10 Regression] ICE in vect_slp_analyze_node_operations, at tree-vect-slp.c:2775

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92537 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/90796] [8/9 Regression] GCC: O2 vs O3 output differs on simple test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90796 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vsevolod.livinskij at frtk dot ru --- C

[Bug tree-optimization/91240] [8/9/10 Regression] Wrong code with -O3 due to unroll and jam pass

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91240 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC|

[Bug middle-end/90796] [8/9 Regression] GCC: O2 vs O3 output differs on simple test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90796 --- Comment #16 from Michael Matz --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #14) > Time to backport now? Hmpf, I've actually done the regstrapping for gcc9 already but then forgot to submit. Thanks for the reminder.

[Bug rtl-optimization/91333] [9/10 Regression] suboptimal register allocation for inline asm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91333 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/92594] [10 Regression] internal compiler error: in build_value_init_noctor, at cp/init.c:400 using std::tuple

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92594 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.0

[Bug c++/92593] [10 Regression] ICE with CTAD using undeclared constraint

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92593 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.0

[Bug c++/92582] [10 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault with concept on constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92582 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.0

[Bug target/91494] Performance Regression when upgrading from 8.3.0 to 9.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91494 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/91433] Performance Regression when upgrading from 8.3.0 to 9.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91433 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- *** Bug 91494 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug tree-optimization/92595] New: [10 Regression] ICE in related_vector_mode, at stor-layout.c:534 since r278229

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92595 Bug ID: 92595 Summary: [10 Regression] ICE in related_vector_mode, at stor-layout.c:534 since r278229 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: i

[Bug tree-optimization/92595] [10 Regression] ICE in related_vector_mode, at stor-layout.c:534 since r278229

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92595 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/71785] Computed gotos are mostly optimized away

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71785 Aleksey changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rndfax at yandex dot ru --- Comment #12 from A

[Bug c++/92580] "if constexpr" not discarding branch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92580 Paul Targosz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED --- Comment #4 from Paul Targosz

[Bug tree-optimization/91355] [8/9/10 Regression] optimized code does not call destructor while unwinding after exception

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91355 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Compon

[Bug tree-optimization/91355] [8/9/10 Regression] optimized code does not call destructor while unwinding after exception

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91355 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- bb 10 into which it is sunk has been created by split_critical_edges, although the edge from the resx 4; bb to the landing pad is not critical, there is: /* PRE inserts statements to edges and expec

[Bug c++/92365] [10 Regression] ice unexpected expression ‘int16_t()’ of kind cast_expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92365 --- Comment #7 from Martin Liška --- Just for the record, I see the failure in spatialindex package.

[Bug c++/92236] [concepts] Explain non-satisfaction in static_assert

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92236 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Sutton --- I'm going to send a patch for this, hopefully this morning, that ties concept diagnostics into static asserts. It wasn't as bad as I thought it was going to be. I didn't implement this: static_assert (!In

[Bug tree-optimization/91355] [8/9/10 Regression] optimized code does not call destructor while unwinding after exception

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91355 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug rtl-optimization/71785] Computed gotos are mostly optimized away

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71785 --- Comment #13 from Segher Boessenkool --- (In reply to Aleksey from comment #12) > But adding these two flags "-fno-reorder-blocks-and-partition > -fno-reorder-blocks" If you say that basic blocks should not be reordered, then they are not. A

[Bug rtl-optimization/91333] [9/10 Regression] suboptimal register allocation for inline asm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91333 --- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse --- gcc version 9.2.1 20191109 (Debian 9.2.1-19) (current debian testing/unstable) gives me the 3 movapd, whether I use -O1, -O2 or -O3, and -Os gives 2 movapd. I didn't try with a vanilla gcc, not sure which debi

[Bug tree-optimization/92596] New: [10 Regression] ICE in exact_div, at poly-int.h:2162 since r278406

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92596 Bug ID: 92596 Summary: [10 Regression] ICE in exact_div, at poly-int.h:2162 since r278406 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-

[Bug tree-optimization/92596] [10 Regression] ICE in exact_div, at poly-int.h:2162 since r278406

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92596 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ipa/92372] [10 Regression] ICE in ipa_update_overall_fn_summary at gcc/ipa-fnsummary.c:3671 since r277780

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92372 Zdenek Sojka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zsojka at seznam dot cz --- Comment #1 fr

[Bug c++/92593] [10 Regression] ICE with CTAD using undeclared constraint

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92593 Andrew Sutton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andrew.n.sutton at gmail dot com --- Co

[Bug target/92573] [10 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92573 --- Comment #1 from Segher Boessenkool --- Author: segher Date: Wed Nov 20 13:38:52 2019 New Revision: 278497 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278497&root=gcc&view=rev Log: rs6000: Fix UNORDERED without NaNs, for DFP (PR92573) This is the a

[Bug target/92573] [10 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92573 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

Vamos evoluir juntos?

seu leitor nao suporta emails html

[Bug rtl-optimization/71785] Computed gotos are mostly optimized away

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71785 --- Comment #14 from Aleksey --- (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #13) > (In reply to Aleksey from comment #12) > > But adding these two flags "-fno-reorder-blocks-and-partition > > -fno-reorder-blocks" > > If you say that basic bloc

[Bug fortran/48303] [Legacy] Support Character constants in DATA statement for non-character variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48303 MarkEggleston changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mark.eggleston at codethink dot co

[Bug rtl-optimization/91161] [9/10 Regression] ICE in begin_move_insn, at sched-ebb.c:175

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91161 --- Comment #3 from Alexander Monakov --- With -fno-dce, a NOTE_INSN_DELETED_LABEL appears between the last "real" insn in the basic block (a sibcall) and a barrier rtx: (call_insn/u/c 20 19 12 3 (call (mem:QI (symbol_ref:DI ("ni") [flags 0x3]

[Bug target/92566] rs6000_preferred_simd_mode isn't very good

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92566 --- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool --- The whole function can be something as simple as mode = mode_for_vector (mode, 16 / GET_MODE_SIZE (mode)); if (this is actually an existing mode && !VECTOR_UNIT_NONE (mode)) return mode;

[Bug c++/92597] New: std::fma gives nan using -march=sandybridge+ with asm volatile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92597 Bug ID: 92597 Summary: std::fma gives nan using -march=sandybridge+ with asm volatile Product: gcc Version: 9.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/91355] [8/9/10 Regression] optimized code does not call destructor while unwinding after exception

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91355 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- I think we have two issues. One is that if we sink something on the edge between resx and corresponding landing pad, ehcleanup2 is upset, and the other one is that it is really not beneficial to sink the stm

[Bug c++/92598] New: explicit specialization of template from unnamed namespace using unqualified-id in enclosing namespace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92598 Bug ID: 92598 Summary: explicit specialization of template from unnamed namespace using unqualified-id in enclosing namespace Product: gcc Version: 9.2.1 Status: UNCONFIR

[Bug lto/92599] New: ICE in speculative_call_info, at cgraph.c:1142

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92599 Bug ID: 92599 Summary: ICE in speculative_call_info, at cgraph.c:1142 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal

[Bug lto/92599] ICE in speculative_call_info, at cgraph.c:1142

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92599 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/92597] std::fma gives nan using -march=sandybridge+ with asm volatile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92597 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comm

[Bug rtl-optimization/71785] Computed gotos are mostly optimized away

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71785 --- Comment #15 from Segher Boessenkool --- (In reply to Aleksey from comment #14) > Performance is not the case here, so don't bother with it. Strict order of > labels and using everywhere "jmp reg" instead of "jmp rel + jmp reg" - this > is wha

[Bug c++/92597] std::fma gives nan using -march=sandybridge+ with asm volatile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92597 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/92598] explicit specialization of template from unnamed namespace using unqualified-id in enclosing namespace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92598 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Status|UNCON

[Bug sanitizer/92589] heuristic to avoid flexible array members too liberal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92589 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug middle-end/90796] [8/9 Regression] GCC: O2 vs O3 output differs on simple test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90796 --- Comment #17 from Michael Matz --- Author: matz Date: Wed Nov 20 16:51:10 2019 New Revision: 278512 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278512&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix PR90796 PR middle-end/90796 * gimple-loop-jam.c (any_acc

[Bug lto/92600] New: ICE: lto1: internal compiler error: symtab_node::verify failed, building 523.xalancbmk_r with -flto -fno-inline

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92600 Bug ID: 92600 Summary: ICE: lto1: internal compiler error: symtab_node::verify failed, building 523.xalancbmk_r with -flto -fno-inline Product: gcc Version: 10.0

[Bug target/91702] [9/10 Regression] ICE with mips16

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91702 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug ipa/92109] [10 Regression] ICE in modify_call_stmt, at ipa-param-manipulation.c:1586

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92109 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug middle-end/91858] [9/10 Regression] Compile time hog w/ complex float trigonometric functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91858 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Reduced testcase: _Complex float f = __builtin_ctanf (1.0f + 1.0if);

[Bug c++/91706] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected class 'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in equate_type_number_to_die, at dwarf2out.c:5782

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91706 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug jit/92483] [10 Regression] many jit test failures due to ABRT, SEGV

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92483 --- Comment #1 from David Malcolm --- Author: dmalcolm Date: Wed Nov 20 17:51:41 2019 New Revision: 278515 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278515&root=gcc&view=rev Log: jit: fix ICE with GCC_JIT_BOOL_OPTION_SELFCHECK_GC since r278084 (PR ji

[Bug libgomp/92511] [OpenACC] Support subset subarray mappings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92511 --- Comment #2 from jules at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jules Date: Wed Nov 20 17:51:09 2019 New Revision: 278514 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278514&root=gcc&view=rev Log: OpenACC "present" subarrays: runtime API return value and unmapp

[Bug jit/92483] [10 Regression] many jit test failures due to ABRT, SEGV

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92483 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/92090] [10 regression] ICE in gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-5.c starting with r276469

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92090 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #16

[Bug ipa/92109] [10 Regression] ICE in modify_call_stmt, at ipa-param-manipulation.c:1586

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92109 --- Comment #6 from Martin Jambor --- So this helps: diff --git a/gcc/cgraphclones.c b/gcc/cgraphclones.c index bfcebb20495..359ea53d8a6 100644 --- a/gcc/cgraphclones.c +++ b/gcc/cgraphclones.c @@ -1079,6 +1079,7 @@ symbol_table::materialize_all

[Bug tree-optimization/92152] [10 Regression] Wrong code (Resurrection of PR53663)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92152 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug target/92592] Redundant comparison after subtraction on x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92592 --- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse --- IFN_SUB_OVERFLOW recognition?

[Bug other/92090] [8/9 regression] ICE in gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-5.c starting with r276469

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92090 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||10.0 Summary|[10 regress

[Bug target/92071] [10 regression][ARM] ice in gen_movsi, at config/arm/arm.md:5378

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92071 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

  1   2   >