https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91130
--- Comment #31 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Richard Earnshaw from comment #30)
> Makes sense. I'm going to wait now until Joseph gets back and has had a
> chance to comment.
@Joseph: May I please remind you this?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91222
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka ---
This patch fixes the ICE
Index: ipa-devirt.c
===
--- ipa-devirt.c(revision 273865)
+++ ipa-devirt.c(working copy)
@@ -1003,7 +1003
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91222
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Mon Jul 29 08:18:38 2019
New Revision: 273866
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273866&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR lto/91222
* ipa-devirt.c (warn_types_mismatch): Compar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91222
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91227
--- Comment #13 from Florian Weimer ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #12)
> (In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #11)
> > GCC on ELF provides defined address ordering for separate objects via linker
> > ordering and section attribute
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91267
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91267
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
Testing returning false which is basically what we did before (just quicker).
This may be an argument for making the lattice expandable.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91227
--- Comment #14 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #13)
> I don't see why I cast should magically fix this issue,
In libstdc++, std::less does such a cast, there were discussions about it
at that time.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91281
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51333
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86638
--- Comment #4 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Mon Jul 29 08:52:56 2019
New Revision: 273872
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273872&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Prevent tree-ssa-dce.c from deleting stores at -Og
DCE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51333
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |libstdc++
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91280
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51333
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The testcase linked OK with 4.4 but not 4.5, so I suspect it started to fail
after r154054 which moved the recursive_init_error definition into the cxxabi.h
header.
The symbol was already missing from libs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91258
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91265
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51333
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
We don't export the recursive_init_error symbols from the shared library. That
might be intentional, and wasn't a problem when they weren't declared in a
public header.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91268
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91270
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91259
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91259
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to David Stone from comment #0)
> libstdc++ contains many expressions that are not parenthesized
Many?
> that do not meet these requirements (this was not true of the Concepts TS,
> but as chang
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91267
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jul 29 10:10:15 2019
New Revision: 273874
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273874&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-07-29 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/91267
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91273
--- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka ---
This seems to work for me with current trunk
hubicka@lomikamen-jh:/aux/hubicka/trunk4/build2/gcc$ cat ~/1.ii
extern "C" {
struct {
} ltregul_;
}
hubicka@lomikamen-jh:/aux/hubicka/trunk4/build2/gcc$ cat ~/2.F
c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91284
Bug ID: 91284
Summary: Gcc for aarch64 binaries
Product: gcc
Version: 8.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
Assignee
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91265
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Fixed with r273875:
2019-07-29 Martin Liska
* tree-ssa-dce.c (eliminate_unnecessary_stmts): Do not
remove LHS of operator new call. It's handled latter.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91265
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91273
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #1)
> This seems to work for me with current trunk
No, it's broken also on current trunk.
>
> hubicka@lomikamen-jh:/aux/hubicka/trunk4/build2/gcc$ cat ~/1.ii
> extern "
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91273
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka ---
Still works for me
hubicka@lomikamen-jh:~$ /aux/hubicka/trunk-install/bin/g++ 1.ii 2.F -O2 -flto
/usr/local/bin/ld: /tmp/ccpfzvWm.ltrans0.ltrans.o: in function `main':
:(.text.startup+0x5): undefined reference
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91273
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 46633
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46633&action=edit
1.ii
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91273
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 46634
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46634&action=edit
2.F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91273
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #3)
> Still works for me
> hubicka@lomikamen-jh:~$ /aux/hubicka/trunk-install/bin/g++ 1.ii 2.F -O2 -flto
> /usr/local/bin/ld: /tmp/ccpfzvWm.ltrans0.ltrans.o: in function `
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91273
--- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka ---
aha, relies on indentation of common in 2.F. i will check what goes wrong.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91257
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91257
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jul 29 11:38:46 2019
New Revision: 273876
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273876&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-07-29 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/91257
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91267
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91273
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91283
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91201
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91280
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91280
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Hmm, this has earlier errors:
>
> t.ii:123:20: error: invalid use of incomplete type ‘class
> TensorMap, 0>’
> 123 | static const int NumInputDims = H ArgTyp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91285
Bug ID: 91285
Summary: _Pragma does not work in a useful fashion
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51333
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91286
Bug ID: 91286
Summary: invalid use of incomplete type depends on
--enable-checking=release
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91284
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91282
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tnfchris at gcc dot
gnu.org
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91287
Bug ID: 91287
Summary: LTO disables linking with scalar MASS library (Fortran
only)
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91287
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||lto, wrong-code
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91288
Bug ID: 91288
Summary: [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in add_symbol_to_partition_1,
at lto/lto-partition.c:153 since r249224
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91288
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 46636
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46636&action=edit
1.ii
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91288
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 46637
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46637&action=edit
2.ii
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91256
--- Comment #2 from Danack at basereality dot com ---
Apparently this might be fixable by calling:
omp_pause_resource_all(omp_pause_hard);
However, that function is only defined in OpenMP version 5, which isn't
available in the versions of G
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91150
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91259
David Stone changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||david at doublewise dot net
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91257
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jul 29 14:19:07 2019
New Revision: 273877
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273877&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-07-29 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/91257
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51333
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Jul 29 14:27:19 2019
New Revision: 273878
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273878&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/51333 Define recursive_init_error constructor non-inline
Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51333
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Fixed on trunk so far.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91285
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Isn't it better to do:
# defineENCLOSING_OBJECT(TYPE, MEMBER, OBJECT)\
((void)sizeof (&((TYPE *) 0)->MEMBER - OBJECT),\
(TYPE *) ((char *) OBJECT - offsetof (TYPE, MEMBER)))
Instead?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91259
--- Comment #7 from Casey Carter ---
Thanks, Jonathan. I can confirm that grepping for "\b(concept|requires)\b"
finds a great many uses in comments, but only the one concept definition and
one requires-clause in .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91192
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91285
--- Comment #2 from Konrad Schwarz ---
Thank you for your suggestion -- it does indeed work.
However, this is a workaround for this specific problem --
other pragmas cannot be handled in this way --
consider # pragma GCC optimize ... or # pragma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91227
--- Comment #15 from Martin Sebor ---
I agree that comparison of the intptr_t values would be preferable over
extending the pointer inequality semantics. It's the intended mechanism for
this sort query. It makes code that relies on the ordering
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91192
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91157
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91190
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91289
Bug ID: 91289
Summary: powerpc-eabi: Usage of -fstack-limit-symbol leads to
internal compiler error during RTL pass
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91290
Bug ID: 91290
Summary: pragma maybe-uninitialized does not propagate to
lambda
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91258
--- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor ---
We need to put a breakpoint in the block below in
strlen_check_and_optimize_stmt and print the lhs node and its type (p
debug_tree (lhs)) to explain how is_char_store is set to true for the
unexpected argument
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90813
--- Comment #33 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Jul 29 17:45:24 2019
New Revision: 273880
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273880&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-07-29 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/90813
* dump-pa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89330
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91242
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolutio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70320
--- Comment #1 from jozefl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jozefl
Date: Mon Jul 29 19:21:18 2019
New Revision: 273883
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273883&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Allow both upper and lower case 'r' in register names
2019-07
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91201
--- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse ---
It looks like a convoluted way to write:
unsigned char sum()
{
unsigned char res=0;
unsigned char*p=(unsigned char*)bytes;
for(int n=0;n
-linux-gnu
Between 20190728 (r273850) and 20190729 (r273879), gcc.dg/20020312-2.c started
to FAIL:
+FAIL: gcc.dg/20020312-2.c (internal compiler error)
+FAIL: gcc.dg/20020312-2.c (test for excess errors)
+UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/20020312-2.c compilation failed to produce executable
I'm seeing it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91283
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> Created attachment 46635
> --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46635&action=edit
> gcc10-pr91283.patch
>
> Untested fix.
FWIW,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91292
Bug ID: 91292
Summary: Mangler incorrectly handles negative numbers in
expressions
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91293
Bug ID: 91293
Summary: Wrong code with -O3
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
As
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91294
Bug ID: 91294
Summary: [10 Regression] wrong strlen result of a conditional
with an offset
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91294
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90538
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91287
--- Comment #1 from Xiong Hu XS Luo ---
Martin's commit 4ee64e30659a9125a47eeea882d8044e690ce334 will cause ICE.
It's a REGRESSION not related to this current issue.
~/local/gcc_t/bin/gfortran -O3 -mcpu=power9 hellofortran.f90 -mveclibabi=mass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91295
Bug ID: 91295
Summary: [gdb] program crashed with segementation fault when
set breakpoint at address
Product: gcc
Version: 8.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91201
--- Comment #6 from Joel Yliluoma ---
Maybe a horizontal checksum is a bit obscure term. A 8-bit checksum is what is
being accomplished, nonetheless. Yes, there are simpler ways to do it…
But I tried a number of different approaches in order to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91296
Bug ID: 91296
Summary: ICE when passing complex number %re/%im as a procedure
argument with -Waliasing.
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91026
Peter Cordes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||peter at cordes dot ca
--- Comment #3 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91295
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91280
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #46632|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89330
--- Comment #19 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #18)
> This breaks bootstrap with --enable-checking=release.
>
> during IPA pass: cp
> ../../gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-sccvn.c:7307:1: internal compiler error: in
> speculativ
87 matches
Mail list logo
