https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92427
Bug ID: 92427
Summary: Initializing an element which has a zero-length array
of a type-with-destructor causes an internal compiler
error
Product: gcc
Version: 8.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92427
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92428
Bug ID: 92428
Summary: Crash on conflicting types
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92427
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
GCC 5 says:
92427.C:11:25: error: too many initializers for ‘C [0]’
} y = { 1, { { 2, 3 } } };
^
then since r231665 we accepted the test. Then since r233126
92427.C: In destructor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83079
--- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The following patch fixes the testcase in comment#3:
Index: gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.c
===
--- gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92058
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Fri Nov 8 21:40:45 2019
New Revision: 277990
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277990&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/92058 - constinit malfunction in static data member.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92058
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92215
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92215
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Fri Nov 8 21:48:47 2019
New Revision: 277991
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277991&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/92215 - flawed diagnostic for bit-field with non-integra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92428
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
Each enum type is compatible with an integer type, and in GCC that's
unsigned int by default (in the absence of values that don't fit in
unsigned int), so it's valid to declare a function b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90998
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Fri Nov 8 21:52:39 2019
New Revision: 277992
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277992&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/90998 - ICE with copy elision in init by ctor and -Wconv
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90998
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92426
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91582
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79016
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82243
--- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I don't think that it has to do with kinds. Currently there simply seems
to be no code being emitted for array constructors.
Example:
program p
implicit none
integer :: i, n = 40
real:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85484
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92357
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 47202
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47202&action=edit
pr92357.ii
Partially reduced testcase.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90295
Mathias Stearn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||redbeard0531 at gmail dot com
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92429
Bug ID: 92429
Summary: [10 Regression] ICE in vect_transform_stmt, at
tree-vect-stmts.c:10918
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-va
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92347
--- Comment #2 from Arseny Solokha ---
I believe I have something that is a different manifestation of the same
problem.
1. gcc-10.0.0-alpha20191103 snapshot (r277758) ICEs when compiling the
following testcase reduced from gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92430
Bug ID: 92430
Summary: [10 Regression] Compile-time hog w/ -Os
-fno-if-conversion -fno-tree-dce
-fno-tree-loop-optimize -fno-tree-vrp
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
101 - 122 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
