[Bug c++/91125] -frepo can't build tramp3d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91125 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/91603] Unaligned access in expand_assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91603 --- Comment #3 from Bernd Edlinger --- Okay, Thanks! Looks like these neon instructions don't work at all in big-endian.

[Bug lto/91677] -fbuiltin (default) breaks static link against lto libc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91677 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug c++/91675] [9/10 Regression] Memory corruption with std::function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91675 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.3

[Bug testsuite/91676] new test case gcc.dg/torture/pr91656-1.c in r275406 fails on powerpc64 BE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91676 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/91672] wrong amount of storage allocated for initialized structs with flexible array members

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91672 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug testsuite/91670] [10 regression] g++.dg/ubsan/pr59415.C fails starting with rr275388

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91670 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.0

[Bug debug/91507] wrong debug for completed array with previous incomplete declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91507 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz

[Bug c++/88128] G++ should implement CWG 330

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88128 --- Comment #3 from Viktor Ostashevskyi --- I see that std::span implementation was proposed in https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2019-08/msg00068.html. Was this bug fixed for implenting it? Is it possible to make std::span from std::vector?

[Bug middle-end/91680] New: Integer promotion quirk prevents efficient power of 2 division

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91680 Bug ID: 91680 Summary: Integer promotion quirk prevents efficient power of 2 division Product: gcc Version: 9.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/91681] New: Missed optimization for 128 bit arithmetic operations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91681 Bug ID: 91681 Summary: Missed optimization for 128 bit arithmetic operations Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: normal

[Bug ipa/91682] New: IPA-cp can not propagate value for by-ref argument in form of *arg = param op constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91682 Bug ID: 91682 Summary: IPA-cp can not propagate value for by-ref argument in form of *arg = param op constant Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/88128] G++ should implement CWG 330

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88128 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Viktor Ostashevskyi from comment #3) > Was this bug fixed for implenting it? No. > Is it possible to make std::span from std::vector? Yes, that works with current trunk.

[Bug c++/88128] G++ should implement CWG 330

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88128 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #4) > (In reply to Viktor Ostashevskyi from comment #3) > > Is it possible to make std::span from std::vector? > > Yes, that works with current trunk. Although th

[Bug tree-optimization/91665] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in build_vector_from_val, at tree.c:1904

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91665 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug target/91681] Missed optimization for 128 bit arithmetic operations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91681 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-*, i?86-*-* Status

[Bug middle-end/91680] Integer promotion quirk prevents efficient power of 2 division

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91680 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||easyhack, |

[Bug middle-end/91667] bogus -Wformat-overflow warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91667 --- Comment #2 from jbeulich at suse dot com --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #1) > The warning is still in GCC 9 but has gone away in GCC 10.0 with r274837. While I trust you one this, ... > In bug 91490, comment #4 I said: I'm not su

[Bug rtl-optimization/91683] New: ICE: SIGSEGV at -O when compiling for riscv64

sion algorithms: zlib zstd gcc version 10.0.0 20190906 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug debug/90441] [9/10 Regression] corrupt debug info with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90441 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/91675] [9/10 Regression] Memory corruption with std::function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91675 ensadc at mailnesia dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ensadc at mailnesia dot com

[Bug c++/90393] [9/10 Regression] ICE in return statement with a conditional operator, one of the second and third arguments is throw, and the other is a const variable of a class with a nontrivial co

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90393 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mika.fischer at zoopnet dot de --- Com

[Bug c++/91675] [9/10 Regression] Memory corruption with std::function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91675 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/65930] Reduction with sign-change not handled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65930 --- Comment #16 from Richard Biener --- So to outline the desired approach again the idea is to make the SCC finding (the DFS walk) in check_reduction_path the first-class operation of vect_is_simple_reduction, not passing in the reduction code b

[Bug c/89549] [7/8/9/10 Regression] -Wmisleading-indentation is disabled from this point onwards, since column-tracking was disabled due to the size of the code/headers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89549 --- Comment #11 from Dávid Bolvanský --- Would be nice to fix this for the last release of GCC 7.

[Bug c++/91125] -frepo can't build tramp3d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91125 --- Comment #5 from Nathan Sidwell --- Author: nathan Date: Fri Sep 6 12:51:44 2019 New Revision: 275456 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275456&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [PATCH] Deprecate -frepo option. https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/201

[Bug target/91684] New: [10 regression][ARM] ICE in gen_movdi, at config/arm/arm.md:5079

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91684 Bug ID: 91684 Summary: [10 regression][ARM] ICE in gen_movdi, at config/arm/arm.md:5079 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/91685] New: -Wtype-limits warns for constant expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91685 Bug ID: 91685 Summary: -Wtype-limits warns for constant expression Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug c/86647] Test on constant expression (unsigned) -1 < 0 triggers a spurious -Wtype-limits warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86647 Yann Droneaud changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yann at droneaud dot fr --- Comment #3 f

[Bug c++/81642] -Wtype-limits should not trigger for defined numbers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81642 Yann Droneaud changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yann at droneaud dot fr --- Comment #3 f

[Bug c/91685] -Wtype-limits warns for constant expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91685 Yann Droneaud changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c/86647] Test on constant expression (unsigned) -1 < 0 triggers a spurious -Wtype-limits warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86647 --- Comment #4 from Yann Droneaud --- *** Bug 91685 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c/86647] Test on constant expression (unsigned) -1 < 0 triggers a spurious -Wtype-limits warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86647 --- Comment #5 from Yann Droneaud --- I've reproduced the issue with bool test(void) { return ((unsigned int)0 - 1) < 0; } See https://godbolt.org/z/b1QqIC

[Bug libstdc++/19544] Difference in behaviour if default constructor added

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19544 Nic Brown changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nic at buymore dot pro --- Comment #11 from

[Bug testsuite/91670] [10 regression] g++.dg/ubsan/pr59415.C fails starting with rr275388

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91670 --- Comment #2 from ctice at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ctice Date: Fri Sep 6 14:54:48 2019 New Revision: 275460 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275460&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix testcase to not use LTO with -fvtable-verify. 2019-09-05 C

[Bug fortran/91686] New: ICE in gimplify:2554

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91686 Bug ID: 91686 Summary: ICE in gimplify:2554 Product: gcc Version: 7.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee:

[Bug c++/11247] -frepo fails to instantiate typeinfo

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11247 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED CC|

[Bug middle-end/91687] New: Fused multiply subtract not generated when same operand appears in multiplication and subtraction.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91687 Bug ID: 91687 Summary: Fused multiply subtract not generated when same operand appears in multiplication and subtraction. Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug testsuite/58321] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/memcpy-strategy-3.c scan-assembler-times memcpy 2 on x86_64-apple-darwin*

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58321 --- Comment #13 from Iain Sandoe --- Author: iains Date: Fri Sep 6 15:51:01 2019 New Revision: 275466 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275466&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [Darwin, testsuite ] Fix for PR58321. Darwin doesn't emit a .file directiv

[Bug middle-end/91687] Fused multiply subtract not generated when same operand appears in multiplication and subtraction.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91687 --- Comment #1 from barnaby.wilks at arm dot com --- (In reply to barnaby.wilks from comment #0) > Some architectures have instructions that allow the expressions of the form > "(x * y) - z" to be done in one instruction (for example the FNMSUB >

[Bug target/63891] [7 regression] Failure of darwin-weakimport-3.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63891 --- Comment #18 from Iain Sandoe --- Author: iains Date: Fri Sep 6 15:56:18 2019 New Revision: 275467 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275467&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [Darwin, testsuite] Fix PR63891 (darwin-weakimport-3). This is a testcase

[Bug c++/71394] bad location for -Wconversion-null

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71394 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug testsuite/67958] The tests changed by r223498 now FAILs on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67958 --- Comment #11 from Iain Sandoe --- Author: iains Date: Fri Sep 6 15:59:54 2019 New Revision: 275468 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275468&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [Darwin, testsuite] Fix PR67958. These tests require specific scan-asms in

[Bug c++/78744] Build errors on OS X 12.1 with Xcode 8.1 GCC 6.2.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78744 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c/91688] New: -Woverride-init could use an intermediate mode of operation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91688 Bug ID: 91688 Summary: -Woverride-init could use an intermediate mode of operation Product: gcc Version: 9.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug testsuite/27221] g++.dg/ext/alignof2.C fails on powerpc-darwin (and powerpc-aix)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27221 --- Comment #9 from Iain Sandoe --- Author: iains Date: Fri Sep 6 16:03:42 2019 New Revision: 275469 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275469&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [Darwin, testsuite] Fix PR27221. The test can't succeed on 32b powerpc Darw

[Bug tree-optimization/91687] Fused multiply subtract not generated when same operand appears in multiplication and subtraction and -ffast-math

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91687 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||86999 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug target/91681] Missed optimization for 128 bit arithmetic operations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91681 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug middle-end/91680] Integer promotion quirk prevents efficient power of 2 division

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91680 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug c/91689] New: internal compiler error: in decode_addr_const, at varasm.c:2864

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91689 Bug ID: 91689 Summary: internal compiler error: in decode_addr_const, at varasm.c:2864 Product: gcc Version: 6.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/91690] New: Slow IEEE intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91690 Bug ID: 91690 Summary: Slow IEEE intrinsics Product: gcc Version: 9.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee:

[Bug c/91691] New: Cross compiling glibc produces a false maybe-uninitialized error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91691 Bug ID: 91691 Summary: Cross compiling glibc produces a false maybe-uninitialized error Product: gcc Version: 8.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/91691] Cross compiling glibc produces a false maybe-uninitialized error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91691 --- Comment #1 from Alistair --- The full command line is: gcc clnt_udp.c -c -std=gnu11 -fgnu89-inline -O2 -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wundef -Werror -fmerge-all-constants -frounding-math -fno-stack-protector -Wstrict-prototypes -Wold-style-definiti

[Bug c/91691] Cross compiling glibc produces a false maybe-uninitialized error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91691 --- Comment #2 from Alistair --- I can also reproduce this with the 9.2 release.

[Bug libfortran/91593] Implicit enum conversions in libgfortran/io/transfer.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91593 --- Comment #5 from Jerry DeLisle --- Looking back at the code I see we are translating from Front-end to run time regarding whether or not we actually are going to show the positive sign or not or suppress it the sign altogether in floating poin

[Bug target/91684] [10 regression][ARM] ICE in gen_movdi, at config/arm/arm.md:5079

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91684 --- Comment #1 from Bernd Edlinger --- Created attachment 46846 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46846&action=edit untested patch

[Bug fortran/91668] Failure to deallocate ALLOCATABLE component of a type in a POINTER array of types on deallocation of POINTER array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91668 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|UNCONFI

[Bug c/91463] missing -Warray-bounds accessing past the end of a statically initialized flexible array member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91463 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/91463] missing -Warray-bounds accessing past the end of a statically initialized flexible array member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91463 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug target/91684] [10 regression][ARM] ICE in gen_movdi, at config/arm/arm.md:5079

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91684 Wilco changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/91690] Slow IEEE intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91690 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug tree-optimization/91647] [10 Regression] new FAILs for Warray-bounds-8 and Wstringop-overflow-3.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91647 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #10 from Martin Sebor

[Bug target/91654] Regressions of SPEC2017 rate caused by r274994

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91654 --- Comment #2 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Fri Sep 6 19:27:58 2019 New Revision: 275475 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275475&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/91654 * config/i386/x86-tune-costs.h (sk

[Bug go/91692] New: gcc build fails with --enable-languages="go"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91692 Bug ID: 91692 Summary: gcc build fails with --enable-languages="go" Product: gcc Version: 9.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: go

[Bug c/91463] missing -Warray-bounds accessing past the end of a statically initialized flexible array member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91463 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor -

[Bug middle-end/91679] missing -Warray-bounds accessing a member array in a local buffer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91679 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor -

[Bug go/91692] gcc build fails with --enable-languages="go"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91692 --- Comment #1 from Thomas Doczkal --- Created attachment 46848 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46848&action=edit config.log file

[Bug fortran/91686] ICE in gimplify:2554

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91686 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug c++/67862] [concepts] ICE in tsubst, at cp/pt.c:12625

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67862 Andrew Sutton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andrew.n.sutton at gmail dot com --- Co

[Bug middle-end/91680] Integer promotion quirk prevents efficient power of 2 division

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91680 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug fortran/91668] Failure to deallocate ALLOCATABLE component of a type in a POINTER array of types on deallocation of POINTER array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91668 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug fortran/91668] Failure to deallocate ALLOCATABLE component of a type in a POINTER array of types on deallocation of POINTER array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91668 --- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #2) > Is this actually required? My feeling would be that is is not, but I may > well be mistaken. > > Does somebody have chapter & verse on this? And what

[Bug fortran/91668] Failure to deallocate ALLOCATABLE component of a type in a POINTER array of types on deallocation of POINTER array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91668 --- Comment #4 from c.s.brady at warwick dot ac.uk --- My belief was based on the same statement in section 6.3.3 of the F2003 standard

[Bug c++/91673] [10 Regression] GCC ICE when partially specialising class template on a function-signature type with deduced noexcept qualifier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91673 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- Reduced: template struct S { using U = void() noexcept(B); }; S s;

[Bug c++/91693] New: Comparing addresses of templated inline vars gets bogus "not a constant expression" error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91693 Bug ID: 91693 Summary: Comparing addresses of templated inline vars gets bogus "not a constant expression" error Product: gcc Version: 9.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug go/91692] gcc build fails with --enable-languages="go"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91692 --- Comment #2 from Ian Lance Taylor --- Thanks for the bug report. The normal case when configuring GCC is to create a new empty directory and run SRCDIR/configure in that directory, as documented at https://gcc.gnu.org/install/configure.html.

[Bug fortran/91668] Failure to deallocate ALLOCATABLE component of a type in a POINTER array of types on deallocation of POINTER array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91668 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug libgomp/91694] New: configure.ac does not correctly check for gethostname

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91694 Bug ID: 91694 Summary: configure.ac does not correctly check for gethostname Product: gcc Version: 9.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug libgcc/91695] New: [X86] get_available_features only sets FEATURE_GFNI and FEATURE_VPCLMULQDQ when avx512_usable is true

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91695 Bug ID: 91695 Summary: [X86] get_available_features only sets FEATURE_GFNI and FEATURE_VPCLMULQDQ when avx512_usable is true Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFI

[Bug go/91692] gcc build fails with --enable-languages="go"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91692 --- Comment #3 from thomas at doczkal dot eu --- On September 6, 2019 9:00:31 PM UTC, ian at airs dot com wrote: >https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91692 > >--- Comment #2 from Ian Lance Taylor --- >Thanks for the bug report. The nor

[Bug target/91696] New: [X86] AVX512 intrinsics that only support SAE should allow (_MM_FOUND_NO_EXC|_MM_FROUND_CUR_DIRECTION) to match icc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91696 Bug ID: 91696 Summary: [X86] AVX512 intrinsics that only support SAE should allow (_MM_FOUND_NO_EXC|_MM_FROUND_CUR_DIRECTION) to match icc Product: gcc Version: u

[Bug target/91696] [X86] AVX512 intrinsics that only support SAE should allow (_MM_FOUND_NO_EXC|_MM_FROUND_CUR_DIRECTION) to match icc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91696 --- Comment #1 from Craig Topper --- I've also submitted a patch to clang to do the same. https://reviews.llvm.org/D67289

[Bug target/91683] ICE: SIGSEGV at -O when compiling for riscv64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91683 Jim Wilson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/43565] Missed address comparison folding of DECL_COMMONs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43565 Jorg Brown changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jorg.brown at gmail dot com --- Comment #15

[Bug c++/91693] Comparing addresses of templated inline vars gets bogus "not a constant expression" error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91693 --- Comment #1 from Jorg Brown --- Related missed-optimization bug: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43565

[Bug middle-end/91512] [10 Regression] Fortran compile time regression.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91512 --- Comment #20 from Sunil Pandey --- Created attachment 46851 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46851&action=edit Compile time regression reproducer. attached reproducer show ~28X compile time regression after the commit. See

[Bug tree-optimization/91647] [10 Regression] new FAILs for Warray-bounds-8 and Wstringop-overflow-3.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91647 --- Comment #11 from Iain Sandoe --- with the path applied on x86_64-darwin16 (same results for c++98 / c++17 unless the line count in the test has changed, this is a progression - three fewer fails - but it seems 3 different ones) XPASS: g++.d

[Bug tree-optimization/91457] FAIL: g++.dg/warn/Warray-bounds-4.C -std=gnu++98 (test for warnings, line 25)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91457 --- Comment #14 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #13) > (In reply to Christophe Lyon from comment #10) > > Yes, the warning is intended and Glibc was just patched to avoid it: > https://sourceware.org/ml/glibc-cvs/2019

[Bug target/91684] [10 regression][ARM] ICE in gen_movdi, at config/arm/arm.md:5079

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91684 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug other/26966] [7/8/9/10 Regression] linking of C++/ObjC app fail on OpenBSD 3.9/10 due POSIX threading unresolved symbols

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26966 --- Comment #31 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Mark Mitchell from comment #16) > OpenBSD is not a primary or secondary platform. Is the OpenBSD port even still maintained? I don't see any maintainer listed for it in MAINTAINERS, and the onl

[Bug target/33104] Missing error check in .md converter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33104 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/53074] insn-recog.c:recog calls predicates known to be false before matching bare RTL code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53074 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/38093] undefined predicates in bfin.md

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38093 --- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager --- So, if I understand the patch, isn't this just papering over the issue by fixing the specific instance of the bfin target causing this genrecog crash? That is, couldn't some other port also cause genrecog to

[Bug target/91684] [10 regression][ARM] ICE in gen_movdi, at config/arm/arm.md:5079

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91684 --- Comment #4 from Bernd Edlinger --- Author: edlinger Date: Sat Sep 7 05:11:16 2019 New Revision: 275484 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275484&root=gcc&view=rev Log: add PR target/91684 to ChangeLog Modified: trunk/gcc/ChangeLog