https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92096
--- Comment #2 from Roger Orr ---
Hello Richard,
PR92037 appears to be resolved in revision 276804, which precedes the first of
my failing revisions (276902).
FWIW it was still failing last night with 276968
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91369
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #12)
> Well, not fully. The paper has additions of constexpr keywords on the
> library side, but more importantly, we'll probably need some hacks in the
> compiler
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92085
--- Comment #5 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: prathamesh3492
Date: Tue Oct 15 07:19:41 2019
New Revision: 276984
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276984&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-10-15 Prathamesh Kulkarni
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90723
--- Comment #3 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #2)
> (In reply to prathamesh3492 from comment #1)
> > Author: prathamesh3492
> > Date: Sat Jul 13 08:28:33 2019
> > New Revision: 273466
> >
> > UR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92046
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Oct 15 07:28:26 2019
New Revision: 276985
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276985&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-10-15 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/92046
* com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88918
Bug 88918 depends on bug 92035, which changed state.
Bug 92035 Summary: [AVX512F]Unimplemented intrinsic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92035
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92035
Hongtao.liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92101
Bug ID: 92101
Summary: Class template partial specializations with class NTTP
does not work
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92074
--- Comment #3 from Xiong Hu XS Luo ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #2)
> The regression is because we now inline covered into digits2:
>
> IPA function summary for digits_2/29 inlinable
> global time: 1553.078985
> self size:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71222
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The bug is still present on gcc-8-branch.
On gcc-9-branch there's an ICE:
71222.cc: In function 'int main()':
71222.cc:4:16: internal compiler error: in instantiate_decl, at cp/pt.c:24449
4 | auto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70037
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Created attachment 47038
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47038&action=edit
New testcase
I tried updating the attachment to C++2a syntax and it crashes differently:
g++ -std=gnu++20 70
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69718
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Jeff, the usual way would be to use dg-error to match the diagnostics and lines
where an error is expected. Something like:
typename foo(Init) requires Concept {
// { dg-error "expected nested-name" "" { *
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68827
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
This no longer gives an ICE (nor "confused by previous errors, bailing out) on
current trunk:
68827.cc: In instantiation of 'bool requires_types_args(V&&, Var&,
Args&& ...) [with V = A; Types = {int, char}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68826
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
No ICE with current trunk:
68826.cc: In instantiation of 'bool requires_types(Types&& ...) [with Types =
{char, int, const char (&)[3]}]':
68826.cc:10:30: required from here
68826.cc:5:19: error: 'foo' w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68628
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Known to work
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68608
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Last reconfirmed|2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68429
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
ince-on-invalid-code with gcc-8-branch, accepts-invalid with gcc-9-branch,
correctly rejected with trunk using -std=c++17 -fconcepts:
68429.cc: In function 'int main()':
68429.cc:19:8: error: cannot call f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68395
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Using -std=gnu++17 -fconcepts this compiles OK with GCC 7, 8 and 9. Rejected
with trunk:
bug5.cpp:72:3: warning: access declarations are deprecated in favour of
using-declarations; suggestion: add the 'usi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86588
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-reduction
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67178
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 67147, which changed state.
Bug 67147 Summary: [concepts] ICE on checking concept with default template
arguments
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67147
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67147
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 67178, which changed state.
Bug 67178 Summary: [concepts] ICE on self-referencing concept
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67178
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67178
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67147
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67210
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 67210, which changed state.
Bug 67210 Summary: [concepts] Error parsing ">>" after a template-id that names
a concept
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67210
What|Removed |Ad
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 67685, which changed state.
Bug 67685 Summary: ICE on invalid requires expression
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67685
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67685
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92099
--- Comment #1 from 孙晅 ---
Also tried with gcc 10.0.0 201901015 (experimental) and failed to compile.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67901
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67934
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Last reconfirmed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67934
--- Comment #3 from postmas...@trippelsdorf-de.bounceio.net ---
MESSAGE NOT DELIVERED
=
There was an issue delivering your message to mar...@trippelsdorf.de.
This is an 5.1.2 Error.
This error typically means:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67934
--- Comment #4 from postmas...@trippelsdorf-de.bounceio.net ---
Created attachment 47040
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47040&action=edit
attachment-110151-1.eml
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67217
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 67217, which changed state.
Bug 67217 Summary: [concepts] Constraints are ignored when specializing union
templates
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67217
What|Removed |Adde
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67704
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67720
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79381
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 79381, which changed state.
Bug 79381 Summary: [concepts] Call to template function with type-requirement
unsatisfied not rejected
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79381
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81270
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92102
Bug ID: 92102
Summary: identical requires-expression not subsumed
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92094
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Oct 15 10:09:10 2019
New Revision: 276987
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276987&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-10-15 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/92094
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92094
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92065
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
I think I saw this elswhere.
10088 /* Variables inherited from containing functions should have
10089been lowered by this point. */
10090 if (exp)
10091 context = decl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92048
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92048
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Oct 15 10:47:48 2019
New Revision: 276991
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276991&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-10-15 Richard Biener
PR testsuite/92048
* gcc.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92048
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91975
Bug 91975 depends on bug 92048, which changed state.
Bug 92048 Summary: [10 regression] armeb regression after r276645
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92048
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92102
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92081
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91929
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Oct 15 11:47:27 2019
New Revision: 276993
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276993&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-10-15 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/91929
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91929
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89301
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67704
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||antoshkka at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 89301, which changed state.
Bug 89301 Summary: [concepts] requires clause on a template alias is ignored
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89301
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67704
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
From Bug 89301:
The following code compiles however it should not:
template
requires(condition)
using enable_if_t = T;
template>
void foo();
void test() {
foo();
}
Slightly changed example als
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81043
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2019-08-12 00:00:00 |2019-10-15
--- Comment #1 from Jonatha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92089
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78173
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||redi at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 92089, which changed state.
Bug 92089 Summary: [concepts] requires-expression results in hard error during
constraint checking
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92089
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92103
Bug ID: 92103
Summary: constraints not checked on nested class template
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92103
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92093
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92093
--- Comment #2 from Bill Schmidt ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Tue Oct 15 12:44:25 2019
New Revision: 276999
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276999&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-10-15 Bill Schmidt
PR target/92093
* gcc.target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92093
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.0
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92104
Bug ID: 92104
Summary: __builtin_has_attribute in templates
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92104
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92088
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 47041
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47041&action=edit
patch for the inliner
void foo(int n)
{
struct X { int a[n]; } y;
inline struct X __attribute__((always_i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82019
--- Comment #2 from Antony Polukhin ---
Updated version of the test (works well on GCC 10):
// { dg-options "-std=c++2a" }
template
concept VectorOperations = requires(T& v, const Data& data) {
v += data;
requires __is_same_as(T&, dec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65438
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65438
--- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus ---
Author: burnus
Date: Tue Oct 15 14:13:01 2019
New Revision: 277000
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277000&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[Fortran] OpenMP+OpenACC: Remove bogus contigous-pointer check
g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81827
--- Comment #23 from Luke Robison ---
(In reply to Luke Robison from comment #22)
> (In reply to Luke Robison from comment #21)
> > (1) Changing some or all of the "type(levelNN)" definitions to
> > "class(levelNN)" definitions
> > (2) Changing f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92105
Bug ID: 92105
Summary: [7/8/9/10 Regression] decltype(decltype(decltype))
prints exponential number of fix-it hints
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92105
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88335
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 47042
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47042&action=edit
gcc10-pr88335.patch
Untested patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86009
--- Comment #2 from Hubert Tong ---
After adding "auto" for "Concept auto":
template concept C0 = true;
template concept C1 = true;
void f(C0 auto *) { }
template void f(wchar_t *);
We now get:
:5:15: error: template-id 'f' for 'void
f(wchar_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92106
Bug ID: 92106
Summary: ICE with structured bindings and -Wreturn-local-addr
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92106
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
--- Comment #1 from Ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92106
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.4
Summary|ICE with structur
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92007
--- Comment #9 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to Ilya Leoshkevich from comment #7)
> Having eliminated bb 5, we cannot avoid making bb 6 cold, since this
> would violate CFG integrity: as far as I understand, it's important to
> maintain t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92106
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92106
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90723
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92106
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92106
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #2)
> > 9351 /* When returning address of a structured binding, if the
> > structured
> > 9352 bi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92106
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #4)
> + tree init;
> + if (TYPE_REF_P (TREE_TYPE (base))
> + && (init = DECL_INITIAL (base)))
> + return maybe_warn_about_returning_address_of_loc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92099
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71125
--- Comment #5 from Tom Honermann ---
(In reply to Andrew Sutton from comment #3)
> Function concepts have some parsing issues related to TS-style terse
> notation, overloading and variadic templates. In particular, there are
> places where writi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92099
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Reduced:
template struct A { static constexpr _Tp value = __v;
};
typedef A false_type;
template struct DependentFalse : false_type {};
enum class E;
template void fn1() {
static_assert(DependentFalse::
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92107
Bug ID: 92107
Summary: GCC's insn attribute arithmetic does not follow C
rules
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92108
Bug ID: 92108
Summary: [10 regression] r276645 triggers excess errors for
gcc.dg/Wstringop-overflow-17.c
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92104
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92016
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92108
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
20191015
(experimental) (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
compiled by GNU C version 10.0.0-pre 20191015 (experimental), GMP
version 6.1.2, MPFR version 4.0.2, MPC version 1.1.0, isl version isl-0.21-GMP
GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=100 --param ggc-min-heapsize=131072
during IPA pass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91426
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91426
--- Comment #11 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #10)
> (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #9)
> > Fixed on trunk for GCC 10 by r276132.
>
> I still see different colors in the following error as of r276658:
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92105
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92109
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
Summary|ICE in modify_c
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
