https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92507
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92522
Bug ID: 92522
Summary: valid code using deque throws bad_alloc when compiled
with -flto
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26241
--- Comment #24 from Xiong Hu XS Luo ---
closing this since no need backport?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83325
--- Comment #5 from Arseny Solokha ---
Is it still an issue? I cannot reproduce it anywhere anymore. Maybe related
PR82952 could be more appropriate for tracking it further.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69728
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80069
Bug 80069 depends on bug 69728, which changed state.
Bug 69728 Summary: [7 Regression] internal compiler error: in
outer_projection_mupa, at graphite-sese-to-poly.c:1175
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69728
What|Remo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59859
Bug 59859 depends on bug 69728, which changed state.
Bug 69728 Summary: [7 Regression] internal compiler error: in
outer_projection_mupa, at graphite-sese-to-poly.c:1175
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69728
What|Remo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80105
Bug 80105 depends on bug 69728, which changed state.
Bug 69728 Summary: [7 Regression] internal compiler error: in
outer_projection_mupa, at graphite-sese-to-poly.c:1175
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69728
What|Remo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92439
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 92403, which changed state.
Bug 92403 Summary: [concepts] requires expression in if constexpr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92403
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92186
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pilarlatiesa at gmail dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92403
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 92403, which changed state.
Bug 92403 Summary: [concepts] requires expression in if constexpr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92403
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88075
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92523
Bug ID: 92523
Summary: Unhelpful error messages when requires-clause contains
function call
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92524
Bug ID: 92524
Summary: ICE in short program with constexpr and std::array
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92132
Li Jia He changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||helijia at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92098
Li Jia He changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81159
--- Comment #6 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #3)
> Ok, this shouldn't be too hard. I guess I could implement it for GCC 10.
last chance to get it in before stage 1 closes...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90466
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=951
Bug 951 depends on bug 26241, which changed state.
Bug 26241 Summary: [8/9 Regression] None of the IPA passes are documented in
passes.texi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26241
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26241
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=951
--- Comment #10 from Eric Gallager ---
Update: the last bug that was open that this bug depends upon has been closed.
So, ok to close this one as well?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=951
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92486
--- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 14 Nov 2019, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92486
>
> --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
> I have another idea, cant we add fake fie
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92486
--- Comment #11 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 14 Nov 2019, msebor at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92486
>
> Martin Sebor changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92516
--- Comment #3 from David Binderman ---
Agreed.
Since code is fine with -O2, but not with -O3, then
it looks like an optimiser problem to me.
About 2 hours of reduction has already been done. More is in progress.
Current size is about 2.2 Megs
(struct s); p++)
> printf("%d", *p);
> printf("\n");
> }
> --
>
> Results:
>
> --
> $ gcc -std=c11 -pedantic -Wall -Wextra test.c && ./a.out
>
> $ gcc -std=c11 -pe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26241
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.4 |10.0
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92510
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
601 - 631 of 631 matches
Mail list logo