https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92183
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92184
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92179
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92185
Bug ID: 92185
Summary: ICE when perform condition reduction vectorization on
uchar ind var
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92186
Bug ID: 92186
Summary: [concepts] requires expression outside of concept
definition cannot return false
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92187
Bug ID: 92187
Summary: [concepts] An abbreviated function template ignores
type constraint in some circumstances
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92109
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 47088
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47088&action=edit
Reduced test-case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92109
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-reduction |
Assignee|marxin at gcc dot gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92188
Bug ID: 92188
Summary: Cannot merge memory write for
_mm_cvtps_ph/_mm256_cvtps_ph and x86-64
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92185
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92185
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Hmm, I can't reproduce this, I tried ppc64le and x86_64.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92174
--- Comment #10 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #9)
> fixed on 9-branch and trunk.
Thank you for the fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92185
--- Comment #3 from Kewen Lin ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> Hmm, I can't reproduce this, I tried ppc64le and x86_64.
Sorry, my local codebase is on r277221, trying latest trunk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91969
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Oct 23 08:55:05 2019
New Revision: 277309
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277309&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Do not ICE in IPA inliner.
2019-10-23 Martin Liska
PR ipa/919
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91969
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92184
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolutio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92189
Bug ID: 92189
Summary: Fortran-written bind(C) function with allocatable
argument does not update C descriptor on exit
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92172
--- Comment #3 from Richard Earnshaw ---
(In reply to Seth LaForge from comment #2)
> Using R11 in ARM and R7 on Thumb is mandated by the AAPCS I believe. I don't
> think the overhead is likely to be particularly different in Thumb vs ARM.
No i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92190
Bug ID: 92190
Summary: [10 Regression] ICE in sp_valid_at, at
config/i386/i386.c:6162 since r276648
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92190
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2019-10-23
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92179
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Oct 23 10:29:36 2019
New Revision: 277310
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277310&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-10-23 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/92179
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92179
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91887
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Oct 23 10:32:06 2019
New Revision: 277312
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277312&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-10-23 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92191
Bug ID: 92191
Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version: 7.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92191
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92191
--- Comment #2 from John Watts ---
Thanks for rapid response, but sorry, need to see full command line you
want. Tried:
gfortran -g -ffpe-trap=zero,overflow,underflow -fdollar-ok -save-temps
-wrapper gdb --args -c fosyan.f
gfortran: error: u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92191
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
>
>
> gfortran -g -ffpe-trap=zero,overflow,underflow -fdollar-ok -save-temps
> -wrapper gdb --args -c fosyan.f
> gfortran: error: unrecognized command line option '--args'
>
There must be a comma in betwe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92185
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92192
Bug ID: 92192
Summary: Undefined symbols in libstdc++ when compiled with lto
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92039
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-reduction |
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81669
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Oct 23 11:29:10 2019
New Revision: 277313
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277313&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Initialize a field in fibonacci_node.
2019-10-23 Martin Liska
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81669
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89863
Bug 89863 depends on bug 81669, which changed state.
Bug 81669 Summary: trunk/gcc/fibonacci_heap.h:58: possible missing
initialisation ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81669
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92163
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
ee-vrp.c (extract_range_from_plus_minus_expr): If the resulting
range would be symbolic, drop to varying for any explicit overflow
in the constant part or if neither range is a singleton.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20191023-1.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
t
ee-vrp.c (extract_range_from_plus_minus_expr): If the resulting
range would be symbolic, drop to varying for any explicit overflow
in the constant part or if neither range is a singleton.
Added:
branches/gcc-9-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20191023-1.c
- copied unchan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92163
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I'm not sure it is what we want though, because it will mean more unnecessary
compile time work, -fnon-call-exceptions is not on by default for most
languages and even if it is, not all stores can throw.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92191
--- Comment #4 from John Watts ---
As directed:
gfortran -g -ffpe-trap=zero,overflow,underflow -fdollar-ok -wrapper
gdb, --args -c fosyan.f
gfortran: error: unrecognized command line option '--args'
Regards,
John Watts
john_wa...@isoparix.co
ee-vrp.c (extract_range_from_plus_minus_expr): If the resulting
range would be symbolic, drop to varying for any explicit overflow
in the constant part or if neither range is a singleton.
Added:
branches/gcc-8-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20191023-1.c
- copied unchan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92111
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92191
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
Replace: gdb, --args
with: gdb,--args
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92039
--- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 23 Oct 2019, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92039
>
> Martin Liška changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92192
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Building libstdc++ with -flto is not really supported - we apply a fixed symbol
export set which isn't tuned for its effects. I remember recent fixes in this
area though.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92191
--- Comment #6 from John Watts ---
e:\ISOPERF\SRC>gfortran -g -ffpe-trap=zero,overflow,underflow -fdollar-ok
-wrapper gdb,--args -c fosyan.f
GNU gdb (GDB) (Cygwin 8.1.1-1) 8.1.1
Copyright (C) 2018 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: G
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67245
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80485
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eugene at hutorny dot in.ua
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55722
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91885
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Oct 23 12:12:57 2019
New Revision: 277317
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277317&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r276141
2019-10-23 Martin Liska
Backport from mainli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92193
Bug ID: 92193
Summary: Poor diagnostics when a constexpr function call
follows a failed static_assert
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91885
--- Comment #9 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Oct 23 12:16:28 2019
New Revision: 277318
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277318&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r276178
2019-10-23 Martin Liska
Backport from mainli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91885
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92194
Bug ID: 92194
Summary: maybe-uninitialized false positive with c++2a
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91944
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 47092
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47092&action=edit
Reduced test-case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91944
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #2)
> Created attachment 47092 [details]
> Reduced test-case
Sorry, wrong bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92191
--- Comment #7 from John Watts ---
(gdb) backtrace
#0 0x0001004fcf20 in ?? ()
#1 0x0001004fd4c9 in ?? ()
#2 0x0001004fd6d0 in ?? ()
#3 0x00010050aac4 in ?? ()
#4 0x0001004983af in ?? ()
#5 0x0001004df32b in ?? ()
#6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91944
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91944
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|UNCONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91945
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 47093
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47093&action=edit
Reduced test-case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91945
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91887
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Oct 23 12:31:24 2019
New Revision: 277319
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277319&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-10-23 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91772
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91772
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Oct 23 12:31:24 2019
New Revision: 277319
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277319&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-10-23 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91812
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Oct 23 12:31:24 2019
New Revision: 277319
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277319&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-10-23 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91916
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
@Iain: ping
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92184
--- Comment #3 from David Binderman ---
Problem seems to have gone away at revision 277300.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71002
Bug 71002 depends on bug 40135, which changed state.
Bug 40135 Summary: using alias-set zero for union accesses necessary because of
RTL alias oracle
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40135
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40135
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90231
--- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Oct 23 12:38:03 2019
New Revision: 277321
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277321&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR debug/90231
* tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c (get_debug_comput
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65930
--- Comment #19 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Oct 23 12:41:49 2019
New Revision: 277322
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277322&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-10-23 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/65930
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92162
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92185
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92172
--- Comment #4 from Wilco ---
(In reply to Seth LaForge from comment #2)
> Good point on frame pointers vs a frame chain for unwinding. I'm looking for
> the unwindable frame chain.
>
> Wilco:
> > Why does this matter? Well as your examples show
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87768
--- Comment #6 from gcc-bugs at marehr dot dialup.fu-berlin.de ---
I can confirm that this works from 9 and up. Is there any chance to backport it
to 8?
In the ticket it says `Target Milestone: 8.4`, does that mean there will be a
8.4 release tha
-fno-openmp -fno-openacc
-fPIC -fno-semantic-interposition -fuse-ld=gold -fltrans
@/var/tmp/portage/dev-qt/qtgui-5.12.5/temp/ccDJPKT5 -o
libQt5Gui.so.5.12.5.ltrans12.s
GNU GIMPLE (Gentoo 10.0.0_pre) version 10.0.0-pre 20191023
(experimental) (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
compiled by GNU C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92196
Bug ID: 92196
Summary: Regression: -fno-automatic affects local variables in
subroutines/function declared with recursive keyword
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92195
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Cherry-picking the PR90811 follow-up r272181 does not fix this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92131
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Version|9.1.0
ee-vrp.c (extract_range_from_plus_minus_expr): If the resulting
range would be symbolic, drop to varying for any explicit overflow
in the constant part or if neither range is a singleton.
Added:
branches/gcc-7-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20191023-1.c
- copied unchan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92195
Bug ID: 92195
Summary: [7/8 Regression/Latent] 'libgomp.c/pr90811.c:29:1:
error: address taken, but ADDRESSABLE bit not set'
('internal compiler error: verify_gimple failed')
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92195
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |8.3.1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92197
Bug ID: 92197
Summary: String Concatenation, Commutativity, and Side-Effect
Inducing Functions
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88335
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #47032|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92198
Bug ID: 92198
Summary: error "different exception specifier" with forward
referring noexcept condition
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92198
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92194
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92074
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Wed Oct 23 14:45:24 2019
New Revision: 277333
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277333&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ipa/92074
* params.def (inline-heuristics-hint-percent)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91886
--- Comment #1 from nsz at gcc dot gnu.org ---
seems to be broken since r271916
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92167
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Church ---
A similar problem occurs when passing the wrong number of arguments to a
function which has been renamed with a macro -- the diagnostic is associated
with the renaming macro instead of the original source lin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92194
--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse ---
With -Wsystem-headers you also get the warning in C++17 (and it is actually a
bit more informative, at least it says where it is used).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92197
--- Comment #1 from Louis Jenkins ---
Can confirm that on Godbolt, this bug occurs _only_ with GCC, not with clang,
nor icc, or ellcc. This bug has occurred since GCC version 4.7.3, presumably is
still occurring in GCC version 10.0 (or whatever t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91886
--- Comment #2 from nsz at gcc dot gnu.org ---
note that "ws" is now supported by clang, but "wa" is not.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92199
Bug ID: 92199
Summary: [10 regression] g++.old-deja/g++.robertl/eb133b.C
fails after r277300
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92199
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92197
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92172
--- Comment #5 from Seth LaForge ---
Richard:
> No it doesn't. The AAPCS for AArch32 makes no reference to a frame pointer,
> so there is no portable way defined for walking a frame other than by using
> dwarf records or C++ unwinding descriptio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92200
Bug ID: 92200
Summary: Shared pointer not destroyed
Product: gcc
Version: 7.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92200
--- Comment #1 from Vanshil Shah ---
Created attachment 47096
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47096&action=edit
preprocessed file that triggers the bug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91369
--- Comment #18 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Oct 23 17:42:11 2019
New Revision: 277342
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277342&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/91369 Implement P0784R7 changes to allocation and construction
T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92172
--- Comment #6 from Wilco ---
(In reply to Seth LaForge from comment #5)
> GCC 8:
> push{r7, lr}
> sub sp, sp, #8
> add r7, sp, #0
> str r0, [r7, #4]
> ...
>
> Clang 9:
> push{
ty: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sbergman at redhat dot com
Target Milestone: ---
With recent trunk:
> $ gcc/trunk/inst/bin/g++ --version
> g++ (GCC) 10.0.0 20191023 (experimental)
> Copyright (C)
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
