[Bug c++/92201] [10 Regression] "internal compiler error: ‘verify_gimple’ failed" with -std=c++2a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92201 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Status|UNC

[Bug c++/91548] [10 Regression] Regression in constexpr evaluation of std::array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91548 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #8 from Marek Polacek

[Bug gcov-profile/91971] Profile directory concatenated with object file path

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91971 --- Comment #5 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: qinzhao Date: Wed Oct 23 18:12:39 2019 New Revision: 277344 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277344&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-10-23 qing zhao PR gcov-profile/91971

[Bug fortran/92178] Segmentation fault after passing allocatable array as intent(out) and its element as value into the same subroutine

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92178 --- Comment #8 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Patch submitted. https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-10/msg01686.html

[Bug gcov-profile/91971] Profile directory concatenated with object file path

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91971 qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libstdc++/92200] Shared pointer not destroyed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92200 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/92202] New: [10 regression] Compilation error in gcc/ipa-reference.c in r277345

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92202 Bug ID: 92202 Summary: [10 regression] Compilation error in gcc/ipa-reference.c in r277345 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/92201] [10 Regression] "internal compiler error: ‘verify_gimple’ failed" with -std=c++2a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92201 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug c++/92201] [9/10 Regression] "internal compiler error: ‘verify_gimple’ failed" with -std=c++2a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92201 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|10.0|9.3 Summary|[10 Regression] "

[Bug c++/92201] [9/10 Regression] "internal compiler error: ‘verify_gimple’ failed" with -std=c++2a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92201 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Known to work|

[Bug c++/91427] Implement P1825R0, Merged wording for P0527R1 and P1155R3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91427 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug tree-optimization/92163] [10 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in bitmap_set_bit)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92163 --- Comment #6 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Posted updated patch upstream: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-10/msg01702.html Thanks, Prathamesh

[Bug target/91927] -mstrict-align doesn't prevent unaligned accesses at -O2 and -O3 on AARCH64 targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91927 Kamlesh Kumar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kamleshbhalui at gmail dot com --- Comme

[Bug tree-optimization/92203] New: [10 Regression] ICE in eliminate_stmt, at tree-ssa-sccvn.c:5492

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92203 Bug ID: 92203 Summary: [10 Regression] ICE in eliminate_stmt, at tree-ssa-sccvn.c:5492 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-invalid-c

[Bug middle-end/26163] [meta-bug] missed optimization in SPEC (2k17, 2k and 2k6 and 95)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163 Bug 26163 depends on bug 92074, which changed state. Bug 92074 Summary: [10 regression] 26% performance regression on Spec2017 548.exchange2_r https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92074 What|Removed |Ad

[Bug ipa/92074] [10 regression] 26% performance regression on Spec2017 548.exchange2_r

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92074 Kewen Lin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug debug/92204] New: Confusing GDB output for an optimized C program

posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib gcc version 10.0.0 20191023 (experimental) [trunk revision 277309] (GCC) $ gdb-trunk -v GNU gdb (GDB) 9.0.50.20191023-git Copyright (C) 2019 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html> T

[Bug c++/90205] Wformat-signedness detects %d and suggests %d fixit hint

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90205 --- Comment #9 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Tavian Barnes from comment #8) > Maybe "argument 2 has type 'double' (promoted from 'float')"? Yes, that seems better to me, at least...

[Bug target/91766] -fvisibility=hidden during -fpic still uses GOT indirection on arm64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91766 Kamlesh Kumar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kamleshbhalui at gmail dot com --- Comme

[Bug fortran/92178] Segmentation fault after passing allocatable array as intent(out) and its element as value into the same subroutine

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92178 martin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mscfd at gmx dot net --- Comment #9 from martin

[Bug target/91766] -fvisibility=hidden during -fpic still uses GOT indirection on arm64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91766 --- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Kamlesh Kumar from comment #9) > This fixes it. > > diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c > index 2e73f3515bb..6fb87d5f49f 100644 > --- a/gcc/config/aarch64/a

[Bug fortran/92178] Segmentation fault after passing allocatable array as intent(out) and its element as value into the same subroutine

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92178 --- Comment #10 from Steve Kargl --- On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 05:09:55AM +, mscfd at gmx dot net wrote: > > --- Comment #9 from martin --- > Is this possibly related to bug 87142? > Certainly appears that way. If I add a 'print *, ">"//tr

[Bug fortran/87142] Aliasing issue with overloaded assignment and allocatable components

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87142 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC|

[Bug libstdc++/88466] [C++17] Support std::hardware_destructive_interference_size and std:: hardware_constructive_interference_size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88466 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6

[Bug c++/92201] [9/10 Regression] "internal compiler error: ‘verify_gimple’ failed" with -std=c++2a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92201 --- Comment #3 from Stephan Bergmann --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2) > Untested fix. Building LibreOffice (from which I had distilled the reproducer) works fine for me again with that patch. Thanks!

[Bug debug/92204] Confusing GDB output for an optimized C program

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92204 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug testsuite/92199] [10 regression] g++.old-deja/g++.robertl/eb133b.C fails after r277300

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92199 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.0

[Bug bootstrap/92202] [10 regression] Compilation error in gcc/ipa-reference.c in r277345

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92202 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Component|other

[Bug tree-optimization/92203] [10 Regression] ICE in eliminate_stmt, at tree-ssa-sccvn.c:5492

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92203 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

<    1   2