https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92170
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90947
Dimitar Yordanov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dimitar.yordanov at sap dot com
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83534
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91979
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Thanks, once you have a copyright assignment on file please post to the
gcc-patches list with a testcase.
This might need a new -fabi-version to preserve the old mangling for
compatibility, but I'll let Ja
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87403
Bug 87403 depends on bug 91915, which changed state.
Bug 91915 Summary: New warning for duplicate if condition in if-elseif-elseif
chain
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91915
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91915
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91915
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Great, thank you Marek!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81669
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91956
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92174
Bug ID: 92174
Summary: runtime error: index 15 out of bounds for type
'gfc_expr *[15]
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63426
--- Comment #9 from postmas...@trippelsdorf-de.bounceio.net ---
Your email was bounced...
-
... because something went wrong between you and your recipient. Ugh!
What to do next?
Well,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91969
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90947
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 47082
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47082&action=edit
gcc10-pr90947.patch
Here is an untested patch that fixes it for -std=c++17/-std=c++2a, though not
for C++11/14
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92005
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91971
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91576
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
Honza?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92175
Bug ID: 92175
Summary: x86 backend claims V4SI multiplication support,
preventing more optimal pattern
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90938
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92175
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92109
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-reduction
Status|UNCONF
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90320
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86465
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91021
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91891
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90133
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91816
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89357
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90354
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90928
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91825
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91860
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91885
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81866
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82364
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83356
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Priority|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83712
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83972
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84536
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92133
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92175
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Something should compare the costs. Either vect_recog_mult_pattern should move
the mul_optab != unknown_optab etc. check after vect_synth_mult_by_constant,
compare the costs of the pattern recognized sequenc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83534
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92074
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #4)
> Same regression on skylake.
Confirmed and same happens for znver1:
https://lnt.opensuse.org/db_default/v4/SPEC/graph?plot.0=32.407.0
https://lnt.opensuse.org/db_def
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85887
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85887
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89022
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88305
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88322
Bug 88322 depends on bug 88305, which changed state.
Bug 88305 Summary: Implement P0019R8, C++20 std::atomic_ref
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88305
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88760
--- Comment #41 from Jiu Fu Guo ---
for code:
subroutine foo (i, i1, block)
integer :: i, i1
integer :: block(9, 9, 9)
block(i:9,1,i1) = block(i:9,1,i1) - 10
end subroutine foo
"-funroll-loops --param max-unroll-times=2 --param
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92170
--- Comment #5 from Austin Morton ---
Of course, I only provided it to show how I was generating the "expected"
results.
I wasn't sure what the purpose of splitting at "." was (in particular since I
think of GCC as a C/C++ compiler and the "." w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92133
--- Comment #2 from Feng Xue ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1)
> Let me take a look.
I've created a patch
(https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-10/msg01260.html), could you take a
time to review it?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92170
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou ---
> I wasn't sure what the purpose of splitting at "." was (in particular since
> I think of GCC as a C/C++ compiler and the "." would not normally appear in
> qualified names as a separator).
Yet there is a c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92170
--- Comment #7 from Austin Morton ---
As I said, the code made no sense to me in the context of C/C++ qualified names
- the comment didn't clarify that this bit of code was concerned with Ada
qualified names.
Printing the fully qualified name is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92133
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92176
Bug ID: 92176
Summary: LRA problem with reloads for subreg operands
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86465
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91969
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
A reduced test-case:
$ cat ice.C
enum by {};
class A {
public:
class B {
public:
virtual void m_fn2(by) = 0;
};
virtual int m_fn1();
B *cf;
};
by a;
class C : A, A::B {
void m_fn2(by);
};
void
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91393
--- Comment #11 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #10)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #9)
> > I've got a patch candidate for it.
>
> Ping Martin. Anything happened with that patch ?
There's a discussion g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92131
--- Comment #19 from Eric Botcazou ---
Created attachment 47084
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47084&action=edit
Tentative fix
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92173
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92173
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Oct 22 11:51:52 2019
New Revision: 277286
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277286&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-10-22 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/92173
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89280
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90354
--- Comment #6 from vfdff ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> > Which target? Which GCC version did work for you?
>
> Which target are you working on? Since you mark this as regress
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90354
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||out of tree port
Status|WAI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89410
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89357
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90320
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89434
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90758
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90663
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91021
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90794
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91133
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90796
--- Comment #12 from Michael Matz ---
Author: matz
Date: Tue Oct 22 12:25:03 2019
New Revision: 277287
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277287&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR middle-end/90796
PR middle-end/90796
* gimple-loop-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90796
Michael Matz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9/10 Regression] GCC: O2 |[8/9 Regression] GCC: O2 vs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91201
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
--- Comment #25 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91241
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-checking
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91273
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91384
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Priority|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90476
--- Comment #7 from Jonny Grant ---
Could someone confirm this please.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91623
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*, i?86-*-*
Priority
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91812
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92177
Bug ID: 92177
Summary: [10 regression] gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-22.c FAILs
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91816
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92177
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91887
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92105
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91891
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67960
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87338
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90291
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88660
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90264
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91100
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87833
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91969
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90706
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90415
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91607
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89075
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.3
1 - 100 of 174 matches
Mail list logo