[Bug target/91769] [9 regression] wrong code with -O2 on MIPS

2019-09-15 Thread aurelien at aurel32 dot net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91769 Aurelien Jarno changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com,

[Bug fortran/91556] Problems with better interface checking

2019-09-15 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91556 --- Comment #30 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Sun Sep 15 08:43:42 2019 New Revision: 275726 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275726&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-09-15 Thomas Koenig PR fortran/91556 * gfortra

[Bug target/91769] [9 regression] wrong code with -O2 on MIPS

2019-09-15 Thread aurelien at aurel32 dot net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91769 --- Comment #2 from Aurelien Jarno --- I have just done a build of trunk (r275723) and I confirm the bug is still reproducible.

[Bug target/91769] [9 regression] wrong code with -O2 on MIPS

2019-09-15 Thread aurelien at aurel32 dot net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91769 --- Comment #3 from Aurelien Jarno --- This is the change introduced by the commit: --- gnuplot-testcase.s.r269878 +++ gnuplot-testcase.s.r269880 @@ -73,8 +73,7 @@ lw $3,12($3) .loc 1 37 15 view $LVU16 ldc1$f2,64

[Bug fortran/91588] ICE in check_inquiry, at fortran/expr.c:2673

2019-09-15 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91588 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org Assigne

[Bug fortran/91726] [7/8/9/10 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_array_ref, at fortran/trans-array.c:3612

2019-09-15 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91726 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/58901] vax bootstrap fails on subreg reload

2019-09-15 Thread coypu at sdf dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58901 coypu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||coypu at sdf dot org --- Comment #7 from coypu

[Bug fortran/91773] New: Buffer overflow for long module/submodule names

2019-09-15 Thread andreas at skeidsvoll dot no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91773 Bug ID: 91773 Summary: Buffer overflow for long module/submodule names Product: gcc Version: 9.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: f

[Bug target/77800] Undefined ref to host_detect_local_cpu on netbsd/arm

2019-09-15 Thread coypu at sdf dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77800 coypu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/91727] [7/8/9/10 Regression] ICE in conformable_arrays, at fortran/resolve.c:7490

2019-09-15 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91727 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/84487] [8/9/10 Regression] Large rodate section increase in 465.tonto with r254427

2019-09-15 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84487 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|tkoenig at gcc do

[Bug fortran/91550] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in do_subscript, at fortran/frontend-passes.c:2652

2019-09-15 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91550 --- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Sun Sep 15 14:57:48 2019 New Revision: 275729 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275729&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-09-15 Thomas Koenig PR fortran/91550 * frontend

[Bug fortran/91550] [8/9 Regression] ICE in do_subscript, at fortran/frontend-passes.c:2652

2019-09-15 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91550 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9/10 Regression] ICE in |[8/9 Regression] ICE in

[Bug fortran/91727] [7/8/9/10 Regression] ICE in conformable_arrays, at fortran/resolve.c:7490

2019-09-15 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91727 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/91773] Buffer overflow for long module/submodule names

2019-09-15 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91773 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug middle-end/50481] builtin to reverse the bit order

2019-09-15 Thread jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50481 --- Comment #6 from Joseph S. Myers --- As noted in the RISC-V BoF today, this would also be useful for the RISC-V bit-manipulation extension.

[Bug driver/81358] libatomic not automatically linked with C11 code

2019-09-15 Thread jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81358 --- Comment #7 from Joseph S. Myers --- This came up in the RISC-V BoF today.

[Bug target/91767] [10 regression] After r274953, clang-compiled xgcc segfaults during RTL pass: stv

2019-09-15 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91767 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- For building gcc with ubsan, you should configure --with-build-config=bootstrap-ubsan, rather than trying to inject the flags in other ways. Anyway, for the ICE, it would be interesting to put a breakpoint wh

[Bug fortran/84487] [8/9/10 Regression] Large rodate section increase in 465.tonto with r254427

2019-09-15 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84487 --- Comment #24 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #22) > This patch > > Index: trans-decl.c > === > --- trans-decl.c(Revision 269895) > +++ tran

[Bug driver/81358] libatomic not automatically linked with C11 code

2019-09-15 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81358 --- Comment #8 from Andreas Schwab --- See also bug 84568 and bug 86005.

[Bug fortran/91727] [7/8/9/10 Regression] ICE in conformable_arrays, at fortran/resolve.c:7490

2019-09-15 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91727 --- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Sun Sep 15 17:49:44 2019 New Revision: 275731 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275731&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-09-15 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/91727

[Bug fortran/91557] [7/8/9 Regression] Bogus warning about unused dummy argument _formal_*

2019-09-15 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91557 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Sun Sep 15 19:48:41 2019 New Revision: 275733 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275733&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-09-15 Thomas Koenig Backport from trunk PR fortran/9155

[Bug fortran/91557] [7/8/9 Regression] Bogus warning about unused dummy argument _formal_*

2019-09-15 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91557 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Sun Sep 15 20:01:44 2019 New Revision: 275734 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275734&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-09-15 Thomas Koenig Backport from trunk PR fort

[Bug c++/91740] [9 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2429

2019-09-15 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91740 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[9/10 Regression] ICE in|[9 Regression] ICE in

[Bug c++/91740] [9/10 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2429

2019-09-15 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91740 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Sun Sep 15 20:22:27 2019 New Revision: 275736 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275736&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/91740 - ICE with constexpr call and ?: in ARRAY_REF.

[Bug fortran/91557] [7/8/9 Regression] Bogus warning about unused dummy argument _formal_*

2019-09-15 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91557 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Sun Sep 15 22:35:40 2019 New Revision: 275737 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275737&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-09-15 Thomas Koenig Backport from trunk PR fort

[Bug fortran/91557] [7/8/9 Regression] Bogus warning about unused dummy argument _formal_*

2019-09-15 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91557 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/47781] warnings from custom printf format specifiers

2019-09-15 Thread cjwelborn at live dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47781 Cj Welborn changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cjwelborn at live dot com --- Comment #20 f

[Bug c/15338] There should be a __format__ attribute for syslog.

2019-09-15 Thread cjwelborn at live dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15338 Cj Welborn changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cjwelborn at live dot com --- Comment #4 fr

[Bug c++/82165] Operator overloading doesn't work with enum bit fields

2019-09-15 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82165 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/30277] bit-field: wrong overload resolution

2019-09-15 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30277 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug c++/91774] New: Assignment from return value of function to reference returned by function occasionally produces wrong results

2019-09-15 Thread smartman1996 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91774 Bug ID: 91774 Summary: Assignment from return value of function to reference returned by function occasionally produces wrong results Product: gcc Version: 7.4.0

[Bug c++/33819] [4.2 Regression] Miscompiled shift of C++ bitfield

2019-09-15 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33819 --- Comment #13 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Mon Sep 16 04:34:28 2019 New Revision: 275746 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275746&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/30277 - int-width bit-field promotion. Here, if cp_perfor

[Bug c++/30277] bit-field: wrong overload resolution

2019-09-15 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30277 --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Mon Sep 16 04:34:28 2019 New Revision: 275746 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275746&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/30277 - int-width bit-field promotion. Here, if cp_perform

[Bug c++/82165] Operator overloading doesn't work with enum bit fields

2019-09-15 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82165 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Mon Sep 16 04:34:23 2019 New Revision: 275745 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275745&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/82165 - enum bitfields and operator overloading. In this t

[Bug tree-optimization/80791] [8/9/10 regression] test case gcc.dg/sms-1.c fail2 starting with r247885

2019-09-15 Thread linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80791 Kewen Lin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---