[Bug middle-end/90676] [9 Regression] ambiguous GIMPLE after store merging

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90676 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- I guess we should simply switch to -gimple dumping format for dumping MEM: void __GIMPLE (ssa,guessed_local(1073741824)) f2 () { __BB(2,guessed_local(1073741824)): __MEM ((char *)&a) = _Literal (unsign

[Bug c++/90687] New: [9 regression] ICE in ocp_convert, at cp/cvt.c:766

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90687 Bug ID: 90687 Summary: [9 regression] ICE in ocp_convert, at cp/cvt.c:766 Product: gcc Version: 9.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug middle-end/90676] default GIMPLE dumps lack information

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90676 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[9 Regression] ambiguous|default GIMPLE dumps lack

[Bug middle-end/88784] Middle end is missing some optimizations about unsigned

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88784 --- Comment #21 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Fri, 31 May 2019, ffengqi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88784 > > --- Comment #20 from Qi Feng --- > I have tried to merge signed and unsigned toge

[Bug c++/84497] link errors with trivial external thread_local variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84497 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/59994] [meta-bug] thread_local

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59994 Bug 59994 depends on bug 84497, which changed state. Bug 84497 Summary: link errors with trivial external thread_local variables https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84497 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug tree-optimization/90671] [10 Regression] ICE on valid code at -Os and above with -g enabled in gsi_split_seq_after, at gimple-iterator.c:345

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90671 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri May 31 07:53:48 2019 New Revision: 271802 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271802&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/90671 * tree-ssa-threadupdate.c (ssa_

[Bug c++/90687] [9/10 Regression] ICE in ocp_convert, at cp/cvt.c:766

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90687 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/90688] New: [7/8/9/10 Regression] ICE in calc_dfs_tree, at dominance.c:458 since r235297

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90688 Bug ID: 90688 Summary: [7/8/9/10 Regression] ICE in calc_dfs_tree, at dominance.c:458 since r235297 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug tree-optimization/90688] [7/8/9/10 Regression] ICE in calc_dfs_tree, at dominance.c:458 since r235297

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90688 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Known to work|

[Bug target/90689] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2310 on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90689 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Target||powerpc64*-unknown-linux-gn

[Bug target/90689] New: ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2310 on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90689 Bug ID: 90689 Summary: ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2310 on ppc64le Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c/90690] New: Undocumented -Werror-implicit-function-declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90690 Bug ID: 90690 Summary: Undocumented -Werror-implicit-function-declaration Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug debug/86964] [7/8 Regression] Too many debug symbols included, especially for extern globals

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86964 --- Comment #19 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri May 31 08:22:14 2019 New Revision: 271803 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271803&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-05-31 Thomas De Schampheleire PR debug/86964

[Bug driver/90684] New alignment options incorrectly report error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90684 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/90668] loop invariant moving a dependent store out of a loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90668 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||alias, wrong-code Status|UN

[Bug tree-optimization/90671] [10 Regression] ICE on valid code at -Os and above with -g enabled in gsi_split_seq_after, at gimple-iterator.c:345

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90671 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug debug/90674] [7/8/9/10 Regression] ICE in gen_subprogram_die

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90674 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c/90677] [9/10 Regression] gcc-9.1.0 fails to build __gcc_diag__ souce: error: 'cgraph_node' is not defined as a type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90677 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug tree-optimization/90681] [10 Regression] ICE in vect_slp_analyze_node_operations_1, at tree-vect-slp.c:2513 since r271704

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90681 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/90688] [7/8/9/10 Regression] ICE in calc_dfs_tree, at dominance.c:458 since r235297

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90688 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Component|tree-optimization

[Bug target/90678] [10 Regression] ICE in aarch64_return_address_signing_enabled, at config/aarch64/aarch64.c:4865 since r271735

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90678 --- Comment #4 from Sam Tebbs --- Thanks Martin, fixed by r271780. I can commit your reduced testcase if you would like.

[Bug target/90678] [10 Regression] ICE in aarch64_return_address_signing_enabled, at config/aarch64/aarch64.c:4865 since r271735

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90678 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Sam Tebbs from comment #4) > Thanks Martin, fixed by r271780. I can commit your reduced testcase if you > would like. It's probably not needed. Thank you for the fix.

[Bug c++/90691] New: [GCC9 regression] -Wsign-compare false-positive with constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90691 Bug ID: 90691 Summary: [GCC9 regression] -Wsign-compare false-positive with constant Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug libstdc++/90682] std::terminate() will happily call a null terminate handler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90682 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Fri May 31 10:35:11 2019 New Revision: 271808 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271808&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR libstdc++/90682 allow set_terminate(0) and set_unexpected(0) Make the

[Bug libstdc++/71579] type_traits miss checks for type completeness in some traits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71579 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Fri May 31 10:35:03 2019 New Revision: 271806 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271806&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR libstdc++/71579 assert that type traits are not misused with incomplet

[Bug libstdc++/90682] std::terminate() will happily call a null terminate handler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90682 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.0 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wake

[Bug target/90678] [10 Regression] ICE in aarch64_return_address_signing_enabled, at config/aarch64/aarch64.c:4865 since r271735

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90678 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/71579] type_traits miss checks for type completeness in some traits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71579 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/90648] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE tree check: accessed operand 4 of call_expr with 3 operands in generic_simplify_MULT_EXPR, at generic-match.c:27222

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90648 --- Comment #11 from Richard Biener --- Created attachment 46437 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46437&action=edit not fully fix So even a 1:1 implementation of gimple_builtin_call_types_compatible_p doesn't catch this since

[Bug middle-end/90648] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE tree check: accessed operand 4 of call_expr with 3 operands in generic_simplify_MULT_EXPR, at generic-match.c:27222

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90648 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Priority|P3

[Bug c++/90691] [9/10 regression] -Wsign-compare false-positive with constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90691 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic, needs-bisection P

[Bug c++/90691] [9/10 regression] -Wsign-compare false-positive with constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90691 --- Comment #2 from Roman Lebedev --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > Confirmed. Note that this isn't just about constants, but about the evaluation of constant-range of the signed operand. E.g. '(b ? 10 : 9)' is not a constant, b

[Bug driver/90692] New: The "%{!shared:%:if-exists(default-manifest.o%s)}" spec option fails if gcc is installed in a path with spaces

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90692 Bug ID: 90692 Summary: The "%{!shared:%:if-exists(default-manifest.o%s)}" spec option fails if gcc is installed in a path with spaces Product: gcc Version: 9.1.0

[Bug c++/90691] [9/10 regression] -Wsign-compare false-positive with constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90691 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug libstdc++/68303] performance: unordered_map&co. up to 7x speedup

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68303 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- Patch posted to https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-10/msg00903.html Reviewed at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-05/msg02120.html

[Bug c++/90691] [9/10 regression] -Wsign-compare false-positive with constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90691 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3) > Started with r270136. I'd say we should stop considering > -fcompare-debug=-W* as bugs, after all, it is extremely unlikely we are > going to fix those anyway,

[Bug c++/90691] [9/10 regression] -Wsign-compare false-positive with constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90691 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4) > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3) > > Started with r270136. I'd say we should stop considering > > -fcompare-debug=-W* as bugs, after all, it is extre

[Bug tree-optimization/90681] [10 Regression] ICE in vect_slp_analyze_node_operations_1, at tree-vect-slp.c:2513 since r271704

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90681 --- Comment #2 from Alejandro --- I'm looking at this, will keep you posted.

[Bug c++/90393] [9/10 Regression] ICE in return statement with a conditional operator, one of the second and third arguments is throw, and the other is a const variable of a class with a nontrivial co

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90393 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kutdanila at yandex dot ru --- Comment #

[Bug c++/90687] [9/10 Regression] ICE in ocp_convert, at cp/cvt.c:766

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90687 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/90681] [10 Regression] ICE in vect_slp_analyze_node_operations_1, at tree-vect-slp.c:2513 since r271704

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90681 --- Comment #3 from Alejandro --- (In reply to Alejandro from comment #2) > I'm looking at this, will keep you posted. I could also reproduce it targetting armv8.2-a+sve.

[Bug target/89659] [microblaze] unrecognizable insn at floating point conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89659 Rico Amslinger changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Known to work|

[PATCH] fixincludes breaks mingw64 build

Hi! I'm trying to build the x86_64-w64-mingw64 crosscompiler on gentoo. It breaks because a fixincludes-fix is applied at a place where it should not be applied. This broke the cross-gcc build for gcc-8.3.0 and 9.1.0 with error messages that made it tricky to figure out what was really going o

[Bug c++/71482] Add -Wglobal-constructors warning option

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71482 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug c++/71482] Add -Wglobal-constructors warning option

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71482 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek --- (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #3) > (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #2) > > Patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-05/msg01860.html > > Does Sean have a bugzilla account? I don't s

[Bug middle-end/90693] New: Missing popcount simplifications

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90693 Bug ID: 90693 Summary: Missing popcount simplifications Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end

[Bug libstdc++/71579] type_traits miss checks for type completeness in some traits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71579 --- Comment #9 from Antony Polukhin --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #8) > Is there more work to do to support the whole of https://wg21.link/lwg2797 ? Looks like I've missed the is_nothrow_invocable_r, is_convertible, is_nothrow_co

[Bug target/90689] [10 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2310 on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90689 --- Comment #1 from Segher Boessenkool --- I cannot reproduce this (on a native compiler). Do you use some non-default defaults, maybe? And, what SVN revision did you test?

[Bug middle-end/90694] New: incorrect representation of ADDR_EXPR involving a pointer to array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90694 Bug ID: 90694 Summary: incorrect representation of ADDR_EXPR involving a pointer to array Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/90694] incorrect representation of ADDR_EXPR involving a pointer to array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90694 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/90690] Undocumented -Werror-implicit-function-declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90690 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c/43673] Incorrect warning: use of 'D' length modifier with 'a' type character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43673 --- Comment #7 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Fri May 31 18:46:02 2019 New Revision: 271820 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271820&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c/43673 * c-format.c (print_char_table, scanf_char_table

[Bug c/43673] Incorrect warning: use of 'D' length modifier with 'a' type character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43673 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug libstdc++/71579] type_traits miss checks for type completeness in some traits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71579 --- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely --- Yes I noticed is_nothrow_invocable_r was missing but forgot to mention it.

[Bug target/90622] Suboptimal code generated for __builtin_avr_insert_bits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90622 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/90694] incorrect representation of ADDR_EXPR involving a pointer to array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90694 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch Severity|normal

[Bug libstdc++/71579] type_traits miss checks for type completeness in some traits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71579 --- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely --- This change broke a compiler test: g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept15.C I'll have to figure out how to update that test to keep testing what it was meant to test, without triggering the library assertion.

[Bug other/90695] New: [10 regression] g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept15.C fails starting with r271806

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90695 Bug ID: 90695 Summary: [10 regression] g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept15.C fails starting with r271806 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/71579] type_traits miss checks for type completeness in some traits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71579 --- Comment #12 from Antony Polukhin --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #11) > This change broke a compiler test: g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept15.C > > I'll have to figure out how to update that test to keep testing what it was > meant to tes

[Bug libstdc++/71579] type_traits miss checks for type completeness in some traits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71579 --- Comment #13 from Antony Polukhin --- I meant + noexcept(noexcept(Tp(std::declval( but now I'm not sure that it would test excactly the same thing.

[Bug testsuite/90696] New: fixinclude test failures--- sys/ucred.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90696 Bug ID: 90696 Summary: fixinclude test failures--- sys/ucred.h Product: gcc Version: 9.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: testsuite

[Bug testsuite/90696] fixinclude test failures--- sys/ucred.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90696 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- IIRC this was fixed after the release was done. It just the testcase that needed to updated.

[Bug testsuite/90696] fixinclude test failures--- sys/ucred.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90696 --- Comment #2 from dllbrt --- This failure occurred with two build configurations, a generic one and ../gcc-6.4.0/configure --prefix=/usr --enable-languages=ada,c,c++,fortran,,go,java,objc,obj-c++ --enable-lto --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-buil

[Bug testsuite/90696] fixinclude test failures--- sys/ucred.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90696 --- Comment #3 from dllbrt --- where would I get the corrected test suite?

[Bug middle-end/12849] testing divisibility by constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12849 --- Comment #7 from Cassio Neri --- Thanks for implementing the modular inverse algorithm in gcc. However, the implementation has an issue. In some cases, for no obvious reason, the compiler falls back to the old algorithm. For instance, boo

[Bug testsuite/90696] fixinclude test failures--- sys/ucred.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90696 --- Comment #4 from dllbrt --- (In reply to dllbrt from comment #2) > This failure occurred with two build configurations, a generic one and > ../gcc-6.4.0/configure --prefix=/usr > --enable-languages=ada,c,c++,fortran,,go,java,objc,obj-c++ --ena

[Bug c/90677] [9/10 Regression] gcc-9.1.0 fails to build __gcc_diag__ souce: error: 'cgraph_node' is not defined as a type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90677 --- Comment #5 from Sergei Trofimovich --- No problem! Thank you for the very detailed explanation! Name stealing makes sense. I managed to craft a workaround for old gcc-4.6.4 source code locally [1] and not blocked by proper fix. [1] the work

[Bug c++/85254] boost::is_final does not work for template types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85254 Ville Voutilainen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com

[Bug other/90695] [10 regression] g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept15.C fails starting with r271806

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90695 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target|powerpc64*-unknown-linux-gn | |u

[Bug target/89355] Unnecessary ENDBR

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89355 --- Comment #6 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Fri May 31 23:59:16 2019 New Revision: 271828 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271828&root=gcc&view=rev Log: i386: Don't insert ENDBR after NOTE_INSN_DELETED_LABEL NOTE_INSN_D

[Bug c/90697] New: ia64: segmentation fault during GIMPLE pass: dom

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90697 Bug ID: 90697 Summary: ia64: segmentation fault during GIMPLE pass: dom Product: gcc Version: 8.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/90698] New: Darwin X86 backend lacks support for mcmodel={medium, large, kernel}

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90698 Bug ID: 90698 Summary: Darwin X86 backend lacks support for mcmodel={medium, large, kernel} Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement

[Bug target/90698] Darwin X86 backend lacks support for mcmodel={medium, large, kernel}

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90698 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Target|

[Bug target/90698] Darwin X86 backend lacks support for mcmodel={medium, large, kernel}

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90698 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dominiq at lps dot ens.fr --- Comment #1 f

[Bug target/50077] large model (-mcmodel=large) is broken on *86*-apple-darwin*

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50077 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/63793] -mcmodel=medium in gfortran on x86_64 emits references that are RIP relative (instead of using the GOT)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63793 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/90698] Darwin X86 backend lacks support for mcmodel={medium, large, kernel}

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90698 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added CC||howarth.at.gcc.testresults@

[Bug target/69061] Huge (~7GB of them) Static arrays are not fully usable on Darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69061 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/90698] Darwin X86 backend lacks support for mcmodel={medium, large, kernel}

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90698 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added CC||testuser021845 at gmail dot com --- Commen

[Bug target/90698] Darwin X86 backend lacks support for mcmodel={medium, large, kernel}

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90698 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug target/63893] gcc.dg/pr61599-1.c fails on darwin, due to -mcmodel=medium

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63893 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/90698] Darwin X86 backend lacks support for mcmodel={medium, large, kernel}

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90698 --- Comment #5 from Iain Sandoe --- *** Bug 63794 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug target/63794] -mcmodel=large in gfortran on x86_64 emits references junk `@GOTOFF' after expression on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63794 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug bootstrap/57291] Failure in build stages 2 and 3 concerning pseudo-op: .balign

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57291 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug web/90699] New: typo: "taget" should be "target"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90699 Bug ID: 90699 Summary: typo: "taget" should be "target" Product: gcc Version: 9.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: web As

[Bug c/90699] typo: "taget" should be "target"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90699 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||documentation Status|UNCONFI

[Bug tree-optimization/90697] ia64: segmentation fault during GIMPLE pass: dom

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90697 --- Comment #1 from Jason Duerstock --- Changing -O3 to -O2 yields a successful build.

[Bug tree-optimization/90697] ia64: segmentation fault during GIMPLE pass: dom

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90697 --- Comment #2 from Jason Duerstock --- Hopefully a more useful backtrace: (gdb) bt #0 0x4140a6b0 in set_value_range(value_range*, value_range_type, tree_node*, tree_node*, bitmap_head*) () #1 0x41514260 in vr_values::update_va