[Bug target/52593] Builtin sqrt on x86 is not correctly rounded

2019-09-17 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52593 --- Comment #11 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to David Heidelberger (okias) from comment #10) > fixed in glibc so... what still needs to be done from GCC's side then?

[Bug bootstrap/58427] xgcc target compilation depends on installed libgcc_s.so

2019-09-17 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58427 --- Comment #2 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Rose Garcia from comment #1) > related binutils bugreport: > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12549#c18 That binutils issue has been fixed; is there anything left for GCC to do?

[Bug target/89557] [7/8/9/10 regression] 4*movq to 2*movaps IPC performance regression on znver1 with -Og

2019-09-17 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89557 --- Comment #10 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Jan Ziak (http://atom-symbol.net) from comment #9) > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5) > > Please provide a compilable testcase. > > Done some time ago. Please change the status of t

[Bug tree-optimization/91776] `-fsplit-paths` generates slower code on arm

2019-09-17 Thread yhr-_-yhr at qq dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91776 --- Comment #2 from yhr-_-yhr at qq dot com --- > I think it's BM2837, ie. Cortex-A53. Or did you mean a different Pi? oops you're right, I just got this pointed out when I showed this post to my friend. I just copied it from `cat /proc/cpuinfo`.

[Bug c++/91806] New: error: expansion pattern ‘()’ contains no parameter packs

2019-09-17 Thread unixod at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91806 Bug ID: 91806 Summary: error: expansion pattern ‘()’ contains no parameter packs Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug target/89557] [7/8/9/10 regression] 4*movq to 2*movaps IPC performance regression on znver1 with -Og

2019-09-17 Thread 0xe2.0x9a.0x9b at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89557 --- Comment #11 from Jan Ziak (http://atom-symbol.net) <0xe2.0x9a.0x9b at gmail dot com> --- (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #10) > > /usr/bin/time ./a0-7.4 |& egrep -o [0-9]+.*user > 1.48 real 1.26 user > /usr/bin/time ./ag-7.4

[Bug tree-optimization/91758] Clang fails to pass validation after r261089

2019-09-17 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91758 --- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou --- > I've got it. It's a usage of an uninitialize member variable in a class: > https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40547#c38 Thanks for catching this!

[Bug go/91763] [10 regression] go.go-torture/execute/printnil.go FAILs

2019-09-17 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91763 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- So that sounds like PR91794? See the 2nd attachment for a suggested fix, note -fexceptions/-fnon-call-exceptions is dealt with in another way.

<    1   2