https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91404
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91403
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91407
Bug ID: 91407
Summary: Wnon-virtual-dtor should't fire for classes with
operator delete=delete
Product: gcc
Version: 8.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91408
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91408
Bug ID: 91408
Summary: [10 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2310
since r273981
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91401
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Aug 9 07:23:03 2019
New Revision: 274226
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274226&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/91401
c/
* c-parser.c (c_parser_omp_clause_dist_sched
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91393
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
Summary|lto1: internal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91396
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|driver |other
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91398
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91400
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91404
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91408
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91408
--- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Just change vector_operand predicates in usadv8qi to register_operand.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91406
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
-Q -v is only a wild guess given whether options are enabled or disabled may
depend on the function context. There's really no way to implement it
accurately
(this -1 trick for "auto-detection" could eventu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91408
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Yeah, that is what I'm testing. Both instructions use register_mmxmem_operand
which is for mmx with sse actually a register_operand.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91408
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 46693
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46693&action=edit
gcc10-pr91408.patch
Full untested patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91393
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman ---
Created attachment 46694
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46694&action=edit
xz compressed tar file
cat bug1.txz | xz -d | tar xvf - should do it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91393
--- Comment #3 from David Binderman ---
Created attachment 46695
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46695&action=edit
xz compressed tar file
cat bug2.txz | xz -d | tar xvf - should do it.
First attachment contains object files
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91376
--- Comment #10 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 46696
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46696&action=edit
i386-pc-solaris2.11 input objects
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91393
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91376
--- Comment #11 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #9 from Martin Liška ---
> (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #8)
[...]
>> I don't see how nm would come into play here.
>
> I thought you see the fai
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91393
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91404
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91376
--- Comment #12 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #11)
> > --- Comment #9 from Martin Liška ---
> > (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #8)
> [...]
> >> I don't see how nm would com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91393
--- Comment #6 from David Binderman ---
Command line seems to be
/home/dcb/gcc/results.274150/bin/gcc -O3 -flto -g -pipe -Wall
-Werror=format-se
curity -fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong -grecord-gcc-switches
-fasynchr
onous-unwind-table
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91393
--- Comment #7 from David Binderman ---
Created attachment 46697
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46697&action=edit
preprocessed C source code
Preprocessed source code for open.c (aka /tmp/q.i in previous comment)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91404
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Good, now I can reproduce it. I was wrongly building xalancbmk from SPEC2017.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90924
Tanaya Patil changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tanaya_patil at persistent dot
com
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91393
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90313
--- Comment #4 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Fri Aug 9 09:37:55 2019
New Revision: 274234
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274234&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Reject tail calls that read from an escaped RESULT_DECL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90313
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[7/8/9/10 Regression] Is an |[7/8/9 Regression] Is an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91404
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
I've got a patch candidate..
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91154
--- Comment #20 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 7 Aug 2019, segher at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91154
>
> Segher Boessenkool changed:
>
>What|Removed |A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91409
Bug ID: 91409
Summary: Missed optimization on `labels as values` expression
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91409
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88220
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91393
--- Comment #9 from Martin Liška ---
I've got a patch candidate for it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91404
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64501
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|marxin at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90838
Wilco changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91410
Bug ID: 91410
Summary: OpenMP error message when compiling OpenACC code
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90924
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91411
Bug ID: 91411
Summary: Extraneous size & location attributes for members in
DWARF
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91386
--- Comment #20 from Richard Earnshaw ---
Author: rearnsha
Date: Fri Aug 9 16:14:59 2019
New Revision: 274238
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274238&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[aarch64] PR target/91386 Use copy_rtx to avoid modifying original
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91386
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail|10.0|
--- Comment #21 from Richard Earnsha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90879
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90693
Wilco changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48595
--- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
The score port was removed in 2014. All open bugs for it should have been
closed at that time.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48595
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44756
Bug 44756 depends on bug 48595, which changed state.
Bug 48595 Summary: score-elf fails to build with --enable-werror-always
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48595
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91398
--- Comment #3 from ead ---
Thank you for the expanations and your time!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86535
--- Comment #24 from Curtis Hamilton ---
Okay, I modified the code and got pass that issue. But have run into another
issue that has me stumped. I'm getting the below error:
/usr/ports/lang/gcc9/work/gcc-9-20190217/libgo/go/runtime/os_freebsd.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91412
Bug ID: 91412
Summary: Unexpectedly correct raw string literal
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86535
--- Comment #25 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
The code in os_freebsd.go is written for the gc toolchain. You'll need to look
at it and see whether it makes sense for gccgo.
That said, that call to sysctl does seem to make sense. You'll need to add
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59570
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59681
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83003
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83798
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83797
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek ---
*** Bug 83798 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71790
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71369
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50184
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91122
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91396
ctice at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ctice at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88072
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88072
--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Patch submitted.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91398
Peter Cordes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||peter at cordes dot ca
--- Comment #4 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90893
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90893
--- Comment #3 from ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ibuclaw
Date: Sat Aug 10 05:25:44 2019
New Revision: 274249
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274249&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix ODR violation in d/runtime.cc
gcc/d/ChangeLog:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66970
frankhb1989 at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||frankhb1989 at gmail dot co
70 matches
Mail list logo