https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91656
Zdenek Sojka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91665
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91645
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 4 Sep 2019, lisyarus at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91645
>
> --- Comment #2 from Nikita Lisitsa ---
> If by 'isless(y, 0.0)' you mean 'y < 0.f',
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91577
--- Comment #5 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Thu Sep 5 07:50:07 2019
New Revision: 275399
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275399&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Force IFN_LOAD/STORE_LANES operands to be memory (PR9157
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91656
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91657
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91660
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91659
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91577
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolutio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91664
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88839
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolutio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91635
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91645
--- Comment #5 from Nikita Lisitsa ---
Oh, thank you a lot! Indeed, this version compiles to just mulss & sqrtss
float test (float x)
{
float y = x*x;
if (std::isless(y, 0.f))
__builtin_unreachable();
return std::sqrt(y);
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91645
--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 5 Sep 2019, lisyarus at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91645
>
> --- Comment #5 from Nikita Lisitsa ---
> Oh, thank you a lot! Indeed, this version c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41396
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|middle-end |rtl-optimization
--- Comment #4 from Ri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91668
Bug ID: 91668
Summary: Failure to deallocate ALLOCATABLE component of a type
in a POINTER array of types on deallocation of POINTER
array
Product: gcc
Version: 8.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91658
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Please attach preprocessed source, it's impossible to debug this with the
missing include file (and the files that file might include).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91665
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91664
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91474
--- Comment #4 from Joey Dumont ---
Created attachment 46831
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46831&action=edit
Preprocessed parallel_settings.cc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91669
Bug ID: 91669
Summary: #pragma's and _Pragma's work but _Pragma's used in an
equivalent macro don't
Product: gcc
Version: 5.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82750
Bug 82750 depends on bug 81740, which changed state.
Bug 81740 Summary: [7 Regression] wrong code at -O3 in both 32-bit and 64-bit
modes on x86_64-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81740
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81740
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90501
--- Comment #16 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Sep 5 11:02:43 2019
New Revision: 275401
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275401&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-09-05 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/90501
* tr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90501
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91665
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|jakub at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91658
--- Comment #6 from Ivan Chow ---
Thanks for helping out.
Please see attached file.
-Original Message-
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org [mailto:gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org]
Sent: Thursday, September 5, 2019 5:27 AM
To: Chow, Ivan (Aiken)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91658
--- Comment #7 from Ivan Chow ---
Sorry. I didn't know the limit of the size of the file in the email.
Please see attached file with gzip compressed.
Thanks for helping out.
-Original Message-
From: gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91639
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91639
--- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Thu Sep 5 11:23:48 2019
New Revision: 275402
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275402&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[preprocessor/91639] #includes at EOF
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patche
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91665
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
int val[1024];
void
foo (int n)
{
int i;
for (int j = 0, i = n; j < 1024; ++j, i=(unsigned)i+1)
val[j] = i;
}
generates signed add for the induction vectorization.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91665
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
> int val[1024];
> void
> foo (int n)
> {
> int i;
> for (int j = 0, i = n; j < 1024; ++j, i=(unsigned)i+1)
> val[j] = i;
> }
>
> generates signed add fo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91615
--- Comment #7 from Christophe Lyon ---
(In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #6)
> Created attachment 46820 [details]
> untested patch
This patch fixes the armeb problems reported here, thanks!
(in addition to the scan-assembler-times issue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90328
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49774
Bug 49774 depends on bug 90328, which changed state.
Bug 90328 Summary: [7 Regression] Wrong loop distribution with aliasing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90328
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89578
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Sep 5 12:11:52 2019
New Revision: 275405
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275405&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-09-05 Richard Biener
* lto-streamer.h (LTO_minor_vers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90328
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Sep 5 12:11:52 2019
New Revision: 275405
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275405&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-09-05 Richard Biener
* lto-streamer.h (LTO_minor_vers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87609
--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Sep 5 12:11:52 2019
New Revision: 275405
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275405&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-09-05 Richard Biener
* lto-streamer.h (LTO_minor_vers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87609
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90328
Bug 90328 depends on bug 87609, which changed state.
Bug 87609 Summary: [7 Regression] miscompilation with restrict and loop
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87609
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91656
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91656
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91656
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91656
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Sep 5 13:23:28 2019
New Revision: 275406
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275406&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-09-05 Richard Biener
PR rtl-optimization/91656
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91657
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91659
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91001
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Sep 5 13:30:23 2019
New Revision: 275408
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275408&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/91001
PR middle-end/91105
PR middle-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91106
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Sep 5 13:30:23 2019
New Revision: 275408
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275408&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/91001
PR middle-end/91105
PR middle-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91105
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Sep 5 13:30:23 2019
New Revision: 275408
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275408&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/91001
PR middle-end/91105
PR middle-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91615
--- Comment #8 from Bernd Edlinger ---
Author: edlinger
Date: Thu Sep 5 13:40:17 2019
New Revision: 275409
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275409&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-09-05 Bernd Edlinger
PR middle-end/91615
* ex
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91001
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed on the trunk so far.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79700
JMB changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jmb_tux at gmx dot net
--- Comment #3 from JMB --
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91035
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91670
Bug ID: 91670
Summary: [10 regression] g++.dg/ubsan/pr59415.C fails starting
with rr275388
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91671
Bug ID: 91671
Summary: [10 Regression] gfortran.dg/direct_io_10.f fails at
runtime with -O3
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79700
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to JMB from comment #3)
> this bug should be fixed.
Yes, we know. That's why there's a bug report.
> Otherwise please give a short comment to this bug report explaining why this
> can not or sh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91670
ctice at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ctice at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91669
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91671
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target Milestone|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91644
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Thu Sep 5 15:37:52 2019
New Revision: 275421
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275421&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/91644 - ICE with constinit in function template.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91644
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91635
--- Comment #22 from Jim Wilson ---
> First of all, I think you need to use :DI instead of :GPR for the last
> define_split, as it shouldn't be iterated with.
Yes, sloppy copy paste. I will fix before committing.
> Second, doesn't this mean th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91605
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91605
--- Comment #5 from Bernd Edlinger ---
Yes, fixed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91605
Bernd Edlinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67825
Andrew Sutton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrew.n.sutton at gmail dot
com
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67860
Andrew Sutton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrew.n.sutton at gmail dot
com
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91672
Bug ID: 91672
Summary: wrong amount of storage allocated for initialized
structs with flexible array members
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91673
Bug ID: 91673
Summary: GCC ICE when partially specialising class template on
a function-signature type with deduced noexcept
qualifier
Product: gcc
Version: unkno
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91673
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86393
--- Comment #12 from Mikael Slevinsky ---
It is fixed for all GCC versions I checked: all the up-to-date versions of 4.9,
5, 6, 7, 8, 9 from Homebrew.
Also, I recently updated from High Sierra to Mojave, and the new clang is:
scima-mh421-20:Fas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91674
Bug ID: 91674
Summary: [ARM/thumb] redundant memcpy does not get optimized
away on thumb
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91675
Bug ID: 91675
Summary: Memory corruption with std::function
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91671
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91660
--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Thu Sep 5 18:14:34 2019
New Revision: 275426
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275426&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-09-05 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/91660
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90537
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91581
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86393
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91660
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Thu Sep 5 18:37:13 2019
New Revision: 275427
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275427&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-09-05 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/91660
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91671
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91656
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91676
Bug ID: 91676
Summary: new test case gcc.dg/torture/pr91656-1.c in r275406
fails on powerpc64 BE
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91657
--- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
It looks like it was as your fix cleaned things up. Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87030
--- Comment #26 from Iain Sandoe ---
Author: iains
Date: Thu Sep 5 19:14:35 2019
New Revision: 275429
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275429&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[Darwin] Fix PR87030 and tidy config fragments.
This is about 32/64b host
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61250
--- Comment #29 from Iain Sandoe ---
Author: iains
Date: Thu Sep 5 19:27:31 2019
New Revision: 275431
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275431&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[c-family] Backport fix for PCH / PR61250.
When we are parsing a source fi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91660
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Thu Sep 5 19:28:04 2019
New Revision: 275432
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275432&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-09-05 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/91660
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91660
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91677
Bug ID: 91677
Summary: -fbuiltin (default) breaks static link against lto
libc
Product: gcc
Version: lto
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91678
Bug ID: 91678
Summary: decltype returns wrong type under certain conditions
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91637
Rolf Ebert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91677
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
The builtins are not recorded in the symbol table. There is another bug about
this same issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91635
--- Comment #23 from Segher Boessenkool ---
If a splitter wants a new register during combine, it should do a match_scratch
for that. This is documented.
You do not normally get new registers during combine. combine cannot really
handle those.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91496
--- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: anlauf
Date: Thu Sep 5 20:13:00 2019
New Revision: 275442
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275442&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-09-05 Harald Anlauf
PR fortran/91496
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91635
--- Comment #24 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(clobber of a match_operand I mean, sigh).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91635
--- Comment #25 from Jim Wilson ---
Author: wilson
Date: Thu Sep 5 20:32:55 2019
New Revision: 275444
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275444&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
RISC-V: Fix bad insn splits with paradoxical subregs.
Shifting by more tha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91679
Bug ID: 91679
Summary: missing -Warray-bounds accessing a member array in a
local buffer
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91679
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78736
--- Comment #17 from Jonny Grant ---
Hello Joseph
This was the test case I created. There isn't any warning output when 'a_t' is
converted to 'int'. Or even if it was converted to an 'unsigned int'
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2019-07/msg000
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91647
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91496
--- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: anlauf
Date: Thu Sep 5 21:02:44 2019
New Revision: 275445
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275445&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-09-05 Harald Anlauf
Backport from mainline
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
