https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91130
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91163
jdobry at centrum dot cz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91179
Bug ID: 91179
Summary: Spurious -Wconversion warning after promotion
Product: gcc
Version: 7.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91178
Serge Belyshev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91176
--- Comment #10 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Tue Jul 16 08:12:05 2019
New Revision: 273507
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273507&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR91176: Skip debug insns when computing inline costs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91172
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91176
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolutio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91178
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91176
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91175
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91173
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91130
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|aarch64-linux-gnu |aarch64-*-* arm*-*-*
Host
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91163
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WONTFIX |INVALID
--- Comment #10 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91174
--- Comment #2 from Antony Polukhin ---
(In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #1)
> For which ABI do you propose the change? It's not correct for GNU/Linux:
As far as I understand the proposed change does not touch ABI. `lea eax, [rdi +
48]`
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91174
--- Comment #3 from Florian Weimer ---
(In reply to Antony Polukhin from comment #2)
> (In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #1)
> > For which ABI do you propose the change? It's not correct for GNU/Linux:
>
> As far as I understand the prop
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91174
--- Comment #4 from Antony Polukhin ---
Sorry, now I understood that the bug is invalid. Please close.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91178
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
The main issue is that loop vectorization creates a chain of increments
# vectp_f.21_116 = PHI
vect__16.23_118 = MEM [(int *)vectp_f.21_116];
vectp_f.21_119 = vectp_f.21_116 + 16;
vectp_f.21_121 =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91174
Florian Weimer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91130
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #5)
> Why does it clash only on arm and aarch64?
I'll debug that, it's really strange.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91175
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91175
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue Jul 16 10:21:57 2019
New Revision: 273521
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273521&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Do not use -Werror in a test that has -frepo warning (PR testsuite/91175).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91170
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
> That mostly just adds static_assert checks, which can't change anything at
> runtime.
It changes how we get to keys/values besides moving static asserts but I
hecking-yes-rtl-df-extra-amd64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 10.0.0 20190716 (experimental) (GCC)
This seems to be a quite recent regression affecting various targets.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91175
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83518
Wilco changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91181
Bug ID: 91181
Summary: Failing as_as type conversion in vect_build_slp_tree_1
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91164
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jul 16 11:37:05 2019
New Revision: 273522
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273522&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/91164
* dse.c (rest_of_handle_dse): If
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91164
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91157
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89190
--- Comment #4 from Wilco ---
Author: wilco
Date: Tue Jul 16 12:00:42 2019
New Revision: 273523
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273523&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[ARM] Fix Thumb-1 ldm (PR89190)
This patch fixes an ICE in the Thumb-1 LDM peepho
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89190
--- Comment #5 from Wilco ---
Author: wilco
Date: Tue Jul 16 12:06:55 2019
New Revision: 273524
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273524&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add missing testcase for PR89190
testsuite/
PR target/89190
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89190
--- Comment #6 from Wilco ---
Author: wilco
Date: Tue Jul 16 12:12:01 2019
New Revision: 273525
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273525&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add missing testcase for PR89190
testsuite/
PR target/89190
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89190
--- Comment #7 from Wilco ---
Backported to GCC8 branch, and added missing testcase to trunk and GCC9. All
fixed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89190
Wilco changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89222
--- Comment #10 from Wilco ---
Author: wilco
Date: Tue Jul 16 12:37:14 2019
New Revision: 273526
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273526&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[ARM] Fix PR89222
The GCC optimizer can generate symbols with non-zero offset fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89222
--- Comment #11 from Wilco ---
Author: wilco
Date: Tue Jul 16 13:13:26 2019
New Revision: 273527
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273527&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[ARM] Fix PR89222
The GCC optimizer can generate symbols with non-zero offset fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89222
Wilco changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91181
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91180
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91181
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alejandro at gcc dot gnu.org
Known t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91182
Bug ID: 91182
Summary: deprecated attribute string-literal
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91173
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Tue Jul 16 14:44:44 2019
New Revision: 273529
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273529&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/91173
* tree-ssa-address.c (addr_for_me
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91173
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10 Regression] ICE: in |[9 Regression] ICE: in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91130
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
Ok, we have a -dumpspecs option. If I use it for x86_64 and aarch64 I get a
small difference that should be fine:
--- x86_64.spec 2019-07-16 16:48:03.923522778 +0200
+++ aarch64.spec2019-07-16 16:47:0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91173
--- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Tue Jul 16 14:57:51 2019
New Revision: 273531
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273531&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/91173
* g++.dg/pr91173.C: New test.
Ad
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91130
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
It's not related to .d FE as it fails also with a different file name:
$ echo "int main() {}" > main.c && gcc -c -flto main.c && gcc -o a.out main.o
-flto -MMD -MF deps
gcc: error: deps: No such file or direc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91130
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91148
--- Comment #11 from Martin Sebor ---
Most of the issues were fixed before the warning was enabled: see r271338. The
cleanup was done on x86 and it was expected that other targets would need some
minor changes before the warning could be enabled
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89222
Wilco changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.5 |7.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90684
--- Comment #4 from Wilco ---
Author: wilco
Date: Tue Jul 16 16:17:39 2019
New Revision: 273533
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273533&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix alignment option parser (PR90684)
Fix the alignment option parser to always a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90684
Wilco changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91130
--- Comment #10 from Richard Earnshaw ---
I'm not particularly familiar with how LTO is supposed to work. I can
reproduce the crash on ARM as Martin described (but not on AArch64). The
problem seems to be an assert that the number of files to a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91130
--- Comment #11 from Richard Earnshaw ---
Some pass in the compilation process must create that temporary file with the
options to gcc; but whichever pass this is doesn't appear in the output of "gcc
-v"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91130
--- Comment #12 from Richard Earnshaw ---
How do I invoke lto-wrapper inside gdb? it seems to pick up some magic options
via the environment...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91183
Bug ID: 91183
Summary: strlen of a strcpy result with a conditional source
not folded
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91183
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91148
--- Comment #12 from David Edelsohn ---
Dumping work onto all other target maintainers at a time not of their choosing
isn't acceptable either.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90980
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88918
Bug 88918 depends on bug 90980, which changed state.
Bug 90980 Summary: Missing AVX512 unaligned intrinsics
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90980
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90903
--- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: anlauf
Date: Tue Jul 16 19:58:15 2019
New Revision: 273535
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273535&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-07-16 Harald Anlauf
PR fortran/90903
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90903
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91184
Bug ID: 91184
Summary: memory leak with enable_shared_from_this and pthread
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91185
Bug ID: 91185
Summary: -Og miscompiles code causing runtime segfault
Product: gcc
Version: 7.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: reg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91186
Bug ID: 91186
Summary: gcc-9.1.0 fails to to fins a .symver symbol
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91186
--- Comment #1 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
Created attachment 46605
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46605&action=edit
gcc-lto-partition-bug.tar.gz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91185
--- Comment #1 from Dávid Bolvanský ---
(gdb) r bw
Starting program: /home/xbolva00/IFJ16/src/ifj16c bw
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0xeac5 in eval (op=0x55768b80) at interpret.c:37
37 tVar *a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91185
Dávid Bolvanský changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
--- Comment #70 from EML ---
Created attachment 46606
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46606&action=edit
islower pre-processed code (-E flag)
Attached the pre-processed code from -E
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91186
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
There are known issues with top-level inline-asm and LTO and you are running
into one of those.
FUSE_SYMVER(".symver fuse_setup_compat2,__fuse_setup@");
FUSE_SYMVER(".symver fuse_setup_compat22,fuse_setup@F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91184
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91187
Bug ID: 91187
Summary: Is it possible to make -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant
learn about extern "C"?
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91187
--- Comment #1 from Albert Astals Cid ---
This is with gcc version 9.1.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91120
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86375
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68897
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81453
--- Comment #2 from Eric Gallager ---
The name -Wordered-pointer-comparison was suggested for this warning here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-01/msg00608.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91187
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
CC|
77 matches
Mail list logo