[Bug c++/91974] function not sequenced before function argument

2019-10-02 Thread barry.revzin at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91974 --- Comment #4 from Barry Revzin --- Yes, sorry if that wasn't clear, this is with -std=c++17.

[Bug c++/91974] function not sequenced before function argument

2019-10-02 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91974 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/44265] Link error with reference to parameter array in specification expression

2019-10-02 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44265 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/88814] transform snprintf into memccpy

2019-10-02 Thread david.bolvansky at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88814 Dávid Bolvanský changed: What|Removed |Added CC||david.bolvansky at gmail dot com ---

[Bug middle-end/91977] New: missing -Wstringop-overflow on memcpy into a pointer plus offset

2019-10-02 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91977 Bug ID: 91977 Summary: missing -Wstringop-overflow on memcpy into a pointer plus offset Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/91977] missing -Wstringop-overflow on memcpy into a pointer plus offset

2019-10-02 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91977 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/91973] gcc failed for Multiple level macro expansion

2019-10-02 Thread qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91973 --- Comment #4 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #3) > Macro replacement for function-like macros is defined in C17 6.10.3. > Note in paragraph 10 the words "the function-like macro name follow

[Bug tree-optimization/80936] bcmp, bcopy, and bzero not declared nonnull

2019-10-02 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80936 --- Comment #8 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Wed Oct 2 22:00:42 2019 New Revision: 276491 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276491&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/80936 - bcmp, bcopy, and bzero not declared nonnull

[Bug preprocessor/91961] __has_attribute expands macro argument

2019-10-02 Thread ndesaulniers at google dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91961 --- Comment #4 from Nick Desaulniers --- Thanks for the report. I noticed we had https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38653 on file, so I cc'ed Clang folks who might have some thoughts.

[Bug c/91973] gcc failed for Multiple level macro expansion

2019-10-02 Thread joseph at codesourcery dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91973 --- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- We're talking about the sequence of pp-tokens in the expansion of bar(foo, addr), which is (foo) (addr), where foo is followed by ), not about the definition. Please take any further quest

[Bug c/91973] gcc failed for Multiple level macro expansion

2019-10-02 Thread qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91973 --- Comment #6 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #5) > We're talking about the sequence of pp-tokens in the expansion of bar(foo, > addr), which is (foo) (addr), where foo is followed by ), not

[Bug rtl-optimization/91976] [10 regression] RTL check: expected code 'const_int', have 'reg' in emit_block_move_hints, at expr.c:1627

2019-10-02 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91976 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Oct 2 22:33:39 2019 New Revision: 276495 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276495&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/91976 * expr.c (emit_block_move_hints)

[Bug fortran/91963] Logical function does not simplify

2019-10-02 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91963 --- Comment #8 from Steve Kargl --- On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 06:25:15PM +, sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91963 > > --- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl --- > On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at

[Bug bootstrap/91972] Bootstrap should use -Wmissing-declarations

2019-10-02 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91972 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|build | Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/91978] New: Unresolved associate target containing defined operation

2019-10-02 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91978 Bug ID: 91978 Summary: Unresolved associate target containing defined operation Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug c++/91979] New: Incorrect mangling for non-template-argument nullptr expression

2019-10-02 Thread jrtc27 at jrtc27 dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91979 Bug ID: 91979 Summary: Incorrect mangling for non-template-argument nullptr expression Product: gcc Version: 7.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/91980] New: No diagnostic for type "complex"

2019-10-02 Thread Keith.S.Thompson at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91980 Bug ID: 91980 Summary: No diagnostic for type "complex" Product: gcc Version: 8.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assi

[Bug libstdc++/61601] C++11 regex resource exhaustion

2019-10-02 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61601 --- Comment #9 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Tim Shen from comment #7) > (In reply to Maksymilian Arciemowicz from comment #6) > > > Do you have any other testcases? > > > > for trunk? maybe you have to use ::regex_match > > std::regex_ma

[Bug c/91980] No diagnostic for type "complex"

2019-10-02 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91980 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- I think the problem is the define for complex is in a system header which causes the error not to happen due to -Wno-system-headers being the default. This is a known issue in newer versions of GCC. There mi

[Bug target/87243] FSF GCC needs to do something special (like using xcrun) on darwin18 to find system headers in SDK

2019-10-02 Thread jeremyhu at macports dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87243 Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jeremyhu at macports dot org

[Bug other/79885] --with-build-sysroot= does not get honored throughout the build (fix-includes, CPP, CXXCPP, configure-stage2)

2019-10-02 Thread jeremyhu at macports dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79885 --- Comment #13 from Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia --- 1. clang honors $SDKROOT from the environment if it is not passed via -isysroot on the command line. That's all gcc needs to do, and then users running 'xcrun gcc' would ge this behavior automa

[Bug target/90835] Incompatibilities with macOS 10.15 headers

2019-10-02 Thread jeremyhu at macports dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90835 Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jeremyhu at macports dot org

[Bug target/90835] Incompatibilities with macOS 10.15 headers

2019-10-02 Thread jeremyhu at macports dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90835 --- Comment #13 from Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia --- Also note that also already does the following: /* * Compatibility with compilers and environments that don't support compiler * feature checking function-like macros. */ #ifndef __has_buil

<    1   2