[Bug tree-optimization/91647] new FAILs for Warray-bounds-8 and Wstringop-overflow-3.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91647 --- Comment #5 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #4) > (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #3) > > I get the following error when running a cross-compiler for > > x86_64-apple-darwin: > > > > xgcc: error: unrecognized

[Bug middle-end/36262] [4.3 Regression] Extreme memory usage of VRP compared to older versions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36262 --- Comment #13 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Sep 4 07:27:42 2019 New Revision: 275365 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275365&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-09-04 Richard Biener PR rtl-optimization/36262

[Bug c++/91309] Fails to compile when initializing template argument with immediately-invoked lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91309 --- Comment #1 from beachboy44 at me dot com --- Possibly related cases that also fail to compile: template using F = decltype([]{ return T{0}; }); auto g = [](auto x) { using G = F; return G{}(); }; https://godbolt.org/z/tSwWUF auto

[Bug target/59230] __divtf3@@GCC_4.4.0 missing from libgcc_s.so.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59230 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab --- Created attachment 46808 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46808&action=edit Missing __divtf3@@GCC_4.4.0 on ia64

[Bug target/91635] wrong code at -O2 with __builtin_add_overflow() and shifts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91635 --- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek --- Then gen_rtx_REG (mode, REGNO (SUBREG_REG (x))) case I meant only in case some splitter would be required for proper operation rather than just being an optimization. If they are all an optimization, the !p

[Bug tree-optimization/88415] [7 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: dead STMT in EH table)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88415 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/87929] ICE in verify_gimple failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87929 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Sep 4 08:06:24 2019 New Revision: 275366 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275366&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-09-04 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 20

[Bug tree-optimization/90006] [7 Regression] gcc loops indefinitely around vect_get_constant_vectors on -O2 -ftree-slp-vectorize -fno-math-errno

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90006 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Sep 4 08:06:24 2019 New Revision: 275366 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275366&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-09-04 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 20

[Bug tree-optimization/88903] [7 Regression] wrong-code with SLP vectorized shift

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88903 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug c++/89698] [7 Regression] Run-time error due to optimization of field access after cast at -Os/-O2 and higher

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89698 --- Comment #10 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Sep 4 08:06:24 2019 New Revision: 275366 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275366&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-09-04 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 2

[Bug tree-optimization/88030] ICE in calc_dfs_tree, at dominance.c:458

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88030 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Sep 4 08:06:24 2019 New Revision: 275366 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275366&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-09-04 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 20

[Bug target/91635] wrong code at -O2 with __builtin_add_overflow() and shifts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91635 --- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 46809 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46809&action=edit gcc10-pr91635.patch If you want full patch from me, here it is, but as I said I can't easily test it (I don't

[Bug middle-end/88448] [9 regression] gnat.dg/opt66.adb etc. FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88448 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Sep 4 08:06:24 2019 New Revision: 275366 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275366&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-09-04 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 20

[Bug c++/89698] [7 Regression] Run-time error due to optimization of field access after cast at -Os/-O2 and higher

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89698 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/88415] [7 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: dead STMT in EH table)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88415 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Sep 4 08:06:24 2019 New Revision: 275366 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275366&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-09-04 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 20

[Bug tree-optimization/88903] [7 Regression] wrong-code with SLP vectorized shift

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88903 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Sep 4 08:06:24 2019 New Revision: 275366 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275366&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-09-04 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 20

[Bug tree-optimization/90006] [7 Regression] gcc loops indefinitely around vect_get_constant_vectors on -O2 -ftree-slp-vectorize -fno-math-errno

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90006 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/87985] Compile-time and memory hog w/ -O1 -ftree-slp-vectorize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87985 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/88315] SAD and DOT_PROD SLP reductions with initial value != 0 create wrong code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88315 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/84746] [7 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O2 and -O3: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84746 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/66462] GCC isinf/isnan/... builtins cause sNaN exceptions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66462 --- Comment #16 from Tamar Christina --- > Do you have a link to those problems? And no, please don't regress us for no reason at all, it's really easy to *not* regress this on double-double. As far as I am aware, the final version of the patch

[Bug tree-optimization/83580] [8 Regression] Wrong code caused by vectorization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83580 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/82186] [7 Regression] ICE (segfault), VLA type with inlining

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82186 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug middle-end/63155] [7 Regression] memory hog

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63155 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|7.5 |8.3

[Bug middle-end/63155] [7 Regression] memory hog

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63155 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/91635] wrong code at -O2 with __builtin_add_overflow() and shifts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91635 --- Comment #17 from Kito Cheng --- Hi Jakub: Thanks your patch, I've run with gcc testsuite and no new fails, and I am ruining more gcc testsuite regression with different arch/abi combination for that. I am amazing that seems like RISC-V is f

[Bug target/87767] Missing AVX512 memory broadcast for constant vector

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87767 --- Comment #5 from Matthias Kretz --- > So for #c3 you are essentially asking for a .rodata size optimization. Comment #1 also does so, no? But yes, this is a .rodata optimization and thus potentially a visible reduction on cache pressure. Cons

[Bug libstdc++/91655] New: Use of `__in` and `__out` as argument names in c++ headers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91655 Bug ID: 91655 Summary: Use of `__in` and `__out` as argument names in c++ headers Product: gcc Version: 9.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug target/87767] Missing AVX512 memory broadcast for constant vector

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87767 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug libstdc++/91655] Use of `__in` and `__out` as argument names in c++ headers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91655 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to sagebar from comment #0) > because the fix would be so simple that resolving it could possibly take > less time than reading this bug report. Only if we didn't want to bother testing the fix.

[Bug libstdc++/91653] ostream::operator<<(streambuf*) should fail the ostream when write output stream error but not

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91653 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- GCC 4.9.2 has been unsupported for several years.

[Bug libstdc++/91655] Use of `__in` and `__out` as argument names in c++ headers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91655 --- Comment #2 from sagebar at web dot de --- Of course. I understand, am sorry to have bothered you, and totally agree that those macros are extremely bad (but sadly are being used by programs that I'm trying to provide compatibility for). Have a

[Bug fortran/91648] [9/10 Regression] ICE in generate_finalization_wrapper, at fortran/class.c:2009

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91648 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Target Milestone|---

[Bug fortran/91643] [10 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_create_temp_array, at fortran/trans-array.c:1265

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91643 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.0

[Bug fortran/91641] [9/10 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_is_contiguous_expr, at fortran/trans-intrinsic.c:2857

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91641 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.3

[Bug libstdc++/91655] Use of `__in` and `__out` as argument names in c++ headers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91655 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/91647] [10 Regression] new FAILs for Warray-bounds-8 and Wstringop-overflow-3.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91647 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|new FAILs for |[10 Regression] new FAILs

[Bug tree-optimization/91645] Missed optimization with sqrt(x*x)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91645 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/91646] gfortran takes long time and consumes a lot of memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91646 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/91646] gfortran takes long time and consumes a lot of memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91646 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- The FE generates an absolutely _huge_ functions (2.2 million lines of .original dump) for __copy_lvt_statsdatamod_Stats_struc. It's impossible to tell if the function generated makes any sense - a smaller e

[Bug fortran/91646] gfortran takes long time and consumes a lot of memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91646 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug tree-optimization/88149] [7 Regression] ICE in vect_transform_stmt since r265959

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88149 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/88149] [7 Regression] ICE in vect_transform_stmt since r265959

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88149 --- Comment #17 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Sep 4 10:51:02 2019 New Revision: 275370 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275370&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-09-04 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 2

[Bug fortran/91650] [10 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_constant_to_tree, at fortran/trans-const.c:370

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91650 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/91656] New: [10 Regression] wrong code with -fgcse-after-reload

ra-riscv64 Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd gcc version 10.0.0 20190904 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug tree-optimization/91656] [10 Regression] wrong code with -fgcse-after-reload

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91656 --- Comment #1 from Zdenek Sojka --- Created attachment 46811 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46811&action=edit another testcase (needs -O3) $ riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc -O3 testcase340.c -static && ./a.out Aborted $ risc

[Bug target/91615] [10 regression][armeb] ICEs since r274986

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91615 --- Comment #5 from Christophe Lyon --- (In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #4) > Hi Christophe, > > many thanks for your invaluable help. > > I think except this one all regressions are fixed or > at least understood. > > Unfortunately I

[Bug target/91474] Internal compiler error when building mabi=32 mips64-elf cross-compiler: segfault in parallel_settings.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91474 --- Comment #2 from Joey Dumont --- How do I pass -save-temps to make? Is there a environment variable that changes the gcc command options?

[Bug tree-optimization/91645] Missed optimization with sqrt(x*x)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91645 --- Comment #2 from Nikita Lisitsa --- If by 'isless(y, 0.0)' you mean 'y < 0.f', then no, it doesn't change anything, it produces the same 'ucomiss ... call sqrtf' boilerplate. May I have misunderstood you? By the way, what about '#pragma GCC o

[Bug target/91474] Internal compiler error when building mabi=32 mips64-elf cross-compiler: segfault in parallel_settings.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91474 --- Comment #3 from Dragan Mladjenovic --- You can try manualy rerunning the faulting command after libtool: compile: ... with -save-temps.

[Bug middle-end/91001] internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2310

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91001 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug middle-end/91105] internal compiler error: maximum number of generated reload insns per insn achieved (90)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91105 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/91106] internal compiler error: output_operand: invalid use of register 'frame'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91106 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug middle-end/91001] internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2310

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91001 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- *** Bug 91105 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug middle-end/91001] internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2310

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91001 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- *** Bug 91106 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug tree-optimization/81740] [7 Regression] wrong code at -O3 in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81740 --- Comment #13 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Sep 4 11:56:15 2019 New Revision: 275372 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275372&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-09-04 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 2

[Bug fortran/91646] gfortran takes long time and consumes a lot of memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91646 G. Steinmetz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gs...@t-online.de --- Comment #4 from G.

[Bug fortran/91646] gfortran takes long time and consumes a lot of memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91646 --- Comment #5 from G. Steinmetz --- Created attachment 46814 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46814&action=edit Addon generator_module_hierarchy_ptr.f90

[Bug fortran/91646] gfortran takes long time and consumes a lot of memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91646 --- Comment #6 from G. Steinmetz --- Created attachment 46815 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46815&action=edit Input "2 2", result test_2_2.f90

[Bug fortran/91646] gfortran takes long time and consumes a lot of memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91646 --- Comment #7 from G. Steinmetz --- Created attachment 46816 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46816&action=edit Input "3 3", result test_3_3.f90 Enclosed are generators to systematically test the facts. Please find attached

[Bug target/81800] [8/9 regression] on aarch64 ilp32 lrint should not be inlined as two instructions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81800 --- Comment #19 from Wilco --- Author: wilco Date: Wed Sep 4 12:42:22 2019 New Revision: 275373 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275373&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [AArch64] Fix PR81800 PR81800 is about the lrint inline giving spurious FE_INEXA

[Bug preprocessor/91639] [10 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/plugin/location-overflow-test-pr83173.c -fplugin=./location_overflo w_plugin.so scan-file-not # (?!1 [^\r\n]+location-overflow-test-pr83173-1.h"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91639 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/91652] -march=skylake-avx512 -mno-fma -O2 generates FMA instructions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91652 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/81800] [8/9 regression] on aarch64 ilp32 lrint should not be inlined as two instructions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81800 --- Comment #20 from Wilco --- Author: wilco Date: Wed Sep 4 13:06:55 2019 New Revision: 275374 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275374&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [AArch64] Fix PR81800 PR81800 is about the lrint inline giving spurious FE_INEXA

[Bug target/81800] On aarch64 ilp32 lrint should not be inlined as two instructions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81800 --- Comment #21 from Wilco --- Backported to GCC8 and GCC9 too.

[Bug target/81800] On aarch64 ilp32 lrint should not be inlined as two instructions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81800 Wilco changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/91618] template-id required to friend a function template, even for a qualified-id

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91618 --- Comment #4 from Nathan Sidwell --- to remind me, bullet 3 that Barry references is: 'if the name of the friend is a qualified-id and a matching function template is found in the specified class or namespace, the friend declaration refers to

[Bug libstdc++/41861] [DR 887][C++0x] does not use monotonic_clock

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41861 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch Last reconfirmed|2010-02-05 12

[Bug middle-end/66462] GCC isinf/isnan/... builtins cause sNaN exceptions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66462 --- Comment #17 from Segher Boessenkool --- (In reply to Tamar Christina from comment #16) > > Do you have a link to those problems? And no, please don't regress us for > > no > > reason at all, it's really easy to *not* regress this on double-

[Bug d/91628] libdruntime uses glibc internal symbol on s390

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91628 rdapp at linux dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rdapp at linux dot ibm.com -

[Bug d/91628] libdruntime uses glibc internal symbol on s390

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91628 --- Comment #8 from Florian Weimer --- (In reply to rdapp from comment #7) > Created attachment 46817 [details] > Proposed patch using __tls_get_offset > > I drafted a patch that uses __tls_get_offset instead of the internal symbol > following F

[Bug d/91628] libdruntime uses glibc internal symbol on s390

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91628 --- Comment #9 from rdapp at linux dot ibm.com --- (In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #8) > Calling functions from inline assembly is always a bit iffy. For example, > your code lacks clobbers for the vector registers (if present) and the >

[Bug rtl-optimization/91657] New: [10 regression] many failures after r275365

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91657 Bug ID: 91657 Summary: [10 regression] many failures after r275365 Product: gcc Version: 8.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: rtl-o

[Bug c++/66844] [c++-concepts] Requires-expression parameter with void type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66844 Andrew Sutton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andrew.n.sutton at gmail dot com --- Co

[Bug d/91628] libdruntime uses glibc internal symbol on s390

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91628 --- Comment #10 from Florian Weimer --- (In reply to rdapp from comment #9) > I opted for inline assembly to make sure r12 is not changed directly before > the function call. Do you have an idea to guarantee this in another way? Wouldn't an out-

[Bug c++/67070] [concepts] Concept with negation and disjunction not checked correctly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67070 --- Comment #11 from Andrew Sutton --- Most of the concerns in this issue have been resolved when concept satisfaction was defined in terms of normalized constraints in all contexts (requirements or otherwise). In particular. negation makes the c

[Bug c++/67147] [concepts] ICE on checking concept with default template arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67147 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Sutton --- This seems to have been fixed at some point. All examples compile in the concepts-cxx2a branch.

[Bug c++/67148] [concepts] Failed concept check when indirecting through a constrained trait

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67148 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Sutton --- This seems to have been fixed at some point. All examples compile in the concepts-cxx2a branch, which also has a test for this PR.

[Bug c++/67147] [concepts] ICE on checking concept with default template arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67147 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Sutton --- There's a test for this PR in the concepts-cxx2a branch.

[Bug c++/67178] [concepts] ICE on self-referencing concept

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67178 Andrew Sutton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andrew.n.sutton at gmail dot com --- Co

[Bug c++/67210] [concepts] Error parsing ">>" after a template-id that names a concept

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67210 Andrew Sutton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andrew.n.sutton at gmail dot com --- Co

[Bug c++/67217] [concepts] Constraints are ignored when specializing union templates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67217 Andrew Sutton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andrew.n.sutton at gmail dot com --- Co

[Bug d/91628] libdruntime uses glibc internal symbol on s390

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91628 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #11

[Bug c++/67225] [concepts] Expression constraint with a constrained result turns off access checking

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67225 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Sutton --- It looks like there was an earlier state where access was being turned off by one construct or another. All of the examples here fail as they're supposed to. Added tests to concepts-cxx2a.

[Bug d/91628] libdruntime uses glibc internal symbol on s390

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91628 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek --- Though, looking at libdruntime, it already handles that and has several *.S files.

[Bug tree-optimization/91647] [10 Regression] new FAILs for Warray-bounds-8 and Wstringop-overflow-3.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91647 --- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor --- Thanks, the trailing 10 in x86_64-apple-darwin10 makes the difference! Here's a small test case copied from the one around line 335 in g++.dg/warn/Warray-bounds-8.C, and its output with the cross: void sin

[Bug c++/67319] Short-hand concepts for variadic member functions broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67319 Andrew Sutton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andrew.n.sutton at gmail dot com --- Co

[Bug c++/67427] [concepts] Subsumption dependence on template parameter ordering

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67427 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Sutton --- I believe that the ambiguity is correct under the revised semantics of concepts. The targets of the parameter mapping in Sentinel differs for the two declarations of distance because the order of template pa

[Bug c++/67654] [concepts] ICE when using concepts in constexpr function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67654 Andrew Sutton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andrew.n.sutton at gmail dot com --- Co

[Bug c++/91658] New: g++: internal compiler error: Killed (program cc1plus)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91658 Bug ID: 91658 Summary: g++: internal compiler error: Killed (program cc1plus) Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Com

[Bug c++/91658] g++: internal compiler error: Killed (program cc1plus)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91658 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/91658] g++: internal compiler error: Killed (program cc1plus)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91658 --- Comment #2 from Ivan Chow --- Thanks for the info. I ran this on Ubuntu 18.04 with 16GB RAM configured on a VMware VM and the maximum memory allowed is 16GB for this VM What should I do? Thanks for any advices. -Original Messag

[Bug c++/91658] g++: internal compiler error: Killed (program cc1plus)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91658 --- Comment #3 from Ivan Chow --- Sorry. Actually, I can increase the VM memory. Only the "recommended" maximum memory is 16GB. Let me increase the VM memory to 24 GB and see what happen. But it does have a maximum memory, which is 64GB. Th

[Bug c++/91658] g++: internal compiler error: Killed (program cc1plus)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91658 --- Comment #4 from Ivan Chow --- 24GB still crashed the compiler I think the preprocessor cc1plus has a bug in handling some of the templates of that file... it shouldn't need that much memory I ran command 'top' and can see the mem

[Bug c/78736] enum warnings in GCC (request for -Wenum-conversion to be added)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78736 --- Comment #14 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: prathamesh3492 Date: Wed Sep 4 16:25:21 2019 New Revision: 275376 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275376&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Add warning Wenum-conversion for C and ObjC.

[Bug middle-end/66462] GCC isinf/isnan/... builtins cause sNaN exceptions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66462 --- Comment #18 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- On Wed, 4 Sep 2019, tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > As far as I am aware, the final version of the patch had no regressions for > any > target, including PowerPC which I used the GCC

[Bug middle-end/66462] GCC isinf/isnan/... builtins cause sNaN exceptions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66462 --- Comment #19 from Tamar Christina --- > It *was* committed (r249005). Then reverted (r249050). > reported "a > large number of new failures on AIX, including compiler ICEs". I not

[Bug c++/67658] [concepts] invalid code with constrained concepts compiles

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67658 Andrew Sutton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andrew.n.sutton at gmail dot com --- Co

[Bug c++/67684] [concepts] friend access not working with constrained function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67684 Andrew Sutton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andrew.n.sutton at gmail dot com --- Co

[Bug c++/67685] ICE on invalid requires expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67685 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Sutton --- Fixed in the concepts-cxx2a branch and added a test for the PR.

  1   2   >